this wallets have 400 million balance together more than total supply. so it's because of hacked coin? blockchain accepts those hacked coin but can't count them in total supply?
Yes and yes. We can't freeze those funds as they mostly belong to honest exchange users and, without the exchange support, we can't tell how many coins are still in the hacker hands.
|
|
|
Thanks e6ug! I will link the page as soon as I get to my pc. We were thinking of setting up a little contest about the additional graphics. What do you guys think? We still have some xcn funds to use for anything (exchanges need a lot more anyways).
|
|
|
Blah blah rhubarb blah.
This thread is full of complains about price on exchanges and not getting free money.
IMHO, people should focus on the project instead, which is what matters in the end.
......
After all, we blah say.
I thought it is normal if I ask question politely then I will get the answer. But it is your publicity if you are acting like that. I did not say anything about money, exchanges or so. Even I do not want coins from airdrop. Only what I wanted was the explanation. But you instead of giving me the answer react like this. So disappointing. I wasn't talking about you, I was just saying that there is too much discussion about *you already know what*. There is a team of >10 people working on this project every day, and all that the btctalk users want to say is "hey, you didn't give me my 2 cents! price down, leave the boat!". THIS is disappointing.
|
|
|
Blah blah rhubarb blah.
This thread is full of complains about price on exchanges and not getting free money.
IMHO, people should focus on the project instead, which is what matters in the end.
......
After all, we blah say.
|
|
|
Hmm... So somebody is withdrawing it. Ok... You said, that also hacked coins were on btc38/aex, but they have done nothing with it, but if someone would try to withdraw it, they can't yes?
Not sure if I remember right but I think pallas said he had asked btc38 to froze those coins but never got an answer. Yes: back then I was hoping for some collaboration from their end, especially because they were involved in a way or another. But, nothing. Is it still the only mini Blockchain coin? Can you explain what the significance of the mini Blockchain is and how it works? Also can get listed free on www.blockbid.ioIt is the only one as far as I know. There are similar technologies but not the same, balance-sheet based, trie approach. The website, even though it's old, does good when showing the tech and how it works: http://www.cryptonite.info
|
|
|
Hmm... So somebody is withdrawing it. Ok... You said, that also hacked coins were on btc38/aex, but they have done nothing with it, but if someone would try to withdraw it, they can't yes?
Not sure if I remember right but I think pallas said he had asked btc38 to froze those coins but never got an answer. Yes: back then I was hoping for some collaboration from their end, especially because they were involved in a way or another. But, nothing.
|
|
|
We can still hope for Intensecoin?, I am an investor and unfortunately I'm not happy with the days of Intensecoin, someone does it feel that way? I am not being a pessimist but I intend to keep until July, i can not use the graph as an example because it is not very liquid, on the other hand i believe in the quality of the project and in the team. I'm waiting for updates.
Yes, no trust more-less exchange, project idea good, but Devs and owners to lazy and greed, now some free airdrop that project not die complete... They not understand that if owner does not invest money in the project, then community will not invest... They even not understand simple things, no need write "paying laudatory post" with pla-pla-pla very good project\am buy 100500 ITNS\am wait addon another 3-5 fuc*ing month with happy ... just open coinmarketcap.com and look graph with REAL SITUATION with coin and trade Volume (24h) . You are the kind of guy who should invest in a pump and dump coin. Sorry, itns is not for you.
|
|
|
BTW,
I still have the budget in my pocket, and I need to make long term profit.
If some people have an advice?
But no quark, or Feather, Panda
But never make the same mistake like here, remember my previous post.
You are really funny. You are throwing a lot of shit at the coin and then ask in the same thread where to invest. How can you say that it's a scam when there is no premine, no ico, no block reward percent for the devs. We are working for free. I've been for almost two years. Anyway, you are free to buy any shit fork coin you like and please leave this thread.
|
|
|
if everybody submits stale shares, the coins you get are the same than if the pool didn't accept them, because stale shares don't produce blocks.
wrong, The miners that mine with a lower intensity will get less stale shares, a lower hashrate and less coins and profit. The miners that mine with a high intensity will always get their work credited, because the pool support stale work. More stale shares, more coins and profit. Stale work is not a problem in coins that have a long blocktime. and not a problem in general. less than 1% of the shares are stale. you didn't read my post. if everyone submits stale shares, there is no advantage in submitting them. that's what happens with high intensity and pools that accept stale shares. but, those shares do not produce blocks and so they damage the pool and everyone, in the end. on pools that do not accept them, for high intensity users it's even worse. about the final sentence, again you didn't read my posts: I said don't trade 1% hashrate with high intensity, and you are confirming it with that.
|
|
|
you need to relate that to the hashrate. blake is much faster so the the gpu returns a lot quicker.
some pools accept stale shares. f.eks miningpoolhub.com so no work is lost. for coins with a fast blocktime you can change the scantime with the -s parameter A pool accepting stale shares doesn't matter: if everybody submits stale shares, the coins you get are the same than if the pool didn't accept them, because stale shares don't produce blocks. If intensity is too high, scantime doesn't matter (because the work on gpu will take more time that scantime itself); and besides it only works for solo mining, not stratum.
|
|
|
It's another not funny joke? If need wallet compile it yorself from the xmr... You say to larsbalzak use WALLET from another!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! project or alternative wait?
What he meant (I think) is that you can compile the wallet from the XMR branch (in ITNS github), not the actual XMR wallet. There are 2 branches for ITNS wallets, one is the original wallet based on Bytecoin, and then there's a new one, based on XMR. I've used the new one (XMR based) for quite some time, and I didn't have to compile anything myself, just downloaded the executables from github, so I guess you're all here talking about the GUI version (as the CLI version has been out for a while and it works fine). Yes, and now you can test the GUI version of the wallet as well ;-)
|
|
|
higher intensity means more rejected shares. never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.
i 24 is not a high intensity. blake2s and blake256 is using -i 31 without any rejects or problems you need to relate that to the hashrate. blake is much faster so the the gpu returns a lot quicker.
|
|
|
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod. Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc )))) All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))
higher intensity means more rejected shares. never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity. alexis and tpruvot's miners (tpruvot uses one of sp_'s kernels for blake512_80) won't work with intensity higher than 21.3 on 10x0 series. Error in buffer allocation routine. So sp_ in his private mod changed something to avoid it. Maybe larger number for second param in launch config ... don't know ... int math and gpu-programming is difficult for me as I always worked with simulations with double type. I see that alexis uses 128 registers (reg count) in default config but tpruvot uses less (80 as far as I remember) with some custom numbers for some algos. What is your recommendation for this setting? Does it really have affect on performance? alexis can do >21 intensity. it's tpruvot that can't, because of old simd code. about regs, usually it's set by the launch config, not maxregs.
|
|
|
New blockchain snapshot: https://mega.nz/#!lIJwFQTD!yskhFPpiBI36q60HX2y01xMB34SpCEJBMLdhsYxk7OE Switched to 7z from zip as it's smaller, hope it's not annoying for anyone.
|
|
|
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod. Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc )))) All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))
higher intensity means more rejected shares. never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.
|
|
|
eh.. a good project, a pity did not have time to invest in it on the initial placement of tokens. I think it is possible to earn now.. I'm going to buy tokens on the stock exchange
They promised a new wallet, nothing happened. They promised rebranding, nothing happened. They promised ITNS to be listed on a new exchange, guess what? Nothing happened. And this is not a token btw. You must be living on another planet or whatever. The new wallet is almost ready, you can compile it yorself from the xmr branch on github, or wait for the beta release which should come today or tomorrow. Rebranding is going on, takes time, just like everything you wanna do the right way. No hurry. The exchanges are coming, there is a channel on discord where you can see the listing requests and vote up for ITNS. We are looking forward to it. BTW where is the airdrop? Have you started sending it yet? I'm not the one who will do it but it's been prepared as we speak.
|
|
|
eh.. a good project, a pity did not have time to invest in it on the initial placement of tokens. I think it is possible to earn now.. I'm going to buy tokens on the stock exchange
They promised a new wallet, nothing happened. They promised rebranding, nothing happened. They promised ITNS to be listed on a new exchange, guess what? Nothing happened. And this is not a token btw. You must be living on another planet or whatever. The new wallet is almost ready, you can compile it yorself from the xmr branch on github, or wait for the beta release which should come today or tomorrow. Rebranding is going on, takes time, just like everything you wanna do the right way. No hurry. The exchanges are coming, there is a channel on discord where you can see the listing requests and vote up for ITNS.
|
|
|
There are a lot of miner developers. They just don't sell to you.
|
|
|
Thanks for the exchanges list, I will look into it. No news from bitfreak, I tried contacting him by various means but no way.
Bitfreak, what is this? I have never heard about Bitfreak exchange, Sir? He's the guy ho created the coin, and planned it in 2013 (releasing the white papers). I think I will add a whitepaper section to the OP.
|
|
|
|