My country (the U.S.) is out on the leading edge of those negatively impacted by the Talmud, the Zohar, the philosophical constructs that are built around these works, and the people who are attracted to these philosophies. Most other countries have some degree of similar direct effect, but more-so they are effected by my country in it's capacity of the 'sole superpower' which has fallen morally. ' Given over to a reprobate mind' as it were. With the most recent 'full frontal' incantation (Donald Trump) we have lucked out to a degree. Currently very few people have even heard of these works of philosophy, but they are out there and not realistically revocable. These people will not be able to resist the temptation to turn up the heat to fast and the frogs will start feeling the pain and looking for answers. After stumbling upon these works (or having them force-fed down their throats) 'the truth' rings loud and compelling. As unpleasant as the infancy of 'their fantasy' may be it will have a limited lifespan. Some expect 42 months. The strategy of the Mormons is to 'make it through' this period. Probably a wise strategy to be honest. Anyway, Chabad-Lubavitch is such and evil and nasty entity that they will be the best enemies to have. They are eminently beatable. Some of their cousin organizations not so much. What is it with conspiracy theorists and jews? It seems like they are always the problem, you guys are almost like hitler at this point, notbatman is also usually blaming the jews for whatever reason, you are now blaming some weird jewish philosophy for the problems in the US? Trump was probably the best thing to happen to your country. |
|
|
|
1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock) 2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened. 3) you said they used up all the tech (  ) 4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks) 5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.beIt was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images. 1) I don't care why some dead guy's estate donated a wrong rock to NASA 19 years later. Most likely because someone stole the (highly valuable) actual rock. 2) You've been corrected, live with it. 3) Yes, they used up the equipment in the production runs. For space flight projects. Wouldn't have done much good sitting around on the ground right? 4) Now you're really not thinking. 123:59:39 on the flight clock the LRRR were laid down
The laser ranging retro-reflector was deployed during the first extravehicular activity approximately 43 meters (140 feet) west-southwest of the Apollo lunar surface experiment package central station. Leveling and alignment were accomplished with no difficulty. The McDonald Observatory team initially acquired a return signal from the Apollo 15 instrument August 3, 1971, when atmospheric conditions first permitted ranging. http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/posts/1535,6,7,8) Those have been clearly debunked, don't double down on stupid. But if you really want to, go for it! I wonder why conspiracy theorists love these kind of titles: WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) All the videos about flat earth and all that shit always have the same titles, it's like their brains are attracted by them, oh shit it says must watch and 100% true, let me watch that and believe it!!! |
|
|
|
^^^ Evolution theory is true... true theory, that is. Why would you think that I think that anybody would have to track DNA to prove that evolution theory exists? All people need do is look in loads of books to see that evolution theory exists, and has been written down and about many times. Since evolution theory is real, all it says is that evolution hasn't been prove to be factual. If the theory had proven evolution to be factual, evolution would literally be able to be tracked into prehistory, factually, and not because some people said they did it, but have nothing to back up what they said. All the things they give as reasons for evolution can be refuted. They have no proof that this is the way life changes and came about. Evolution theory only exists because some scientists liked it, and some promoters make money off it. Properly developed, Abiogenesis Theory in everything would be way stronger than evolution theory. Why? Because the fossil record has beginnings of creatures throughout itself that don't show any possible ancestor. And there is nothing to suggest that just because some creatures have similarities, that they were related in an ancestor/descendant way. That's only somebody's wishful interpretation. Abiogenisis Theory hasn't been given the credit it deserves, because it is too close to the creation idea. And the whole reason for evolution theory is to discredit creation and the idea of God. Evolution is a hoax.  ''And there is nothing to suggest that just because some creatures have similarities, that they were related in an ancestor/descendant way.'' Well, of course there is, did you forget about lizards developing a valve or toads in the examples I gave you? That doesn't suggest anything, it's literally there, evolution is there, it happened and we saw it. Do you agree that animals can adapt and pass their new genetics to their offspring? |
|
|
|
I live in Canada, born and raised here on fruit farm in Ontario, here is a list of some of the reasons why my country sucks. Con list: - We pay for taxes and don`t have a say where those taxes go, When we could vote on where those taxes went, They just give it to private companies for free
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/powerandpolitics/tories-steamed-over-loblaws-freezer-cash-1.5091869- We vote people to vote for us, we are a representation of a democracy we are not a democracy, When we could all have jobs by voting on issues
- We have other people make the money supply which is backed by nothing and the rest of us work for it, When we could all create it
- We treat immigrants better than people born here and who have worked here their entire life, we treat them better than the veterns here
- We have double standard laws because of religiousness beliefs, some people of certain religions get away with other stuff other people cannot
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-allows-sikhs-to-ride-motorcycles-without-helmet-1.4858361- The beer store is not even owned by the government but private family's and only they are allowed to sell it,The LCBO(Liquor store) is owned by the government and only they are allowed to sell it(same with weed)
- The politicians have bunkers for themselves but not for us the people
- Our taxes go to lining the politicians pockets
- They tax you even on Bitcoin
- The cops beat you for no reason most of the time
- The hospitals perform malpractices hold you down and inject you with needles for no reason, when you are posing no threat or harm
Pros: IMO you are just a whiny baby, if you live in Canada, you are living in better conditions than a ton of people, you have every opportunity to do whatever you want there, if you haven't accomplished anything, it's on you, anyone can do almost anything, whether you are a man/woman, poor/rich, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Even if you are in favor of having 100 different genders, this should still be illegal, no one should ever consider this a normal thing, it's objectively wrong, you can't drink alcohol or have sex but you can change your gender when you are 6 years old? Isn't mutilation a mental illness?
|
|
|
|
^^^ But if you examine what is happening, archaeology is gradually proving the Bible to be true. So, we don't only have the science of the nation of Israel, we also have the science of archaeology. In addition, we have the science of standard science that proves itself not capable of finding any other way than the Bible. What else do you want? Even science is proving the Bible true, and that they are wrong in many of the standard ideas that they have been promoting. No it's not, archaeology and any science is literally proving the bible to be wrong. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Biblical_scientific_errorsAs you can see, science proves the bible to be wrong in anything. ''In addition, we have the science of standard science that proves itself not capable of finding any other way than the Bible.'' I don't know what that means. ''we don't only have the science of the nation of Israel'' Like what? |
|
|
|
^^^ Right! And consider how great your thinking might be if you hadn't had all these shots to dumb you down. You must have gotten a shit load of vaccines then  |
|
|
|
.....
..... this picture is pure gold. No, your cartoons are not arguments. Do you actually have any? Yah I brought up a bunch but you failed to counter discuss any of them. Nice movie script you linked. 1) why was the moon rock fake they gave the Netherlands? 2) why did buzz say he did not go to the moon? 3) why did they destroy the tech to go to the moon? 4) why in the transcripts did you link does it say nothing about a retro reflector? 5) why is there footage of them filming it all on a movie set? 6) why is there bubbles in some of the footage? 7) why is there strings? why is there multiple shadows on some of the footage? All of the original photography is available on the NASA archives. Do you know how to find it, or are you the moronic slave of your Youtube Overlords? There's a story behind the moon rock fake, and you can easily look it up. But WTF? Let's do it for you, how is that? The rock was given as a private gift to former prime minister Willem Drees Jr in 1969 by the U.S. ambassador to The Netherlands, J. William Middendorf II, during a visit by the Apollo 11 astronauts, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin, soon after the first moon landing. Drees had been out of office for 11 years, but was considered an elder statesman. When Drees died in 1988, the rock was donated to the Rijksmuseum. So 19 years after Astronaut gives the rock to X, X dies and rock goes to Museum. Who knows what happened in that time frame to the real rock? (And who cares?) https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.htmlYou've believed a misquote from Buzz. The child didn’t ask Buzz Aldrin if he ever went to the moon. Rather, she posted the question “Why has nobody been to the moon in such a long time?” to the astronaut. When Aldrin said in reply that “we didn’t go there” and “that’s the way it happened,” he was referring to the fact that the U.S. has sent no missions back to the moon since the final Apollo spaceflight took place in December 1972, not asserting that he had never been to the moon in the first place. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-moon-admission/The didn't DESTROY the tech, they used it all up. Like the remaining Saturn rockets were used for the Spacelab missions. Transcripts say nothing about a retro reflector? Really? You will find them talking about placing the experiment package and deploying it. But you'd have to know the name of the package to understand that, right? 5,6,7 and 8 are garbage. ok this your defense. 1) you don`t know why the moon rock was not a moon rock when they tested it (because it was not a moon rock) 2) you are right, she asked why did we not go back to the moon in such a long time, Buzz responds, that is not a 8 year olds question, well because we did not go and that is the way it happened. 3) you said they used up all the tech ( ) 4) link the transcripts saying retro reflector and highlight that word for me (k thanks) 5,6,7,8 there is video proof of it brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3FJ2dhr-aA&feature=youtu.beIt was all a bluff, stop defending these people you pay them your tax dollars and they fuck you in the ass by taxing you for walt disney photoshopped bullshit images. So a few youtube idiots found out NASA faked the moon landing but the whole russian intelligence and others didn't? Yeah sounds totally logical, do you realize they were competing against each other at that point, you think Russia would just let them lie and not see the ''strings'' you claim appear in the video LOL. |
|
|
|
^^^ Did you actually take your smartphone camera along last time? Your DNA test kit? Evolution is a hoax, but you are proving that you aren't that good. Yes I did. Genetics and DNA helps us proving evolution. ''1. Genetic Diversity. Human children inherit 3 billion base pairs of DNA from each parent, but they are not an exact duplicate. The rate of change has been measured precisely to an average of 70 bases (out of our 6 billion total) per generation. So as we go back on the family tree, there are more and more genetic differences between us and our ancestors. For example, there would be about 140 differences between your DNA and that of your four grandparents, and 210 differences between you and your eight great-grandparents, and so on. That enables us to make a prediction from the amount of genetic diversity between two species about the time since their common ancestor population lived. Using non-genetic evidence, the common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees was estimated to have lived about 6 million years ago. The calculation from genetic differences gives a figure remarkably close to the estimated value.'' https://biologos.org/common-questions/what-is-the-genetic-evidence-for-human-evolution/You and your silly science fiction story! How far back did you go this time? 1000 years? 10,000? 100,000? Million or more? How many different animals and plants did you track the DNA from? And over how many distant-past years did you track it? I mean, if you did something like this, or if you have some practical way that you can measure this, then evolution might have a bit of a start. So far... Evolution is a complete hoax. You seem to be confused because you think we need to somehow be able to track the DNA of everything at anytime to prove evolution theory, that's not the case. As explained several times, evolution theory is the best theory we have of how we became what we are today, it's safe to assume that if something can evolve over shorter periods of time, like the lizards or the toads in the above examples, they can also do it for longer periods of time, we have the fossil record for that: https://www.learnreligions.com/how-fossil-evidence-supports-evolution-249888https://biologos.org/common-questions/what-does-the-fossil-record-show/ |
|
|
|
^^^ Did you actually take your smartphone camera along last time? Your DNA test kit? Evolution is a hoax, but you are proving that you aren't that good. Yes I did. Genetics and DNA helps us proving evolution. ''1. Genetic Diversity. Human children inherit 3 billion base pairs of DNA from each parent, but they are not an exact duplicate. The rate of change has been measured precisely to an average of 70 bases (out of our 6 billion total) per generation. So as we go back on the family tree, there are more and more genetic differences between us and our ancestors. For example, there would be about 140 differences between your DNA and that of your four grandparents, and 210 differences between you and your eight great-grandparents, and so on. That enables us to make a prediction from the amount of genetic diversity between two species about the time since their common ancestor population lived. Using non-genetic evidence, the common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees was estimated to have lived about 6 million years ago. The calculation from genetic differences gives a figure remarkably close to the estimated value.'' https://biologos.org/common-questions/what-is-the-genetic-evidence-for-human-evolution/ |
|
|
|
There is only one religious belief that should be expressed in public, when there is no question asked of you. This is the fact that Jesus Christ died and arose for the sins of all people, so that all have the chance to be saved for eternal life. Other expressions of religion should exist in simple question form, or in the way one lives his life. Ask simple questions to get info about the religion of others. If they ask you questions about your religion, then you can express the answers to what they ask. but do so with sensitivity to their feelings and their religion. True religion is to do good to all people. If expressing religious beliefs antagonizes other, they should be kept to one's self. Were you there when it happened? I don't see any history book mentioning it besides the science fiction book, the bible. How do we know it happened? How do we know that even if something like that happened it wasn't some sort of illusion created by aliens that are trying to control us? It's a hoax, there is no proof for it. |
|
|
|
^^^ Vaccines are a good stab at making you well. If a nation of people has never been vaccinated, they might have a reasonably good immune system. But the immune system still isn't perfect. When a disease comes along, it might damage the nation. All that vaccines do is shift the immune system overdrive. The immune system kills off the disease, but is weakened when it does this. If no more vaccinations are given, the immune system will gain most of its strength back. There are a couple problems with this: 1. The immune system never gains as much strength back as it had originally, so the "victim" is susceptible to more diseases; 2. The immune system has learned to fight vaccines a little, so further vaccinations aren't as effective, or they weaken the immune system further. If you are saved from a dreadful disease by being vaccinated, then stop further vaccinations. They only weaken your system so that you will need more of them. If you have been vaccinated for anything, work as hard as you can with good nutrition to build your immune system up again. Depending on your age, it might take as much as a couple of years or more to flush the vaccine poison from your body after it has done its job. Vaccines are not natural. Essentially all of the times you get stabbed in nature - snake bites, spider bites, thorns, certain fish, any animal bite, etc. - the stabs cause infection, illness, and often death. Vaccine stabs do the same. It's just that they are often more subtle about it. But sometimes they kill and paralyze almost immediately. Stay away from them except in emergency situations, like where you might die with or without them. They might have a better immune system, the problem, however, is that vaccines are used to stop deadly diseases so you basically have 2 outcomes: 1. People with a weaker immune system 2. 95% of the population wiped out due to terrible diseases that weren't stopped with vaccines and we simply waited for some small amount of people to develop immune systems strong enough to stop them (this is also evolution btw) |
|
|
|
^^^ It's because every time somebody goes to put this "flat earth nonsense" to rest and prove the globe a flat earther is born, you can't un-see the deception. Once the illusion is shattered it's broken forever.  You would have been silenced by now if your conspiracy was real and they had as much control as you claim they do, do you not realize that? Meanwhile you can see boats disappearing bottom first and you can never zoom in and see the bottom half. (MIRAGE CONVERGENCE MIRROR BAND ZONE, ETC ETC) |
|
|
|
  +bonus: Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV | Movies & Television: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xESo called "moon landing" was staged in a hollywood studio. It is a complete fraud. So if you believe it was "real" then you have been bamboozled. ''Simply put, the Apollo program that took us to the moon in the 1970’s was part of a technological ecosystem that has become antiquated over time, and would no longer be suitable for a lunar mission.'' Of course idiots like you would misinterpret anything when you need to, by using that quote you are directly saying that we DID land on the moon since he said we don't have the technology 'anymore' like we did in the past, you are a moron and you don't even realize it haha. |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/i/moments/1134976495686901760Almost all foreign visitors to the United States are now required to provide their social media account details, email addresses and phone numbers from the past five years. A new question asking for social media information appeared on the online visa application on Friday. Photo via @thehill ... wtf?  These are weird rules and don’t make any sense as to why they need our social media accounts, I wonder if this is an attempt to collect our data and manipulate it in someway. When I saw this news breakout someone said now they require our passwords too, but that turned out fake though I feel going ahead they may require it too. One interesting question that crossed my mind is what if we keep our social media posts private, will they reject the application because they cannnot access the accounts any idea about this? They already collect your data, do you remember when you accepted those terms of privacy? Yeah, most of those literally say they can do whatever they want with your data, I pretty much doubt USA is doing it because they want to control or do anything with your social media, they already can mate, they are already doing it, not only them, most countries and most companies that have access to your data. |
|
|
|
The articles contain the evidence and proof you are asking for. Animals have been shown to evolve, the case of the toad is simply one of many. Just like the lizards they evolved by adapting to the new environment developing new features that are passed on through generations (evolution). This clearly shows that animals not only adapt but they can pass their new genes to their offspring and so on. Is it really difficult to understand this?
You have a normal animal, somehow its environment changes or its forced to go somewhere else and starts developing, say, longer legs, those genes are passed on and only longer legged animals exist, the others eventually die, now you have that animal but with longer legs. After thousands of years, they might be forced again to change for whatever reason, now they also develop a bigger head, so now you have longer legged, bigger heads animals, if you follow this progression, eventually after many years you will find a totally new animal, is it really hard to see this?
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You said it: "... they might be forced ... ." Why did you say "might be?" Because you and everybody know that nobody knows. Evolution is a hoax. EDIT: Next time you go back there, take your smartphone along, and snap a few pictures for us. It was an example, dumbass, I already showed you instances where THEY WERE FORCED to move, look at the examples above and stop being a religious faggot. Do you really not understand the example or are you just fully delusional unable to accept anything that doesn't involve the magic daddy in the sky? |
|
|
|
We did not land on the moon, It was fake, however the earth is a globe shape. They later had droids go up and put some metal there so they can say they went, but they never went when they said they did. It really was made in a Hollywood basement. Buzz says it in this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsjWEDSkbUU "Buzz Aldrin - Never went to the moon" The first sign of a liar is the longer the answer the more of the lie. "ah hum that is not a 8 year olds questions" I have opened the door to the solar system, the lock remains there. Your kind will not be allowed to leave this system until you figure it out. Your technology is getting better but as a race you are devolving. Buzz aldrin admits we never went to the moon. A little girl asked him the question why have we not been back to the moon. He said the following " That's my question. I want to know but i think I know, because we didn't go there and that's the way it happened and if it didn't happen it's nice to know why it didn't happen so in the future if we want to keep doing something, we need to know why something stopped in the past that we wanted to keep it going. "Because money is a good thing" -Buzz Aldrin You know what's funny about those type of things, you have thousands of people saying we did go to the moon but if you find out an old man said once we didn't, BOOM that means we didn't, you didn't believe him when he said we did but for some reason you believe him now, weird huh? |
|
|
|
^^^ The only reason why science was barely available in ages beyond 500 years ago, is that science wasn't organized. The earth, nature, and machine usage of people existed for thousands of years. So, the things of nature that science uses in its calculations existed for thousands of years... actually, from the beginning. Nobody knows the future. Science can't, for a fact, predict the future, just as religion can't. Yet BOTH are used for predicting the future to people, so that people can be more comfortable in their minds about what will happen to them. So you can see that science and religion aren't very different after all. What kind of retarded argument is this? Poop and a monkey cannot predict the future therefore, SEE?? THEY ARE NOT THAT DIFFERENT AFTER ALL. Are you this dumb or do you like to troll? Religion is based in faith and nothing more which literally means it's based on nothing, you simply believe it because you do, there are no predictions, no tests, no evidence. |
|
|
|
Do you have evidence that vaccines are, in fact unsafe or lead to any kind of mental illness? Beyond the CDC not filing reports with congress....
If a rattle snake or a cobra bites you, injecting their venom into you, is there any danger? When you look at all the crap that is in modern vaccines as shown by the CDC in their own website, why would you think that there is any safety? The whole body is designed in nature to keep this poisonous stuff from entering. The skin protects us. So, we have the medical bypassing nature's own skin safety program, and then refusing to do the safety tests (or at least provide the results of those tests), even when government requires the tests. Obviously the lack of safety is from the medical rather than from the vaccines. Can you prove they are refusing to do safety tests? Just because somewhere someone didn't test something it doesn't mean governments all over the world are in on it and are trying to poison people. https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/debunking-myths-about-vaccine-testing-and-safety/Simple. The medical wants to make money. Presenting successful safety tests would make people so comfortable with vaccines that they would flock to get theirs. The thing that happened was: 1. Robert Kennedy and his group tried to get the safety tests; 2. The medical wouldn't present them; 3. Kennedy did a FOIA request; 4. The medical didn't present the tests - not even one - at the FOIA-government demand. Now, either you accept this as proof that there aren't any successful tests, or you recognize that the medical is simply evil. Or do you have some other excuse why the money-hungry medical wouldn't further their own financial enhancement in the tremendous way that successful safety tests would have? Everyone wants to make money. What you said was already discussed and shown not to be true, I can also show thousands of safety tests done. https://www.historyofvaccines.org/index.php/content/articles/vaccine-development-testing-and-regulationhttps://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines,%20blood%20&%20biologics/published/Ensuring-the-Safety-of-Vaccines-in-the-United-States.pdfhttp://vk.ovg.ox.ac.uk/vaccine-development |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
