Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 11:09:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
601  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: A tale of two ASICs on: August 27, 2013, 10:26:32 PM
Congrats!  Sounds like you were one of the lucky ones.

Cheers
602  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 10:24:00 PM
Quote
Yes, every miner has an ROI.  But in some cases, those ROIs are NEGATIVE.
and yet it is STILL RoI.

A negative ROI. Saying that something has negative ROI "has ROI" is like saying someone in debt "has money" because negative money is still money.
We can argue semantic all day.  Let's get back to the meat of it:

1) Jun 2013.  ASICMiner opens sales of USB sticks at 2BTC.  as just stated above $1M and assrape.
2) Jun 2012.  BFL starts taking orders and quickly has so many that only the 1st week of them will profit AT CURRENT BTC RATES.

Which is the worst company attitude?  Unintentionally screwing your customers cause their greed will kill the BTC profitability or ass-raping your customers?
603  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 10:22:00 PM

<SIGH> RoI = Return on investment.  If you invest $100 and get $1 in return, that $1 IS a return on investment, albeit a very POOR return.  You use the term to indicate a 100% RoI without specifying that.  Maybe you need to modify HOW you refer to things... FULL RoI, 100%+ RoI, etc.  Buying a CPU/GPU/FPGA/ASIC and mining with it = RoI.  Whether you PROFIT or not is another matter.

No. You're confused. Because you're an idiot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_on_investment
Quote
For a single-period review divide the return (net profit) by the resources that were committed (investment):[2]
   return on investment (%) = (Net profit / Investment) × 100
or
     return on investment = gain from investment/ cost of investment[1]

Let's do the math, since it seems like you're not capable of it yourself.

If you spend $100, and you earn back $1 Then your net profit is $-99.

$-99/$100 * 100% = -99%

Seriously, how fucking stupid are you?  This is a commonly used, mathematically defined, investment term with a specific meaning.

Yes, every miner has an ROI.  But in some cases, those ROIs are NEGATIVE.
and yet it is STILL RoI.
604  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 10:18:33 PM
<SIGH> RoI = Return on investment.  If you invest $100 and get $1 in return, that $1 IS a return on investment, albeit a very POOR return.  You use the term to indicate a 100% RoI without specifying that.  Maybe you need to modify HOW you refer to things... FULL RoI, 100%+ RoI, etc.  Buying a CPU/GPU/FPGA/ASIC and mining with it = RoI.  Whether you PROFIT or not is another matter.

Here is the formula for ROI:
ROI = (gain from investment - cost of investment) / (cost of investment)

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/returnoninvestment.asp
ROI is a measure of profit, not revenue.
"In the above formula "gains from investment", refers to the proceeds obtained from selling the investment of interest. Return on investment is a very popular metric because of its versatility and simplicity. That is, if an investment does not have a positive ROI, or if there are other opportunities with a higher ROI, then the investment should be not be undertaken."

So your example would yield a -99% ROI.
Exactly.  A poor RoI but it is RoI nonetheless.
605  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 10:13:44 PM
I'm sure I will regret this, but I'm going to answer your question anyway.

927w with a platinum PSU. This is the one area in which BFL is clearly superior. With an identical PSU(Antec 1300w platinum) four BFL Single SCs draw just under 1100w and hash at around 375Gh/s(after mods to their crappy stock cooling). The minirig SC has twin EVGA classified 1500w PSUs and it draws almost exactly 2x this amount.

If you think this is a huge advantage for BFL gear however, then you'd be mistaken. Bitfury has claimed that the first of their finished products have shipped today and this will mark the end of BFL's superiority in the efficiency department, even while the vast majority of their customers victims still await the products they paid for months ago. Operating cost differences between these two products will end up being nearly meaningless IMO. This is why I've chosen to add more hashing power in the form of cheaper and more readily available secondary market Avalons.
Thanks for the reply, looks like you have a very nice setup.  Good luck with it.
606  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 10:11:35 PM

RoI is the fiction of the greedy.


No, it's entirely real.  Did you miss the part where I told you my batch 2 avalon has paid for itself, In bitcoin?  

I spent bitcoins I had because I wanted more bitcoins then I started with, and now, I have them.

Quote
If difficulty is 1,000,000,000 when you get your unit, simply REFUSE to sell at current prices that equal a loss.  If more and more people do this, the pirice WILL rise.

Which doesn't matter if your goal was to increase the number of bitcoins you have. Which I told you, is the reason I bought an ASIC. Otherwise I would have just kept my bitcoins.

Quote
On the other hand, you are saying it's quite alright to fuck over the customer if there is such an artificially high demand and you charge then $1,000,000 for less hash than a mini-rig costing $30k.  SURE you get them in hand NOW, but damn you got ass-raped in the process.

What the fuck are you talking about?  In may of 2011 $1 million dollars could have bought you more then 1.5TH/s. If you'd kept the money the bitcoins you mined would probably be worth $50-100 million dollars.  

The timing matters.  In fact, I think, but I haven't done the math - if you'd spent $1 million dollars on GPUs in June of 2012 instead of spending $30k on a BFL mini-rig, you'd actually have already made a profit by now, given the price increase.  That's the incredible irony of this.   The people who ordered Mini-rigs at that point in time would have been better off buying GPUs.

I agree people shouldn't buy block erupters expecting to get an ROI. I think most people just buy them for fun.

Quote
Quote
Of course it's BFL's fault. They had faulty information because BFL withheld that information. That was no way to know what effect the other orders would have because BFL chose not to share that information with them.  Which is why I decided not to order from them last year, and went with Avalon instead (I have a batch 2 that's already paid for itself in BTC)

Yet again, the greedy persons view of the world.

Again, are you smoking crack?

Why would someone want to just give free money to BFL in exchange for nothing of value? If they want to give to charity there are lot of worthwhile options.

If you're not a little greedy, there's no reason to care about bitcoin at all.  There's no reason to care about money. If they weren't greedy they would never have bought ASICs in the first place. Why would they?

Quote
BFL is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

BFL is damned because their mistakes are in the past.  There is nothing they can do now to rectify the situation, that's what happens.  That's how time works. Mistakes can't always be undone, and the damned stay damned.

Quote
If you listen to the shills on the ASICMiner posts, RoI != profit.  RoI is simply Return ON investment.  EVERY MINER HAS AN ROI, some just have a HIGHER RoI than others.  Using your flawed BTC argument, you'll never attain MORE BTC than you spend unless the network has reached saturation, so you should never again buy another new product.

I just told you. My Batch2 Avolon has already paid for itself, in BTC. And it certainly is true that no one should buy a pre-order at this point in time. Anyway people use "ROI" around here to mean positive ROI. If you make less then you pay it's a negative ROI.

Quote
can't take any more ignorance.

Ignorance of what?

You're just spewing total nonsense.

You claim to be defending BFL, and yet you say they fucked their customers. You admit their customers will never ROI, and that BFL never intended for them too.  You say the customers should have figured it out, and then you say their customers are only complaining because they're "greedy".  Except if they weren't greedy they never would have bought an ASIC in the first place.

That's like saying you shouldn't complain about getting fucked because the only reason it hurt is because you're too uptight for the giant dick to fit comfortably in your asshole.

You're not defending BFL, certainly not in a way that would make sense to the people they fucked.  We seem to agree on the facts, it's just you don't think there's anything wrong with ripping people off if they're "greedy" and stupid.

It's totally bizarre.
<SIGH> RoI = Return on investment.  If you invest $100 and get $1 in return, that $1 IS a return on investment, albeit a very POOR return.  You use the term to indicate a 100% RoI without specifying that.  Maybe you need to modify HOW you refer to things... FULL RoI, 100%+ RoI, etc.  Buying a CPU/GPU/FPGA/ASIC and mining with it = RoI.  Whether you PROFIT or not is another matter.

I'm skipping ahead cause you are switching logic and misunderstand everything I said and using god knows what, so let's try this:


1) Jun 2013.  ASICMiner opens sales of USB sticks at 2BTC.  as just stated above $1M and assrape.
2) Jun 2012.  BFL starts taking orders and quickly has so many that only the 1st week of them will profit AT CURRENT BTC RATES.

Which is the worst company attitude?  Unintentionally screwing your customers cause their greed will kill the BTC profitability or ass-raping your customers?
607  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BF Labs Inc. caught red-handed lying! on: August 27, 2013, 08:55:08 PM
http://products.butterflylabs.com

Quote
Order Terms: Bitforce SC (ASIC) products are shipped according to placement in the order queue

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/blogs/bfl_jody/310-monday-august-26-2013-shipping-upgrade.html

Quote
Monday, August 26, 2013 Shipping Upgrade
    Jalapenos: Feb 2, 2013
    Little Singles: Oct. 11, 2012 pay date No LS shipped today
    Singles: July 15, 2012 pay date
    MiniRigs: MiniRigs for June 25 (2nd 500gh/s unit) and July 28 for 1st 500 gh/s

Products actually shipped far out of order. The order queue is a lie.

They shipped Jala's for almost 2 months before shipping other stuff.  You feel they should have just sat on the Jala product they could ship?
608  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 08:51:34 PM
Can't help but laugh at bfl still trying to put on a brave face. Really once you've used avalon I'm not really sure why anyone would bother with bfl. Whether they can be trusted to produce is not really a question of interest when they can't produce when they say they will. Until they have that trust they will always be in the shadows of avalon.

How are those batch #3 Avalons coming along?  Cheesy

Splendid thanks. They overclock like madmen...

I have results from 2 more batch3s, 2 batch2s, and 4 batch1s if you're interested.
I am interested? What is the thread link?

If you overclock a BFL unit "that much" you would probably burn a hole through the table, carpet and then the subfloor or basement foundation. Might even become a china syndrome. (Well if the chord lasts that long)

Sadly BFL stuff is not easily overclockable. I'm averaging about 715Gh/s from 1 minirig SC and 4 Singles(think 12 singles), but they're *HOT* and require 10x the attention the 9 Avalons do. I have two AC units cooling them(32k BTU) and they still overwhelm the ACs during the day.
How much power does it take to run the avalons when they are that overclocked?
609  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 08:25:35 PM
Quote from: bcp19
can't take any more ignorance.

I personally thank you for your well-reasoned arguments.  But you'll be much happier and live longer if you just use the wonderful "ignore" feature of this forum.  Smiley
While I understand your point, I feel my own internal ignore feature works well enough.  I think this says it best though: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=281936.msg3018470#msg3018470
610  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Time to sue ButterflyLabs - Big Single-SC owner let's league for class action on: August 27, 2013, 08:20:43 PM
You are quite correct.  That word may be one of the watchwords for the NSA and their electronic surveillance.  Maybe they have already sent both mine and his information to the FBI for further investigation.  I personally welcome it, I have nothing to hide.
It doesn't work that way. Unless you use a ton of keywords like Al Queda, Obama, etc.

You are probably thinking of context sensitive crawlers and flagging. In which case you'd probably have to write it out in a different language if you want to draw any attention.

If you threaten to blow up the white house (or harm the president), the FBI is obligated to investigate such occurrences. (Yes, they actually send someone...well if you report it at least.)

=========================

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data

Thats just one tool that is recently become public. The tool allows someone to type in a web address such as: www.butterflylabs.com and it will give an analyst access to the IP's that have visited that site.

Or you could type in your IP and a few keywords and bring up your online browsing history.

Google History: https://accounts.google.com/Login?service=hist

You can wipe your history off the public servers but retention means it is available for a long, long time.
OMG! Now you've done it!!! <AUUUUGGGGGHHHHH>
611  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Guesstimate thread for total ASIC pre-order hashing power. on: August 27, 2013, 07:27:03 PM
I love the chart, it is very well made.  I do have to admit that you predicted the 'explosion' to happen about a month after I did, but we have more information at this time than I did when I made mine.  Very well done.
612  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Time to sue ButterflyLabs - Big Single-SC owner let's league for class action on: August 27, 2013, 07:20:23 PM
Watch out, you really can have an ISP pull the plug on your account.
Having consulted a lawyer, I truly hope he goes that route.  I already have a countersuit ready for his threat, and if he gets my internet access taken down then I have a suit ready for either him or my ISP.  My ISP if they are too dumb and act on information from a random stranger without getting his personel information, and against him if he does provide that information.  Unlike his spurius libel claim, I *will* have a monetary impact if he gets my internet turned off.  Up until he presents his case in a court of law and gets a favorable ruling, any action by hm against me is actionable.  
I understand your sentiments. But shutting down a persons account is very easy...dangerously so...and legally.

There are so many spurious terms of agreement that you two have with your ISP, that if he proves you were at a certain location and posted a certain thing, that may or may not be enough to get your account terminated at the ISP.

I know this because I have seen grown babies (manchilds) do this to one another when they get a little too stupid for words. Then they turn to the FBI to have each other investigated like idiots.

You'd probably think that people in high authority in the US government and the Armed Forces are different than you average folk. Lets just say, the only difference is their ability to use English properly. Some of the nasty ones even turned to department heads at AFOSI and DIA (and/or the FBI) to have them frivolously investigated.

--------------------

Point being, watch out. (to both of you)
You are quite correct.  That word may be one of the watchwords for the NSA and their electronic surveillance.  Maybe they have already sent both mine and his information to the FBI for further investigation.  I personally welcome it, I have nothing to hide.
613  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 07:11:59 PM
Not if they shipped 50k on the same day, or even in the same week or so.  2016 blocks would be found almost immediately and then there'd be a huge diff jump. 50k Jalapenos would be 300TH. About the hashrate at the beginning of this month.
I can see it now "WHY THE FUCK AREN'T YOU SHIPPING?!?!?!?"  "Well, to be fair, we're building everything and shipping it all at once"  "THAT'S FUCKING STUPID!!!  I LIVE HALFWAY AROUND THE WORLD!!! YOU'RE FAVORING US CUSTOMERS!!!!  ASSHOLES!!!!"

Quote
So, they're not under obligation not to fuck their customers? Why would you defend a company fucking it's customers, simply because they're not "obligated" to refrain?  Maybe not illegal but certainly not ethical.

At least with the block erupters people know what the hashrate and difficulty growth will look like when they get them, since they'll be getting them right away. A lot of people buy them just for fun.
RoI is the fiction of the greedy.  If difficulty is 1,000,000,000 when you get your unit, simply REFUSE to sell at current prices that equal a loss.  If more and more people do this, the pirice WILL rise.  On the other hand, you are saying it's quite alright to fuck over the customer if there is such an artificially high demand and you charge then $1,000,000 for less hash than a mini-rig costing $30k.  SURE you get them in hand NOW, but damn you got ass-raped in the process.

Quote
Of course it's BFL's fault. They had faulty information because BFL withheld that information. That was no way to know what effect the other orders would have because BFL chose not to share that information with them.  Which is why I decided not to order from them last year, and went with Avalon instead (I have a batch 2 that's already paid for itself in BTC)
Yet again, the greedy persons view of the world.  If BFL had the morals of ASICMiner, after the first week of orders and seeing the demand, they'd have raised prices by at least 4-20 times to stagnant the demand, but then whoever missed out on that first week would be screaming THEY got fucked.  BFL is damned if they do and damned if they don't.

Quote
You're basically claiming that everyone who didn't make the same decision I did was an idiot who deserved to lose their money to BFL.
Yes.  From your seeming thinking that ASICMiner is justified fleecing people, then those that did not do there research got what they deserved.  That is your position on the fools paying 2BTC for a USB stick, right?

Quote
My batch 2 Avalon has already paid for itself in BTC.  The only reason I bought a miner was to increase the amount of BTC I had.
 Ah, the old I paid BTC for BTC flawed argument.  I'm no longer dignifying this with an answer.

Quote
What the fuck are you talking about?  Of course the monarch is a terrible fucking buy!  Why the fuck would anyone buy something that won't ROI?  Are you smoking crack?
If you listen to the shills on the ASICMiner posts, RoI != profit.  RoI is simply Return ON investment.  EVERY MINER HAS AN ROI, some just have a HIGHER RoI than others.  Using your flawed BTC argument, you'll never attain MORE BTC than you spend unless the network has reached saturation, so you should never again buy another new product.

<snip> [/quote]can't take any more ignorance.
614  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Mining Equipment Manufacturers -- BFL Monarch 600 on: August 27, 2013, 06:50:48 PM
Thank you for such an awesome site!

A suggestion: currently the middle column (the one you are sorting by) is for 17% periodical difficulty increase.  This corresponds to 11.97-day difficulty change period, which corresponds to constant daily network growth of (1.171/11.97-1)x100% = 1.32%.

Now if we look at two last graphs at http://bitcoin.sipa.be, we may notice that during the last month the daily growth not only exceeded 1.3%, but even kept above 2% most of the time, which would correspond to 25%.  Actually, 14-day average growth has been significantly above 2% for 3 weeks in a row already.

True, such high growth rates have not been seen since 2011, but given current situation in the mining market it is very likely that this growth will persist for some time.  I mean, Asicminer is preparing to add few hundred TH in September, Bitfury and Avalon keep producing and delivering chips, Avalon-based DIY solutions have only just started to appear en-masse, and there are these numerous new players preparing to join in September and October.  Doesn't it look like the real massacre fun mostly is only about to start.  Predicting 25% through the next few periods is not exaggerated, it's conservative!  I would predict 30+, but I may be biased.

So, I would suggest setting the middle column to 25% (maybe at least to 20%) and even more importantly, setting the right column to at least 40%.  Thank you for considering this!
One thing you did not mention is that each increase is from a running average (prob not the best word) of the actual increase.  Once a difficulty increase has happened, even if the rate froze at that level, you'd still have a fairly good sized increase just to catch up.
615  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs New 600GH "Mining Card" - RED FLAGS?!?! on: August 27, 2013, 06:34:54 PM
Not sure if you know but there were at least 1800 new paid invoices (not just unpaid for orders) placed within 48 hours from the moment they posted the pre-order on the page.
So you are a little late.
Sarcasm is always hard to figure out in text, isn't it?
616  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs New 600GH "Mining Card" - RED FLAGS?!?! on: August 27, 2013, 06:28:13 PM
I really feel sorry for anyone naive enough to place a new scam pre-order for a monarch. Jesus mary can't people even see that they can't deliver anything in any quantity but Jalapenos? And they are over a year late with everything else.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO BFL.

Continue to repeat this money saving mantra  Wink

Why discrimate so?  For the most part, if you ain't got it in hand... you're screwed.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.

DO NOT SEND ANY NEW MONEY TO ANY ASIC MANUFACTURER.
617  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BF Labs Inc. caught red-handed lying! on: August 27, 2013, 06:21:11 PM
if I were to consider anybody to be put on such a list, I wouldn't threaten them first--I would just do it.

I never miss a chance to say this: I think it's counter productive, as you have to look at the red hot Ignored posters and say "are they really worthy of ignoring? Are they getting trolled with lots of undeserved ignores?". It doesn't help when some people with long time pulsating Ignore buttons spend a lot of effort to become trusted again, only to spend their trust on playing trollish games again.

Simple troll repellent mechanism: ignore posts, not posters. Pressing ignore just encourages more gamesmanship.
Very profound statement sir.  I applaud you.

While I am probably ignored by quite a few, I personally think it is funny.  Now, please understand I do not mean funny from a trolls prespective, but rather that if they have been turned off by what I have said in the past and have ignored me, then they will miss the gems as well as any posts I make that are of real substance unless someone they haven't ignored quotes it.  I know there are certain people that when I got their hate posts, I responded with whatever whimsy crossed my mind, and having set that stardard, every subsequent post to them carries that same whimsy.  Without taking the time to fully read ALL of my posts, you actually miss out on a lot.  I often make fun of myself more than I do others, but I've only run across 2 or 3 people who have picked up on it.

I am happy, healthy and secure in my life.  For me, that is all that matters.
618  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 05:57:50 PM
Maybe you need to go back and reread the original statement instead of paraphrasing it and making it false.  The comment was "Meanwhile, in BFL land, more product than any other company has been shipped.  More hashrate than any other company has been shipped."  Your statement says they claimed over half of the current network hash rate, which is patently false.

Nope, it's completely true.  

They did claim that most of the hashrate was from them, in fact at one point they claimed that ALL of the hashrate increase was from them, and that they were the only company shipping anything.  I'm pretty sure it was within the past month.

It's odd that you seem to think there's only one "original comment" like that was the only thing they ever said about it.

I also don't even understand what point you're trying to make.  You seem to only be arguing with people who criticize them without making any actual point at all.

If BFL is shipping the majority of Hashrate, then their customers were fucked from the very begining, even if they didn't delay.  That's what they're actually claiming.

On the other hand, if they're not shipping most of the Hashrate, then their customers have been fucked by their being nearly a year late.

Either way, they fucked their customers.

I still don't understand why you care so passionately about defending BFL.  It's very bizarre.
Hmm, you are correct, they did exaggerate on there product page there, but what company hasn't?  Each new ASIC manufacturer claims to get MORE hash or LEAST $/GH or some such fanciful claim.  Since BFL is as guilty as the rest, are YOU going to call the rest on it or just stick to BFL cause "They're the scam"... hmm?

More devices.  I don't see those little USB toys as devices, sorry.  They're a ripoff novelty device made just to screw the unknowing BTC populace.  If you added up every single USB miner ASICMiner has sold... BFL has more hash rate from their first day orders that have shipped.  I've already said I bet BFL is closer to 7,000 units shipped than the low ball numbers the haters believe.  I personally believe that number COULD be well over 10,000, but that number is from a fair amount of speculation.

I love that statement I bolded above... I've pointed that out so many time to the people whining about 'potential profits lost' and yet you are one of the first ones to admit it would happen.  Yep, so many customers ordered SO many units that they essentially fucked themselves... BUT!  It's BFL's fault for accepting the orders.  ASICMiner is the one that has TRULY fleeced people by using a shortage to sell at insane prices.  But since Gas companies raise prices in expectation of increased demands over holiday weekends and motels triple their rates if a convention or highly advertised event like the Daytona 500 and etc, etc, etc.... it is obviously OK to screw people over monetarily and get away with it.
619  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Time to sue ButterflyLabs - Big Single-SC owner let's league for class action on: August 27, 2013, 05:38:56 PM
Watch out, you really can have an ISP pull the plug on your account.
Having consulted a lawyer, I truly hope he goes that route.  I already have a countersuit ready for his threat, and if he gets my internet access taken down then I have a suit ready for either him or my ISP.  My ISP if they are too dumb and act on information from a random stranger without getting his personel information, and against him if he does provide that information.  Unlike his spurius libel claim, I *will* have a monetary impact if he gets my internet turned off.  Up until he presents his case in a court of law and gets a favorable ruling, any action by hm against me is actionable.  
620  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL announces 28nm 600GH/S blade for $4680 on: August 27, 2013, 05:29:19 PM
Keep chanting your mantra, <Oooom... long con... Ooooom>.  You refuse to acknowledge anything but your limited point of view, even though you are wrong.  

I wonder what causes someone to have such an emotional investment in defending BFL? They're a bunch of assholes completely fucking over their customers.

They claim that most of the hashrate increase is caused by them. If that is true, it means they took so many orders that if they shipped them on time their customers would never make much back on their investment, without price increases.

So what is it that motivates people to come on here and vociferously defend them?  If it's the case that most of the hashrate increases are due to their shipping units, then their customers were fucked all along.

Anyway, you don't really have much of an argument anyway, as far as I can tell.  You don't have any numbers at all. So it's not even clear what you're trying to say.
You are misinterpreting someone who defends their position on things as being someone who is deeply invested into a company.  While I am the formar, I most certainly am not the latter. I made an estimate based on a certain question and it's since been blownout of proportion and used like I made a knowing statement of fact.

Your statements show your lack of understanding as well.   "They claim that most of the hashrate increase is caused by them" Nope. Maybe you need to go back and reread the original statement instead of paraphrasing it and making it false.  The comment was "Meanwhile, in BFL land, more product than any other company has been shipped.  More hashrate than any other company has been shipped."  Your statement says they claimed over half of the current network hash rate, which is patently false.  The actual statement says more than any other company.  That would be a lot easier to do than the haters claim.

Since your opinion so *SO* vitally important to me, I'll take your comments into consideration.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!