Much as I thought, parents are the true controllers of their hobbies and not those gambling platforms. Eaports will definitely surface and take over some good portions on the internet, the responsibility of parents are to ensure strict regulations among childrens while on the internet.

Good God: children are smarter than most parents these days and their possibility of controlling the children's won't be feasible. KYC can be override by these kids with the help of parents documents: e shock u?, few months ago a young and smart boy sold his father land and traveled to Russia. In conclusion, KYC won't be a hindrance to smart children.

Though you did absolutely well to bring the good gospel of Bitcoin to your college mates. For the freebit gambling casino you just said, isn't a scam advertisement because they have been into the system for long and their records still intact. In the advertisement, they never said play to win $200 rather play "maybe you can stand a chance to win or not". Many gambling casinos with advertisement are found doing this all the time to ensure new members are lured into the gambling platform to win such huge reward.

Don't be surprise mate, the possibility came from their supply. The supply of this digital token is 30000FYI token which 29000 FYI are already in circulation which means the supply was so limited compared to other tokens in digital world. If really compare to Bitcoin price and supply; then FYI token won't sort for $50 per token.

Don't jump into this digital token because, there is much to happen to it price according to some rumors making around it core team members decision.

"bad project is equal to bad results."

Answer to your analysis, bad project give low exchange volume: this mean that, whenever the project stay good the results will be good because of the token volume. How then do you sell that token without a volume? Good project always come with good exchange volume but bad project give otherwise. In conclusion: good project will give profits while bad project will give bad results.

This bores down to self-control in gambling. Health wise still depends on how a gambler is able to handle what's called "self-control" because this is the main reason why many gamblers end up in danger health wise. There should be limits  for every gambler out there in order to curb this issue among gamblers addict. Personally, most of my gambling activities are done within weekends because of my time to relaxe out stress. 

Basically no withdrawal was disabled from the OP but due to the increase of Bitcoin; it transaction fees increased. This has nothing to do with the casinos as they can't determine Bitcoin price. Issues from OP can easily sort out through the use of altcoins to make your withdrawal transactions from the casinos. The same August was the same month the price of Bitcoin increased and we'll understand that, Bitcoin rise always follows with it fee increase.

The fact still remains that, if any country embark on online gambling sites regulations many gamblers will still ho into it through VPN. Most of my colleagues aren't up to the age of 18+ but yet still gamble with us, banning those teenagers can only work with traditional casinos and not online platforms. Taking the forum as an example age wise, many gamblers here aren't upto that age per se but yet still gamble online.

Conclusively, any government that get tax from traditional casinos will put mechanism in place to stop online gambling sites casinos because of their tax invasion.

Candidly, you can't wipe-off any online casino with any huge strategy because the house will always have an edge over any game around their scufer. Gambling platforms come with hidden secrets concerning any of it games, they always outsmart gamblers but luck can smile on gamblers occasionally. Blackjacks has some secrets about its table numbers for the game which you as the gambler can't see, so, the house will always bit you to your odds of wipe-off.

Being an idle man will always attract stuff(easy money) to mankind. During the novel coronavirus pandemic, many families seek for means to sustain their livelihood which turned many of them into doing what can give money. No doubt many gamblers took the bold steps to gamble online for this purpose. So, not an argument that the population of gamblers increased during the pandemic.

Well, not all third world countries are actually been regulated at the moment. Particularly my country which has not yet make any pronouncements either it be illegal or legal. What they did was to cautioned citizens against cryptocurrencies.

This can take place when global adoption takes place around the globe. Making this method of payment as an option in business will hlep spread the awareness of this digital currency to the world. Though, this might take long before we be able to pay with Bitcoin for online shops or physical shops.

There are some online merchandise who are currently accepting the payment through Bitcoin. So, this can spread through the online world slowly till everyone is convince about the digital currency and it purposes to mankind.

Absolutely. There's no other way to approach life itself than research and experiences, so this is not only applicable to Bitcoin. All stated  points on OP are true because Bitcoin is a new technology that needs more information to understand and those with the understanding must exercise their experience to get things done right. Learning new things everyday can only help us gain experience in order to manage our problems.

For anyone to succeed in cryptocurrency industry s/he must imbibe the spirit of research and experience, hence futility in play. Profits can only flow into the hands that had the needed research and experience, so, learn everyday to have the experience.

Ripple can't be a rival to ethereum when there are others that are currently contending with it. Ripple can't make top coins in the market except when they intend to pump the market as they are known to be scammers. The only project I can see contending with ethereum is the $DOT  which has a cross chain for scalability. At the moments this project has been toping many other projects because of this innovative ideas. Ripple has none and can't contend with any.

That's a huge loss base on my earnings. What I can't comprehend with cryptocurrency enthusiasts who are traders is, they care less of what can happen which has happened to others. They don't remember what happened to others who actually used new exchanges without reputation in the past, though even reputable exchanges had one time disappointed us, including myself. As at today, I don't trust new cryptocurrency exchanges with zero reputation and average trade volumes to even start with.

Maybe he talked about the incident that took place in August 2010 almost ten years ago, I quote: . How can a farmer become an electrical engineer and start to analyze what happened to 40kva generator? .

Let him face what he has created and leave Bitcoin to it existence, there's absolutely nothing a man with a centralized heart to understand what's wrong with a decentralized heart. 

Good projects tokens or coin should be kept because of future exposure of the project. Holding project tokens with good prospect pays on a long-term basis, although this can be disastrous as the project can equally fold up. But, finding a good project with holding on a long-term will bring the profit needed.

Believe me, this section doesn't match everyone of us, because trade isn't meant for all. Don't start the battle without any prior knowledge, trading shouldn't be a business for all. Hold! Is better.

Let's be frank with ourselves, buy and hold some random stupid tokens won't yield anything even in years. The buy and hold don't actually give the assurance of win to anyone with such mindset. The project will determine if the tokens are Worth holding or not, don't expect to buy rubbish and think hold will perform a magic of profit.

But, buy and  hold will be a good strategy when you buy the right token or coin. There are good defi projects with prospect, buying anyone of them will surely give a good profit on a long-term. I bought some Bandtokens in April early this year to hold which gave me profit.

Whenever I find myself in such situations I do have to hold as much as possible. Some few days ago I bought RLC, unfortunately I bought at the wrong time. The market went down as a ran into a loss but with a little hold I was able to make some profit on two trade. While i hold the tokens, the price appreciated with few percentage and I sold out; on that same day the market take a new turn and I bought back, at this time I made a decent profits beyond my expectations.

When you believe in a project then, holding their tokens won't be an issue. You can hold for midterms to take out profit.

Well, not all the time some tokens or coins go bearishly, experience has taught me that, good projects won't dump very fast as shit projects in this ecosystem. There are some tokens from good projects that when dump by bounty hunters can't be bought back when the entire proj start a race into pumps. I love holding my stash because "Blessed are those with stronghands for they will surely get rewards". Those tokens you called shittokens today can be savior tomorrow, also, #defi can emerge from them even after death.

KYC shouldn't be seen as something dangerous because the freedom won't be here for so long, the government will definitely find their ways into implementing the "must use of KYC for both decentralization and centralization". The issue should be: watch out the types of centralize platforms that request your personal information, if they're not trustworthy then don't border about them as your information won't be secure with them.

The traditional Banks always demand personal information from it users, so will Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency platforms when the government fully implement regulations of cryptosystem.

Theoretically nothing like RED. Practically, there's such thing as RED, whenever the market go downtrend from the purchase point then RED has occur.

Weaker hands will always sell off their bags when the RED occur, but the stronger hands will always hold their bags. You loss because you don't hold and not because you bought from the RED zones.  Holding onto your bags even at RED zones is more profitable than gold   e shock u abi?