Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2024, 03:23:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 [314] 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 ... 386 »
6261  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] Terminus R606 CONUS shipped $225 [No non US shipping] on: September 19, 2019, 11:23:52 PM
As per the 1st post he has now dropped it to $225.

However, I want it stated that I am really busy for the next week or so. Because of that it might take an extra day or 2 to ship. That's 100% on me but I want it out there.

-Dave
6262  Other / Meta / Posts about things that belong in multiple places. Should there be a way to link on: September 18, 2019, 09:14:21 PM
So, earlier today I posted about a vulnerability in the LastPass plugin for web browsers.
I put the post in:  Bitcoin Forum > Bitcoin > Development & Technical Discussion > Wallet software
Figuring it's a good place to post about something that might matter to people who use web wallets.

OmegaStarScream pointed out that it was already being discussed in a post in Bitcoin Forum > Economy > Marketplace > Service Discussion

I think that where I have it is better, but I do see the argument for having it under service discussion.

Should there be an "approved standard" way for someone to post, a link from one board to another to say, "this is important here / but it's also important there go to this post to discuss more"

We really don't need 2 posts discussing this plugin issue, but I am sure there are people who have never ventured into the marketplace service discssion board, because in their mind it's only about buying & selling stuff.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185746

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5185601

-Dave
6263  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: merged mine on: September 18, 2019, 05:06:15 PM
50 TH/S scrypt algo


sha256  you right - 50 TH/S is $13



2TH/S scrypt 0.6 BTC a day - so 50 TH/S is around 13 btc
https://www.miningrigrentals.com/rigs/127103/?currency=BTC

Gotcha, this post was originally under bitcoin mining not altcoin mining so I assumed it was SHA.

http://give-me-coins.com/litecoin-pool is merge mining it no idea of their hashrate.
litecoinpool.com has merge mining they do not disclose what they are merge mining since they convert and only give you LTC

There are a few others out there too that merge mine and don't tell you what they are mining so it's possible.
-Dave
6264  Other / Off-topic / LastPass Vulnerability another vulnerability for WebWallets (chome / opera) on: September 18, 2019, 04:54:58 PM
I did not see this mentioned here but if you are using lastpass make sure you are updated.
They have updated and your extension should auto update but be sure.

https://blog.lastpass.com/2019/09/lastpass-bug-reported-resolved.html/

Why are you still using web wallets?

-Dave

6265  Other / Meta / Re: Is this concerning? This could be a conspiracy too. on: September 18, 2019, 01:56:55 PM
There needs to be a limit on how far back in time it goes. OR a better ban appeal process for it.

Hell I'm 90% sure I have github access to tenebrix as back in the day it was linked to a tenebrix.org email address so I should be able to do a reset / recovery.

So outside of the fact that I just outed myself, how hard would it be for me to start playing games like that. Find old dead projects that people have linked to, get some domains and go to work screwing with people.

-Dave


This would likely be a well documented case if something used to be legit, and then turned into a malicious site. Bans aren't just handed out without doing research so there's definitely going to be some discussion on this point. Lets say that the staff member who issued a ban didn't see any evidence of this being legit back in the day, then I'm sure including this information within the ban appeal will solve the issue.

For example, if you owned a domain, and sold it off at some point, but still have links to it in your posts from when you owned it, and its suddenly turned into a malware site. You should be able to prove that the domain was moved on afterwards via domain records, and that might possibly help the situation. Being able to prove that you used to own a domain, and no longer do would probably result in the ban being removed in most instances.

At the moment there's been a lot of users getting banned for plagiarism that was posted a few years ago now that users have the tools to find this on a massive scale which is a good thing in my eyes. It has already been quoted in this thread, but theymos approves of banning anyone that has plagiarized in their post history no matter how far back.

Welsh,

I understand what you are saying, I really do get it. But using your own words above it's still only possibly / probably.
So yeah, odds are said user will get their account back after jumping through hoops. But, it's still going to be a process.


It's a bit of a sensitive topic for me because when the massive plagiarism bans came in the spring / early summer. Someone I know got a ban for plagiarizing their own work.
From back in May just replace spam / plagiarize with bad links:

They can appeal to mods or admins in private if they feel like they can't make their claim publicly.

Discussed that with him. Not interested in anyone knowing who he is IRL.
Not you, not theymos, not anyone. Only reason I know is because I have known him for 30+ 40+ (crap I'm old) years. And he is not real happy with the fact that I know his forum use or the fact that I am talking about it here. But, I think this discussion needs to exist.

The other issue would be that since he has almost no merit and a lower post count it's going to be tough to make a good defense.

Yes, it's a very rare 1 off case, but it's still there. And if I know 1 person who had it happen, I will bet you just about any amount there is at least one more.
Possibly they have had an issue with another forum member and this was a push they needed to leave.
Does their SO think they spend too much time on here and it's an internal excuse to leave?
Did they cash out 18 months ago when BTC was at $20k and just don't care as much?

Could they appeal? yes.
Do they want to? possibly.
Will they because of external factors? perhaps not, or at least not now.

As I said, spamming & plagiarizing now. You're out of here. Once it's over 1500 days old and has not been done since? Temp ban with stern warning or something.

Just my view, take it as you will.

-Dave


So yeah, many people have been banned, many people have gotten their accounts back. Some have been banned, and just walked away.

-Dave


6266  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Pools (Altcoins) / Re: merged mine on: September 18, 2019, 12:40:34 PM
can you help me with something
i try to see from were peseta coin ptc recevie so much haswpower


2 TH/s came from prohasing
and the rest they keep secret
i know for sure is merged mine pools

50 TH/ is a lot - for a coin with $5 a day volume


to rent 40 TH/s is 13 btc a day Roll Eyes

I assume you mean 40TH is $13 a day.

Since it is merged mined it could be anyone with their own p2pool node doing it in the background.

Could also be another small pool that is doing it. Also, now a 40TH of NEW miners is under $1000 USD used it's a lot lot less, if someone with free / cheap electricity wanted to do it it's not a large expense.

-Dave
6267  Other / Meta / Re: Is this concerning? This could be a conspiracy too. on: September 18, 2019, 11:47:35 AM
<snip>
2. Should a (some) very old post (posts) worth reporting unless it contains harmful contents like malware to download or phishing link etc (obviously both offense are ban worthy)
<snip>

There should be some kind of rule / limit to this.
The problem is that I can post a link today that is 100% legitimate. Be it for a miner firmware / altcoin wallet / pdf of useful phone numbers / whatever.
And over the years the domain it is linked to falls into the hands of a bad actor.
Case in point I now own roulettecoin.cc     https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=592251.0
and tenebrix.org      https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=45667.0

and a few others. These were legit projects with some following that more or less died.

If I go nuts and turn them into bitcoin stealing malware sites and then start reporting everyone in every thread that linked back to them for spreading malware it's going to cause a lot of people a lot of grief.

There needs to be a limit on how far back in time it goes. OR a better ban appeal process for it.

Hell I'm 90% sure I have github access to tenebrix as back in the day it was linked to a tenebrix.org email address so I should be able to do a reset / recovery.

So outside of the fact that I just outed myself, how hard would it be for me to start playing games like that. Find old dead projects that people have linked to, get some domains and go to work screwing with people.

-Dave
6268  Economy / Collectibles / Re: MESSAGE FROM GRAVITATE CASH OUT COINS NOW on: September 18, 2019, 12:56:19 AM
I'm unlucky. My two coins are simply empty.

Gravitate you are an asshole. Some pm to every user who paid for that brass crap would do. Not everyone sitting 24/7 on this board. I understand problems can happens. But you knew from round one what you was doing.

2016 I purchased this and today someone I gave it as a gift called to ask how to redeem them. They empty. Gift failed. Than fuck at least I have decency to pay them back and pretend everything is fine.


Good job. What a dick move.
This space is so shit. And yeah, if I met you I would tell you to your face what kind of douche you are.

Was the BTC moved from the coins or were they never funded?
If it was moved when was it moved?
Just trying to get a # of how many were not funded vs. breached.

-Dave

6269  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: DogeDraw - Dogecoin Lottery - Win upto 25x - (Faucet, Free DOGE & more) on: September 17, 2019, 12:53:29 PM
THIS IS MEGA IMPORTANT:
I looked at the headers of the email that I did get (blocked my address)
You are running PHPMailer 5.2.4 THIS IS AN OLD VERSION WITH MANY KNOWN EXPLOITS.

Check here and please update it. This is probably why I did not get it the 1st time. Many places are blocking old versions by default when they see vulnerable versions in the header.

https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-15729/product_id-32737/Phpmailer-Project-Phpmailer.html

You need to have your programmer fix this.

-Dave

Quote
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:04:19 +0000
To: Dave <***.***.***>
From: DogeDraw Admin <admin@dogedraw.com>
Subject: Please Activate Your Account At DogeDraw.com!
Message-ID: <f17c5545001132a0da329652b438290e@www.dogedraw.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.4 (http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/phpmailer/)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - shared.hostptc.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sharklasers.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dogedraw.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: shared.hostptc.com: authenticated_id: admin@dogedraw.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: shared.hostptc.com: admin@dogedraw.com
6270  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: DogeDraw - Dogecoin Lottery - Win upto 25x - (Faucet, Free DOGE & more) on: September 17, 2019, 12:07:08 PM
So:

1) For a small lottery site I'm not sure why you need my real name and an email address. Plenty of places do not ask for this.
2) Never got the email with the activation code. (going to a yahoo account I keep for stuff like this) I had to use a different one
3) The faucet page looks like some css is missing or something. Black text on the patterned background.

-Dave
6271  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: [DAILY FREE RAFFLE] 362nd JUST BECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD FREE BITCOIN on: September 17, 2019, 11:49:33 AM
8 DaveF

-Dave
6272  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🎲EOSBet.io - Licensed Casino Platform 🎲Provably Fair 🎲NOW ACCEPTING BTC ₿ on: September 16, 2019, 10:40:44 PM
EOSBet fantasy token investors lost 70% value of its investment!

This is huge! Cheesy


If you want to sue the investment scam artists behind EOSBet, please submit your loss to Game Protect?

As opposed to this person who lost 100% of the money he gave to you:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5183189.0

Are you ever going to respond to them or just keep trying to rip off other people to get money while promoting your casino that sells illegal lottery tickets.

-Dave

6273  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Raspberry Pi 4 performance on: September 16, 2019, 08:15:03 PM
Did the sync ever finish OK?
Also wondering if you ordered the cases or are doing anything else with the cooling. I'm still kicking around ideas for mine, none look great.

-Dave
6274  Other / Meta / Re: Percentage of Merit received on old posts, deleted posts, and average per post on: September 16, 2019, 02:58:05 PM

Can't we just pretend that this is like a contract that the local politicians are giving out. All I need to do is give DarkStar_ an envelope full of cash. (Or in this case an opendime stick) and I'm good to go.

Geez, this needing to be honest and useful to get something just feels so wrong compared to politics.

-Dave

6275  Other / Meta / Re: Reporter Statistics on: September 16, 2019, 01:40:25 PM
WooHoo finally got over 300.
Yeah I know I'm still a slacker compared to some of you, but I do report the ones I see.
Also, can now see the list of what has been done to the ones I reported.

-Dave
6276  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: The Hottest Commodity: Virgin Bitcoin on: September 16, 2019, 01:41:47 AM
Starting a PPS mining pool paying 105% isn't risky and people will quickly line up to sign up even if the variance would be high initially. Mining contracts could be used to jump-start the pool and lower the variance before enough people join.

In theory, if you have BTC that may be "tainted" and want "virgin" BTC all you really would have to do is use either https://www.nicehash.com/ or https://www.miningrigrentals.com/ or a similar service and rent hash and mine to a p2pool node.

Yeah, it has not found a block in ages but that is because of the lack of hash. If you went nuts and maxed out nicehash you could get ~325 PH/s between US & EU nodes.

Silly and probably pointless, but it could be done.

-Dave
6277  Economy / Gambling / Re: Blockchain Poker - Play Poker with Bitcoin (for free) on: September 15, 2019, 10:18:08 PM
This week the team deployed:
  • In-chat tournament notifications
  • BB-skipping prevention
  • Instant deposit detection (about 3-5x faster than before)

There were also a number of performance improvements deployed in preparation for MTTs.

Great to hear that it is being worked on.
I am still playing here regularly. You have put together a great poker product.
Happy that you are not just sitting there and saying "Good Enough"

-Dave
6278  Economy / Gambling / Re: [UPDATED + PROMO VIDEO]✅🎲"BITANTHILL" - Mobile cryptocurrency gaming platform🎲✅ on: September 15, 2019, 07:13:04 PM
Any updates? It's been a month since the video was posted and no more info.

Looking forward to PvP backgammon.

Was going to put in for the beta, but my work schedule would probably keep me from playing on a regular basis.

-Dave
6279  Economy / Computer hardware / [WTS] Antminer L3+ [US 48 only] $100 shipped OBO on: September 15, 2019, 05:21:25 PM
Antminer L3+
Yet again I'm selling something for one of my customers.
He is asking $100 shipped to you in the lower 48 states.
I tested it and it was working 100% before posting this.

Will test again and reset to default before shipping.

If you have any questions ask.








Thanks,
Dave
6280  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How using Tor Browser increases bitcoin theft? on: September 15, 2019, 02:59:24 PM
1) I use tor a lot

2) There is and continues to be an issue with:
   a) Malicious exit nodes. Yes, many people choose to say, it's safe but anyone with enough time and money can sniff all traffic and do a really good MITM attack with it.
   b) And I think this is the bigger issue. People not setting stuff up properly and getting bitten by that.

3) As said before tor is different the the tor browser but explaining that to people is very difficult. Hell, the brave browser has a "connect with new private window & TOR" option.

I'm going out on a limb and saying this is LBC doing a cover their ass thing.

"Oh, look you connected using TOR, it's your fault, you don't get your BTC back. Next ticket"
It could be preemptive or it could be, they have seen a greater number of issues with TOR users and don't want to deal with it anymore.

-Dave
Pages: « 1 ... 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 [314] 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 ... 386 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!