This is false equivalency horse shit people always trot out when shit like this happens, allowing this double standard to continue.

Taking some thing from some one's hand is not force (unless of course you have no rights to said property). Even if it was, a reasonable amount of force used to obtain your own property from some one with no rights to it is not a crime.

Also it should be noted the act began with Accostas resistance to the legal act of taking the microphone back, not the other way around. The first to initiate illegal force is quite relevant to any case of assault.

See you are just using circular logic. I say it is not easier. I give examples.

You say "If it was easier to kill it via other means why would all these mass shooters choose the harder way via guns?"

This is circular logic, you are just referencing your own unbased conclusion as the source for your logic.

My point is even if you waved a magic wand to make all the guns go poof, those shootings would magically transform into arsons, stabbings, bombings, etc. Murders don't happen because of inanimate objects. They happen because of intent. Furthermore those inanimate objects help protect people from all of this, so it is not as simple as "oh lets just get rid of that and the problems will be gone!"

I am very sorry your reading comprehension is so poor.

I say "Hey! This approval rating has this average rate of loss, and the Democrats did just that number" (a
you reply (unsourced I might add) saying essentially "Yeah but, if his approval rating were LOWER he would have lost less seats!"

It is "more impressive" because the example showed an approval rating HIGHER than Trump had, and the average was 33 seats

Trumps ACTUAL approval rating at the time of election was actually about 10 points lower, 40%... meaning that in spite of having an approval rating LOWER than used in the average calculation, he still maintained the same number of seats as in the average... meaning that the Dems actually had less than average gains for an incumbent with his approval ratings.

If you don't see the issue with your logic here by now, my explaining is not going to make anything better for you.

Either it was settled or dismissed, it can't be both. So I checked for myself. It was settled, because it was a FOIA suit, and the requested records simply did not exist, even though they were required to be created by law. Essentially the government had responsibilities under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that it was not meeting. This does in fact have serious implications.

https://eu.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2018/10/03/guthrie-center-county-iowa-fire-paige-exline-arson-murder-crime-nevada-homicide-kill-sexual-abuse-ia/1509016002/

If that is not a high enough count for you how about...

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/western-wildfires/arson-growing-concern-during-california-wildfire-season-n390561



Then there is this...

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/incidents/20130415a.html

and this...

http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/terrorism/incidents/20171031a.html


Your argument of "ease" is flawed. The fact is if people want to murder they will find a way. In the UK they banned guns, then knife crime want crazy. They banned knives, now they stab each other with screwdrivers. Then they FUCKING BANNED SCREWDRIVERS, or rather walking around with them on the street without just cause.

Your premise is flawed.

Ok, sit down Timmy and I will explain it for you in simple words.

Orange man bad right? Ok so orange man, have approval under 45% yes?

Which is harder for orange man to keep more seats than past times of keeping seats, if orange man have 45% approval or 50% approval?

lower approval than what I stated with average results = even more impressive for Republicans (IE not an argument in support of your point)



At this point if you don't know how to add and subtract I am not sure I can help you any more than this.

That is a wonderful whataboutism you have there. I don't know if anyone has taught you but, words are different than actions, and women throwing themselves at you because you are rich is different than assault. You keep sticking with those talking points though, they are clearly working for you.

I want everyone here to pay close attention how as one of the most epic traps in our history is set, and the hapless targets, full of hubris walk right into it.

Over the next year or so you are going to see a lot of things unfold. There are going to be lots of serious high level indictments made public, prosecutions, as well as military tribunals of many high level people within, and formerly within our government. Everything you have been watching unfold over the last few years is as a result of this. Every circus, every freak show, they were all symptoms of some very powerful, and very corrupt people being systematically stripped of their influence and leverage over society.

As far as they are concerned either they have control or no one will, and they will burn as much down on the way out as they can to prevent this. That is why this has taken so long. A lot of you have been wondering why these prosecutions didn't start right away. This is why. They needed to be stripped of the ability to seriously harm the nation. At this point, this has been done to a large degree, but they will still attempt to do so, primarily via trying to instigate civil war and mass panic.

All this election fraud, it was expected, and part of the plan. The pattern of election fraud has been well documented, only this time there were people watching close and documenting the act. The mid terms were a trap, and they just stepped right in it...

Common core is specifically designed to break the critical thinking skills of children and teach them to use collectivist thought.

I see! So is the turn out for Republicans more impressive or less impressive if you use lower approval rating? lol. Good job arguing against yourself and understanding simple addition and subtraction.

No, I know how to do research. You do not. That's why every time you do this I am going to demand a source until you learn. You know why? You are making the claim so the burden of proof is on you. Show me the proof, or keep jibbering about nothing like you always do.

Instead of just making cutesy comments how about you source your reference? We have been over this 1000 times. How do you expect anyone to take your opinions seriously if you can't even source or explain them in your own words?

Ok, so, you have some Russian hackers here allegedly. Now please explain, where does the collusion with Trump line up?

LOL. K.

"Average result, since 1970, for President’s Party in midterm when job approval is below 50% - 33 seat loss"

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-midterm-elections-preview/



Seats gained? 33

https://www.politico.com/election-results/2018/house/

Congrats Democrats, you get a C. Maybe a C+ if you do the extra credit. The blue wave star sticker goes to people who get A's.

You don't really believe that. If you do you are pretty ignorant. It doesn't even cost anything to start a fire if you do it right. No one is handing out free guns. Gasoline is cheap. There is a reason we have fire codes... because populated buildings on fire can be very lethal, and spread quickly.

Also, everyone thinks of a clock with a radio and a beeping timer when they think of IEDs. You can build an IED out of a light bulb and some gasoline. If people want to kill people they can do it no matter what you write down and call law.

Lets break it down for the slower bluer folks here...



1. Does he have a RIGHT to be present at this press conference?

-No.



2. Did he have an opportunity to ask a question?

-Yes. Nothing entitles him to have more questions answered immediately.



3. Was the microphone his property?

-No. The microphone did not belong to him.



4. Does the custodian of property have the right to deprive that property from some one with no rights to it?

-Yes.


5. What is the legal and technical definition of using force in an attempt to prevent some one from doing some thing they are legally entitled to do?

-Assault.


6. Should he be prosecuted for assault?

-No, this is only some thing retards on the left say in order to build the most extremist narrative possible here in order to distract from the fact that he shouldn't have behaved that way regardless of the law.


7. Are people really that upset about what Jim Acosta did?

-Most people wouldn't stop to piss on Jim Acosta if he was on fire. No one cares about him except when he makes himself a nuisance. People are pissed because this is a BLATANT AND OPEN demonstration of the double standards the media has for the left vs the right. If the roles were reversed here and it was a conservative reporter and a liberal staffer they would be LOSING THEIR FUCKING MINDS and it would be on the 24 hour media loop for months.


8. Any of you remember this?

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHGfyrvRK0Y



In short, this is why the left has no more credibility. At least on the right, you can expect people to do things conservatives do. The left has no substance, is unpredictable, extremist, and does not follow any rules, even the ones they make.

I literally answered your question in this post, but you didn't stop frothing at the mouth long enough to actually read it. Loving the personal attacks in the reputation section because you can't handle a legitimate debate too.

"True believers" are the most dangerous type of opponent, especially when they are wrong. That is part of why post modernism/Marxism is such a cancer. People present a narrative of victim-hood in order to justify the victimization of others, in order to get "equality" by taking some thing from others. This then creates a cycle of even more victims then looking for more people to "justifiably" victimize.

The worst part is since they think this is all for the greater good they fight with that much more vigor. Then when confronted with facts that demonstrate they are really supporting systems that result in everything they claim to hate, they can't handle it then bury their head in the sand, and get EVEN MORE extremist in a vain attempt to double down to create enough emotional noise to ignore this reality.

With an indicting argument like that, who needs 2+ years of investigation? Back to the kids table with you, I hurry along, I hear they have butterscotch pudding! OOOOo better get some before its gone!




While I agree with the OP, Spendulus does have a point here. It is kind of like religion. Maybe their religion is all people with brown hair are evil. You don't have to believe in it, but if you have brown hair, and enough people do, it still effects you. The same is true with the religion of post modernism/Marxism that has captivated the left.

"Re: Trump for Noose - Tax Fraud"

Since when do they hang people for tax fraud anyway? Good luck with your endless diversion from facts.