I did a left and a right version. Everything is now in the original gallery link.

[edit: I am going to redo it because I don't particularly like these results, seem a bit off. The new ones will be in the gallery ]

Birds of a feather? You will also notice the key difference between your comparison is "you" ie one man, and "you guys" a group of people engaging in mob behavior. Of course lets gloss over this so you can create a sense of false equivalency. I treat you this way because... it is how you treat other people and you don't deserve any extra effort on my part for niceties that will give no results anyway.

Putting me on ignore is the smartest thing you have done yet, because every time you come at me you end up looking like an even bigger ass. You are in positions of authority. People are going to criticize you. Deal with it.

Find me an example of the pacman style and I will do it too.

Well then perhaps instead of insinuating it is proof of some kind of dishonest behavior, you should admit this is what you judged your OPINION of him on. I have watched you and others endlessly ride these conflicts as if they themselves are proof of wrong doing simply because he reacted badly to being accused. This to me is just more evidence of the mobbing behavior you partake in.

P.S. Everyone take note of those attack dogs closing ranks with their own inquisition on anyone who dares question their behavior.

Is this what you mean?

      


https://imgur.com/a/GBy0IMT

Am I wrong? You seem to be doing a pretty good job proving your own Barney Fife credentials right now.

I modified the image so all the complicit cheerleaders can feel better about their complicity.







So this small group of people are our saviors now? The sky would most certainly fall without you here to save us. Could have fooled me. Yeah Theymos, lock the thread quick before people start realizing we aren't the minority.

Because as a knee jerk cheerleader for these people, I see you as no different. Is that not how you scambusters do it? Guilt via association? The point remains regardless of the fact it applies more closely to people you support, such as by making this post to begin with.

Set up a self moderated thread with posted rules that it is for new users only.

You don't get it Jet. The trust system was built on a foundation of mould.



Imagine if you will some one mass tagging people all day long obsessive compulsively with little to no research put into each rating. Lots of people complain, but you are so focused on how much "good" you do, you deem it inconsequential to listen to any complaints and instead opt to mock and further harass the people making a complaint regardless of how politely they go about it. Because this entertains you, you force them to grovel before you for with arbitrary acts the whole time knowing they will never be free of you because might makes right, and they have none. [ops face when]





You are doing it right now by pretending these posts are proof of anything. I looked them all over carefully and I see proof of nothing except a pattern of behavior of a coordinated group of individuals with power in the trust system (including you) attempting to force compliance with their demands via means of manufacturing the appearance of wrong doing systematically over an over again as punishment for refusing to comply.

I have seen it with my own eyes before, you aren't fooling me with this horse shit. There is no proof, but you know if you say it enough times stupid lazy ass kissers will buy the lies. One less voice of dissent with a reputation to be heard in the way. Dismiss the rest as scammers. Rinse and repeat.

Limits for thee, but no limits for me.

I anyone else seeing a theme of people who disagree changing the subject to other peripheral issues? I wonder why...

I think more importantly this demonstrates the "logic" of the left.

- You make a legal statement I don't like.

- I can not control myself as a result. You are at fault for me not being able to control myself.

- End the ability to have free speech because I might not be able to control myself.

- If you do not comply to my demands I will be able to control myself even less and will become violent.

- When it comes time for accountability for my actions I will be absolved because you provoked me by having opinions I can not resist reacting with violence to

- this is all your fault

- I don't like when you point out the contradictions in my reasoning

- repeat step 1

As soon as Maduro is gone. He is like the meth addict cousin you can't leave alone in your house because everything of value will go missing.

In the case of members who actually do have a reputation, their only strategy is to attempt to diminish that with accusations and mobbing, because that is all they know how to do. They are used to being able to dismiss every complaint as a scammer or an alt, and in a constant mindset of either you do way I say or you are a scammer or supporting scams, not because I have proof, but because I said so. This is why we need a standard of evidence for rating.

What gives you or anyone else the right to attempt to harass or intimidate him into compliance with ratings you demand? None of this is any proof of wrong doing, just more simplistic guilt via association and guilt because he didn't immediately acquiesce to your demands for compliance. Like a cop arresting some one for resisting arrest screaming "STOP RESISTING" as you hit them and kneel on his neck as he tries to breathe handcuffed.

It is circular logic. Your authority is your mandate and your mandate is your authority. Do what I say or else.

I think you should give up your home and let some Mexican family move in instead since you feel so strongly about this.

So who is being nasty and emotionally charged? Interesting you blame them for some how evoking that by their mere presence, but the people actually acting out the nasty and emotionally charged part are some how not at fault, but the boys are for "reasons". Essentially now your argument is if you are under 18 you have no right to have an opinion and express it in public?

Who says they were used, you? Just because they support a cause you don't agree with they are automatically guilty and deserve everything that happened right? Wearing a MAGA hat is only provocative to lunatics that can't handle people who have differing opinions than them, and then attempt to attack or shame them into compliance like the street thug brown shirts you are.

You make lots of assumptions about these kids, their beliefs, how they came to them, their parents, but not once do you address the racial slurs hurled at them, the attempts at intimidating them, the threats of violence, or the media lies to cover it up. It is almost like the left never takes any responsibility for its actions instead opting to instead continue to threaten children with violence rather than admit they were lied to and they made a mistake.

This whole event was a textbook example of the "cry bully" tactics of the left, and the media literally willing to put children at risk of violence just to get some more views and support their own political bias. You keep pretending like these kids did anything wrong. Keep exposing yourselves for the unhinged lunatics indiscriminately lashing out desperately seeking any vessel for your hatred while you simultaneously project that image onto your opponent to absolve yourself of any guilt over it.

It is really easy to just claim it is obvious. Interesting though, any time people ask for sources there never seems to be any actual empirical data behind it... just models, simulations, and theories.

Not seeing anything proving dishonesty there... I see lots of accusations from people with ulterior motives though.