Added average profitability last 24. Working on net hash rates and total market depth.
|
|
|
A few things:
1. Would it be possible to show current network hashrate for each of the coins? That info would be AWESOME for judging overall coin health but may be a bit out of scope to coinchoose (if you do it, a graph like you have of the prices would be the cat's meow).
2. What about total market voume trade (in BTC) for each of the coins over the past 24 hours? Another crucial bit of info in deciding which coin to mine.
3. Total coin marketcap would be a valuable one to see too... not as crucial as the first too.
The FTC fiasco fallout and cleanup should be fun. I'm mining DGC myself.
Yes to all three. Hashrate is what I am looking at adding next (once I verify I have a good way of finding it). ahemm Really?? CCE getnetworkhash API which has parameters for interval blocks and total number of blocks back from current. In THREE selectable output types. Soon with the ability to to use time instead of blocks and accurately calculate POS/POW chains. For those coins that I use CCE's blockexplorer - I am already there Just figuring out the non-CCE currencies
|
|
|
A few things:
1. Would it be possible to show current network hashrate for each of the coins? That info would be AWESOME for judging overall coin health but may be a bit out of scope to coinchoose (if you do it, a graph like you have of the prices would be the cat's meow).
2. What about total market voume trade (in BTC) for each of the coins over the past 24 hours? Another crucial bit of info in deciding which coin to mine.
3. Total coin marketcap would be a valuable one to see too... not as crucial as the first too.
The FTC fiasco fallout and cleanup should be fun. I'm mining DGC myself.
Yes to all three. Hashrate is what I am looking at adding next (once I verify I have a good way of finding it). hashrate doesnt work for PoS networks . It eliminates PoS blocks from security and health estimation. PPC has +80% of PoS blocks. it would be super secure on 0 hashrate. My fault, I should have been clearer. I was just stating my concerns about a site that would put up a network hash rate that cannot be accurate. Just to take caution with the rest of their numbers... Anyway, I am basically going to get around the POS/POW problem by setting up an extra database that will contain the POW difficulty for every block since its implementation. The explorers on CCE update every block when the daemon trips the blocknotify script. I will add the process of getting the POW difficulty for the block currently being mined, along with a couple of other bits of information. This should allow for an accurate hash rate calculation. The extra information is to allow the users of the getnetworkhash API to use time or blocks when defining how they want the network hash calculated.As of now the API only allows for blocks. Is this thing on? Can people see my posts?? As long as POW blocks are being produced there is a hash rate. My plan does not elimate the POS blocks, but rather uses what the POW difficulty of a POS block would have been had it been solved via POW vs, POS. Thereby counting POS blocks in the calculation. [/quote] yes - it is on. I am watching to see as I know I want to get up the net hash rate, but am seeing what you figure out
|
|
|
A few things:
1. Would it be possible to show current network hashrate for each of the coins? That info would be AWESOME for judging overall coin health but may be a bit out of scope to coinchoose (if you do it, a graph like you have of the prices would be the cat's meow).
2. What about total market voume trade (in BTC) for each of the coins over the past 24 hours? Another crucial bit of info in deciding which coin to mine.
3. Total coin marketcap would be a valuable one to see too... not as crucial as the first too.
The FTC fiasco fallout and cleanup should be fun. I'm mining DGC myself.
Yes to all three. Hashrate is what I am looking at adding next (once I verify I have a good way of finding it).
|
|
|
FTC is showing 220% profit when it is actually broken and gives 0% - FTC forked into multiple chains and every big pool is on a different chain, [ftcpool, coinotron, give-me-ftc, wemineftc]
Bitbar is showing 0 reward, while giving 0.16 BTB
BitBar is now fixed. SO, basically, I should remove Feathercoin?
|
|
|
i am so happy that coinchoose is down
Good for you. You hate people having information. Site is back up.
|
|
|
Hi!! I see you properly read diff of bitbar, but completely lost block reward. you can make and easy workaround: Calculate reward = 1/(diff/0,000244140625)^(1/6) ; and your problems will go forever. coin.block_reward = COIN / pow(coin.difficulty, 0.16666667) Also, You can set default sort to adjusted diff, because it is awesome! Thank You for this great site. That calc leads to a block reward of around .61, but I believe it is .16.
|
|
|
FYI - YaCoin is CoinChoose resilient. Guess why?
I think I remember seeing it listed once very shortly and the profitability was like 300% but maybe I was just seeing things. Yep. Can't mine it with a GPU so it was delisted
|
|
|
It should be back up. Sorry for inconvenience as CoinChoose was DoSed
|
|
|
FYI - YaCoin is CoinChoose resilient. Guess why?
|
|
|
It should be back up. Sorry for inconvenience as CoinChoose was DoSed
|
|
|
imagine all the babies crying right now because of this
Because some immature little whiny people decide to destroy a free service? Look, all I present is data. People who fear data are losers, for lack of a better term. I am never going to charge anyone and all data is verifiable. I will look at sweeping the data to Google Docs so it is free dude with your stupid service people pump and dump.. what good is that! I am so glad this site is down! pump and dump is market manipulation on exchanges, it has almost nothing to do with switching from coin to coin based on profitability. Miners by definition sell coins, they don't pump (buy) then dump (sell). If you believe people waited for coinchoose to switch from coin to coin based on profitability you are sorely mistaken. To give you an example, I only have one command to launch and 3 config files to edit for adding a new coin to my setup. This includes automatically compiling the coin daemon from the git repository, adding an init script for it and launching it. My setup then distributes the configuration to the rigs needed to solo-mine and adapts to the new coin. It parses the exchanges rates, uses the local daemon to find out the actual mean reward including fees, computes an estimation of the orphan rate and fine-tune it from the rate of orphan my rigs mine. When the data is in it starts to switch rigs to the coin if it is the most profitable for a rig (it uses the sha256d and scrypt efficiency of each rig to make this decision). I'm even warned when: - the coin becomes popular enough that solo-mining becomes gambling so that I configure P2Pool for this coin or create a pool account,
- the original git repo is updated
- the coin is dying and may be removed from my configuration
I don't use coinchoose anymore (I did briefly as a source for exchange rates but I prefer to develop more elaborate decision algorithms) so if you think DoSing coinchoose will prevent people from switching from coin to coin, it's only true for the less serious miners that don't/can't code a dynamic setup like mine. Linking coinchoose to pump and dump is simply ridiculous. This is exactly what I mean. Mine is just the basic info and I am glad to see people developing more sophisticated methods!
|
|
|
Either do something that doesn't cause some idiot to do a DoS or some technical protection. We have CloudFlare but don't pay for the full service which has DoS protection.
Right $200 for a month. If we get the $200, will you throw it behind that tier for a month. Yes
|
|
|
All I was doing was presenting the data that also is still out there.What is really concerning is people like you who don't want people to have that information.
People pump and dump on their own (I have nothing to do with what price they sell for)
|
|
|
imagine all the babies crying right now because of this
Because some immature little whiny people decide to destroy a free service? Look, all I present is data. People who fear data are losers, for lack of a better term. I am never going to charge anyone and all data is verifiable. I will look at sweeping the data to Google Docs so it is free
|
|
|
Either do something that doesn't cause some idiot to do a DoS or some technical protection. We have CloudFlare but don't pay for the full service which has DoS protection.
|
|
|
We are under a DoS right now. Idiots. As a result, site is down and likely will be done forever
|
|
|
|