|
en fait c'est très différent, vostok est un gros coup qui pourrait réussir, mais on ne nous donne qu'un strapontin, sauf si on souscrit de gros fonds par ailleurs.
à priori il faut garder et voir, une fois faite l'airdrop.
waves seul est relatif à l'usage individuel, peut décrocher un peu après l'airdrop AMHA, mais pas tellement, et se reprendra sans doute assez vite..
de toute façon soyons objectif, particuliers et entreprises ne peuvent être dans le même bassin; mais auront une même technologie.
|
|
|
|
Merci pour les infos Estenity, serais-tu me dire le nombre de rounds pour Vostok,
le token est à 1.20 usd wow, connais-tu le ratio wawes, wct = ? Vosok
pour le nombre de rounds, voir sur le site vostok.io ou vostokone.io les porteurs de waves et de wct recoivent par airdrop des tokens VST debut avril dans chaque wallet contenant au moins 1 waves ou 1 wct au total 30 M VST pour 100 M de waves et 10 M de wct (3% du total des VST) sasha considere que c'est le remboursement des fonds apportés à l'ico de waves. ça fait un ratio d'environ 0,33 (pour la moyenne des jetons détenus depuis début février) parce que les waves et wct détenus dans les exchanges ne reçoivent rien. on peut prévoir le montant de l'airdrop par adresse waves sur vostok.wavesplatform.com |
|
|
|
le prix de l'ICO était btc 0,00005
maintenant nous avons 0,00035477 BTC (2,44%), soit bien plus.
et maintenant les smart contracts.
0.0006944 presque x2 depuis  oui c'est bien, mais la crise globale du marché n'en finit pas malgré une stabilisation assez longue. pendant ce temps waves se perfectionne, et les dev sont tres actifs, en particulier vostok en est à son second round de financement à 0,60 et maintenant 1,20 usd par jeton, et me semble témoigner de l'applicabilité industrielle et/ou institutionelle du modèle. le mécanisme est celui de waves, donc l'intérêt s'élargit. bon, on attend tranquillement pendant que les eaux du monde sont brassées. |
|
|
|
|
seems still alive, any reason ?
|
|
|
|
Blocked for no reason account.
maybe they will try to recover their clients one by one? from a new doctrine ? their chief maybe has changed ? would be a fairy tale. |
|
|
|
Anonymous based coins are always subject to regulation issues, it's just the nature of them. I wouldn't be confident in them for being a long term investment.
They're all going to be expunged from authorised exchanges eventually but that certainly won't mean they're worthless. It's going to be very interesting to observe where they settle and grow once it's clear that's going to happen. why would anybody need centralized exchanges ? because they're not oxymorons label and function are two different things. |
|
|
|
Anonymous based coins are always subject to regulation issues, it's just the nature of them. I wouldn't be confident in them for being a long term investment.
They're all going to be expunged from authorised exchanges eventually but that certainly won't mean they're worthless. It's going to be very interesting to observe where they settle and grow once it's clear that's going to happen. why would anybody need centralized exchanges ? |
|
|
|
what is interesting in waves client is using easily decentralized gateways and a few tokens like wct, other stuff looks of very limited interest. maybe https://h2ox.io/, based on waves, will succeed. we shall see. Just had a look at the siteyou posted and it woke up my curiosity: would like to lease my waves to their node but have a question regarding the following advice I read there IMPORTANT !
You have to verify the address you are leasing from!
What actions should I perform to verify my waves address? this site has been recommended by a tweet of sasha on february 26th, so I suppose it is legitimate. https://twitter.com/sasha35625you have nothing special to do to verify the leasing address, only read twice the spelling to assume it is correctly written. it is much more easy with the alias, which is much shorter. original tweet reference was: https://twitter.com/H2OXio/status/1100438906091257856the h2ox.io site seems to be down just now. |
|
|
|
The artificial dump was fun, the organic rise that is coming next will be glorious.  This is Bitcoin. This is a our new Bull Market. Embrace the action. Boredom will never be our fate. When the dump happened I wondered if we would see a huge BSV rise soon after... I kind of wish I had posted when I thought it so I'd look extra geniusy. But I am wondering if the big seller(s) might not be a BSV insider? yes you were right..BSV rebounds violently... |
|
|
|
It will be interesting to see how the implementation of SECOR (uncle mining) affects the price & volume of MSR. Will the tech actually help or does marketing play more of a role in influencing movements? MSR will indeed make a good case study to those wise enough to watch it. I suppose the next few days will paint the story in either direction. when does it occur ? |
|
|
|
What is this LuckyCoins 777 ? You can't send it, can't sell it unless in units of 1000, and I see only the address issuing it has sold any (correct me if I'm wrong)
The coin ID is ELzPGDcDofrJPkp1WurDhDfo7X8HPinyw6Ls9FYGvWKX
Greetings. This is a Smart Asset. You can identify them by checking whether they have <> in their logo. The issuer set some requirements in regard to trading and transfer operations by using his asset. You can read asset's description to check more details concerning this asset or check its script here https://nodes.wavesnodes.com/api-docs/index.html with assets/details/{assetId}?full=trueMost probably, this is a scam attempt to ask you to buy more in exchange for provided opportunity to place an ask order. Sincerely, Waves Community Manager so this is the beginning of an explanation (though complex) , thank you. however from now i will take a distance from ALL smart contracts. |
|
|
|
Getting bombed with fake scam smart contract airdrops on waves dex. They cant be transfered and they cant be sold, dont get caught buying ANY smart contracts on waves they are all scams. The first one surge was real but the rest are all scams
That is big concern they should have to implement something to get rid off from scam projects. This kind of project will build bad image of this platform we need legit project like on ETH than it will get real attention. Waves is a fantastic platform and smart contracts is a strong addition, but the smart contract airdrops Im afraid will lure people in to smart contracts that only let people buy but never sell at any price Airdrops is a nice way to attract people to watch their projects. But it's always important that people do their own investigation before they want to buy am token from the dex. That also for those smart contract airdrops. each other doing his investigation supposes easy access to "currencies" related documents. why not publish a "reference site" with their main characteristics? I cant find any site with info on some of these smart contract airdrops. my suggestion was to create one. maybe better than to put a short info in DEX. this is for "small" contracts; evidently any contract of importance must have its own site (which must be properly referenced). |
|
|
|
Getting bombed with fake scam smart contract airdrops on waves dex. They cant be transfered and they cant be sold, dont get caught buying ANY smart contracts on waves they are all scams. The first one surge was real but the rest are all scams
That is big concern they should have to implement something to get rid off from scam projects. This kind of project will build bad image of this platform we need legit project like on ETH than it will get real attention. Waves is a fantastic platform and smart contracts is a strong addition, but the smart contract airdrops Im afraid will lure people in to smart contracts that only let people buy but never sell at any price Airdrops is a nice way to attract people to watch their projects. But it's always important that people do their own investigation before they want to buy am token from the dex. That also for those smart contract airdrops. each other doing his investigation supposes easy access to "currencies" related documents. why not publish a "reference site" with their main characteristics? |
|
|
|
does it exist any relation between BLK and BAY currencies outside of the same dev dzimbeck ?
The only relation was I started with BitHalo and needed an altcoin for speed concerns. So I chose BLK because it was the only POS coin that was 100% POS since Peercoin was POS+POW. Later on I took BitBay because it was the first normal looking project I was offered and my projects were free open source ones and I didn't really hold a big position in BLK. The rest as they say, is history. I still maintain the BitHalo and BlackHalo code base. The majority of any blockchain improvements I do are here though... such as the peg. thank you for clarification |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
