I was thinking just keep a record of the last thing each person said. Perhaps resetting it to their name when they log in to the server.
Ok. What about if a player has not spoke in an hour. Should i have a cut off time back to a blank string / their name? No, why? A user can use the same seed if they feel lucky or whatever. It just needs to be really provably fair and everyone can verify.
|
|
|
I am offering to pay for legally binding arbitration. You choose any reputable service, I pay for it if it's within the general price range. I suggest judge.me. Since you apparently never heard of it, try Google.
If I am here to scam, ask yourself why I would have reported a serious security vulnerability of a popular bitcoin site instead of running away with the coins. Or thousands traded with PayPal, 0 chargebacks. And spending way more time I'm compensated with getting my investors a good return on their funds.
|
|
|
I wouldn't trust the testimony in a necro'd thread of a confirmed scammer.
If it weren't for the numerous similar allegations, I would have doubts also. Have you read the tradefortress review thread? After having dealt with this scammer firsthand and read the numerous other stories that recount almost the exact same modus operandi, it's a safe bet that he intends to continue scamming forum users with offers of programming services he is incompetent to perform. How about more proof that hearsay? He is offering to make it work so let him or are you really like the Ebayers filing complaints just to get partial refunds because they can? Sorry but "I said, they said" doesn't cut it. Competitors CAN and WILL trash the competition for gain, I have experienced it personally.Proof: 1. Notarized statements from your other "experts". 2. Let a third party agreed upon by both you and Tradefortress examine the product in question. 3. Find a solution Thanks for your comments. @MPT, I will pay for legally binding arbination. Sounds good?
|
|
|
I can see a new thread from MoneyPakTrader when BFL ships:
"I accidently dropped my Butterfly Labs ASIC miner, I am refusing a RMA from BFL, I demand keeping it and getting a full BTC refund even with a price rally"
My new offer is paying for legally binding arbination. Funny how he's quiet now.
|
|
|
Any more refunds or is it just a token gesture?
|
|
|
How was this issue resolved? It looks like TF is in the process of scamming me and several other people using his minimal Coding skills. He took 27 BTC from me (I'm asking/waiting for a refund from him). A scammer tag could prevent others from giving him more BTC for unusable/shitty web development.
You do realize that this person has a scammer tag, and that I haven't scammed him or you? I'm sorry that the development time was longer & the experience wasn't working out of the box (even through it would have if you used the latest version of PHP & bitcoind), but that's not because of "shitty web development", more of issues with your configuration which i won't go over again and again. However, I have to say I suspect MoneyPakTrader is motivated by attempting to (and he will not) getting more money than he actually paid me with a free long on BTC. You went from asking if you owe me more to full refund to 16 BTC refund to 12 BTC refund. It's called trying to see how much you can get. I actually have suspicions that you edited the files to make the deposits *not* working after I've tested it to be (blockchain doesn't lie), but since you've locked me out of cPanel I can't check the timestamps. So what would I offer to resolve this? Simple, get the site working. but I suspect you're not interested in getting the site working, rather closing your retroactive long on Bitcoin/USD and fucking with the script.
|
|
|
Interesting post. However, I myself have also looked into this, and noted that
1) The current rally started around January the 15th
2) All news posts you link in your article are from February, some of which are only 1 day old: Hosting.co.uk : Feb 15 Btc ATM: Feb 25 Internet Archive: Feb 21 Mega: Feb 13 Reddit: Feb 16 Namecheap: Feb 20 HumbleBundle (saying they WON'T accept BTC): Feb 26 FrankDomains: Feb 26
3) Setting up an account on MtGox and transfering money there so you can start buying BTCs takes from 2 to 3 weeks.
Therefore, we can safely say that this rally was not caused by the "widespread bitcoin adoption". Maybe the reverse is true, but who knows. What is true is that given the big influx of BTC news this february, we should expect more players to enter the market around next month, but who knows if that will drive the price up or down.
I think it's quite likely that people who have insider knowledge of X service accepting Bitcoin started the rally beforehand. Kim Dotcom for example.
|
|
|
Maybe this is answered in previous 100 pages of posts... Why can't they use https://btct.co/ ? No one really trusts btct.co. I'd rather see it on BitFunder. Curious why you believe BitFunder is trustworthy and BTCT.CO is not? Security is probably a good reason.
|
|
|
Oh no, another overpriced heap of plastic that I want nothing to do with being shoved in my face which will be obsolete yet again in a couple of years >_<
p.s. I fucking called this years ago, they'll be bringing out the Xbox 720 soon to compete
I'll put a bitcoin on them naming it just the Xbox.
|
|
|
US Quantitative Easing tends to increase commodities prices, so this might benefit the bitcoin price.
|
|
|
Your open orders (manual processing)
1 mctobtc (2013-02-25 15:25:00)
Not exactly what I would like to put coins into.
|
|
|
Where are your BTC tied up?
|
|
|
In addition, I suggest you contact Obsi. He may be able to help you with adding interest to your depositor's funds.
|
|
|
When I looked at it I knew there's probably some credit union starting with q, and yes there is: qcu.org
|
|
|
What's the total amount of assets loaned to Bakewell? What is it for - shorting?
The loan is: 5906 BTC-BOND 59 bASIC-MINING 7,737 G.SDICE Were they loaned to him personally or to his mining company (makes no odds as far as default risk is concerned - if he's going to scam he'll obviously scam the company too)? The loan was personal and should not be related to his mining company. You are aware of Bakewell's rather large loan request on BTC Jam right; is this related?
Also are you are keeping the ASICMiner shares for the dividends or would you potentially lend/liquidate them? Yes, this is the same loan! I see a lot of potential in ASICMINER, especially with selling ASICs to the public after the difficulty / ASICs market stabilizes. It will be kept for the dividends, but may be sold depending on the P/E and future prospects.
|
|
|
I don't like how the domain is just an iframe to the actual server. Try setting nameservers up instead of using your registrar's redirect function or whatever.
|
|
|
Hi TradeFortress!! I PM'd you a loan request. Are you still accepting applicants?
Thanks much! Nice try, marketersales. I have received quite substantial verification from OrangeVonPurple.
|
|
|
We'd like to offer a new BTC loan, however with the asset lending to ianbakewell we're a bit short on funds. Right now is a pretty good time to buy some bonds
|
|
|
|