Is it going to be run by the national governmetn? I heard it was going to be all local and privately run and basically like an extension of the credit system we have in the us but not just based on money. I don't like any credit rating system but this sounds better to me than what we have. more equitable.
Yep, that's exactly how the rest of the world describes that Communist dictatorship... "equitable" |
|
|
|
LOL invaded LOL the brown people are coming!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you know what domestic means?
This is gonna be sooooooooooo awesome!
I am "brown people." Do you know what sovereignty means? Yeah, its pretty funny. These guys don't even have any idea who they are talking to. Probably the same kind of people that would unironically call a black man a white supremacist to his face. Another question, are any of you even from the USA? |
|
|
|
....
hey retard, you're still wrong.
Look at the definition you link, a pipe bomb does not meet that definition; so go fuck yourself you retard.
Yes, it does meet the definition, (2)(A). (2) the term “weapon of mass destruction” means— (A) any destructive device as defined in section 921 of this title; What else would you like to be corrected on? Hey fuck face; look at section 921 -- (4) The term “destructive device” means— (A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas— (i) bomb, (ii) grenade, (iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (v) mine, or (vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses; (B) any type of weapon by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and (C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled. Also, counter-argument to "destructive device": The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon; any device, although originally designed for use as a weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic, line throwing, safety, or similar device; surplus ordnance sold, loaned, or given by the Secretary of the Army pursuant to the provisions of section 4684(2), 4685, or 4686 of title 10; or any other device which the Attorney General finds is not likely to be used as a weapon, is an antique, or is a rifle which the owner intends to use solely for sporting, recreational or cultural purposes. == Literally all the AG (which is Trump appointed) is say "not destructive" and it's not a WMD dumbass, which legally, it's classification is barely a destructive device, in a well argued and well funded lawsuit. But otherwise, it's just a pipe bomb. It amazes me how often he argues agains't his own points and doesn't even realize it until later. Or maybe I give him too much credit. |
|
|
|
|
I already explained in detail above why compressed gas fuels are more dangerous than liquid fuels such as gasoline. If you can't understand why fuel under pressure is more dangerous than fuel in liquid form at atmospheric pressure, then I do not know what to tell you.
|
|
|
|
Lol. It's crazy how wrong you guys are about pretty much everything. It's kinda cool having my own personal trolls though. Spendulus and TECSHARE both have their points refuted multiple times, yet they call "me" the idiot. It's pretty obvious these guys are concern trolls. Finding the MSDS is pretty easy; you literally just google element name + "msds". Gasoline:  Many dangerous, no breath, keep away from so spark. Wow! So now you are saying liquid gasoline is safer? That... is exactly what we have been arguing. Thanks for going full circle with your retardation. |
|
|
|
retarded memes
The fact that you think the pipe bombs were fake shows the image is more FAKE NEWS. Oh really? Can you tell me then why he wasn't charged with building "weapons of mass destruction" which is a standard charge any time some one builds a FUNCTIONAL explosive device? Go back and listen to that FBI statement carefully... eh maybe not you, but anyone else with a 8th grade level of science education or more. because a pipe bomb isn't a weapon of mass destruction you fucking tard. God, I swear anyone with an IQ over 50 could tell you that, but nah, you consume more of your fake news koolaid you moron. I swear to god, anyone that takes this retard seriously is an idiot. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/842Fucking 2 min to find the actual law violation. That's cute how you reported my post as off topic to make it look like I didn't just post that link  you might want to check the federal definition of "weapon of mass destruction" https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2332a#c_2None of your arguments invalidate the reality of all those listed leftist attacks though however, even IF they were correct (they aren't). |
|
|
|
retarded memes
The fact that you think the pipe bombs were fake shows the image is more FAKE NEWS. Oh really? Can you tell me then why he wasn't charged with building "weapons of mass destruction" which is a standard charge any time some one builds a FUNCTIONAL explosive device? Go back and listen to that FBI statement carefully... eh maybe not you, but anyone else with a 8th grade level of science education or more. |
|
|
|
@TEC, by a few years ago, did you mean two years ago, around the time Trump took office? This is around the time Antifa became openly active.
Yes, Exactly. Now you are going to tell me that the words he used incited ANTIFA to violence therefore he is responsible, while ignoring hundreds of calls for violence on the left since then, as well as increasing, regular violence from the left. That damn Trump, upsetting people so much they get violent! You know its his fault they got so upset they punched an old lady. She was clearly a Nazi so it was ok.  |
|
|
|
Quite a convenient list there It's a comparison of OECD, 1st world, developed nations. It's a pretty standard list of countries to use when comparing things like health, disease, wages, wealth, unemployment, crime, education, etc. I understand you don't like it because it doesn't fit your narrative, but that doesn't change the facts. You can use facts to prove anything that is even remotely true, facts schmacks! Techshare doesn't even understand the words he uses, for example he claimed I should look at per capita homicides by countries. When I informed him that the US has approx 8X the firearms homicide rate he turned around and said it was because there are 10X more people in the US than CAN.... How can you argue with someone like that??? Nope. I said no such thing. You are attributing your own problems with reading comprehension to me. |
|
|
|
Where have we heard this saying "punch a nazi" before? It is almost like the left has been normalizing violence and otherizing anyone right of MAO for at least the past couple years or more.
Therefore they deserve to be sent bombs? Or is there some other connection to this thread that I'm missing? Yes, you are missing the fact that anyone right of the extreme left, or just random people walking by, are regularly designated "nazis" , and this is used to justify their assault. This has been going on for a few years now, and not a peep from the left over it. Now that the left is also now starting to get "targeted" by extremists, now, NOW is the time to tone down the rhetoric... not before the years of regular violent attacks on conservatives and regular calls for violence ignored. Thank you for the wonderful demonstration of how the left insists on jumping to the most extreme conclusion every time, simply because it suits them. So to sum it up so you can't try to take this off into some other extremist interpretation that suits you... The left has no grounds to point fingers and lay blame after years of laying silent over leftist violence against conservatives in the US. Where have we heard this saying "punch a nazi" before? It is almost like the left has been normalizing violence... Famous left winger, Captain America. More like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AhGYo9TExU(notice this is about a year and a half old...) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKICKcMU3MU I don't know where that is either any more... |
|
|
|
Are you sure its not ok to punch a "nazi"?
No, I'm not gonna punch you, don't worry. No, I am sure you won't. You would take a good look at me and turn tail Where have we heard this saying "punch a nazi" before? It is almost like the left has been normalizing violence and otherizing anyone right of MAO for at least the past couple years or more. |
|
|
|
But ok. Take Hispanics out of US firearms homicide counts. Does that make it look like Canada? Not even close.
Which white ethnic group you're gonna try next? Russians? Italians? Those damn Sopranos must be killing lots of people and making the US look bad.
So Hispanics and Latinos are nothing but a white ethnic group now? I don't know if they would agree. It seems pretty commonly accepted they are part of "minority groups". Also this "making people look bad" is a pure projection of your own creation. I raised the fact that cultural and racial differences result in more violence, and this is not something more culturally homogeneous nations have to deal with. I raised the point that the USA is more diverse than Canada, then backed it up with statistics. You have to try to cast this as a racist thing because you have no other good argument, and attacking rather than debating is all you know. |
|
|
|
You can't even come up with claims! All you have are straw men logical fallacies. Lol, Okay... I am out... Yeah God forbid I call you out on your logical fallacies and inability to even present a premise to argue. Have fun jerking yourself off over how much you believe you are right. Thanks for playing. |
|
|
|
If you say something to some one and they freak out and physically attack you for it, is it their fault for attacking you or your fault for upsetting them? I would love to hear your answer.
You seem to be confused. Trump isn't being attacked physically, he's being rightfully ridiculed for saying stupid shit. If someone attacks him physically or sends a bomb to him that would not be ok. Instead of assuming who is who in this hypothetical, maybe answer the question. I'm not assuming anything. You're the one ranting about Trump being incorrectly faulted. I already answered your stupid question but in case the answer was not good enough for you to twist it into your narrative here is a more generic one: it's not ok to physically attack anyone for any reason. Are you sure its not ok to punch a "nazi"? |
|
|
|
Yeah, the 17% of Hispanic/Latinos. They are often classified as white. Not a lot of Mexicans in Canada last time I checked.
And what difference does that make? It makes a difference because if you notice Hispanic/Laino is not on that list, meaning they weren't even counted by those numbers (or counted as white)... meaning we have at least 17% more minorities. |
|
|
|
Yeah why let facts get in the way of a good emotional fit. Mmm, I love me some facts. (Click images for full size.) Grinshteyn E, Hemenway D. Violent Death Rates: The US Compared with Other High-income OECD Countries, 2010. American Journal of Medicine. 2016;129(3):266-273. ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551975) Quite a convenient list there... using only comparatively tiny, mostly culturally homogeneous populations. As I explained earlier more urban centers means more crime. Interesting wording too on some of this also. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26551975You notice it says violent death rates, not firearm homicides. What that means is anyone who is shot committing a crime, by police, people defending their homes, suicides, all these get included in this statistic. I am sure that doesn't skew that statistic AT ALL. try this non selectively edited one:  Gee, seems much more reasonable in a global context. "Kleck found that the number of defensive gun uses in the US was somewhere between 2.1 and 2.5 million per year, a huge multiple over the number of crimes involving firearms. Not the lower (though still significant number of 500,000) total that the CDC had claimed." https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/24c4/f535e8c05a916ecddd0c9c5ae20ec93f53bf.pdfGuns save more lives than they take. Just brandishing a gun can be enough to save your life. You don't need to fire it. LOL, k. Good for you. I never said there were NO Mexicans there. Compared to the US though? Really are you gonna try to compare the Latino community of the US and Canada? Also is this your way of avoiding admitting Canada is way whiter than the US? BTW your prime minister wearing a funny costume doesn't count towards diversity. |
|
|
|
|
I never said our current healthcare system was perfect. However if you can afford it, its great. As stated, in its current form it is incredibly inefficient. The problem though is this country has been implementing Socialist type policies for some time now, along with all kinds of red tape and excessive regulations that make things SO DIFFICULT for doctors, they are just quitting in droves. BTW, this was well underway while Obama was still in office, so no knee jerk "MORE PROOF ORANGEMAN BAD" here please.
The policies you are advocating are the cause of the issues, not the solution.
|
|
|
|
73% white for both. Am I missing something? Yeah, the 17% of Hispanic/Latinos. They are often classified as white. Not a lot of Mexicans in Canada last time I checked. |
|
|
|
Imagine being so desensitized to constant mass shootings that your argument degrades in to how you classify a mass shooting.Still, instead of thinking about funding, oh I don't know, basic mental healthcare, I'm sure Trump and the GOP will just want more guns instead. Because more guns has worked so well in the past. Smart. Yeah why let facts get in the way of a good emotional fit. |
|
|
|
If you say something to some one and they freak out and physically attack you for it, is it their fault for attacking you or your fault for upsetting them? I would love to hear your answer.
You seem to be confused. Trump isn't being attacked physically, he's being rightfully ridiculed for saying stupid shit. If someone attacks him physically or sends a bomb to him that would not be ok. Instead of assuming who is who in this hypothetical, maybe answer the question. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
