[banned mixer] Mixer Review Program #2
Bitcointalk username: khaled0111
UI/UX experience:I've used few different mixers in the past so I've a small idea about how a mixer should look like and what to expect to see there (mixers work differently on the back-end but on the front-end, the mixing steps are almost the same). However, this is the first time I use
[banned mixer]. So, the first thing I did was to open the website on different browsers (Chrome, edge, tor,,) to see if there are any glitches or anything like that but didn't notice any.
The design is simple and neat which is what you should expect from a service such as a mixer. Almost everything is there where it's supposed to be and understanding how the service works and what you are supposed to do to mix your coins is not that hard even for someone who is using the platform for the first time!
Some notes and suggestions:- The dark mode is cool but I think it's a bit too dark! The contrast needs to be revised since some content is unreadable unless you increase the screen brightness.
- You use different colors for each new receiving address which is also good but some of those colors don't fit well with the too dark background.
- Everytime you click on a different (?) info buttons, a box pops up and overlaps the previous one and it's not obvious how to close them. This should be done automatically by clicking anywhere on the screen:
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F11%2F01%2FtuaoC.jpeg&t=663&c=6mVCfim7r0RHTQ)
- On the
"Enter your receiving address(es) form, I believe it would be better if the input field for each address was above its corresponding text label (for mobile btowsers) and to its right (for desktop browsers).
Mixing:I made two mixing sessions. The first was with chrome browser on mobile and the second was with tor on desktop (windows).
Mix 1:Browser: chrome
Device: mobile
Service type: basic
Amount: 0.001
I intentionally shose the receiving delay to be 0hr:0min to see if I'll receive the coins instantly as expected. The
Anonymizing meter showed "weak" which makes perfect sense in this case.
Every thing went smooth. I didn't face any problem during the mixing process as everything was straight forward.
As soon as the deposit transaction got confirmed, the mixer sent the mixed coins to the receiving address I've provided earlier. The received amount was the same as what the
Fee calculator showed.
The transaction fee was ~20sat/vb while mempool.space suggested ~ 16 sat/vb for fast confirmation so it was a reasonable fee rate not overpaying.
However, the mixer used three inputs and two change addresses! I don't know if this was done in purpose as part of the mixing process or not but it will significantly increase the transaction weight.
Mix 2:Browser: Tor
Device: desktop (win 10)
Service type: premium
Amount: 0.0011
For this session, I entered the tumbler code I got from the previous one to be sure I won't receive coins from my own address. For some reason, the website didn't recognize it as valid (the input box turned into red) but when I clicked on continue, it got accepted and I was redirected to the next page!
As for the first mixing session, this one went smooth too. I really liked how smooth it was to move the slider which is something I always struggle with on other websites.
The website loaded fastly although I used the onion link on tor!
After the mixing has ended, I received the mixed coins (exact amount) on my wallet.
Note:
- after providing the receiving address and clicking "
continue", I realized I've forgotten to provide the
tumbler code. I wanted to go back to the previous step but there was no way to do so. Clicking on the browser back button, takes you to the main page and you have to start the process from scratch!
It would be useful if the steps numbers on the top of the page were click able and allow you to switch between different tabs in case the user wanted to check or edit some information.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F11%2F02%2FtHFvg.jpeg&t=663&c=OCcgeNLOBq6tJQ)
- on the receiving address field, a
paste button or a qr scanner would be a nice addition.
For both sessions, I downloaded the letters of guarantee and verified their signature with no problems.
Also, I looked up the receiving transactions on a blockexplorer and went back few hops to see if there is any connection between the involved addresses but couldn't find any. So, I suppose the mixer works fine just as it's expected to be.
[
b]Support:[/b]
I sent a message to customer support just to see how responsive they are. I waited few minutes without getting an answer then I realized I need to provide the letter of guarantee first! Not sure why this is required? What if someone have some questions and needs answers before he decides whether to use the service or not?
[
b]Conclusion:[/b]
Overall, the the website design looks good but there is still room for improvement. The user experience was great and there isn't much to complain about. Mixing coins on [banned mixer] is straightforward and doesn't require any technical knowledge.