Nate, This is getting bad all my MM instances are detecting my networked machines and reporting odd names. I cannot change them. I have wiped and reloaded one system. It reads them correctly until I enable perks. Then it starts over again with the miss naming. Nate.
A really odd bug you might want to look into. I do not know what to pull to help you diagnose this.
I have a Rockminer RK3 and 2 Ant S3s. MM picks them up fine but on one machine when I rename them it keeps making them all the same. It does not do this on the other MM systems.
I have rebooted and reinstalled MM to no avail.
Each time I name the RK3 to that it changes it to Ant S3A and the two Ants it makes Ant S3B even though one should be A. So only one is correct.
I verified the IPs and tested everything. They all properly name on the other MM systems.
Any help would be great as it throws off my MobileMiner charts.
If you need me to pull something from MM let me know and I will get it for you.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
It is the vicious cycle just like the GPU and CPU cycles were. Only now we are seeing it in hyper drive. The rate of improvement and each new Gen of ASIC for mining has be ultra fast. http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/review-antminer-s3-450-ghs-bitcoin-asic-miner-bitmain/2014/07/25The Bitmain Antminer S3 Bitcoin ASIC Miner is their next step in the evolution of their ASIC chips as well as going back to the basics with the blade design that started it all. There are some changes that have been made along the way though. First is the cowled dual fan enclosure that the S3 has is a new twist on the first-blade design. They also made overclocking easier as well. The Antminer S3 was initially announced to run at a 478 gh/s and then revised down to 440 gh/s. It is only a matter of time when will every old miner become outdated and non-effective, and rare are the ones that will ROI in the end. It seams that bitcoin brought most interest on itself by earning opertunity that mining generates, and has created an oversaturated field. Bitcoin mining is becoming(actualy more like it allready is) industrial operation, leaving the small guy behind, that being said; i would never again invest in mining equipement. |
|
|
|
I really like the S3 I wish I could get more of them. LOL They are always so easy to use and perform great. The only one that I put above it is Spondoolies miners. They are some beast for sure and the SP30 is shipping we should start seeing them deployed in the next several days. http://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/news/review-antminer-s3-450-ghs-bitcoin-asic-miner-bitmain/2014/07/25The Bitmain Antminer S3 Bitcoin ASIC Miner is their next step in the evolution of their ASIC chips as well as going back to the basics with the blade design that started it all. There are some changes that have been made along the way though. First is the cowled dual fan enclosure that the S3 has is a new twist on the first-blade design. They also made overclocking easier as well. The Antminer S3 was initially announced to run at a 478 gh/s and then revised down to 440 gh/s. |
|
|
|
Thank you. It works much better. Very cool. Keep me in the loop.  Can someone host the RPI images stateside or on mega possibly dropbox?
They are such a pain to try and DL from Biadu. It always messes up. I want to get the latest and finish my review but it keeps failing to DL.
Working on exactly this We have firmware uploaded on dropbox. Please download it at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6q340iadp6b5daa/btcgarden_v0719_192.168.1.123.rar |
|
|
|
Do you have them in XL? I love this design. You have 6 more days to get your orders in! Let's make it to the goal.
|
|
|
|
They use the same chips but different freq and lower power to achieve the results.
Clock of 240??
EDIT:
I think stock is 328 and most run it at 340.... maybe that's your problem, it would explaine your low consuption at the wall...
I take that back, I had the X3 in mind...
--ltc-debug should be --zeus-debug but it not help, still 99% HW i think X3 and X6 use different usb chips then |
|
|
|
I used 3.2 for the minera version. The clock speed I use is 280. I was able to get a Thunder X6 to run properly in minera by making sure --nocheck-golden and --ltc-debug were enabled. If they are not it was 99% errors. I hope that helps you out. I used the Maxl cgminer. I'm using minera with gridseed for a long time, it works fine, thank you! Today i got 2 NEW Zeus Hurricane X6 (64 chips, 240Mhz, 10M hash rate, 230W on wall each) I tried minera 0.3.2 and 0.3.3 CGminer Dmaxl Zeus works with --zeus-chips 64 --zeus-clock 240, but i got 99% HW and about 1M hash rate each Bfgminer works with -S zus:all --set zus:chips=64 --set zus:clock=240, i got a lower HW (about 20%) and get 7M hash rate each i tried add --zeus-nocheck-golden for CGminer or add --set zus:ignore_golden_nonce=1 for Bfgminer, i get same result any ideas? PS: It's works fine with Zeus Official Raspberry IMG, 10M hash rate each, but that is so ugly  i try to copy their cgminer to minera, it can work, speed fine, but all minera UI(data) stop woking (different api output duo to json broke?), if you want, i can upload that cgminer binary file Hey Michelem, i still have no luck with my NEW Zeus Hurricane X6 (64 chips, 240Mhz, 10M hash rate, 230W on wall each) with minera 0.3.3, best speed is using Bfgminer, i got 6-7M hash rate each, 20% HW, if i use CGminer Dmaxl Zeus, i will get 99%+ HW but Zeus Official Raspberry IMG works fine, i can get 10M hash rate each is there a chance you can get Zeus Official Raspberry's cgminer binary be the fifth option for minera? i try copy it manually (backup CGminer Dmaxl Zeus and rename to it) , it can work, but all minea's web infomation stop rolling Zeus Official Raspberry IMG: https://mega.co.nz/#!h8ZTkYCB!xAJWXrF2JNOQN0d5IlTAtjQGK9kuMwsC2Pwi2gzcFQg (from https://zeusminer.com/user-manual-ver-1-0/ ) and i think their source is: https://github.com/zeusminer/cgminer_zeusso you use -zeus-chips 64 --zeus-clock 240 --zeus-nocheck-golden --ltc-debug ? which minera version are you use, 0.3.2 or 0.3.3? i tried --nocheck-golden but not --ltc-debug, i will try it now Clock of 240?? EDIT: I think stock is 328 and most run it at 340.... maybe that's your problem, it would explaine your low consuption at the wall...I take that back, I had the X3 in mind... |
|
|
|
I was able to get a Thunder X6 to run properly in minera by making sure --nocheck-golden and --ltc-debug were enabled. If they are not it was 99% errors. I hope that helps you out. I used the Maxl cgminer. I'm using minera with gridseed for a long time, it works fine, thank you! Today i got 2 NEW Zeus Hurricane X6 (64 chips, 240Mhz, 10M hash rate, 230W on wall each) I tried minera 0.3.2 and 0.3.3 CGminer Dmaxl Zeus works with --zeus-chips 64 --zeus-clock 240, but i got 99% HW and about 1M hash rate each Bfgminer works with -S zus:all --set zus:chips=64 --set zus:clock=240, i got a lower HW (about 20%) and get 7M hash rate each i tried add --zeus-nocheck-golden for CGminer or add --set zus:ignore_golden_nonce=1 for Bfgminer, i get same result any ideas? PS: It's works fine with Zeus Official Raspberry IMG, 10M hash rate each, but that is so ugly i try to copy their cgminer to minera, it can work, speed fine, but all minera UI(data) stop woking (different api output duo to json broke?), if you want, i can upload that cgminer binary file Hey Michelem, i still have no luck with my NEW Zeus Hurricane X6 (64 chips, 240Mhz, 10M hash rate, 230W on wall each) with minera 0.3.3, best speed is using Bfgminer, i got 6-7M hash rate each, 20% HW, if i use CGminer Dmaxl Zeus, i will get 99%+ HW but Zeus Official Raspberry IMG works fine, i can get 10M hash rate each is there a chance you can get Zeus Official Raspberry's cgminer binary be the fifth option for minera? i try copy it manually (backup CGminer Dmaxl Zeus and rename to it) , it can work, but all minea's web infomation stop rolling Zeus Official Raspberry IMG: https://mega.co.nz/#!h8ZTkYCB!xAJWXrF2JNOQN0d5IlTAtjQGK9kuMwsC2Pwi2gzcFQg (from https://zeusminer.com/user-manual-ver-1-0/ ) and i think their source is: https://github.com/zeusminer/cgminer_zeus |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone tried to the 7.19 version of the image yet?
I was wondering what improvements it has. I have been having issues trying to get it to DL for the last several days.
|
|
|
|
Very cool. Keep me in the loop. Can someone host the RPI images stateside or on mega possibly dropbox?
They are such a pain to try and DL from Biadu. It always messes up. I want to get the latest and finish my review but it keeps failing to DL.
Working on exactly this |
|
|
|
I know you guys take it seriously that is why I like the whole Nasty ecosystem. There was a point that PPS almost put BTCG under. That is why I get nervous about it. I know you guys will make the best decisions. PPS nearly put some pools out of business with bad runs of variance.
I am not sure it is a good idea here where it can be much harsher.
It is a good thing that I am sure then. While I do appreciate these concerns, it would be a mistake to think nonnakip and I haven't been discussing implementing NastyPool for years now. In fact, the reason why NastyPool isn't currently offering PPS is because nonnakip has been testing different payout algorithms against live data. That was actually one of the driving factors behind our mining lottery contest. The best thing you can do if you are concerned is to mine on NastyPool and help provide more data for testing. Rest assured of this... I will remain in communication with nonnakip and will continue harassing him repeatedly about the concerns and risks of NastyPool so that fans won't have to. We have had lengthy face to face discussions about the risks and I believe the quote I used to locking down a workable PPS formula was that it was like "catching smoke with your hands." That being said, we will not take a hands off approach to the payout formula used, and it will start off very conservatively. I don't want to let the cat out of the bag, but I think the NastyPPS risk will be minimized a great deal over standard PPS. At this point, I just hope for trust from fans. Once everyone sees the implementation, I urge you to analyze the hell out of what could go wrong. Don't think for a second that these PPS concerns aren't being taken seriously or that it won't be implemented in a responsible and safe way that will not harm NastyFans. |
|
|
|
Great news Guy. You and your team do great work. Dear Customers,
After a close inspection of the first ASICs, I'm pleased to announce that the ASICs are fully functional. Made from industrial grade, sophisticated hardware, the SP30 is now the best mining rig available in the market.
For units produced up to and including September, the SP30's hash rate will be 4.5TH/s +- 5%. Power consumption will be 3KW at the wall.
With additional tuning of the production process for October and onwards, we expect future SP30s to deliver a hash-rate of 5.5 +- 5%, with power consumption of 3KW at the wall.
For customers who have already placed orders and are awaiting delivery, our priority is to ensure on-time delivery of your machines so you can immediately start seeing ROI. I am therefore very pleased to report that we will meet our original delivery schedule and provide all customers with on-time delivery.
For customers receiving units before October, we will adjust the price of your machines consistent with the 4.5TH/s +- 5% hash rate. Compensation will be based on preserving the $/GH ratio of the original deal. Starting in October, we will compensate you for the differential in hashing power according to each customer's preference. We will contact each and every one of you over the next few weeks to discuss your preferred method of compensation.
As always, we are at your disposal for any questions or inquiries.
We sincerely appreciate your loyalty and support as we continue to develop the world’s best mining products and services.
Best Regards,
Guy Corem
CEO
|
|
|
|
Yes BA is shipping. Way late but on the way. BFL will not be until this late fall. It looks like Black Arrow is finally shipping. Hopefully BFL is not too far behind. Dear Customers,
We apologize for the lack of updates during the last few weeks; We have been very busy working with the factories to get your long awaited miner.
As you well know we have been shipping X1s for almost a month. In the last few days we began shipping X3s alongside X1s. We still have days until we finish all the queue.
|
|
|
|
PPS nearly put some pools out of business with bad runs of variance. I am not sure it is a good idea here where it can be much harsher. Thank you for feedback.
So long I run it NastyPool will never stop as a public P2Pool node. The PPS-like payout method will be a separate feature available to nastyfans that have interest. OgNasty and me have many requests for this feature from miners that are bigger than all of us. The feature should help us get PPS-lover miners on NastyPool. And that means strengthening P2Pool. And that is our goal.
Just be careful about the level of risk you're willing to take... pools have shut down in the past when their luck made their pools a losing operation and weren't earning enough to cover their PPS payouts... =squeak= NastyPool is something that has been discussed over a period of years, not days. Many risks have and will continue to be carefully considered. The PPS payout method is obviously a risk, but it is a manageable risk, which is the best kind. I think when you see the actual implementation, you will see that the risk is being minimized a great deal more than some other pool failures that went the way of the dinosaur. |
|
|
|
|
Can someone host the RPI images stateside or on mega possibly dropbox?
They are such a pain to try and DL from Biadu. It always messes up. I want to get the latest and finish my review but it keeps failing to DL.
|
|
|
|
Congratulations!!!! I hope I hit a block with my 333 mh/s that is solo mining. My main rigs have not hit one yet on BTCG yet though.   Yes ladies and gents, I found a block for us. Inordinately proud. Thanks to eleuthria, miaviator (hosting and hammering the S2), BITMAIN, satoshi and my mum. |
|
|
|
Comcast should have to pay you back for those three days. Did the move go well? Finishing up another big order and also moving across town this week!
Test printing some new designs today and should have some pics/info posted by Saturday.
Or not. Lost 3 days of mining due a Comcast goof. Playing catchup now  |
|
|
|
Wow these look cool. How close are you and do you need funding? I'm building what I think will be if not one of the best cold-storage devices certainly the most attractive. :-) www.aeternum.in |
|
|
|
I want to +1 on this. I have one that for review and it runs great. No hiccups or bugs for me and I am using their Pi image. The miner is in my miner room though nice and cool at 70 degrees. Still the stock fan. My review goes live in a couple days I will make sure to link it here. I really like the R3-Box I hope they can get the error rate down that is the only downside I have run into. I have 6 R-box miners running on CGminer on a Windows 7 machine. They seem to run ok but even running them at a clock speed of 290 I am getting only about 200Gh/s from the 6 of them or just about 34Gh/s each They do peak at about 208-210 Gh/s (still under 35Gh/s each) but only brief peaks. 4 or 5 times a day I have to restart 2 3 or all 6 of the miners as they slow down to high teen to low twenties GH/s
I thought it was power related as I had all 6 running from one 360W PS to start with but I have since bought and hooked up a second 360W PS and put 3 units on each and still the same. I can not get speeds of anywhere near the 35 GH/s each I was expecting with any kind of consistency. I get nearly 35 for brief peaks but it drops off to average a bit under 34 and then drops off to less than 25 after a few hours. I have the 6 units set up spaced out with a 20" box fan blowing across them and they run about 39-40c so I don't think it is heat related either.
My question is, What am I doing wrong or is it just a design flaw that these units can not run for more than a few hours at a time reliably?
Is there an updated firmware or driver I should try? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I'm running 6, they haven't skipped a beat. Using main cgminer release. Although my temps are lower (ambient cooler probably) and no extra fans blowing on them. Is your extra fan interfering with airflow? |
|
|
|
|
Sad to hear it.
It was a great project.
Good luck with your new endeavor.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
