They don't have the coins?!?
LOL
I didnt say they didnt have any coins, I said they dont have his coins. |
|
|
|
My lawyer lives next door.
I just wanted my coins at the price I ordered them at.
/wrists
Business promise products they are unable to deliver all the time. They cant give you your coin because they dont have them. |
|
|
|
In the chat I'm in now there is a guy who openly accepts that he steals bitcoins and he has an exploit on blockchain according to those he stole from
I strongly suspect this to be the case. I had an excellent password and got hacked. I did a virus scan and didnt come up with anything that looked malicious. |
|
|
|
|
Their business model doesn't work when there are rapid up ticks in the market.
|
|
|
|
To decrypt an encrypted wallet.dat two possibilities:
a) keylogger
or
b) you claim short but unique. Short = worthless password. If it was short enough it may have simply been brute forced. If it had been long and unique that would have been more interesting. Care to share the password? Hopefully you are not using it anywhere else, you should assume the attacker knows it.
Or C) Someone has a list of of passwords. maybe btc-e, coinbase, this forum, blockchain.org? |
|
|
|
Man you guys are f@#$%d... I didnt realize what was meant by default trust.... f!@# you I dont trust any off you insiders. Especially TradeFortress there are numerous scammer threads about him... He is a lender! I dont trust lenders of coin! I trust who I trust not who you think I should trust. Shit is bullshit. http://rt.com/news/bitcoin-hacking-stolen-million-417/Dont trust the default trust scores. |
|
|
|
Man you guys are f@#$%d... I didnt realize what was meant by default trust.... f!@# you I dont trust any off you insiders. Especially TradeFortress there are numerous scammer threads about him... He is a lender! I dont trust lenders of coin! I trust who I trust not who you think I should trust. Shit is bullshit.
Uhhhh.... told ya so. |
|
|
|
If you say that you are not trolling, then please explain what are you doing?
Or rather what are you trying to do?
What's the point of this thread? Trying to educate us?
I want someone to create a coin that is defined or to get the ripple developers to define ripple. I want a digital currency that can actually work and is capable of replacing the dollar |
|
|
|
Two scammers and we aren't seeing any scammer or untrustworthy tag.
TradeFortress is a little controversial (although I believe he is firmly in the scammer camp for deliberately misleading newbies).
But there can be absolutely no question that BFL is a bad actor and needs the label right away.
Why are you abdicating your responsibilities?
Bull crap. I will defend TradeFortress until I die. Not a scammer. Legit. CoinChat is legit. Inputs.io is legit. Ripple scam is legit. Glados.cc is legit. TradeFortress is legit. 'Nuff said. BFL is not a scam. They only take years to release miners. It keeps the price from changing dramatically. You sir, are a moron. Still standing by this? |
|
|
|
|
I tried to tell people not to trust this guy.
|
|
|
|
To the value is subjective so it is okay that the unit of value is subjective crowd.
Value is subjective to the individual but objective to mankind.. I can say I dont value water because I am not thirsty, I can never say that mankind doesnt value water.
Further the measure of the subjective nature of value is called price!!!!
And price is measured by currency. And Bitcoin is currency. So what's the problem? You can't have an objective measure of value that is disconnected from price. It's just not possible. Gold is a joke. Fiat currencies are inherently flawed. The "accounting" profession is a total fraud. What else is there? Nothing. That's why we have Bitcoin. Like I said, in fifty years, price and value will likely converge in Bitcoin anyways. If you can come up with an "objective" measure of value between now and then, more power to you. Odds are you won't. It's a hard problem. So just accept that Bitcoin is a currency in the short term, and (hopefully) an objective measure of value in the long term. You will never get me to believe that you can have a system of measurement without a UNIT of measurement. Bitcoin IS the unit of measurement. It seems so unmoored only beause it's trying to measure something that is subjective, the value of products and services. The measurement system still requires the pricing mechanisim that a live trade market provides, and even that is only valid momentarily. No it isn't. The reason it is so unmoored is because it is not a unit. Units are a constant that are definable. It is unstable in the same way that measurement of length was before an inch was defined. Price is the representation of the change in subjective value, the currency is supposed to be the constant that it measured against. So under your definition pretty much every major economy is operating on something that is not a currency. The US dollar doesn't fit your definition. It is a completely silly argument. 'Unit' defined for currencies IS an abstract. You're conflating the constant of the abstract unit with a constant of physical unit. 1 Dollar is 100 cents. Dollar is the unit, cents are fractions of that unit. 1 Bitcoin, it is a unit that can fractionally be used down to .00000001. It is defined. The value of the unit is not constant under ANY currency system. In fact, I would argue that bitcoin fits the definition of currency better than the US dollar because it has greater definition. The monetary base in the US is indeterminate in the future, yet the path of bitcoins being introduced to the economy is definite. I'm pretty sure you're just trolling, but I thought I'd say something just in case someone was taking you seriously. No I am not trolling. It isnt my definition it is the definition. No "currency" that is currently used is actually currency. The US dollar is a unit in the same way that the human foot was a unit when we measured length with body parts. That is to say that it is a puesdo- unit. That is the problem at the heart of the global monetary system in it's current state. It is a system of measurement without a unit of measurement. Unit' defined for currencies IS an abstract" for the last 40 years it has been. The world has been living a lie. The value of the unit is not constant under ANY currency system . The UNIT is always the same it is human perception that changes. Price is the representation of the subjective nature of value. Currency is supposed to be the constant that it is measured against. One bitcoin is the monetary unit of the bitcoin system. The value of it is dependent of opinions of all the users, and hence is fluctuating. You are confusing it with the unit of account. This is one of the functions of money. Why count your money? A merchant needs that to compare prices and to know whether his last actions where profitable. If he does not have a unit of account, he can not decide what is the best action in the future, buy a new batch of wares to sell? If it was profitable last time yes, or maybe buy twice as much. The unit of account should be as stable as possible. He should use a type of money that is stable. If the question is day to day trading, fiat is good for that. If you want to calculate your options, for instance sell a house after 20 years of ownership, dollar is not good enough. If you calculate in BTC, a profit of 1 BTC for a year says nothing, it depends heavily on what time of the year that BTC was earned. Was it january this year, or september this year? Huge difference. The best unit of account currently is probably a inflation adjusted dollar, and for the future, a dollar adjusted for inflation expection. Just know what inflation indicator you use. The point with the unit of account function, is that the merchant and customers decide for themselves what unit to use. It is not necessary to use the unit of the currency he uses for payments. In fact, for international trade, you have to choose one of several used for payments. No need to use BTC as a unit of account, maybe after bitcoin is fully implemented in the world economy. The ability to be used as a unit of account is what separates currency from collectibles. Baseball cards are a store of value and a medium of exchange. So are all collectibles Bitcoin is a collectible. Not a currency. |
|
|
|
also conflating units of physical measurement with currency, units as placeholders for valuation as a medium of exchange, is completely irrational. The comparison just doesn't work.
you can say a gram is a certain number of atoms. That is objectively true. There is no such thing as objective value, so you can't measure a constantly defined unit of value. You're just confused.
The same is true of data. It is not objectively real. We measure opinions against facts. Data is equal to a byte a byte is equal to charged particle. If bitcoin were equal to a byte it could work. But the limit would have to be removed to keep the definition true. A byte can't be equal to a charged particle. A byte is eight bits. Sure, a byte can be represented by charged particles, but it is, in practice, just a number no more or less real than any representation of any number. Therefore, a bitcoin, being simply an arbitrary representation of a lot of numbers, should be just fine with you. QED. It is in practice 8 bits or 8 charged particles ( which is objectively real and a constant) |
|
|
|
|
Never paid I will post his ID when I get a min.
|
|
|
|
|
My recommendations for a UNIT of value would be
A byte
A joule
A kilowatt
|
|
|
|
It is not a problem that bitcoin is arbitrarily defined the problem is that the definition isn't held constant.
The economy isn't constant. It can grow or shrink. Frankly, it's clear that you are a gold bug. So I'm interested to know your opinion on this statement, true or false: "Wealth is never destroyed." ? I am not a gold bug, Gold is a poor unit. Defining a UNIT of value in terms of gold is like defining an inch in terms of an inch worm. There are not enough inch worms to measure all the length just like there is not enough gold to measure all the value. It is hard to answer true of false to the above statement. You would have to define wealth. |
|
|
|
Those are not units and neither is bitcoin. That is the fundamental flaw. Units are objectively definable and a constant.
Look at every unit.
One side of the equation is made up and the other side is real.
I knew I should have made this thread self-moderated. You've already got like six pages of trolling on this subject in that other thread. Isn't that enough? Someone make a coin that is defined and I will quit bitching. |
|
|
|
also conflating units of physical measurement with currency, units as placeholders for valuation as a medium of exchange, is completely irrational. The comparison just doesn't work.
you can say a gram is a certain number of atoms. That is objectively true. There is no such thing as objective value, so you can't measure a constantly defined unit of value. You're just confused.
The same is true of data. It is not objectively real. We measure opinions against facts. Data is equal to a byte a byte is equal to charged particle. If bitcoin were equal to a byte it could work. But the limit would have to be removed to keep the definition true. |
|
|
|
To the value is subjective so it is okay that the unit of value is subjective crowd.
Value is subjective to the individual but objective to mankind.. I can say I dont value water because I am not thirsty, I can never say that mankind doesnt value water.
Further the measure of the subjective nature of value is called price!!!!
And price is measured by currency. And Bitcoin is currency. So what's the problem? You can't have an objective measure of value that is disconnected from price. It's just not possible. Gold is a joke. Fiat currencies are inherently flawed. The "accounting" profession is a total fraud. What else is there? Nothing. That's why we have Bitcoin. Like I said, in fifty years, price and value will likely converge in Bitcoin anyways. If you can come up with an "objective" measure of value between now and then, more power to you. Odds are you won't. It's a hard problem. So just accept that Bitcoin is a currency in the short term, and (hopefully) an objective measure of value in the long term. You will never get me to believe that you can have a system of measurement without a UNIT of measurement. Bitcoin IS the unit of measurement. It seems so unmoored only beause it's trying to measure something that is subjective, the value of products and services. The measurement system still requires the pricing mechanisim that a live trade market provides, and even that is only valid momentarily. No it isn't. The reason it is so unmoored is because it is not a unit. Units are a constant that are definable. It is unstable in the same way that measurement of length was before an inch was defined. Price is the representation of the change in subjective value, the currency is supposed to be the constant that it measured against. So under your definition pretty much every major economy is operating on something that is not a currency. The US dollar doesn't fit your definition. It is a completely silly argument. 'Unit' defined for currencies IS an abstract. You're conflating the constant of the abstract unit with a constant of physical unit. 1 Dollar is 100 cents. Dollar is the unit, cents are fractions of that unit. 1 Bitcoin, it is a unit that can fractionally be used down to .00000001. It is defined. The value of the unit is not constant under ANY currency system. In fact, I would argue that bitcoin fits the definition of currency better than the US dollar because it has greater definition. The monetary base in the US is indeterminate in the future, yet the path of bitcoins being introduced to the economy is definite. I'm pretty sure you're just trolling, but I thought I'd say something just in case someone was taking you seriously. No I am not trolling. It isnt my definition it is the definition. No "currency" that is currently used is actually currency. The US dollar is a unit in the same way that the human foot was a unit when we measured length with body parts. That is to say that it is a puesdo- unit. That is the problem at the heart of the global monetary system in it's current state. It is a system of measurement without a unit of measurement. Unit' defined for currencies IS an abstract" for the last 40 years it has been. The world has been living a lie. The value of the unit is not constant under ANY currency system . The UNIT is always the same it is human perception that changes. Price is the representation of the subjective nature of value. Currency is supposed to be the constant that it is measured against. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
