Active is subject to multiple definitions. For example, @vod makes it 149.405, being that of the count of all profiles that have logged in within the last three months.
Your definition would be that of merited >= 2 merits gained in the last 30 days, and results in 1.145 distinct profiles (31/07/2019 .. early morning of 30/08/2019), with the following distribution:
It is just an assumption to see how merit circulated in the forum, and do current smerits allocation to merit sources per month enough for active and good users or not. Sticking with this assumption, and your simple analysis result, we can see that there are around 18 merits for each active and good users per 30 days, only from 131 merit sources. Some users might earn more than 18 merits per month, some others might earn less. It is not correct estimation, because there are so many bias factors, but at least from the estimation, I do think current sMerit supply from merit sources is enough for good users to rank up. The rest thing totally depends on their works. Interesting finding that with the assumption (actively posting, and received >= 2 merits per 30 days), there are only 0.43% of forum users (at 2659437) are active, and good ones. It makes me shocked, honestly.  . di 1145/2659437*100
.04305423
|
|
|
|
I don’t really keep track of who the Merit Sources are
< ... >
I therefore do not track nor try to infer each one’s allocation and how much of it they spend, although on an individual basis
Thank you for your reply, that gives detailed answer for @The Pharmacist's question, but honestly I don't have interest about those things. Because it is not my business, and I think we just let merit sources do their works. There is no good reasons to follow their works as sources, because they actually good users / sources, and know how to do their works, and months passed since the last remove of merit sources (one or two) due to abusements or misuses of merits from sources; not from their own request like @Vod. Dataset in OP is good enough to give us an overview on merit sources and available smerits from them per month. With current statistics: - Total users (includes inactive ones too) at 2659437, due to Statistics center- Total smerits for all sources per 30 days at 21045There are 131 merit sources with a total merit generation of up to 21045 sMerit per 30 days
It means within each 30 days, one user can get around 0.008 merit. . di 21045/2659437
.00791333
However, if we assume that there are only 1 percent of those users ( ~ 26595 = 2659437/100) are active and good ones, each of them will get nearly 0.8 merits per 30 days from all sources. . di 21045/(2659437/100)
.7913329
Yes, this is estimated one good users can get from merit sources, but they can earn more from non-merit-source users ( with above assumptions). I don't believe the forum has around 27k active and good users. If you can, please scrap figure on total active merited users last 30 days (active merited means receive above 2 merits). |
|
|
|
< ... >
Excellent! Do you have plans to keep your threads update on daily basis? If yes, I will support by making further analysis with your data you dump daily, will start doing this after your datapoints surpass 20 (20 days). If you can add a statistics on daily merit circulated in boards, per day, it will be much interesting. I want to have another topic for my collection, if I can get regularly updated data from your thread. tranthidung's statistical threads on bitcointalk  |
|
|
|
|
Both of the price chart and RSI indicator shows us we have been in period of bouncing back. Recovering strongly from current price or not, we all have not known because it is a long term scenario and depends on many factors, from DASH, and external factors like bitcoin as well as political and financial conditions globally. Anyway, I think we can think positively about altcoins' future, includes DASH, in weeks to come.
|
|
|
|
You're great member of this forum and I have no doubts that you can be good campaign manager. But unfortunately, you probably will have hard time to be hired by someone. Number of campaign managers on this forum is probably higher than number of available campaigns. And usually projects prefer to hire most experienced managers like Hhampuz, yahoo or LoyceV. But you have nothing to lose and there is no harm to post your offer. Good luck.
P.S. I think this topic belongs to Services section because I saw other managers posted their threads there.
Your words mean a lot of thing for me, it gives me more strength to keep up my good works and dedicated contribution. You are right that I have nothing to lose with my Service thread, and if renowned managers can do it from their lower ranks than mine for now (Hero Member), I do believe that some day I will have opportunity to start my career as campaign manager. Inititally, I created the topic in Service Announcement, then due to lack of interests, I moved it to Marketplace. My intention is moving it to what you told, Service child board, but I can not see that childboard in list of available boards when clicking on move topic button. Do you have any experience with it? Or the forum only allows moving topics from boards to boards, not to child boards. Sorry, I saw it and and moved already.Anyway, thank you.
I am available!
|
|
|
|
@loyce, it has been a while, can you give me list of ban again after July, 21st until now?
Maybe from rank jr.member+ would be good, since it's too much when you are putting newbie/brand new account as well on the list
It is normal to see abudant newbies or brandnew accounts in latest bans. Most of high ranked accounts banned months ago, around April and May. Their bans mostly come from their plagiarism in the past, months or years ago (that is what I saw in their ban appeal threads). After that massively ban phenomenon, I don't think users at high ranked stupid enough to take risks their accounts with copying and pasting, without sources. If they do this, they use their newbie / brandnew accounts. That reflects on results we have from LoyceV's data dump. |
|
|
|
Hello all WO citizens, you all should read it. I made this one with latest data update from VB1001. Update:ABSTRACT(1) Last two months, Bitcoin fell ~4.5% in price, while figures for total replies, total pages, total views between last two periods (30/6/2019-31-7/2019 and 31/7/2019-31/8/2019) fell 24.8%, 31.3%, and 24.91%, respectively. (Details, please see in the last table in the bottom of the post).(2) In medians, figures for monthly new replies, views, and pages are 426942, 57218 and 277, respectively
Data source (from @VB1001): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52028093#msg52028093https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52029308#msg52029308https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg52325977#msg52325977
Converted dataset:. list id day month2 year date rep repchange prep2 views viewchange pview2 pages pagechange ppages2 btc pbtc, abb(30)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id day month2 year date rep repchange prep2 views viewchange pview2 pages pagechange ppages2 btc pbtc |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 31 10 2017 31oct2017 361446 . . 19386138 . . 18703 . . 6380 . |
2. | 2 30 11 2017 30nov2017 368288 6842 . 19749672 363534 . 18415 -288 . 9786 53.39 |
3. | 3 31 12 2017 31dec2017 380800 12512 82.87 20076512 326840 -10.09 19041 626 . 13186 34.74 |
4. | 4 31 1 2018 31jan2018 386480 5680 -54.6 20118498 41986 -87.15 19325 284 -54.63 10138 -23.12 |
5. | 5 28 2 2018 28feb2018 396480 10000 76.06 20185277 66779 59.05 19825 500 76.06 10629 4.84 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 6 31 3 2018 31mar2018 402460 5980 -40.2 20222795 37518 -43.82 20109 284 -43.2 7119 -33.02 |
7. | 7 30 4 2018 30apr2018 407457 4997 -16.44 20247143 24348 -35.1 20288 179 -36.97 9275 30.29 |
8. | 8 31 5 2018 31may2018 410507 3050 -38.96 20280891 33748 38.61 20526 238 32.96 7559 -18.5 |
9. | 9 30 6 2018 30jun2018 416730 6223 104.03 20315481 34590 2.49 20787 261 9.66 6457 -14.58 |
10. | 10 31 7 2018 31jul2018 419443 2713 -56.4 20341078 25597 -26 20975 188 -27.97 7848 21.54 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
11. | 11 31 8 2018 31aug2018 424622 5179 90.9 20413924 72846 184.59 21132 157 -16.49 6935 -11.63 |
12. | 12 30 9 2018 30sep2018 426942 2320 -55.2 20474102 60178 -17.39 21288 156 -.64 6633 -4.35 |
13. | 13 30 10 2018 30oct2018 430939 3997 72.28 20650285 176183 192.77 21447 159 1.92 6642 .14 |
14. | 14 30 11 2018 30nov2018 437199 6260 56.62 20782977 132692 -24.69 21810 363 128.3 4015 -39.55 |
15. | 15 31 12 2018 31dec2018 446510 9311 48.74 20926425 143448 8.11 22296 486 33.88 3800 -5.35 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
16. | 16 31 1 2019 31jan2019 452916 6406 -31.2 21006158 79733 -44.42 22563 267 -45.06 3459 -8.97 |
17. | 17 28 2 2019 28feb2019 459605 6689 4.42 21042628 36470 -54.26 22974 411 53.93 3901 12.78 |
18. | 18 31 3 2019 31mar2019 465823 6218 -7.04 21079099 36471 0 23292 318 -22.63 4103 5.18 |
19. | 19 30 4 2019 30apr2019 473225 7402 19.04 21133357 54258 48.77 23662 370 16.35 5270 28.44 |
20. | 20 31 5 2019 31may2019 480783 7558 2.11 21193583 60226 11 24040 378 2.16 8501 61.31 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
21. | 21 30 6 2019 30jun2019 488192 7409 -1.97 21256108 62525 3.82 24410 370 -2.12 11262 32.48 |
22. | 22 31 7 2019 31jul2019 493567 5375 -27.45 21307690 51582 -17.5 24679 269 -27.3 10052 -10.74 |
23. | 23 31 8 2019 31aug2019 497611 4044 -24.76 21343127 35437 -31.3 24881 202 -24.91 9605 -4.45 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- rep: total replies - repchange: change of total replies between two months - prep2: percent of change in rep (replies) between two continuous months. - views: total views - viewchange: change of total views between two months - pview2: percent of change in total views (views) between two continuous months. - pages: total pages - pagechange: change of total pages between two months - ppages2: percent of change in total pages (pages) between two continuous months. - btc: BTC price - pbtc: percent of change in BTC price (btc) between two continuous months. Since this update, I use new variables, pview2, prep2, ppages2, because variables for percentage of changes between two months in OP look stupid, so I decided to change.Now, let I explain the formula for variable prep2: To make it simple, I have a simple dataset like: month rep repchange prep2
1 10 na na
2 50 40 na
3 80 30 x
How to calculate x? x = (80-50)/(50-10)*100 It means I calculate percentage of changes in two period: period 1 (from month 1 to month 2), period 2 (from month 2 to month 3) Results:Period of observations (22 months, Oct. 2017 - end Aug. 2019) In medians, figures for monthly new replies, views, and pages are 6221, 57218 and 277, respectively . tabstat rep repchange viewchange pagechange, s(n mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max) c(s)
variable | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rep | 23 431653.3 40063.37 426942 402460 465823 361446 497611
repchange | 22 6189.318 2385.798 6220.5 4997 7402 2320 12512
viewchange | 22 88954.05 91983.42 57218 36470 79733 24348 363534
pagechange | 22 280.8182 176.8509 276.5 188 370 -288 626
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  . list id day month2 year date prep2 pview2 ppages2 pbtc, abb(30)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id day month2 year date prep2 pview2 ppages2 pbtc |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1. | 1 31 10 2017 31oct2017 . . . . |
2. | 2 30 11 2017 30nov2017 . . . 53.39 |
3. | 3 31 12 2017 31dec2017 82.87 -10.09 . 34.74 |
4. | 4 31 1 2018 31jan2018 -54.6 -87.15 -54.63 -23.12 |
5. | 5 28 2 2018 28feb2018 76.06 59.05 76.06 4.84 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
6. | 6 31 3 2018 31mar2018 -40.2 -43.82 -43.2 -33.02 |
7. | 7 30 4 2018 30apr2018 -16.44 -35.1 -36.97 30.29 |
8. | 8 31 5 2018 31may2018 -38.96 38.61 32.96 -18.5 |
9. | 9 30 6 2018 30jun2018 104.03 2.49 9.66 -14.58 |
10. | 10 31 7 2018 31jul2018 -56.4 -26 -27.97 21.54 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
11. | 11 31 8 2018 31aug2018 90.9 184.59 -16.49 -11.63 |
12. | 12 30 9 2018 30sep2018 -55.2 -17.39 -.64 -4.35 |
13. | 13 30 10 2018 30oct2018 72.28 192.77 1.92 .14 |
14. | 14 30 11 2018 30nov2018 56.62 -24.69 128.3 -39.55 |
15. | 15 31 12 2018 31dec2018 48.74 8.11 33.88 -5.35 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
16. | 16 31 1 2019 31jan2019 -31.2 -44.42 -45.06 -8.97 |
17. | 17 28 2 2019 28feb2019 4.42 -54.26 53.93 12.78 |
18. | 18 31 3 2019 31mar2019 -7.04 0 -22.63 5.18 |
19. | 19 30 4 2019 30apr2019 19.04 48.77 16.35 28.44 |
20. | 20 31 5 2019 31may2019 2.11 11 2.16 61.31 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
21. | 21 30 6 2019 30jun2019 -1.97 3.82 -2.12 32.48 |
22. | 22 31 7 2019 31jul2019 -27.45 -17.5 -27.3 -10.74 |
23. | 23 31 8 2019 31aug2019 -24.76 -31.3 -24.91 -4.45 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
Every day that Bitcoin's dominance rises or at least stays at this high levels shatters the confidence of altcoin holders - I visit /r/cryptocurrency from time to time and they are so depressed at the moment.
It is time to accumulate more good altcoins. Let's recall what happened with bitcoin and bitcoin enthusiasts in 2018? All or most of them depressed as same as altcoin enthusiasts now. I do think altcoin enthusiasts can learn from the very recent lesson from bitcoin. Unfortunately, if they hold bad altcoins, they should stop dreaming for aforementioned reasons (in my previous post). They should know when to stop hoping without convincing reasons, and when to cut their painful losses from past wrong investments. |
|
|
|
the reason why this question keeps coming up for different users every day is that the thing they call "market dominance" has nothing to do with actual "dominance". if we define what that number means, i believe a big part of the question is answered.
in short what CMC is calling "dominance" is simply division of bitcoin's market cap (with its ~18 mil supply) by the total market cap of 2000-3000 altcoins (with their total supply of hundreds of trillions).
so obviously when bitcoin goes up $1 its market cap goes up $18 million but if those coins go up $1 their market cap goes up hundreds of trillions. so in order to go up the same amount in market cap as bitcoin they just have to increase in price a very tiny fraction of a $1 which is why that percentage which falsely referred to as "dominance" shrank in first place and that is also why it is rising back up again.
Perfect! I have my opinion as people incorrectly pay their attention on dominance, bitcoin or altcoins. The true indicators for growth of bitcoin or altcoins is total volume. If we keep our minds neutral to see the fact of increases in dailly volume of bitcoin and altcoins since their all time highs in price values more than one year ago. This one, and the fact that most of altcoins has their volume fallen to nearly zero or zero, I do see the growth of altcoins, good ones, I meant. If 2 years ago, we have 3000 thousands altcoins with all good volume, but now we have only 1000 altcoins that have daily volume, and their total daily volume increased compared to figures of 2 years ago, it is truly a good signal of growth, even their prices temporarily fluctuated in bottom ranges.Bad altcoins actually comes to their death periods, and I do believe they won't have minor chances to return because investors have matured more significantly since the crashes of bitcoin and altcoins last two years. Even those shit altcoins boosted by their team by whichever shady methods, investors will be very careful to reinvest in those shit altcoins. The era of shit altcoins have gone, from now on we will see good recoveries of good altcoins. |
|
|
|
It's actually a good idea to stay connected with your local board (not just for merits) and I'm saying that based on what I experienced also. You get to interact with your countrymen and you also get a chance to meet them in local events.
It depends on situation of each local board. How users in that local board spam, and how helpful they are. If one local board only has spam, non-sense, pointless posts; there is no reason to stay with local board. Importantly, if someone have acceptable English reading skill, they should expand to international boards (with English), because most of helpful and lively updated things are in international boards. If someone make a good thread, they will do make it in international board, then translate them in local language, or vice versca. In some cases, you can only find what you need with English-written posts or threads, and can not find them in local boards because people don't translate original threads into local languages. I read a post from admin, that he felt regret to create Japanese local board, because spam, low-quality posts, and it is difficult for theymos to find good users whom can play as moderators for that board. |
|
|
|
Hello guys,
a few days back, while on holiday and travelling away from my usual places, I got my 100th merit!
Correct me if I am wrong, but I remembered that you were a Full Member when I already ranked up to Senior Member rank, then opened my merit give away months ago. More than 70 sMerits available to give away (high strict rules) [Members only]I quoted your post (in my merit give away thread) that was made on February 20, 2019. Dumb question: do I qualify for this? Is full member a member?
So, your fastly journey to the 1000th merit extremely surprised me, TBH. I have only closely reached my 600th. Congratulations! |
|
|
|
I have some ideas for you to improve your infographic. I give extra information for each of your three points. Point #1. It should be revise as: - Help new users to Read and learn before compose posts/ threads.
- Help them to know where they can get forum rules, types of offence when someone violate forum rules, what is pinned threads and importance of pinned threads in each boards/ child boards
I don't think that the suggestion to focus on local boards is good one because the forum is international one, and someone whom have good English skills enough, can join English-written boards. Point #2. It should be revised as: - Reading and knowing how to search effectively (to find available answers, guides)
- Reading about importance indicators of one account: Trust, feedback, and flag that relates to trustworthiness and scam history
- Where to get most contentful and regularly updates on scam issues
Point #3. It should be revised as: - Try to help others and get help
- Try not violate forum rules (spend spare time to read rules repeatedly)
- Read, search, and read before asking/ discussing
- Try to make creative threads/ posts, don't repeatedly write what others done without new creative/ valuable points
They should read my thread, too. I quoted some main points. Promotion with merit system and new rank requirements. It's possible.(1) Never begging for merits (2) Spending most of your time to read and learn (3) Never copy and paste without links to sources, or without quotes (4) Never mind of bounties, campaigns when you are noobs (5) Learn from inspirational stories. Learn from merited users, topics, posts (6) Spend your time to improve your English, especially Reading and Writing skills (7) Don't pay your attention on post-lenghth (Ideas that I took from theymos' Writing a welcome message) |
|
|
|
Can Bitcoin Survive “China Mining Pool Attack” Without ChainLocks?
This is not what DASH community has to worry about, because DASH has good algorithm to fight against those sorts of attack. There are some people naively think that bitcoin is the King, and outstanding in crypto currency ecosystem, but they don't realize that there are some good altcoins that bring innovations for blockchain industry, such as Ethereum, Monero, and DASH. If someone actually worry about that, why not switch their regular transactions from Bitcoin to DASH? Fees are much cheaper, instant send, and more advantageous things with DASH transactions. I agree that there is no crypto can replace the King position of Bitcoin, but it is neither true nor smart to keep using Bitcoin as main coin for daily transactions. BTW, if you have, please share the data on transaction history of bitcoin and DASH in Venezuela. |
|
|
|
I created some statistical analyis threads on bitcointalk.org, so I think it is easier for me and others (whom have big interests in those threads) with a list of my threads. Today, I collected and listed them all in this thread. Most of them will be regularly updated (weekly or monthly). If you see anything incorrect, or typo in my threads, please let me know. ImportantTime Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly) ( weekly udate) Time Series on monthly statistics of forum (new users, new topics, new posts) ( update when I have data) [CLUBS] Top Merited-Users Classified into 4 Clubs ( weekly update) Interquartile range of intra-day merits with time series plot ( weekly update) Assumed monthly statistics on registered accounts of bitcointalk.org (2009-2019) ( monthly update) Some stats of forum in the WO thread (Oct. 2017 - Jul. 2019) ( Monthly update) Merit source observations ( update when merit sources added/ removed) Daily merits over local boardsWeekly earned merits (median) of top 100 merited usersOne year anniversary of enhanced merit systemStats on signatures worn by top 100 merited users (from 2019w23-2019w44)Top-100 merited-artists in the 10th anniversary art contest (newest)The Art Contest has effects on merit distribution. How about merit sources? (newest)History of local boards (newest)At-least-1 sent & earned merits users , excludes autobanned/ nuked. Stats! (newest)List of the forum's admins/ global moderators/ staffs (newest)Percentages of recent earned per total merits of artists in top-50-merited users (recently) (newest)Stats on active & merit status of Donators & VIPs (newest)Merit distributions over boards (24/1/2018 - 19/12/2019) (newest)Impression counts for ads over years (Statistics) (newest)Where receivers received merits from, and meriters sents merits to (newest)MiscellaneousTracking the difference of merit circulations with Default Trust Changes ( done) |
|
|
|
I gave you one merit, because both two threads are good, but you don't need to delete your past application, and bump your application today with same content of deleted post. |
|
|
|
|
SEC is not important at all, as what relates to China. I don't think any of them are important for bitcoin and crypto in general. Price dumped due to SEC, nope, price pumped due to SEC, nope. Price of bitcoin and altcoins will rise or fall depend on their price cycle. SEC can not boost price to move up if a coin jumps in its bearish cycle.
If you only focus on news, you might get lost with crypto trading. In contrast, paying more time to look at instinct, hidden things from technical aspect of price chart.
|
|
|
|
OP, this is good data to see, but I'm confused as to whether the sMerit is what's held by the merit sources or what the sources have distributed. I looked for the answer to that in your post but perhaps I'm missing something.
My dataset only presents total merit sources and total smerits allocated to all those sources per each 30 days. You can observe it there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=sources. For now, we have: There are 131 merit sources with a total merit generation of up to 21045 sMerit per 30 days
For your question, I do think @DdmrDdmr can give you an answer, but I don't know it will satisfy your curiousity or not. Because I believe he might only give you raw figures, and of course not exactly what you wanted. He can give you total merits/ smerits earned, and distributed of each sources, but it is difficult to screen and differentiate between smerits get from earned merits and smerits get as sources from theymos. Even DdmrDdmr can get it, he might not publicly disclose because core ideas of theymos is not give merit beggars more details to annoying begging merit sources. Looks like Theymos hasn't been adding a lot of new merit sources in the past year--I sort of figured as much, since I hadn't seen that many applications and hadn't heard about new sources being added. But at least there are more now than there were last September, and since Meta hasn't been flooded with "how I earn meritz" threads lately, I'm assuming the situation isn't too bad. When newbies are constantly whining about how they're not earning merits, you know there aren't enough being circulated.
As I know of, theymos pay more attention on merit source application in local boards, recent months. Might be good to overlay those graphs as well, but either way props for posting the data.
I actually made it with an initial OP, but there are huge gaps between to variables, meritsource and smerits, in hundreds and thousands, so combined plot looks not good. Ok, fine! Note:
- To make combined plot looks better, I created a new variable, meritsource100, that equals meritsource * 100 |
|
|
|
Many months ago, on 24th January 2018, merit appeared in the forum, as airdropped merits (and sMerits) for grandfather accounts, then it has become a gift for good posters. There is no benefits to beg for merits as well as merit sources, because merit beggars might get negative trust or bad feedback in return. In the thread, I publish observations on merit source growth over months. For more details, there are some threads to read: Some helpful opinion of theymos on merit sources:Certain users are designated as "merit sources". They can create new merit out of nothing, up to a limited number per month (which differs per source). I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.
Merit sources are free to reveal their source amounts, though I think it may be a bit unwise. While it will eventually become obvious roughly what the source amounts are from the stats, there's a huge difference between showing up in a "list of probable merit sources" and having a quote out there of you basically saying "I'm a merit source, come beg me for merit, complain about every merit I send, and accuse me of being part of the anti-X/pro-Y conspiracy."
Notes:
- Update will be made in last post, not in OP.
- If you find something, or discover incorrect data, please let me know.
- Date presents in the format: dd/mm/yyyy.
- Dates present in the dataset might not exactly the day when total merit sources reach those figures, they are just dates recorded arbitrarily by users.
- The first datapoint (24/1/2018), I got the smerits at 8125 smerits (it might be incorrect), from that postEach source has a different limit per 30 days. The current average is 185, and in total up to 8125 merit could be created per month.
Nevertheless, I think it is correct, because about 4 hours after that post, theymos made this one, in which we see there was still 35 total merit sources
Dataset: +----------------------------------+
| date meritsource smerit |
|----------------------------------|
1. | 01may2024 109 32990 |
2. | 22mar2024 108 32890 |
3. | 28nov2023 109 33140 |
4. | 31jul2023 109 33940 |
5. | 11jul2022 110 33989 |
6. | 06jul2021 111 34139 |
7. | 28jun2020 97 21171 |
8. | 15nov2019 98 21671 |
9. | 14nov2019 90 18821 |
10. | 30oct2019 130 20895 |
|----------------------------------|
11. | 27jun2019 131 21045 |
12. | 15mar2019 130 20605 |
13. | 06feb2019 122 20835 |
14. | 05jan2019 123 20735 |
15. | 22dec2018 120 22055 |
16. | 17nov2018 119 22045 |
17. | 17sep2018 120 23045 |
18. | 11jul2018 83 19100 |
19. | 06jul2018 82 18900 |
20. | 18may2018 80 18500 |
|----------------------------------|
21. | 22mar2018 80 17800 |
22. | 12mar2018 77 17650 |
23. | 01mar2018 57 11975 |
24. | 26jan2018 49 9025 |
25. | 24jan2018 35 8125 |
+----------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
@dkbit98 made his thread with 13 phishing quizzes as of writing, including the Binance Phishing Quiz. I think you should add that helpful thread in yours. [LEARN] Phishing Quizzes - Beginners & ExpertsSometimes, I do those quizzes as kinda retest my knowledge on phishing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
