Slut
Sluts Both of you  Enjoy |
|
|
|
Hope so.... Twitter as it is , is a dirty echo chamber narrative control censorship crazy virtue signalling shit hole, absolute dirt.
The dirty secret is that it can't not be. That's why I'm not interested in any of its competitors. Yo... what makes you say that , no disagreement from me just curious I assume he means that every social media platform eventually devolves into liberal tribalism and corp/govt censorship, because the parent company starts selling user data, and taking investment money from the same entities that fund the corptocracy, MSM and the WEF agendas. Essentially being subsidized by these entities for selfish interests. Shill bots eventually take over and run rampant across the entire platform, spewing propaganda. It's the only business model that these social media platforms can make any money at and still survive. No argument from me there... I had some hope that Bitclout aka DESO, would manage to gain some traction... but alas, the consumer cares not for such platforms it seems... (also they were hardly free of corporate interest tbh) |
|
|
|
my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish
For whom or what? Bitcoin? This being the bitcoin price movement tracking and discussion thread, that was my intention, yes. Russia has gradually escalated the invasion of the Donbass to the point (estimated 3 to 5 thousand uniformed) where the Ukrainian government considers it an outright invasion. European governments (except for Honnecker Merkel) agree. Europe has a backbone composed of over-cooked pasta, but they do remember Hitler, and the parallels to Putin are pervasive, profound, and indicative. I am wishing that I did not have so much New York travel planned, at this point: A pre-emptive strike by Putin against the allied west is the likely end of any military escalation track. I should acquire an off-shore life insurance policy in case my domestic one should prove unsuited to the circumstances of my death. All of this, I consider bearish in the short-term, on risk-aversion, and bullish in the long-term on the fundamental technical capability of crypto to provide value storage and liquidity transfer when other systems break down. Is this you or the Monkey talking? I do not agree tbh I do not see Putin=Hitler and I do not see a pre-emptive strike from Russia, certainly not a direct overt one.. jesus christ the implications of that are profound... I can imagine a big bang somewhere.... followed by a game of whodunit... followed by more actions.... which could then lead to mayhem... but a direct overt attack , pre-emptive from Russia... phew... that is the stuff of nightmares... as it could not be a slight attack, it would have to be an end game attack, and well M.A.D comes to mind... unthinkable... world as we know it done... dusted... game over, fuck Bitcoin if that happens... unless it is so surgical that it would boggle the realms of what is possible.. Far more likely a catalyst is needed, or rather an instigation, and then what exactly would pre-emptive mean anymore? or do you propose that Ukraine is already that catalyst? or are you talking escalation of military build up from US in places like Poland etc antagonising Putin? and/or possible future NATO involvement? kicking Russia out of G8 etc as ways of antagonising Putin into a pre-emptive attack? or do you see a bit by bit escalation with "unintended" consequences? or do you really see Putin as having desires to rebuild the USSR, and as a force that needs to be stopped? as opposed to being antagonised into action?  (edit: yes I do not want to believe it could happen) (edit: maybe I am blind though... I wonder what is your train of thought? do you really see it escalating to that point " absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" http://www.webcitation.org/5e3est5lT link to REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century ) or should that be "absent some another catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor 9/11" ? my theory is that ww3 is short-term bearish, long-term bullish
Those were the days huh? (talking of which where is aminorex these days?, still kicking?) |
|
|
|
I am going to make that tomato soup. with the heavy cream. (thank god I have good cholesterol )
Lol you just reminded me I forgot my cholesterol meds today, they started me on them last week and I've forgotten to take it about half the time. edit: rectified. ....if you have not, then check out eating Walnuts , 3-4 a day to control Cholesterol. Also, weirdly enough, Quercetin..... beneficial for multiple other things too  |
|
|
|
LMAO , hello there to you too good sir..  |
|
|
|
Hope so.... Twitter as it is , is a dirty echo chamber narrative control censorship crazy virtue signalling shit hole, absolute dirt.
The dirty secret is that it can't not be. That's why I'm not interested in any of its competitors. Yo... what makes you say that , no disagreement from me just curious |
|
|
|
Damn! I Wish I had some Merits to give!!! That's some funny shit right there! WOs +10  |
|
|
|
As my financial advisor, I appreciate your straightforwardness , thank you ser +1 WOsMerit  and hello you old salty dog nice to see you around  *Doffs hat and to you good ser Happy to see many of the OG's are still here |
|
|
|
i want to be very clear here
i am and have never recommended buying or selling
i am a stacker and dca'er....seems to work best for me along with hodl
so what i post is either supposed to be humorous or speculation
understood? everyone needs to make their own informed decisions
that is all
---------------------
As my financial advisor, I appreciate your straightforwardness , thank you ser |
|
|
|
It is an Idea.
I think you should check it with these points.
All parabola with >50% linear corrections are cycles.
All tops found as log 1.618 extensions of cycle lows.
Cycle top ~$180k BTC.
Sub 50k potentially never seen again.
$1 million bitcoin projection at end of decade.
But please keep in my it is an Idea. Idea of Alternate Macro.
I'm still waiting for Bitcoin below $30k to buy. Do you think it's in vain? You might have anywhere between 10% and 30% odds of achieving less than $30k at some point in bitcoin's future. I would not hold my breath.. and for sure, if you are adequately prepared for UP, then it may well not hurt to have some amount of low ball buy orders. I think that quite a few longer time bitcoiners will save some fiat for those kinds of lower price scenarios, even if they believe them to be less likely. Some of the problems with either no coiners or those folks who have not adequately/sufficiently prepared for the possibility of UP would come when they are holding too much value and waiting for a low entry BTC price point that might not end up materializing.. then they are just stuck without any coins.. so in that regard there should be some level of balance to at least have some value already invested so that you are adequately and sufficiently prepared for UP, too. The amount that you have prepared for each BTC price direction is surely a matter of discretion that should be largely tailored to all of your own personal circumstances; therefore, there are probably not any two people who structure their balances in terms of how much to prepare for UP, DOWN or sideways in the same exact way. Not cool man...... not fucking cool at all. Well, well, well... look what the cat dragged in! Nice of you to drop in. Hope things are going well All good here ser and likewise hope life is treating you well too.... Well , you know, I had to pop in for the DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM There is going to be some variation, but any of us who have been into bitcoin for several years (even a whole cycle) are not going to be feeling too much "doom" and gloom these days so long as our portfolios were largely already established prior to September 2020.. On the other hand, if you were still establishing after September 2020 or just getting started at some point after September 2020, then there could be various levels of nervousness in regards to how you might have played your buys/sells/HODLs or whatever. I am not going to completely ignore the folks who might have thought that they had been mostly prepared for UP prior to September 2020, and then figured out that they were not as "prepared" as they had thought that they had been... so in those respects, some of those folks might have ended up feeling way more doom and gloom than they should have felt in the event that they had gone through with a more adequate/meaningful preparations prior to September 2020. DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM does not care about your portfolio, nor your feels, not you, not anyone. DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM only cares for DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM... |
|
|
|
|
Talking of censorship crazy narrative control asshats...
The EU is continuing its attempt to strangle decentralised wallets..... never let a catastrophe go by without trying to capitalise on it huh? they just cannot help themselves can they ? the commie stench coming from the EU is really really stinking now days, and they will only get worse and worse and worse as they circle the drain. (and my guess is they will not stop until they strangle everything they can, and the net result will be death and starvation and basically decay and hopelessness, the European experiment is destined for shit)
Also I bet Elizabeth Warren just squirted in her pants a little or maybe even a lot on this news.
|
|
|
|
~~~~
Congratulations on 25,000 posts JJG. I will make a tool to count the number of words you have posted in total 25k posts on a weekend. Can guestimate... its usually around million words per post kinda ball park.  |
|
|
|
Unless he does a hostile takeover. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.htmlHad he taken a board seat, the SpaceX CEO would have been limited in how much of the company's shares he could own, with a 14.9 percent cap.
Musk could now remain a passive investor or plan a hostile takeover of the company. Hope so.... Twitter as it is , is a dirty echo chamber narrative control censorship crazy virtue signalling shit hole, absolute dirt. Maybe Musk didn't like the conditions of taking a seat on the board. The Chief Executive said he would have "to act in the best interests of the company and all our shareholders". Best interests is an umbrella term that could mean anything the company wants it to. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10706401/Elon-Musk-NOT-join-board-Twitter-CEO-says-believe-best.htmlWe also believed that having Elon as a fiduciary of the company where he, like all board members, has to act in the best interests of the company and all our shareholders, was the best path forward. Perhaps perhaps....who knows what the man thinks. All I know, is that the PTB at Twitter have wielded Twitter as a weapon .....and they stick their noses into things that have zero to do with them.... issues of politics and issues of societal issues, their sense of self importance is fucking gross, who the fucking hell do they think they are? I have no interest in what a moderator, or a board member thinks, or what they want me to think, or what they want you to think, none... I have more interest in what a local homeless would have to say about it all rather than the twitter gestapo. They are just a chat board, keep the tweets coming, and stay the fuck out of it, they ain't nothing but a service provider and I could not care less about their political leanings, or which narratives they choose to amplify and which they choose to crush. Not to mention who they decide to cancel .... whilst leaving absolute scum to continue to tweet their drivel. Like stay the fuck out of it, and leave it a level playing field and let people decide what they follow, like, engage with or.... not. I have no more interest in their political leanings any more than I do the water company that supplies my water. Fucking ferrets. Same goes for Facebook and all the rest, they have all gotten far far far too big for their boots. They are desperate not be classified as "publishers" with editorial control, for obvious reasons..... well they cannot have their cake and eat it...... |
|
|
|
Unless he does a hostile takeover. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.htmlHad he taken a board seat, the SpaceX CEO would have been limited in how much of the company's shares he could own, with a 14.9 percent cap.
Musk could now remain a passive investor or plan a hostile takeover of the company. Hope so.... Twitter as it is , is a dirty echo chamber narrative control censorship crazy virtue signalling shit hole, absolute dirt. |
|
|
|
Not cool man...... not fucking cool at all. Well, well, well... look what the cat dragged in! Nice of you to drop in. Hope things are going well All good here ser and likewise hope life is treating you well too.... Well , you know, I had to pop in for the DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM |
|
|
|
Sounds like a Vampiric Blood Sucking Leech of a R0ach! LOL.
Good morning liars, pussies, and free people. Safe All You NeedMan... Your post just took a turn to the extreme of what Juan-ita is doing. And it brought me to the conclusion that JJG had no friends. I mean, Juanita probably has more friends now since he posts less often then he did before in the past.  So.. don't you have irl friends to keep you busy irl and have less energy and determination to post around here and dissect like a frog surgeon all the comments around here??  ANd yes. Juanita is also a Frog Surgeon. Are you trying to get me mad at you or to just die from uncontrollable laughter? I am hurting so badly from the profundities of your insulting insights.  Don't feed the trolls JuanitaChiChi. I lost my patience and started calling people names long ago. Save the RF.. always on the edge of innovation. Go figure. Yes.... that IQ game was interesting.
I really wanted it to be part of the forum system somehow merging with merit system to improve the post quality. In the real world, IQ can also be interesting - but likely in the end, it might depend upon how well something like that might be applied to various opportunities in the world - whether we are referring to the analysis of bitcoin and its possible direction or even other various opportunities that might exist out there - in terms of career choices.
Another dilemma can be real world meat space issues, and I suppose when we are younger we might have to attempt focus some of our physical urges depending upon opportunities that might automatically be available based on being born into a position, or if there might be some need to attempt to put yourself into a better position. A minority of folks are born into positions of privilege, but we have also learned that we are going to have more opportunities depending on which part of the world in which we are born, too.
Attempting to bring this back to bitcoin, there may well be some folks who are not really privileged or even high IQ, but they still are either lucky or insightful enough to identify bitcoin relatively early in their life (or at least when they are at least young enough in which identifying bitcoin can make a meaningful difference for them). So, I suppose that i am trying to suggest that IQ might ONLY be one of the aspects of identifying bitcoin and getting into it.. and there also might be some reverse correlation, too, in the sense that some folks with high IQ and even born into some kinds of social/financial privilege might end up NOT identifying bitcoin as early as someone with lower IQ and less social/financial privileges, so in that regard bitcoin can end up serving as a great leveler for folks who had been less advantaged but merely insightful enough to identify bitcoin as a potential opportunity, and to act upon their place of superior knowledge (even if they had encountered some luck in regards to getting to that superior knowledge regarding bitcoin as a topic).
Before checking the on-chain data, I used to think that my assumption of Bitcoin going down was just a speculation and some trend lines on TA however I realised that the 4 year cycle is in the play. If we look at the Miner Capitulation, I am able to see the price going a bit down just to get ready for the next cycle. I will be starting to DCA once we see Monthly RSI in 40's range. I mean, I might fail if it goes the wrong way however I am going to believe myself for once and will support my plan. After being on WO and being in the community, I can say that I am not going to touch any Altcoin ever in my life. When I started, I bought an equal share of BTC and ETH however this time being, it will be BTC only. That's what my plan is and I am sure everyone got a different game plan in their mind.
Bitcoin reward era compare: This chart seeks to illustrate the kinds of returns one would have made on a Bitcoin investment over any given halving period. It does this by breaking up Bitcoin’s history into ‘Eras’, where each halving event marks a new era.  I find that sometimes you have an awkward way of phrasing things.. at least that's how it strikes me. I do appreciate your acceptance that there are likely more things going on within bitcoin price dynamics than merely attempting to point out some seemingly random indicators in order to attempt to identify some "holy grails" and in some sense, maybe guys (and gal?) have to go through some of those kinds of processes in order to attempt to better understand various aspects of bitcoin price dynamics and even to appreciate some longer timeline considerations.. so that you have come to appreciate the stock to flow and four year fractal aspects, which seems to be helpful to your own framings.. and even if you have not articulated another underlying bitcoin price dynamic which is likely the exponential s-curve adoption based on network effects and Metcalfe principles, there can be some level of inevitable necessity to have to account for some of those aspects of bitcoin, even if it may well be difficult to exactly figure out how to measure those various ongoing adoption levels. Regarding purported mining capitulation, that seems to be a kind of fantasy (if not largely misleading framework). If you look at current hashrate levels we are at the very tipity-top of the all time high hashrates, and last two week period had gone up more than 4% and this period only has a few days left and is ONLY less than negative 1% at current typing of this post. Those seem to continue to be outrageously high levels of ongoing support that continues to go into mining - even if we might see some short term declines in hashrate, and if you are not appreciating the recovery from the mid-2021 China effects on the hashrate then maybe you are underplaying how ongoingly bullish hashrate seems to be - even if there continues to be blackbox aspects to many of its details. Regarding shitcoins for sure each of us has to consider the extent that we might want to get involved in any of that both in terms of how to spend our time (mental energies) and our finances (whether to dilute our bitcoin investment amounts)... including if we might consider that it might be valuable use of our time to investing into matters on a short term basis versus longer term investing such as 4-10 years or more. It is not like any of us can choose what values other have, even though we can express our preferences, including how we might mention any of that shitcoin nonsense in this thread or not. For sure, there are times in which some mentioning might be helpful, even if we might be bringing up the topic on our own versus responding to the ideas of some of the other member posts in this thread, so surely there can be tweaks of our plans, strategizing and actions along the way to get our approach (whether balanced or not) to be more in line with our assessments of our finances and psychology in the way that we view bitcoin as compared with other investments and as compared with shitcoins too (if any particular one (or more of them) might be considered as an investment rather than considering as some kind of short-term gamble play). My man.... still here and still with the mega posts.... |
|
|
|
Not cool man...... not fucking cool at all. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
☹️☹️☹️
