Apenas um reparo em como o titulo do tópico é completamente falso. Uma captura de ecrã de um website NÃO PROVA ABSOLUTAMENTE NADA!

You can blame the blockexplorer sites for causing the confusion on users.
Bitcoin users shouldn't be using those sites before understanding how bitcoin works, unless they like to be "the ox looking at the palace"...

Sent from a pool or exchange, maybe?

Dude, really... at least mark the thread with [TROLL].

Just wasted a report to moderator click... you got me...

Dude, you made your price, I made my price. I know when to say no to a deal which doesn't interest me, but you...


BTW, you are a scammer, and the first person to deal with you on your terms will be scammed. Mark my words.


LMFAO. ^^^^

Real price on unregulated markets... right...

I'll sell you 174000 XRP for 30 BTC.

And he calls ME a scammer...

Newbie and dumb... nice.

BTW, any accusations you have against me please post them in the Scam Accusations board.

PS: we can use John K's escrow service.

I'll sell you 150k ripples for 25 BTC, you send first, but only if my gf let's me sell them. lol

They bought in at $240 and sold at $60 

You can change the port in bitcoin.conf, if you have more than 1 bitcoin client that needs port forwarding.

He's awesome, isn't he?

bastard...

You could try sending the entre balance to a newly generated address on bitcoin-qt and check if any coins remain at blockchain.info. If the blockchain.info wallet gets zero balance after you do that, all is OK and there are no mixed up funds.

BTW: only do what I said if you're comfortable enough using pywallet, in case you need to delete the transaction from bitcoin-qt's wallet to get your coins back, if anything goes wrong.

I don't know specifics, like which wallet has the bigger balance, etc., so I can't say.

No, you were careless because you had the means to verify the authenticity of the message, yet you decided to send the coins without doing it and ended up being scammed, or so you say.
Don't try to twist my words.

You may have the right to get your money back, but that will never happen. Nor will any exchange owner freeze some account just because you send him copies of a few PM's on a forum coupled with some TX ID's. I'm sorry you don't understand how unreasonable your request is.

Now for the cherry: Prove that other account who allegedly scammed you isn't under your control, as in "a sock-puppet".
No, the fact you never shared an IP address with that other account doesn't prove shit.
Whatever you could get with the meagre evidence you have, you already got it: the other account got a scammer tag.

Now, stop crying and go on with your life.

Nope, that's not how it works.
How can you prove you didn't send the coins to him on your own free will and are now trying to scam him?

Imagine someone gets caught with your bicycle and you say they stole it. The dude says you gave him the bicycle on your own free will and you have absolutely no evidence he was the one who stole your bike.
You press charges and the dude gets sent to court: Do you really think any judge would convict him without evidence?

Proving the coins were yours at some previous point in time doesn't prove they were stolen.

You may get him a scammer tag(again? LOL) but your evidence is pretty weak, as in non-existent, when you talk about getting a possible exchange admin to freeze an account, and that was what you were saying and what I asked about

PS: Nobody should be helping you "catch the thief". You LOST your coins because you were careless. You had everything at your disposal to find that it was a fake contract with a fake pgp signature, yet you didn't...
Write it off as a learning fee. The dude is tagged as scammer already, and that's all you're going to get.
I'm even going to tell you that he was only tagged as scammer that fast because he used the escrow contract of a global moderator. If he hadn't done that you would still be crying for theymos give him a scammer tag.

You could just turn uPnP on and have 125 connections or more, if you raised the limit in the bitcoin.conf file.
If uPnP doesn't work you can always forward the right port on your router and have the same effect.

Any of the 2 solutions above sure beats the crap out of having to compile Bitcoin-Qt from scratch.

You can't do that, because Bitcoin-qt is always creating new addresses to send change to, so those addresses will not be part of the blockchain.info wallet you imported. Sooner or later the addresses will be out-of-sync, like they already are in this case.