|
Looks like the chain is stuck
I'm on block 451589 have been for last 3-4 days
216863 without block (POW) secs
328632 without block (POS) secs
Is there still an explorer for this coin?
Can anyone fix this please.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
How about DOGE mining with Apollo BTC?  The clue is in the name.... The Apollo is the "SCRYPT miner" The Apollo BTC is the "SHA256D miner" and can be a full BTC node. |
|
|
|
0.10.1 Softfork Activation Updatehttps://github.com/Animecointeam/Animecoin/releases/tag/0.10.1This release activates BIP65 softfork. Once the majority of miners update, blocks of older versions will no longer be accepted by network.
A successful softfork activation will allow making animecoin contracts in the future! Would you please explain the fork. Why are you forking? What happens to the millions of coins in the older wallets? Reason i ask, is i still hold a lot of coin scattered over about 15-20 wallets, mainly 0.8 and 0.9.1, ( a couple might be 0.9.2)and see no reason to upgrade.... |
|
|
|
Okay. How to say that.... ping @Everyone HE DID IT !
The current GPUminer now works with NVIDIA cards. All you have to do is to replace the current fermat.cl file by the 'new' one.
This new file still seems to work with AMD cards.We can properly thank benxy031 for his solution to make the current miner work, with the NVIDIA cards. How To :You just have to use this fermat.cl instead of the default one. That's all !! 
This is not an Update. This is a Fix. (in the gpuminer's "gpu" directory, no need to (re)compile) (Temporary link, before integrating it properly into the project and releases.)Obviously, that doesn't change the problem of a new miner or an evolution of the current miner. But after so long without a working NVIDIA miner, it's still Awesome ! Enjoy, Plug in whatever you have  , and don't forget benxy031 ! I'll run a GTX660 ?(not plugged yet?), GTX970 with 13 CUs (1.6M PPS), 750ti with 5 CUs (700K PPS). I've tested a Quadro 410 512mb, it gives me 200K PPS for 1 CUs That's the low limit. Good Luck & Have Fun  2021 smells good. PS: Just saw this : 6186,C??,31.594989,Gapcoin,28-04-2021,86,10733691.. gg ! Can you please link to the miner you are using, cos the one i use, i get these errors [2021-04-29 11:44:42] Found platform[0] name = NVIDIA CUDA [2021-04-29 11:44:42] Found 1 device(s) [2021-04-29 11:44:46] Compiling ... [2021-04-29 11:44:46] Source: 642216 bytes [2021-04-29 11:46:05] <kernel>:4329:1: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' sqrProductScan320(uint32_t *out, uint32_t *op) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <kernel>:4670:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function } ^ <kernel>:4671:1: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' sqrProductScan352(uint32_t *out, uint32_t *op) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <kernel>:5068:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function } ^ <kernel>:5815:1: error: expected identifier or '(' <!DOCTYPE html> ^ <kernel>:5981:27: error: unknown type name 'up' Sign up ^ <kernel>:5982:15: error: expected identifier or '(' </a> ^ <kernel>:5988:27: error: unknown type name 'up' Sign up ^ <kernel>:5989:15: error: expected identifier or '(' </a> ^ <kernel>:6015:275: error: expected identifier or '(' <a href="/features" class="py-2 lh-condensed-ultra d-block Link--primary no-underline h5 Bump-lin hover" data-ga-click="(Logged out) Header, go to Features">Features <span class="Bump-link-symbol float-right text-no l color-text-tertiary pr-3">→</span></a> ^ <kernel>:6017:251: error: expected identifier or '(' <li class="edge-item-fix"><a href="/mobile" class="py-2 lh-condensed-ultra d-block Link--seco ry no-underline f5 Bump-link--hover">Mobile <span class="Bump-link-symbol float-right text-normal color-text-tertiary -3">→</span></a></li> |
|
|
|
Hi,
Anyone have any nodes / peers for this please?
Let the wallet open for more than 12 hours. Nomally you should find some peers still running the nodes. But for what reason? Bitcoin Interest is already dead. Just want to see if i can mine any and trade on Freiexchange |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Anyone have any nodes / peers for this please?
|
|
|
|
I believe that CPU capability and Ram speed plays a major role when mining chia or say plotting, your CPU have to be gen 9 or gen 10 if it's i series, if it's XEON build then even better, though some XEON are old, Ive ordered for a XEON build server since they have more cores and threads, also 128g ddr4 RAM onboard.
To plot it's better to use 1TB NVME SSD, though avoid running your OS on this ssd
If you are buying gear specifically for CHIA, try and buy a 2TB SSD / NVMe, you will squeeze 1 extra plot out (3 plots fit 1TB, but you can get 7 in 2TB) ALSO, try and buy Enterprise / Datacentre level SSD / NVMe, the writes KILL drives. you use approx 1.6TBW per 100GB written. So to plot say a 10TB drive, you will use 160 TBW. Most consumer SSD don't have much more life than this. (Make sure to look at Mixed USE, not READ optimised) I have also read that the enterprise drives have different priorities, so they can deliver the sustained read/writes much better, ie at full speed for the 8 hours needed to plot. My consumer drives even with heatsinks have massive peaks and troughs. For ref with a Ryzen 1800x, 32GB ram, 1TB NVme, and 1TB SSD, (2 x 3 plots - staggered at 5 minute intervals) i can plot 1.2TB a day MAX. Hope this helps Hi, thanks for sharing some light on this, I would like to ask you what a enterprise drive is? A friend told me that server HDD are better because they are build to run 24/7 everyday, how true is this? Are you running your farm on server PC? No worries. Enterprise / server / Datacentre all similar - its all to do with their high endurance, and the way the handle simultaneous, multiple continuous read / writes, compared to consumer drives, which generally are optimised for highest performance for single user reads and occasional writes... (thing datacentre ssd, 100's of users all reading / writing at same time 24/7 - this is similar to the plotting usage) Have a look here - https://chiadecentral.com/chia-blockchain-ssd-buying-guide/ |
|
|
|
I believe that CPU capability and Ram speed plays a major role when mining chia or say plotting, your CPU have to be gen 9 or gen 10 if it's i series, if it's XEON build then even better, though some XEON are old, Ive ordered for a XEON build server since they have more cores and threads, also 128g ddr4 RAM onboard.
To plot it's better to use 1TB NVME SSD, though avoid running your OS on this ssd
If you are buying gear specifically for CHIA, try and buy a 2TB SSD / NVMe, you will squeeze 1 extra plot out (3 plots fit 1TB, but you can get 7 in 2TB) ALSO, try and buy Enterprise / Datacentre level SSD / NVMe, the writes KILL drives. you use approx 1.6TBW per 100GB written. So to plot say a 10TB drive, you will use 160 TBW. Most consumer SSD don't have much more life than this. (Make sure to look at Mixed USE, not READ optimised) I have also read that the enterprise drives have different priorities, so they can deliver the sustained read/writes much better, ie at full speed for the 8 hours needed to plot. My consumer drives even with heatsinks have massive peaks and troughs. For ref with a Ryzen 1800x, 32GB ram, 1TB NVme, and 1TB SSD, (2 x 3 plots - staggered at 5 minute intervals) i can plot 1.2TB a day MAX. Hope this helps |
|
|
|
Hm...
@minerja, what do you think?
If someone wants to buy some of our lemons we could pay with that.
Or pay in lemons.
Do you accept lemons, Sir? Do you believe in the project?
Hi mate. How many Lemos do you have? I lost most of mine with the various forks that have happened this year...i had about 50,000 total, now have about 3000 |
|
|
|
|
Anyone know of anywhere trading ERC, apart from BTCPOP....
I can see a a few, but want 200 sats per coin (lowest price on BTCPOP), would consider LTC since BTC fees so high currently.
|
|
|
|
Hm...
@minerja, what do you think?
If someone wants to buy some of our lemons we could pay with that.
Or pay in lemons.
Do you accept lemons, Sir? Do you believe in the project?
Yes, I'll take lemons. 60,000 LEMON to create Explorer and 9,000 LEMON to keep it running for 1 year LRY51cDd3AcS1vTQtAv7yvsQ5Lw61wAaUm LOL I mine less that 1000 Lemons a week...so you want a years worth of lemons...erm, PASS |
|
|
|
I think, this coin is possible to list here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ and there will be no any problems with compatibility on add this. There is many bitcoin-based altcoins listed, on this multicoin blockexplorer. Earlier, I saw iquidus-blockexplorer for this coin, raised on some server. I can set up an Explorer, if someone is willing to fund the project ... Cost? |
|
|
|
No link to windows miner, just cpuminer-opt, which doesnt support heavyhash  How do we mine please |
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
Long time miner of the testnets here....
Mined literally millions of test coins with zero issues, BUT mainnet mining seems very weird.
My 1800x is only getting 20h/s according to suprnova, which means i get about 200 coins per day !
What hashrates are you all getting and with what kind of hardware please?
This is my output
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core Processor .
SW built on Feb 18 2020 with GCC 7.3.0.
CPU features: SSE2 AES SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 SHA.
SW features: SSE2 AES SSE4.2 AVX AVX2.
Algo features: SSE2 AES AVX2.
Start mining with AES AVX2.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] 16 CPU cores available, 8 miner threads selected.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://rtm.suprnova.cc:6273
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] 8 miner threads started, using 'gr' algorithm.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 3 to cpu 3.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 4 to cpu 4.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 5 to cpu 5.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 6 to cpu 6.
[2021-03-05 11:26:51] Binding thread 7 to cpu 7.
you are only using 8 threads, try with -t 16. on my 3600 @4.2 i'm getting around 350h/s on 12 threads Can you please tell me which miner you are using, i can't get close to half your speeds |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Just noticed that some of you are selling cache very cheap....whilst i appreciate that we live in a free market space, can i just say, that this is one of only a handful of old, genuine small miner coins.
It has stood the test of time, and is a great starter coin for any newbie.
I really feel selling it off at under 10 sats is crazy....heck to be honest anything under 100 sats is mad.
Lets keep it unique, and cherish its value, better to promote its presence and build it, rather than let it die as a 1 sat coin.
If you think i'm mad...just take a look at 42 coin, its always around 3 BTC per coin, and was a simple "scrypt" mineable coin....
50-100 sats feels a good range for Cache....
Just my 2 cents worth
Now POW mining is done by almost one person, using only the processors. From the above - 86400 (sec) / 900 (interval) = 96 block 96 x ~50 = 4800 CACHE 4800 x 0.00000003 x 58000 = 8.352 $ LOL, I love your enthusiasm, BUT, mining this coins IS SO RANDOM... Over the last 6-8 weeks i have managed to mine just under 100K, using 8 cores (ryzen 1800x the extra threads have zero impact on CACHE), and that was awesome. I clearly was wining most blocks, most days. (Sorry to the other miners) Then it all changed, and for all of March, i am lucky to get 10 blocks a day, so i assume the other guy is getting over 80, but its crap !!! Sometimes the nethash is 1-2h/s yet my 30H/s gets me zero blocks all day, then sometimes when the nethash is between 70-100h/s i get 10 blocks.... It is just so random to mine...and the POS simply doesn't work, or is way too complicated....with 100k coins i got nothing for weeks, then all of a sudden, i was getting more in stakes than mining, then for last 3 weeks, not 1 stake.... I guess i have mis-read things, but please make the POW and POS more staight forward.....might as well play darts with my eyes closed...... It also desperately needs a pool, cos its either win a bock or lose a block at the moment, and with literally 2-3 of us minnig it, 1 of us is winining hugely disproportionate amounts,a nd the other miners really are simply wasting their time..... |
|
|
|
Who wants a hodl wallet.dat file (along with fee_estimates.dat and peers.dat, if needed) with some coins in it?
I wouldn't mind. Been mining HODL for years Please PM me |
|
|
|
Guys, Do your own research before you get carried away with "potential" profits from BURST The new "fork" seems completely and still favours large scale miner / investors from what i can see.... Using this https://www.signum.network/calculator.htmlIf i have 100TB, AND pledge 500 Burst per TB as suggested, which means i have to spend around 10 x $190 (newegg 10TB ext HDD) = $1900 and 500 Burst x 100TB = 50,000 BURST in pledges (so another $290), so thats $2190 and in return i will get just over 57 BURST or $0.33 per DAY Now my maths could be way off, like i say do your own research...perhaps the calculator is wrong (don't be fooled by the commitment slider, when your enter your TB above, even thou commitment says ZERO, it is apply a considerable figure....move it up and back down to ZERO, you will see) Unfortunately, i cannot see how BURST is ever going to be worth while mining again...IT WAS VERY PROFITABLE 3-4 years ago....but now, unless you have a spare 1PB system, with free power, i can't get the numbers to add up... Also, in its heyday it was on many exchanges, over 15 i believe, now i think it is down to just 2..... If anyone really wants to mine a POC coin, may i suggest they simply clone the original BURST, and use it to create a NEW COIN, with no pools for as long as possible. That way with the exeptionally low starting difficulty, PERHAPS small miners will stand a slight change of getting some coin. In its current format, and proposed fork, i see zero point in any small miner trying any current POC coin oh, one last thing, don't be fooled by the "energy efficient mining". The plotting is incredibly intensive, and takes hours to days to weeks, depending on plot size and hardware (esp with SMR drives where 8TB can take 3 weeks) So that is very power intensive, and YES the plots only get scanned once every 4minutes or so...BUT i fould if the disks are continuosly powring down, and then having to power up every 3-4 mins, especially when you have say 10 internal drive, it puts huge stress on the disks motor (so they last no time at all) and quite often unless you stagger the start-up spins, you screw you power supply.... so you end up for relabilitys sake turning off the sleep and power saving modes, so they you have 10 x 10TB drives spinning 24/7, great for releabilty, but check your power consumption..... On that note, IF the figures work for you, give it a go, i certainly found it fun 4 years ago.....but then again BTC mining was also fun 10years ago.... |
|
|
|
What nodes?
No nodes. Coin been dead over 2 years |
|
|
|
OK, Finally wallet 0.5.9 has synced one more time Only working miner i have found is this one https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt/files/1996977/cpuminer-opt-3.8.8.1-windows.zip(i have no affiliation with jaydee, check for virus yourself, etc, i just find his miners cool) i am using the command below (ryzen 1800x) cpuminer-avx2-sha -a scryptjane:20 -o http://127.0.0.1:7687 -u user049 -p pass049 -t 8 and getting approx 1.5H/s per core, so in theory 12 H/s The miner only reports total hash once a hash has been submitted and accepted, so will update you if that ever happens. oh, wallet 1.0.0. is currently on same block height as 0.4.9 BUT thinks it has 30881 block to sync....DUH |
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
Just noticed that some of you are selling cache very cheap....whilst i appreciate that we live in a free market space, can i just say, that this is one of only a handful of old, genuine small miner coins.
It has stood the test of time, and is a great starter coin for any newbie.
I really feel selling it off at under 10 sats is crazy....heck to be honest anything under 100 sats is mad.
Lets keep it unique, and cherish its value, better to promote its presence and build it, rather than let it die as a 1 sat coin.
If you think i'm mad...just take a look at 42 coin, its always around 3 BTC per coin, and was a simple "scrypt" mineable coin....
50-100 sats feels a good range for Cache....
Just my 2 cents worth
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
