Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:54:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
841  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 11:25:13 PM
Is that all you've got? You're quite the pajeet scammer, making me bored. Two baboons, pajeet-thule and pajeet-cryptohunter. Do you like the spelling now? Actual pajeets have more money than CH. Ok.

Sounds like some croatian dog yapping away with no teeth, that's just your mother though... Where are your observable instances or evidence? oh there is none you dumb piece of 3rd world trash.

LOL spewing lies with no evidence. Typical euro trash garbage. I imagine you were like locked in some rancid euro trash shit hole cage as a child with your putrid sister standing there teasing you with... " you will never geet this, you will never geet this" haha

We like this one

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131477.msg50628003#msg50628003

this one with vod open admitting you and your fellow dumb shit gang that have been allowed to infest dt crush his cowardly ability to red trust you

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5137144.msg50915510#msg50915510

Too much evidence to support you being a lying scamming dirty piece of shit now for it to fade away. You have NOTHING ,NO EVIDENCE to support your claims. lies haha

This latest admission from LTC bitchcoward is another nice piece to throw in with VOD's admissions over and over and over.

You feel cocky because theymos seems to favor you. So what, this is an open forum the truth can not be concealed. Your history here is there in black and white for all to read. We archived it all just in case there is some strange server issue where it gets lost.





842  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 11:00:33 PM
Your word is dirt. Only a fucking eastern euro trash pleb like you would not realize that pajeethunter is something you would call someone who hunts pajeets like you and your group of gutter rats.
He is a pajeet(hunter), he doesn't actually hunt pajeets. Wink

He's a crypto, he doesn't actually hunt crypto? okay well if you say so.... but..

He hunts you, therefore he hunts pajeets. Dirty sig spamming bunch of retards. Imagine dumping your dark scam coins before they went parabolic you dumb fool haha. All those years lying to scam innocent investors into buying that premined scam coin and you go and unload too early. LOL . Now need to extort people and pull shady escrows. What a loser whilst a real legend like cryptohunter invested in nxt day after it released, a nem stake holder, picked 6 of the top 10 in the last bull run and made a bunch of millionaires from nothing. You're still here trying to scheme and scam no doubt. Lying again just now in public and failing to bring any evidence to corroborate your crap. What a pajeet loser.

Shhh pajeet go try bully some other sniveling cowards into backing your double standards lies and scamming shit. We will be here ready to bring it all up over and over and over and over again.

It has not dawned on you yet but there is no way for us to lose. We already made it. Can sit here forever just pulling you apart forever just for fun. Where are those fun lauda links demonstrating what a scum bag you are.. we like to post. One minute we pull them all up and bitch slap you around with them again. Then LFC blowjobqueen can come and ease your pain.

843  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 10:39:44 PM
-snip-
Why are you mad scammy cryptohunter?
Can you produce some evidence that cryptohunter scammed someone? sounds like more LIES from an observable liar and scammer, extortionist and shady escrow trust abuser.

Bring the evidence.
My word is more observable proof and observable fact(s) than anything you or pajeethunter ever provided as observable proof and observable fact(s). Cheesy

The observable fact here is you failed to produce anything you lying piece of trash.

Your word is dirt. Only a fucking eastern euro trash pleb like you would not realize that pajeethunter is something you would call someone who hunts pajeets like you and your group of gutter rats.



844  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 10:22:47 PM
-snip-
Why are you mad scammy cryptohunter?

Can you produce some evidence that cryptohunter scammed someone? sounds like more LIES from an observable liar and scammer, extortionist and shady escrow trust abuser.

Bring the evidence and we will compare it to the evidence we have that you are a liar and a scammer, and involved in Many SHADY behaviors here. We can examine the entire extortion and shady escrowing all over again in detail.

@yahoo923749023 - please you fucking moron how is ensuring people ALL get a FAIR and EQUAL chance anything like a liar and scammer like lauda openly demonstrating double standards? and forcing others to back those double standards because THEY will make their life harder if they do not.

LOL at hiding behind merits. This cycled dirt means nothing and is meaningless dog shit. Ask suchmoon if you do not understand. This gamed shit is controlled by your pals here and DT turds. That all happen to be on these same 2 highly paid sig campaigns. WHAT A SHOCK.

It is this " i get to choose who I want" that is why you are open to back handers, and other behind the scenes corruption. You need to demonstrate WHY YOU think the posts are better, not hide behind some broken subjective dog shit like merit.  If you can not then you  can be replaced by campaign managers that can do so. Projects do not want to be associated with corrupt campaign managers. If you do not understand this and the point about the initial distribution of tokens needing to be fair and not gamed due to collusion and market manipulation then you perhaps soon will.
 


845  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 09:56:12 PM


Must have been more intimidation, at least I don't leak intimidating- or non-PMs. Angry cat. Meow.

That's just typical Licking Felching Cumslurping  bitchcoward giving you his dishonest opinion in the hope you allow him to stay in your rancid gang because he needs his sig spamming bitcoin dust.

Probably beat himself his gf with a cane 100x after writing that.  What a gross pathetic excuse of a subhuman.

NO, you just lie, scam, extort, provide shady escrow and trust abuse.
846  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 09:35:06 PM
LFC provided the ultimate proof why this is happening
Yawn. Were I to intimidate anyone, you wouldn't ever be able to prove any of it. You are a scamming monkey for which about 1% of my brain is needed to beat. All the PMs that were sent out were suggestions and any of them can be published. I didn't put more than 15-20 seconds of writing into most of them, quite the intimidation. Roll Eyes

Shut up you lying scamming piece of euro garbage.

Your brain is low function dirt. Anonymint broke you stupid mind time and time again in public when you tried to sound smart. You are sneaky and devious that's about it. You likely have something on theymos. Also why people assume you are female is unclear. You are 100% a guy. Anyone who was familiar with you from years back could mistake you for TMAN. You were often found swearing and cursing I would not be shocked if TMAN is your alt at all. You, owlcatz tman yogg certainly a core of colluding filth there. Vod was always with you guys too. The lower level dregs of THEY or the gang are obvious if you just pull up any thread where one of them is called out. However, your days are numbered here. Too much smoke now. Too many see you for real.

ANYONE else that had be caught lying for financial gain (scamming) and then implicated in extortion schemes, shady escrow and trust abuse would be long gone here. Only because for some unknown reason Theymos seems to show you some degree of favor are you so cocky.

You are dirt, tman is dirt, marlborozo all these eastern euro garbage goons are dirt.

Like 15-20 seconds is not enough to write something to intimidate half the ass licking dregs here, what sort of pathetic excuse is that exactly?? what kind of idiots do you think will fall for these excuses??.  0.1 second in RL is more than enough to make 99% of them shit their pants. These sniveling rats will do anything to keep in with the bunch of dirt bags they perceive to have some power so they can keep spamming their mixing and gambling sigs. The entire DT is rotten. It is hard to look at any and say there is no dirt in their past.

LOL "you would never be able to prove it"Huh sounds like the person that can dream up unlikely explanations and excuses for his actions.

Suchmoon  "the excellent eater" that blob of fat is another scum bag. I notice her pic was removed in seconds. Thank god for that. What sort of freak show is that human garbage. I nearly hurled up all over the place. This imbecile and smarmacist and fox poop and the other bunch of dregs all in the same gang all clinging to each other because they know they are safe as long as they all support each other.

Love how salty turns up to once again be on the WRONG side of things. Like revealing a PM demonstrating clear intimidation and fear that the shitty systems of control give birth to and arguable for the "greater good" is SO UNTRUSTWORTHY but never says anything negative about lauda or his bunch of euro trash goons and all of their prior shady deeds and outright lies and scamming. Another chicken.  

Migoosens or whatever his shit name is blathering on some anecdotal crap that seems to change from post to post and seems unsure what to think or believe. Someone help this confused sole.

None of their excuses or CHANGING The direction (how untrustworthy to reveal a pm that demonstrates their is a huge intimidation racket controlling the entire boards paid to post and trade) makes any difference. That PM is a huge NAIL in this scumbags coffins and clearly demonstrates what kind of fucked up ill conceived dirt DT and merit are and how weak and pathetic fools are allowed some power clearly because "the gang" things these dogs will do as they are told. One step out of line and they are out and given a scam tag and shunned and they clearly know the score. Better keep kissing ass and feltching your eastern euro trash masters, lick lick suck suck slurp slurp.

Thanks for the clear evidence LFC. No point asskissing now, lauda has your number so do THEY. Only a matter of time until you are in this same position now LFC. Tick tock. "he'll have real friends like us" haha

@yahoo97692374

I don't need you to cave to pressure. We just need to find some instances where you did not accept candidates on first come first served basis where you can not present a clear case to refuse them but accept anyone later in the queue . I just need to find you discriminating against a member where you can not present a clear case they are not eligible to have joined IE they are actually a scammer or they can NOT make good posts. Not just some bogus red trust or earned merits bollocks you scamming and lying pals control.

Your projects are vulnerable especially those where the initial distribution of tokens depends upon those selected to advertise it. Corruption in the initial distribution means the the entire projects future is questionable and collusion therefore price manipulation is something ALL projects will seek to avoid. Nobody wants several threads detailing instances of unfair and shady distributional methods by corrupt campaign managers.  IF we had more time we could certainly ensure that campaign managers remain transparent and fair. You never know when we are going to make time. Then once we have demonstrated it JUST ONCE we can use it to leverage every project to avoid you.

Remain fair and transparent and there is no issue. Start favoring scammers and "gang" members or refusing entry to those that are NOT scammers who can make good posts. Then you could well have a problem on your hand. Think about it.

Being a campaign manager is a precarious position. Best to distance yourself from any REAL scammers and those gaming these broken metrics for their own ends.

Ignore cryingdumbfish. Notice how that imbecile talks just like Tman? or tries to. What a fucking mess of a moderator. Even hilarious and co seems more suitable than that cretin.  Both a couple of sig spamming idiots who are basically low functioning bums who crumble during any real debate. Imagine being here years through 2 bulls and needing to spam gambling and mixing sigs. Disgusting supporters and enablers of scammers and liars taking their sides over honest members who call for a fair and transparent environment where all members are treated equally.




847  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 07:37:09 PM
Can someone please help that sniveling ass feltching bitch  LFC bitcoin understand that he should not have just done what lauda said at all.

 He should have told lauda to fuck off you manipulative eastern euro gutter trash I will not do what you are instructing me to do, NOT I will do what I am ordered against my will because I'm a fucking slobbering sniveling wretch who will do anything to spam for bucks and shit scared to go against you and the other euro trash scum.

This dumb cretin is just making it worse for himself.  He is saying now he is bad because he has a conscience ?? wtf is wrong with this morons brain??  so what you should not have a conscience and just do whatever filthy deeds lauda tells you and it would have all been okay??? wtf is wrong with this fool?
[/u]
These people are low functioning, weak, and pathetic trash. Not that this was not obvious at their continual fawning and feltching lauda, tman and other low life trash at every opportunity.

We and our friends have been telling you all since we stumbled into this bunch of bullying scum trying to bully noobs around in meta and rep the entire board seems to have been taken over by scammers and liars we are very familiar with from the alt section from years back. As it unfolded it just seemed more and more unbelievable how widespread their influence was to the point theymos seems to support their actions.

Hhampuz and that other shady scum bag yahoo6293874  whatever are the people that need the greatest focus here. If Theymos refuses to fix these broken systems and insists scammers and liars float around with 300 green trust and are allowed to red trust whistleblowers ,then you need to take the fight to the campaign managers and even the projects themselves. These are far more vulnerable to bad press.

This abusive group of DT1 and their pals who are campaign managers have this entire thing sewn up. It is fucking obvious how it works.

Hhampuz, yahoo69687458  are hiding behind the red tags their scum bag pals slap on people as a reason to exclude them from projects and sigs. Also the "earned merit" garbage metric.

You need to INSIST there is a clear, transparent selection process for all campaign managers. First come first served basis. If anyone is turned away then this needs to be investigated. a/ is their post quality good enough b/ are they a scammer. If there is no reason for them to be turned away then they need to be accepted.

Once this red trust crap means NOTHING and they can not turn people away because they like lemons or decided to present observable instances of a DT's past histories then it will lose it's power and people will not be scared of getting this FAKE red trust and their reign of intimidation will be over.

Theymos cocked this up by giving "them" this power in the first place. If he told them YOU WILL BE BLACKLISTED IF YOU RED TRUST PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT SCAMMERS ....none of this intimidation and crushing of free speech would be happening.  Is there something malfunctioning with theymos? why is he not enforcing this? This dream of a hands off smart decentralized governance on an anonymous forum is IMPOSSIBLE? where is GM or shelby to help him understand this trial and error approach while honest members are slammed as scammers by REAL SCAMMERS is a fucking nightmare scenario for the entire board and the free speech here?

Same with the merit "carrot". That controls paid 2 post ability and rates so again has the same power to a slightly lesser extent.

Decouple it from rank after snr and lower it's significance or remove it from the trust system.

These people are abusing the POWER theymos gave them. The buck stops with him now.  If he will do nothing about it then you need to target the campaign managers and if they are acting untrustworthy then the PROJECT needs to be held accountable for hiring CORRUPT account managers. It is quite simple PROJECTS do not want a ton of threads in REP calling them out for hiring corrupt account managers and  therefore once they have been informed the PROJECT themselves are now going to be untrustworthy and corrupt if they still continue to use them.

Break these campaign managers apart from these euro trash scammers and it will all collapse .... these scammers must have NO POWER over persons abilities to sig spam here EXCEPT if they can prove they are scammers.

Campaign managers are simply using this merit and red trust (both controlled by their scamming pals and their ass lickers) garbage metric as "THEIR REASONS" to accept or deny participants. Bogus and bullshit.

Better still blacklist this untrustworthy scum from the start.

Thule was 100% correct this just makes it even clearer.  

All boils down to the same shit everything does.... it is all about the money, it controls people and their behaviors to the point they think they are wrong to have a conscience and should just do whatever they need to to ensure the best financial return.

Most people on meta are too thick to understand what we have just outlined, so it is likely a waste of our time. However, this latest PM reveal and what the LFC btc is saying about it just demonstrates THULE is 100% correct.
848  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 23, 2019, 04:41:33 PM
now it's time to solve the rest (negative feedback)
There is nothing to be solved. Account buyer = permanent negative.

Nothing? Are we really going to pretend like Vod's feedback isn't blatant abuse?
Your words are so much more confident than your actions, but neither has integrity.

The amount of negative feedback I have received when virtually everyone is in agreement that I am not a scammer, nor had any intentions of doing so, is absurd.

Relevant PM I received :

bill, I feel like a right ass hole but Lauda messaged me ... about you. She told me I should remove you from my trust list. I really didn’t want to do it because I do like you (a lot).

For my own comfort & to make my life easier I did it. I don’t want to get on the wrong side of them.

I am really sorry & I feel a dick for doing it. I had to tell you myself though before you see it yourself.

I hope you can forgive me.

LFC

I don't see you as someone that needs forgiveness. I see you as someone that is rightfully scared to have their reputation or account trashed and you are doing what you can to not be eaten alive for having your own opinion. This is a pattern of abuse and intimidation that goes far beyond yourself, but the problem is that there are too few people willing to actually hold anyone accountable.

I hope you can forgive me, for wishing you had more courage.

WOW

But wait, there is no "they" there is no gang? These systems of control are not being gamed and manipulated by a handful of eastern euro trash and their feltching puppets?  it is all a conspiracy in the true legends cryptohunters mind? he is just completely crazy and so are you now for suggesting it.  You and LFC are now market too by these euro trash goons.

Of course the systems of control here are wide open to manipulation, gaming and abuse. Of course these euro trash pigs and their gang are intimidating and pushing people around whilst making sure they cream off all the best sig deals and escrowing positions and their pals who run the main campaigns are ALL in on it.

Theymos must have rocks in his head not to see this and to have tied shitty gamed cycled merits to trust LOL ..creating systems of control that are wide open to abuse and give incentive and reward to abuse them. What kind of madness was this in the first place. Seems more like some kind of psy experiment.


Shame BILL you didn't realize that people that present OBSERVABLE INSTANCES OF PRIOR WRONGDOING by this bunch of scum are given red trust and a nice big scam label. Then the "gang" and their pals all try to gang up on them.

The way to immediately notice this APART FROM THE GLARING OBVIOUS .... is the double standards being pushed here.

Nutildah is trying to spin that it is some kind of story that he was screaming people should have red trust for selling their accounts in 2014 because it facilitated scamming and anyone selling their account was EVIL. Then that fuck went and sold or tried to sell his account. The INTENT there is far WORSE than your intent just for buying an account perhaps with ZERO intent to scam at all.

Lauda has been a liar and scammer from the start, he has remained shady as fuck. Theymos is out of control asking OG to remove his legitimate red tags and will not give one shit about honest members that battled that dirty scum bag previously and fought to crush his lies and scamming to ensure the entire board was offered a $2 000 000 000 USD compensation deal. If cryptohunter had not called lauda out for his lies and scamming to start with the board would never have even had that offer and nobody would have mentioned the scammy instamine.

Theymos will rather ban HONEST and TRUSTWORTHY members who make a FUSS because they KNOW that lauda and his scummy pals are corrupt and untrustworthy .... then wants scammers and liars like lauda to float around with 300 GREEN?? disgusting.

Yes, this is lauda's fault and that turd bunch of euro scum like tman, owlcatz , yogg  that entire bunch of observable scum and all the pathetic ass kissing sniveling wretches like LFC btc and the 3rd world bunch of gutter rats all willing to say or do anything for a higher rate of sig spamming.  BUT ULTIMATELY this is THEYMOS's fault. He is the warden of this forum and he has turned this board into a complete and utter disgrace where scammers that lied and cheated float around with 300 GREEN giving out orders and scaring all the pathetic dregs they "allow" to be on DT whilst honest and trustworthy members that fight them from the start are told they will get banned if they dont STFU. Then these scammers and liars are ALLOWED to go and give scam tags to those honest members that fought them and proved they were liars and scammers in the first place.



HCP - Hideous Crap Poster - your post is full of shit.

Observable instance 1 - you avoid my central point of the observable DOUBLE STANDARDS from lauda and his bunch in the treatment of bill gator compared with nutildah with regards to account sales and intent. That is the key point which relates to the initial posters point (THULE) that there is vindictive and unfair treatment of bill gator here.

Observable instance 2 - You are talking shit. When someone sees STRONGLY BELIEVES is a SCAMMER  EXTREME CAUTION of course this person is a scammer  or a highly probable scammer is fixed in their mind. If they are logged in they will see it near their user name??  Are you out of your tiny feeble mind telling me because I could not be bothered to type out the entire message and just put a big red sign saying you are a scammer  THAT IS NOTHING LIKE WHAT THE REALITY IS AND A WILD INCORRECT FANTASY..oh really perhaps they think they will send you all their btc to look after and you are not a scammer in the slightest...??

Another asskissing dreg, who avoids the central point because he knows that is not something he can tackle. Also bring the OFTEN INCORRECT other fantasies you are MAKING UP.


Bill you should have taken note months ago when many others were getting red tags for NOTHING related to scamming and in several instances they were simply presenting observable instances of DT members own wrong doing?  shame it only seems to matter now that it is you that is getting tagged for something that is NOT related to scamming.

The cesspit of corruption is so widespread and so infested here even at moderator level I do not think Theymos has the balls or the will power to black list them all. We were growing more and more negative on Theymos but of late he seems to have picked up his game. First standing up to vod and lauda  now showing you favor here , also taking away the weaponized C and P down to sig removal.  Next he needs to decouple merit from rank after snr, reduced merits domination of trust (greatly) and black list ANY member that ..

1. Leaves red for anything other than direct scamming or STRONGLY believe the person is scamming (and can provide a case that stands up to scrutiny.

2. Refuses to red trust scammers if they are show evidence of scamming.


LFC btc = spineless asslicking feltcher like we always said plus a dog shit one line shit poster for 1000s of his posts. Pathetic, get these dregs off DT.  You need people on DT that are not intimidated or manipulated by their own greed and self serving agendas. Or nerds that sit at home with no friends and need to be part of some internet club.

Theymos make some members with ZERO scamming in their past and prior history of standing up to scammers and  huge gangs of their supporters and any other untrustworthy scumbags SUPER mods. Those that need no "pals" here and will do the "right" thing here regardless of pressure of intimidation. Not just here to milk mixing and gambling sigs.

 Banning these people is disgusting you should be giving them positions of power so they can clean up this mess your systems have created. That is not being unkind to you. You may have tried with good intentions to make this board a better place but you have failed. Time to start the clean up. Get these dregs off of DT ffs. How much more can come under "gray" soon to meet the "lauda" threshold of red would be impossible for even the most determined scammer.







849  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 22, 2019, 03:20:46 PM

1. nutildah was claiming in 2014 that all members selling their accounts are facilitating scammers and are evil. In 2016 he sold or tried to sell his account (knowingly facilitating scammers) Some say lauda bought that account and later announced it was no longer for sale. This is unknown. Either way recently Lauda who knows all about this nutildah debacle said there is nothing we can say that will cause him to red tag the nutildah account (who would want to tag their own alt) or such a loyal ass feltcher.


The one below us all...... IMO nutildah is one of the real awesome members, have had great talks with him, I couldn't say anything bad about thaaa dude!!!

Cheesy

Who is this nobody noob garbage? stfu. Nobody wants to hear about some asskissing pleb like you and your opinions of an self confessed EVIL account seller.

Try reading the post and making some kind of sensible rebuttal based on observable instances. The opinion of noob trash means nothing to me. You are likely nutildahs alt knowing that self confessed EVIL account trading scum bag.

2017 lol .... please get back to the newbie board. You can be part of the meta board human centipede when I say so.

850  Other / Meta / Re: [Ban Appeal] bill gator on: May 22, 2019, 03:15:24 PM
Everybody knows what exactly self admittance of account buying means and so experienced user admitting it (when denied previously on pretext of friend), does not sound logical to me.
You seriously think that baboon gator is capable of logic? That joke isn't even amusing. His DT and "trustworthy" days are over.

Ironically, baboons are  capable of logic. But OP, here looks plainly stupid, creating a thread when the punishment is already lenient and frowning the whole community.

I think the account is dead to him anyway, what with the temp ban and the sig ban (no more signature earnings) so it's a last-ditch long-shot effort to revert the ban. Nothing to lose. Sometimes extreme honesty can work. I don't think it will in this case though. Too many lies make the newfound honesty questionable.

LOL at snitchmoon and lauda the liar here.  Talking about lies and logic??

1. Lauda has been found guilty of lying for financial reward (scamming) probable extortion, shady escrow, trust abuse... and yet suchmoron has NO PROBLEM trusting them and including them on DT1. Anything that comes from its slobbering chops is questionable.

Suchmoon is the front man/bbw for this lauda/tman/owlcatz/yogg scammy little bunch of dirt bags.

I tell you what snitch moon, dig your BBW nose into all the dirt you can find on bill gator and I will bring all the dirt on lauda, tman, and we can compare in public?  we will see who is less trustworthy and who it would be far more dangerous to set in a position of DT1.

I don't give one shit about bill gator, that fool never stuck up for the true legend at all, and joined in when it suited him to be part of their gang of dirt bags. I suspect he only appealed out of greed for his sig.

However, double standards need to be pointed out in every thread. They are ON TOPIC and RELEVANT because they furnish the reader with the full and deep understanding of the matters at hand, and peoples possible motives and reasons for the opinions they give with no real grounding or demonstrate the context they are trying to build for offering those opinions are false or misleading.

I would rather see billgator in DT1 than that blob snichmoon or its master lauda. Although all 3 are likely highly unsuitable.

I don't care about his appeal either way, who cares about a sig ban. However, his red tags for buying an account can only remain by lauda and tman or ANY OTHER DT if they also red tag nutildah.  No more double standards.

Keep his sig ban on (who cares) but remove his red tags and stop discussing him as untrustworthy and unworthy of DT1 based on things you give others a pass on and are guilty of yourselves.

851  Other / Meta / Re: @THEYMOS Abusive group punished DT1 for speaking up against them on: May 22, 2019, 02:57:18 PM
It appears the same old group of scammers and their feltchers are in here.

Thule is pretty much correct. (the most important part)

A bot may have snagged bill gator and he got what anyone else would have got. This he should have accepted. It is a far reduced weapon now (a good move from theymos at last). Unless you are a repeat copy and paster for financial reasons you will just get a 2 year sig ban. If you are a real enthusiast you would not care too much about that or even a 10yr one. Only losers and dregs of legends still spam their gambling and mixing sigs.

However, being foolish and likely not liking the idea of 2 years without a sig payment he played into the gangs hands here.

He is now going to have those tags and his sig is gone likely for a long time. Even worse now every thread he starts will show a THIS THREAD IS STARTED BY A SCAMMER (thanks theymos ffs a dreadful and disgraceful implementation without ensuring only scammers have red tags)

The abuse is still clear though. Lauda is observably talking shit again to give out red tags to anyone that stands up to their gang of untrustworthy scum. He says intent is important?? or really?

1. nutildah was claiming in 2014 that all members selling their accounts are facilitating scammers and are evil. In 2016 he sold or tried to sell his account (knowingly facilitating scammers) Some say lauda bought that account and later announced it was no longer for sale. This is unknown. Either way recently Lauda who knows all about this nutildah debacle said there is nothing we can say that will cause him to red tag the nutildah account (who would want to tag their own alt) or such a loyal ass feltcher.

2. Now though Lauda and his gang of ass kissing dregs like Tman and the rest. Say account sellers MUST HAVE A RED TAG. Especially if they do not like them.

Bill gator perhaps bought the account with no intent what so ever of scamming. Nutildah said only those wanting to facilitate scams and are evil will sell their accounts and then sold his??? Intent you say?? more observably bogus and gaming of these foolish systems of control.

So yes, if poor old bill had been kissing some lauda scamming and lying ass then he would come under the nutildah protection. Sadly he spoke out against vod (correctly so) and is going to pay for that dearly. Lauda and that imbecile tman will see to this and their asskissing 3rd bunch of dregs will follow.

SO thule you were correct on your core point but the bot located him not our resident BBW snitchmoon. Who knows what happens behind the scenes. Perhaps the issue would not have been reported at all if he was part of the "gang" who runs this bot and how it it filtered seems currently unknown. This part is not really relevant though to his treatment over the copy and paste and subsequent to his foolish appeal.

He would have been best to just take the sig ban and accept it.  He gave them the opportunity to plaster him with red now.
852  Economy / Reputation / Re: Record of our deleted posts - permitted flow preventing relevant information on: May 22, 2019, 01:22:18 PM
Delete 7

I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
We should not be trying to leverage this just to get our own red removed.

We need to think of the best interests of the entire board. There can be no valid reason to remove red from persons that have such a trail of observable financially motivated dangerous and scamming behaviors on this board.


Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden.

1. how was it off topic?
2. how was it irrelevant ?

which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda

What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be.

This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.

Nobody is forcing you to stay.

Also, you should include a link to each topic when complaining about a deleted post (for reference).

Wait until this post is about to drop off page 1 before bumping it in future.

Everyone honest person is forcing me to stay. You mean nobody from your fortune jack sig spamming dirt bag club wants me to stay.

The email contained no link. This seems like an issue with the forum software. It should give the mods name, the mods reason for deleting and the link. Take it up with theymos.
853  Economy / Reputation / Re: Record of our deleted posts - permitted flow preventing relevant information on: May 22, 2019, 12:38:21 PM
Delete 7

I have a relaxing week off to enjoy myself and come back to more disgusting shady and devious moderation

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
We should not be trying to leverage this just to get our own red removed.

We need to think of the best interests of the entire board. There can be no valid reason to remove red from persons that have such a trail of observable financially motivated dangerous and scamming behaviors on this board.


Explanation required or again I call these mods out for being super shady here. Trying to weaponize this "deleted posts" metric to get excellent, honest and and truthful members banned. Also hiding truths their pals want to remain hidden.

1. how was it off topic?
2. how was it irrelevant ?

which mod deleted it ? from my own thread? examining OGnastys motivation for the removal of legitimate scam tags from an observable liar and scammer like lauda

What kind of board is this where you get a scam tag for presenting observable instances of lying and scamming by those voting themselves into DT and excluding any other persons that dare to call them out for the untrustworthy scum they have demonstrated themselves to be.

This is becoming one of the most horrendous environments of any forum out there.
854  Other / Meta / Re: Merit source application of Coolcryptovator. [Updated] on: May 12, 2019, 05:53:29 PM
I approve this merit source application!

In light of your recent use of merits to support doxing of a very snr member and that endangered him and the boards funds then I think it best the reader strike this endorsement or treat it as a negative sign.

I would consider your removal from merit source more appropriate.

Too many endorsements from too many of those that have politics that we find detrimental to the boards optimal functioning.

Better for theymos to locate other members that can balance the rather unfair and biased politics that are being pushed hard on meta in recent times. Not add more that are closely aligned with them.

Now merit is TRUST, then we need to be very careful to keep a sensible balance of persons that are on either side.  Not have all merit sources that seem to align with the same group.
855  Economy / Reputation / Re: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz on: May 12, 2019, 05:47:26 PM
It's more an example of someone encouraging another user to endanger the lives of potentially innocent bystanders.

Where I am from, if you scream to the public "That guy has a lot of money! This is where he sleeps!" guess who ends up naked and robbed in a burning building? It doesn't matter if he actually has money, or if that's even where he sleeps. It's not cute and it is not a game; you can get people hurt like this.

Make sure to apply the same high standards when Og's lapdog doxes random people for spurious reasons, even outside of Investigations.

Merit is not an encouragement or anything of the sort. It's an opinion at most, and not necessarily an opinion agreeing with the post being merited. Let's calm down with the exaggerations.

Exactly why you correctly noted the merit score metric is meaningless and totally inappropriate to base a TRUST system upon it.
The vast majority of merit given out by this bunch to each other is in support of their shared agenda and protection of their gang members. Pull up ALL of their past meriting of each other and start going through it all. This comment by suchmoon is deceptive and intentionally misleading.

Lauda is down playing the danger VOD has put OGnasty AND the board at.  

1. People may have not been looking at OGnasty and been privy to the information vod has been shouting about for ages. (increased incentive)
2. People may not have known where to look for his doxx or had the incentive before

Now however,

1. More attention to OG over all of this and more incentive to be interested in him and his location
2. Increased awareness of his location
3. New attention from authorities (that may confiscate and find reason to hold for years until it is sorted out)


So increased awareness and widespread incentive, easy details of location, endangerment to OG physically, endangerment of board funds.

This is clearly increasing the probability of several negative implications of OGnasty and the entire board.

If vod does not get a red tag for this then NO PERSON DOXXING OTHERS should get a red tag. There is NO proof OG scammed or did anything wrong at all.

Vod gives red tags if you tell him he needs to present evidence before making accusations against OG and delete his 3rd "SAME" accusation ? but he does not deserve it for potentially being responsible for OG  being hurt or robbed or the BOARDS money being stolen.

What a joke of a system we have here with the biggest joke being the scammers and liars on DT getting to give out red trust to other honest members FOR WHATEVER REASON THEY LIKE lol.

This clearly demonstrates the inner gang are untouchable now. This board is screwed.

This is the problem with granting DT members "special treatment" with scamming, extorting, doxxing, etc etc. Now everyone has a right to say they can NOT have a red tag for doing the same thing or the entire system is unfair and corrupt, and they would be correct. Allowing a 2 tier system is pure corruption and sure failure of this system.

You need clear, fair rules that ALL members have to stick to or they ALL get the same punishment. Anything else will tear the board apart.

What is wrong with VOD and Hhampuz is clear. They think double standards are fine, so are corrupt if not scammers themselves. Perhaps not worth red trust under the red trust for Scammers ONLY rule but should be blacklisted from DT and given a warning for that. Removed from merit source for sure. This is worse than political meriting (which everyone does anyway).

TG - these are not valued members (maybe to each other) these are a bunch on non achieving double standards scum and some are observable liars and scammers among other things. Don't be sorry, be glad you took a stand. It is there in history now.

Your reasons for red trust are far more admirable and noble than theirs in many cases. Watch your back though now.

Suchmoon is their front man it is not as reckless as the inner gang with trust abuse but will be found supporting lauda, vod , tman, owl, any of those just the same as Huge Black Woman aka the pharmacist, fox pup. All cycling merits to each other all including each other on DT all excluding similar members. There is no decentralization here, it is collusion and gang mentality with no single point of accountability.





856  Economy / Reputation / Re: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz on: May 12, 2019, 12:07:58 PM
Neg.-rating someone just because they sent out 1 merit is completely backwards and proper trust abuse in my view. It's similar to political de-platforming.
It may not be neg-worthy on its own but it sure lets you know where they stand..
So what about it? IMO plenty of people could anonymously DOXX and/or anonymously support the DOXX-ing of Og. I'm not allowed to merit such a thread? Objectively it took effort to create regardless of whether it is right or wrong, and that's how merit should be used. Don't use your morality and nepotism to pollute the system.


As I had said, I would have much preferred having some sort of forum tools to address this in a completely different way. My red tags have never been permanent but I felt like this was the closest tool available to get my point across/initiate change. All the right eyes are on this topic right now.. instead of trying to hang me, lets figure out how to fix this. You think I want to red tag some of the best members on various boards?
I won't tag Vod for this action and I'd certainly counter any ratings on all the meriters. The DOXX has already been removed. This action won't prevent future DOXXing. All the right eyes on this thread does what exactly?

Typos.

teeGUMES was just made an example of by those that really control DT. Theymos blessing will do nothing to save him now or in the future. He is marked. His back peddling now will not help him they will remember this.

This repeated "fuck off" to theymos from Lauda is quite strange. Only the other day we asked Lauda why he was saying he will ignore theymos's instructions to use red trust for scammers and those present a case for STRONGLY attempting to scam.

He said theymos is now the student and he is the master?

How does Lauda get to just repeatedly just give theymos the finger and get favor still? GRAY my ass. The scammers here can THANK lauda for pushing the threshold for being RED to a level most scammers would feel guilty of reaching lol

and yet she calls herself THE RED TRUST QUEEN - ffs this forum is a laughing stock to those that KNOW the REAL history of this individual. Having one of the most notorious liars, scammers, extortionists , shady escrows giving out red because you present observable instances in its past?  what a hilarious joke. A scam tag for warning about scammers. The inverse trust system.

This tight group of colluding scum (each with clear instances of observable financially related shady behaviors) and their tight knit supporters need blacklisting.

What do they have on Theymos that is preventing him blacklisting these dirt bags?

Just blacklist them all or delete DT Theymos. If these people are willing to give you the middle finger over and over in public like this then you need to take away their power before they destroy the entire forum.

They are clearly employing double standards here. One of their main arguments for red is that you "may" reveal some traders address. They red trust people for selling accounts but not their pals who try to sell theirs, or they red trust people for presenting observable instances from their post histories they want remain hidden.

This idiot VOD has been bullying OG with his group of colluding scumbag pals for weeks now. He gave us RED TRUST because we deleted a post of his that for the 3rd time accused OG nasty of being a liar when we said he needs to present evidence to continue making such claims. [size=12pt]So if you present observable instances of their wrong doing you get red trust. If you ask them to present evidence and not just make false claims you get red trust?? wtf is this system?  all the time you have idiots like foxpup showering their double standards and abuse with merits?? Others make a post that is truthful and honest and you come in and REMOVE their merits??[/size]
We asked if hhampuz openly supports these scammers and liars and got red trust for investigating it and presenting observable instances of their shady behaviors and these same bunch came running with red tags claiming defamation and then NOT EVEN DISPUTING the observable instances because they simply can not.

Now any DT1 that dares to red trust them is removed by the "gang" of untrustworthy colluding scum you allowed to infiltrate DT1.

Theymos do something about these people as we have been asking you for an age. You created some strange systems of control and just assume these kinds of people will do what you tell them and act for the best for the forum not themselves?? please be sensible.

How hard can it be??  Just tell ALL DT

1. If you red trust someone that you can not present STRONG case is a scammer = blacklist
2. If you are presented with a STRONG case someone is a scammer you must red trust them or = blacklist
3. Any DT that is found to have any financially motivated shady behavior (ever) = blacklisted.


Pushing OG to remove laudas legitimate scam tags left him MORE vulnerable. Those that previously would have certainly supported him against this kind of public bullying have not been as vocal in his support since he seems to have made a deal with the devil.

We are VERY encouraged with your opinions regarding this OG bullying and doxxing but still you are NOT going far enough. Kick these dogs off DT and blacklist them. You don't need to be a genius to see who is colluding with lauda, tman, owlcatz, hhampuz, ieoeio, vod, foxpup (this merit abusing idiot) (suchmoon to a lesser degree but still is bullying OG) , and others all ass kissing them and trying to get into DT and merit source and HugeBlackWoman. They all rally round each other as soon as one is called out.

You are shaming this board letting observable scammers and liars infest DT and use their powers (you gave them) to bully and defame honest members.

This is a trust system right?  whatever they have on you, just call their bluff. Fuck them, the board will support you if you clearly do what is right.

These people are bullies and untrustworthy scum? how did they get on DT in the first place?

If anyone did any real research on VOD you would find some quite disturbing and troubling accounts. To let him bully someone like OG who has been keeping the forums btc safe for a long time is outrageous.
857  Economy / Reputation / Re: LoyceV - robovac. low worth, low achieving, sig spamming fool. - REAL DEBATE. on: May 11, 2019, 11:52:42 AM

So now we notice another imbecile roll up to ignore the loyceV only multiple requests and try to TAKE THE PISS out of loyceV by making him appear unable to generate any original content of his own and totally lacking in creativity. Perhaps it really is low level AI we are dealing with. Something that is capable only of taking other peoples ideas and concepts and then pulling raw data based upon those ideas? like an ask jeeves kind of feature for this board.  Or finding related posts or guides or compilations of both when you request it. You could not ask it what are the possible implications of the merit and trust system because it would not know. You could ask it to create a guide on how the DT selection process functions because it could locate the set of rules that someone else created and it could present those to you.

It seems able to contain other persons ideas and out put them nicely and orderly,  but can not create it's own ideas to any level that would be interesting. This was demonstrated by cryptohunter when debating with it in the initial merit cycling threads where it just output obvious nonsense when asked something it could not locate a previous answer that someone else had generated. After which it withdrew from debating with cryptohunter for good and hid behind ignore and the "trolling" false accusation.

So we say bring YOUR BEST ORIGINAL THOUGHT PROVOKING POSTS. We stopped reading at number 4 because it is obviously an attempt to discredit loyce.

1. Was inspired by cryptohunter himself (like many of loyces later merit stats cycling "analysis" )LOL  - so much for original thought inspiring posts.

2.  Block PM's from newbies so people can not PM to scam them? fair enough but has been mentioned many times before, not exactly requiring huge creativity or thought.

3. "It's been suggested before, and khaled0111 suggested it again today: a possibility for users to report good unmerited posts to Merit Sources"  = errr more garbage about meaningless merit, suggested before multiple times BY OTHERS

4. " my  Mycelium  seems broken "   lol sorry to hear that rovobac.


If anyone other than loyceV posts on this thread from now on we will delete it. We don't know how loyceV has pissed off streamtime but we will not have others make fun of Loyce like this on our thread. We will await robovacs OWN presentation of his original thought inspiring posts and achievements. For an Absolute Imbecile, original thought and creativity/imagination are important and something to be proud of. No more piss taking.




Your OWN original thought inspiring posts that did or could have really made a difference.
858  Other / Meta / Re: Neutral Feedback to replace the red paint for non-scamming activities? on: May 11, 2019, 12:34:14 AM
Neutrals are useless in 99.99% of the cases, so no. I'll stick to red.
For things don't relate to trade/ exchange/ financial stuffs / scams, it should be neutral feedback.
That's what you think and I'm not frankly interested in your opinion. Unlike you, people actually complain to me about getting scammed somewhere quite often.

But could that be because they know about your track history here and presume you are behind the scam ? can you show us the complaints ?

How about those sensible persons that are not interested in your opinion? I mean why should we be discussing trust and suddenly be very interested in the opinion of a confirmed scammer, a probable extortionist and shady non transparent escrow ?

So you confirm you are telling Theymos you are going to do what you want and not what he is instructing you to do?  he says red trust for confirmed scammers ( we say you fit in there) or those you can present STRONG intention to scam others. You are not interested in Theymos's opinions then? why is that?

Because as far as we can tell tranthidung is repeating what Theymos has said. Red trust for confirmed scammers and those you can present STRONG evidence are going to scam. Everything else should be noted with a neutral tag.





859  Economy / Reputation / Re: LoyceV - robovac. low worth, low achieving, sig spamming fool. - REAL DEBATE. on: May 10, 2019, 11:36:33 PM
There is no need for any other thread. We will not delete any of loyceV own posts. He wanted a debate so it is really just for him and us. We just wish for an open debate. None of this "needs merit or it is deleted" bogus junk.

LoyceV own posts will not be deleted . Other people who post (even though we stipulated loyceV only) will be moderated if they are derailing. We prefer just loyceV takes part in this debate. If he does not wish to debate under these much fairer conditions then that is his choice.

How much fairer can we be? he can say what he likes in his own posts and we can say what we like in our own posts. They will not be moderated. The SM is for other members (who we prefer do not post at all).

From now on robovac only.
860  Economy / Reputation / Re: LoyceV - robovac. low worth, low achieving, sig spamming fool. - REAL DEBATE. on: May 10, 2019, 06:17:20 PM
sadly we had to remove Tmans latest mummy ramblings and sexual fantasies. . This damage should not ridiculed and made light of. Poor guy has obviously be subjected to some serious trauma in his youth. Let us get back to waiting for the original thought inspiring posts made by LoyceV and his outstanding achievements that made a huge difference here in all of his years.

Merit itself encourages group think. It is the carrot, and red trust is the stick. This was quite clearly and correctly described by cryptohunter in his most important thread of the year. That clearly missed out on lot of merit Smiley

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0

Those that read the entire thread and correctly understood it, would know that that merit and trust leave free speech vulnerable and encourage group think and echo chambers. Meta board is a concentrated example.

However, let us not go way off topic from the start. Let us give loyceV a fair chance to present.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!