I'm not really a fan of exchanges, but thanks to quite a bit of development over this year affecting how I'm able to trade out my Bitcoin (previously, P2P was my major, almost exclusive choice), I've had to try a few, and since last year been impressed with one based in Austria: BitPanda.com.
They don't have orderbooks (there is a new trading platform but it's separate) so it's more of a direct exchange at the rates given, and I've found them to be better priced than most other options (except P2P), and with no fees for withdrawals to SEPA, hard to find fault. They also have PSD2 licence, which is more than most other exchanges can say (seriously, I'm surprised how many don't have it), can verify most countries in the world, and have multiple fiat cashout options.
It's been really great with support too, and if I were forced to recommend one exchange, this is the one I would.
Trade fee: 1.49% (buy) 1.29% (sell) Listing fee: Not sure, their token trading platform is new. Age: Mobile app: yes Options: credit card, NETELLER, Skrill, Sofort, GIROPAY, Amazon.de vouchers (only payout), bank transfers. Currencies: USD, GPB, EURO, CHF. 2FA: yes HQ: Vienna, Austria Since: 2014 No KYC limit: 30k EUR cashout lifetime.
Sorry if this sounds like a shill!
Thanks for the information! I'll add it right away; this doesn't sound like a shill at all! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Occasional user of HitBTC here. Since the KYC part is incomplete. I would love to add in information based on user experience I have been able to trade and withdraw without providing any KYC details (Of course with small amounts) So Withdraw limits for Non KYC accounts are; 1 BTC daily 5 BTC monthly
Thanks for the information! However, there is one question that I'd like to ask. When did you trade the last time at HitBTC? Was it (very) recently?
|
|
|
OK, so we've got the first snapshot date finalized, finally: Balance check snapshot will be taken on November 12 at 12.00 UTC!This will only be a testing snapshot to ensure that the upcoming, the 2nd snapshot (the actual one) for the incentivized testnet will be bug-free. So even if you miss this one, you'll NOT lose the chance to participate in the incentivized testnet. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Feels good: "Today we set a new daily record of 1,756 Bakkt Bitcoin Futures contracts traded"
|
|
|
I'm glad to see the participation of y'all in this thread! As I've said many times before, I want everyone to help me in keeping the comparison updated; I can't keep it very accurate on my own as all of these platforms continuously evolve. Mercatox only requires KYC if you're withdrawing more than 0.5 BTC per day. Updated. As for Catex (based in China), it seems like it's mandatory. From their privacy policy: To comply with global industry regulatory standards including Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Know-Your-Customer (KYC), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF), Catex requires user accounts to undergo user identity authentication for both Personal & Enterprise-level accounts. This entails collecting formal identification.
I used it without KYC and I asked about it in TG before using it. They said I don't need KYC for the amount I wanted to trade and the amount was pretty low. But I don't know from what amount KYC is mandatory. Thanks for the valuable information! I guess it'll be better if someone contacts their official support and asks about this amount limit; I think I'll do it. | | | May 2018 | | | -0.12%/+0.01% | | | Free | | | 0.0006 BTC | | | No | | | No | | | Hong Kong | | | No | | | No KYC | | | No | | | 2FA | | | |
nice list but there is some incorrect information for Altilly Altilly is headquartered in Sweden not Hong Kong. (see: https://www.altilly.com/page/aboutus) Unfortunately they do have KYC, its opt in for now, and is part of their "AltillyPass" scheme. You have to pay them $10 to join it. (see: https://www.altilly.com/page/altillypass) Thanks for the information! I'll look into it and update the OP accordingly.
|
|
|
RadarRelay:
The total number of accusations: 0 The number of major accusations: 0
List:
<none>
Note: No scam accusations were found.
|
|
|
Adam Gilchrist predicts semifinalists for WT20; names favouriteshttps://sportscafe.in/articles/cricket/2019/nov/07/adam-gilchrist-predicts-semifinalists-for-wt-20-names-favourites
Tomorrow we have 3rd T20 match between Australia VS Pakistan, and Australia has leading the series with 1-0, there is any chance Pakistan can level the T20 series? or tomorrow also match going to end with one side.
It's gonna be one-sided; Finch, Warner, and Smith are gonna cook Pakistani bowlers again tomorrow and gonna win the T20 series. This win will also dethrone the Pakistan team from T20 (1st) ranking and I literally don't Pakistanis re-claiming this position for a long long time.
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FknECW66.png&t=663&c=Z32ot67X5-iNfg) Feels nice! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It seems like the release of SilentDragon mobile wallet is pushing it: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEIyZgSvXsAAW_L5%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3Dsmall&t=663&c=llqaPp3FMhhfGQ)
~snip~ You're being sarcastic here, right? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Yes ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Good to know! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Mercatox.com has been added to the comparison. I find it quite interesting that their exchange is not very well-known, but they've literally everything available. The margin trading, the fiat trading, the lending service, etc. are all included in their services.
|
|
|
Which in your opinion are the best exchanges for crypto-to-crypto (non-fiat) trading that do not require KYC?
I think Binance is mostly fine, at least for now (as long as you're not connecting from one of the restricted countries). Bisq isn't bad either but it's a different thing so it's very limited when it comes to volume and available trading pairs. The following thread of mine should be able to help y'all a bit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5079048.0Have a look at the KYC column of the comparison.
|
|
|
This post needs to be reported. But the question is, what the hell am I gonna put in the Comment section of the report? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
So... we got a new hard fork of Cardano (ADA)? Nice to have one, TBH! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Cardano Gold is not associated with us in any way. It is infringing on our trademark and violating our registered TM. Cardano Gold’s use of our trademark is illegal and we urge you to beware of this scam. Or is it not a fork?
It's Yoroi's 1st birthday and a newer version of it is released today: This update fixes connection issue with Ledger devices on Windows 10 and adds clear steps on how to use Ledger with Yoroi!
The demonstration of the new 0.15 version of Daedalus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Lf96bZksN0
|
|
|
Hmm... I don't think that the Pakistani side will be able to bowl out all three of them in their "whole tour". I've got a feeling that the Aussies are gonna make the sandwich of Pakistani side in this tour. ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif) Pakistan needs to change their pace bowlers (apart from Mohammad Amir). Both Mohammad Irfan and Wahab Riaz have been performing in a very ordinary manner for quite sometime now. The former is 37 years and the latter is 34. I don't understand the logic in sustaining with these bowlers. Pakistan has some very promising pace bowlers playing in the domestic competition and it may not be a bad idea to give them a chance. There are a few good players in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, such as Junaid Khan and Usman Shinwari. Mohammad Hasnain of Sindh is also an exciting young player. And another worrying aspect is their spin bowling. Ever since Saeed Ajmal retired, Pakistan has been without a world class spinner. Now Afghanistan is producing world class spinners (Rashid Khan, Mujeeb ur Rahman.etc), but Pakistan is left with below average spin bowlers. I completely agree. Bowling has always remained Pakistan's strength, but the scenario is changing quietly and PCB is not paying enough attention to it. Today's bowlers (Shadab, Husnain, Shinwari, Imad, Shaheen) are no-where near the level of Shoaib Akhtar, M. Asif, Afridi, Gul, S. Ajmal, etc. These all were a part of the team just a few years back, and since then, PCB has failed miserably in squeezing out the talent like that. I'm seeing a big downfall of the Pakistani team from here onwards. Misbah's roadmap leads to a total disaster, IMO.
|
|
|
Australia just need 15 runs to win and Smith played a wonderful innings and Pakistan was able to pick the wicket of Warner but then Smith played the anchor innings and continuing his form in the shorter format, Mohammad Irfan and Shadab Khan bowled really well but the rest of the bowlers gave away runs, Mohammad Amir started well but then Smith scored freely against him.
Australia won this one easily and am not surprised. This is why rankings don't always tell the complete truth people. Pakistan struggled through out the match. Iftikar and Azam gave them a decent total, but Australia dominated them. The super trio(Warner, Finch and Smith) continue to perform well. If the opposing team can take these 3 out quickly, Australia can be vulnerable as I mentioned in my previous post. Hmm... I don't think that the Pakistani side will be able to bowl out all three of them in their "whole tour". I've got a feeling that the Aussies are gonna make the sandwich of Pakistani side in this tour. ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif)
|
|
|
OP list updated with all the exchanges. More compilations coming soon!
|
|
|
"Not your keys, not your coins!" Einstein Crypto Exchange Seized by Canadian Securities RegulatorCanadian securities regulators have seized control of the Einstein cryptocurrency exchange.
The British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC) announced Monday that it had filed to take control of Einstein Exchange after the platform said on Oct. 31 that it planned to shut down its operations within the next 60 to 90 days. Einstein owes its customers $12.4 million ($16.3 million CAD), according to a court filing.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia granted the BCSC’s order and appointed accounting firm Grant Thornton as interim receiver to take control of the Vancouver-based exchange’s assets, going so far as to authorize Grant Thornton to take possession over any of Einstein’s properties and assets. A court order authorized Grant Thornton to forcibly enter any of Einstein’s business premises if necessary.
The firm entered and secured the premises of Einstein Exchange on Nov. 1.
~snip~
|
|
|
|