Just because you link to something, doesn't make it "fact". Yeah he found a bug in RingCT...which was not even live on a public network, then found examples of it in SDC and ended up breaking your project. How is that a bad thing? He made the bug public so SDC devs could fix it... please explain that logic. Being butthurt because someone found that your project is broken and publicly announces it... Such a bad thing... omg lol  The facts are in the article. There is nothing non-factual in it, and if there is I am happy to change it. It comes as no surprise to me that you dont get the point of the article and dont understand what professionalism is. This is the wild west of crypto...there is no such thing as professionalism. Only your opinion of professionalism in a tiny box. You obviously do not want to address the fact that Shen did SDC a favor in publicly announcing the exploit, which is the right thing to do. To compare RingCT bug with SDC's bug, is a broken comparison. RingCT was not live (nor was it public) on testnet/mainnet, SDC was live on mainnet when it was broken. Again I ask, should Shen have kept his finding private and not told the public? Would that have been better? |
|
|
|
+1 Rusty the way it was handled was very unprofessional, i would of thanked him personally for bringing the bug to our attention, That was after all the intention behind the bug bounty... But his conduct and the propaganda that has been spewed about it since is just disgusting to say the least.
Yes announcing a fatal flaw of a cryptocoin publicly so SDC developers could fix it, ...such an "unprofessional" way to do it. Perhaps Shen should have kept the bug private and deanonymized your chain later when it had more users/investments? Would that have been better?  |
|
|
|
Just because you link to something, doesn't make it "fact". Yeah he found a bug in RingCT...which was not even live on a public network, then found examples of it in SDC and ended up breaking your project. How is that a bad thing? He made the bug public so SDC devs could fix it... please explain that logic. Being butthurt because someone found that your project is broken and publicly announces it... Such a bad thing... omg lol |
|
|
|
So...who likes my chart  wow much green Love how you conveniently leave out SDC being broken and likely de-anonymizing its users/txs in the process. But keep selling us on SDC... Please explain what is not factual in the chart. And if you want to bring up sdc be broken then great, this is a perfect example how amateurish your cryptographer is. Can how explain how your leadership group are not a bunch of jerks. I've already explained it. Feel free to sling personal attacks on myself, I don't really get offended easily. But perhaps you could tone down the name calling of others and act like an adult? Thanks. Shen found the bug in YOUR version of ringCT Fixed the bug Then wrote that public blog about shadow The facts are clear. This whole thing just proves how unprofessional you guys are. And if i am coming across a bit angry well then maybe I am getting sick of all the crap that gets thrown at shadow from you morons. |
|
|
|
So...who likes my chart wow much green Love how you conveniently leave out SDC being broken and likely de-anonymizing its users/txs in the process. But keep selling us on SDC... Please explain what is not factual in the chart. And if you want to bring up sdc be broken then great, this is a perfect example how amateurish your cryptographer is. Can how explain how your leadership group are not a bunch of jerks. I've already explained it. Feel free to sling personal attacks on myself, I don't really get offended easily. But perhaps you could tone down the name calling of others and act like an adult? Thanks. |
|
|
|
Its funny that you morons are still pushing that we deanonymized shadow bullshit. Your anonymous kid cryptographer found the bug in your own codebase. This bug came from the same cryptonote whitepaper that both projects were working off. A few days after he fixed the bug in Moneros code he wrote that public blog. Its all documented here: https://decentralize.today/monero-had-the-same-bug-as-shadow-33a86ddeac2e#.sjo6i1y7jYou morons are a bunch of dicks for how you handled that situation and it shows that the poisoned community is led from the top. RingCT was on test net (or in pre-testnet phase) when "the bug" was "found". I'm not aware of any bug in RingCT...are you talking about Ring Signatures in monero? SDC was on mainnet and in the public usage when the bug in SDC was discovered. Kind of hard to compare the two. Shen released his findings publicly. If he wanted he could have kept it to himself and probably wreaked havoc on SDC. Your viewpoint is that of a butthurt supporter. SDC should be thankful that Shen found the bug and did not keep it a secret and made it public knowledge so it could be addressed. Monero didn't release broken shit, SDC did...are monero supporters still morons because of this? Or are we all adults here and can drop the name calling like kids did back in grade school?  |
|
|
|
raging....
Can you tell us if you bought SDC at a very high price and want it to go back higher? Sounds like a bribe i bought at 5k sat & Welcome to Ignore Typical.. 1. Make biased/unfounded claims 2. get called out on those claims 3. instead of addressing those claims directly, you run away or find a reason to run away |
|
|
|
So...who likes my chart wow much green Your chart is a sales pitch and is not 100% factual nor transparent. Love how you conveniently leave out SDC being broken and likely de-anonymizing its users/txs in the process. But keep selling us on SDC... Neither of those things fit into this chart, This chart is clearly Available features of the nominated projects, neither a past patched bug, or Acceptance to a few centralized markets, count as features. That's like saying you want to do a comparison of features but ignore the foundation of what you are selling stands on (proven, tested, vetted crypto). Seems kind of pointless. |
|
|
|
raging....
Can you tell us if you bought SDC at a very high price and want it to go back higher? |
|
|
|
So...who likes my chart wow much green Your chart is a sales pitch and is not 100% factual nor transparent. Love how you conveniently leave out SDC being broken and likely de-anonymizing its users/txs in the process. But keep selling us on SDC... |
|
|
|
I doubt it just have a look at how it measures up to the supposed shit coin Shadowcash(SDC). No wonder XMR fan boys wage a smear campaign on it this chart sort of speaks for its self! now go check the price difference  You forgot the following box: - Crypto has been broken by another coin's developer (SDC check) ----> which implies your first item for SDC is false as it has been de-anonymized by Shen Noether. - Accepted in DNMs (XMR check) |
|
|
|
CURRENT HIGH BIDS
| | | #1 | | | #2 | | | #3 | | | #4 | | | #5 | | | | Username | | | Blazed | | | dazedfool | | | coin@coin | | | tothemoonsands | | | digicoinuser | | | | Price | | | 0.4BTC | | | 0.2BTC | | | 0.21BTC | | | 0.21BTC | | | 0.21BTC | | |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT HIGH BIDS
| | | #1 | | | #2 | | | #3 | | | #4 | | | #5 | | | | Username | | | greenplastic | | | dazedfool | | | coin@coin | | | miffman | | | digicoinuser | | | | Price | | | 0.5BTC | | | 0.2BTC | | | 0.18BTC | | | 0.17BTC | | | 0.19BTC | | |
|
|
|
|
These next few months are critical and going to be volatile (probably). The after effects will be drawn out over years possibly decades. |
|
|
|
10 days ago that was posted... we were supposed to hit 0.01 days ago. Where is the 0.01 coins? Hardly a crash if volume of the decline < volume of the rise. Where's the crash? Perhaps font-ass doesn't follow the fundamentals of XMR and of course should be assumed to be just a pumper and dumper. XMR fundamentals much stronger than fontas can imagine. |
|
|
|
Monero just had a 50% correction, to be expected after the run up. I would like to see .015 hold for a good while.
I hope there will no more panic sellers so it can bounce back between .0175 to .020 again. Low volume != panic selling Low volume as compared to the volume that took the price up to 0.026. 7k-9k 24 volume even on the low end is crazy high 24 hour volume only a couple months ago. It has been consistent 10k+ 24 hour volume at the very least. But that is low in retrospect to the volume of the bull move (100k+ btc vol). |
|
|
|
Where are the first bits?
Where are the first bits?
Sorry I must have misread your question. The first bits will likely be lasered on to the upper left part of the hologram along with the serial #. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
