In che percentuale (indicativamente) è più alto?
Da diversi mesi è più alto di circa 10-20$ (ovviamente varia) più di Bitstamp. |
|
|
|
|
Il prezzo su MtGox è artificialmente alto a causa delle difficoltà di prelievo, e dunque non riflette il prezzo di mercato.
Di conseguenza i venditori singoli tendono a basarsi su tale prezzo per vendere ai loro utenti, il che sebbene certo non sia una frode, è decisamente fuorviante.
Secondo me è da considerarsi pratica scorretta e andrebbe proibita, specie perché va a colpire in particolare chi si sta avvicinando al mondo dei Bitcoin e di conseguenza non sa come interpretare tale affermazione.
|
|
|
|
|
DefaultTrust completely defeats the purpose of having trust handled by the users themselves.
Most users will keep their DefaultTrust setting, hence people who happen to sit in the DefaultTrust list have way too much power.
i.e. I can't leave a negative feedback to someone in that list, because if he'll reitaliate (and he'd likely do, if he deserved the negative feedback in the first place) I'll be labeled as untrustworthy for most users, who likely don't know or care how to setup trust properly.
If the reason why you put in the DefaultTrust is to give some extra protection to the lazy users, there's, for instance, a much better solution: no DefaultTrust, and a big red warning message "You have to setup your trust if you want to be safe" on every page.
That's just a random idea, but even just having no DefaultTrust would be much better than having it instead.
Please remove it, or people on it will be free to ill-behave at will.
|
|
|
|
Concluso con xxx un altra transazione x,xxx ottimo come sempre!
cioè riveli pubblicamente una transazione fatta da un tuo cliente? O_o e neanche ti rendi conto di quanto e perché sia grave una cosa del genere? sono sconcertato. |
|
|
|
There is so many threads about this. I can't believe how many people just search it quickly with google and think they have figured it out.
+1 unbelievable. I mean, I should know by now that the world is full of idiots, but they manage to surprise me everytime anyway. |
|
|
|
Suing a company for keeping to their own ToS which the user accepted? Only in America..
Actually, in every civilised country you can't "write just anything" in a contract. Illegal is illegal is illegal, doesn't matter if it's written down in a piece of signed paper. Or are you suggesting that you really believe that if you sign a contract which says you should murder someone, that contract is valid? |
|
|
|
Why don't you go for it and stop calling others 'sheep'? Because I don't have any money in Mt. Gox. Lame excuse. It's still relatively easy to get money into Mt. Gox as I understand things. It was a matter of sending in some BTC for me. Took a matter of seconds. What in the holy name of fuck?!? Are you suggesting that he should send money to mt.gox in order to have an excuse to sue them, because the actual people who are hurt by mt.gox are lazy instead? What's going on inside your head? |
|
|
|
Something really bad is gonna happen to MtGox soon. They are going to loose all their customers. And a heck load of money.
This post isn't really helpful, however. |
|
|
|
Buy cheap now before financial statement - don't sell too low if you bought at 2 - 3 or even more
Friedcat already said the divs will be lower the following weeks, that means to me actually shareprice
is a little undervalued
It will go back up only if he manages to deliver something worthy, and that's far from certain. We're basically at the same level of risk as when the IPO started. |
|
|
|
Just as I predicted. 796 is desperate in adding new assets.
If they are desperate, and they add an asset which turns out to be a scam, they'll likely be devastated after that. |
|
|
|
You have to draw the line somewhere.
And there's no "correct" level to place that line, you'll never be 100% safe.
But this could be verified to some extent. If after the OS and all necessary firewall/antivirus software re-installation on the new clean partition with no access to any previously used media the problem isn't gone then it is the case of such a rootkit presence with a very high probability. And how can you know if "the problem is gone"? |
|
|
|
what if he has a rootkit in the firmware of the keyboard or battery?
tinfoil-level security Exactly. You have to draw the line somewhere. And there's no "correct" level to place that line, you'll never be 100% safe. |
|
|
|
I guess there's little point in selling now anyway, so for now I'll just keep holding and hoping.
Lesson learned: investment is not a game for casual amateurs.
+1 I'd also like to add that unless you have time to follow the developements multiple times a day, you should instead get a broker that manages it, if you really want to invest something. |
|
|
|
It would be true if he accepted "real" money, but all he is handling is bitcoin, i.e. "fictional" money.
It is a demo because no real money comes into play.
lol bullshit over 9k. |
|
|
|
sure it would be better if all those websites use https. I dont think it is so bad.
I'm more preoccupied by botnet/rootkit/virus/malware/spyware than a "no-https" website.
Being pretty sure some sort of cyber-critter is actually using my GPU to mine while my computer is idle, but I dont know how to find it and erradicate it, Therefore, this is more a problem than a no-https website on my side.
OP bring a good observation anyway, I must admit.
Format your HDD and take the proper security precautions when you setup your OS again. what if he has a rootkit in the firmware of the keyboard or battery? |
|
|
|
<blah blah blah blah>
You're stupid, I'll help you. 30 BTC is more or less 1-2% of the whole BITVPS. |
|
|
|
I think you should move the monthly statemants back to your website,https://www.bitvps.com/
This is what you can and should do now.
You mean linking them on the site (I agree), because they have always been published on google docs IIRC. |
|
|
|
Thanks for your feedback, armchair lawyers.
The pot calling the kettle black... Interesting... PSA: OP is paving the way to steal all your coins. +1. It's clear as crystal, just read the "contract". Ooops it's not a contract, it's a demo. And remember he unilaterally changed it, without any warning. He's bulshitting you with this "fictional"+"demo" thing, which WON'T protect him from the State, but MIGHT protect him from his gullible users. If it was really a demo it would be on testnet instead on mainnet. This fact alone should be enough. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
