Using the scientific method to prove the Bible works. Anti-Bible scientists that use science on the Bible, don't use science in a complete way, or they ignore some of the findings, or they quit prematurely because they find that science is proving the Bible to be reliable.

Note that there has been no proof of evolution theory evolution (ETE) ever having been found. This makes ETE to exist in theory only. In fact, the idea that ETE occurred over extended periods of time, makes it unable to ever be proven until we develop working time machines, and methods to examine the DNA of millions of past creatures from multitudes of time zones.

The significance of this is that ETE scientists will always have their foot in the door regarding ETE, but they will never get in any further. The other significant point about this is, nobody will ever be able to use past DNA examinations to prove ETE is wrong.

This means that we will have to continue with the knowledge that adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like have nothing to do with ETE... because we can't even prove that ETE exists/existed.

Further, it proves that you are not asking or commenting about evolution. How? By the fact that I have answered these things for you over and over, and you can't find any way to contradict what I say. This proves that you have other reasons for continuing to comment the way you do on the evolution subject. You are trying to harm me by attempting to get me to slip up in something that I say.

This proves that you are a person of bad faith.

Finally you are close to the truth. The scientific method doesn't prove evolution. Rather, evolution is merely a science fiction story that the scientific method is continually proving more incorrect, the longer it is investigated scientifically.

I don't necessarily think the things that you say that I do just because you say that I do... especially since you contradict the things that you say at the same time that you say them. Rather, you suggest that you are a troll by interjecting ideas as you do.

The Holy Spirit filled my heart with the certainty that Jesus arose from death. This means that I didn't use any method to determine it.

Since you don't really even understand what the scientific method does and how it works, why would you think that I claim that it sucks? Do you mean like a vacuum cleaner? Like a sucker fish? Like the front end of a jet engine?

That's okay. I'm not really that curious.

Oh, sorry. I hadn't realized that you skipped scientific investigation class in school.

 

Since I answered the question, but you just don't seem to understand the answer, look above for the answer.

If the sum total of adaptation lies in evolution, it isn't a fact. But since it doesn't, go and investigate it so that you can tell me if it is fact or not.

Since evolution is not a fact, but it is portrayed as fact...

Evolution is a hoax.

Note that the definition of evolution is not given in the above quote. This means that the standard definition is to be used. But the standard definition is wrong, because we have no proof of even one animal or plant ever changing into another.

Note, also, that we don't really know of any beneficial mutations. All the mutations that are clearly not beneficial are obvious. But those that look beneficial may have long-term detrimental effects. This means that we don't even know if any mutations are beneficial.

This leaves the development part of the the adaptation description. Development is something that is essentially already programmed in the DNA. Adaptation simply makes certain programming more prevalent, so that the creature involved can adapt to new surroundings or climate, etc.

Seems to me that you don't know about some of the more simple facts of life.

KNOWING that things fall to the ground, doesn't have anything to do with knowing WHY they fall. They fall even if we don't know why.

In the case of gravity, if we want to know WHY gravity works, outside of being told why by someone who knows why, the scientific method might be the best way to find out why.

The WHY of it doesn't have anything to do with the fact that it happens. If nobody wants to know WHY, and nobody uses any method to determine WHY, it still happens.

^^^ There is a major difference between Jesus Christ and the others. The others have been dead for ages, or never existed. Jesus arose from the dead, and is powerfully alive.

Jesus exists through all time. He helped create the universe, was even the controlling factor in the creation.

You are treading on dangerous ground when you talk against Him.

Go to a cemetery and walk through it. Consider that you don't have any control, just like those poor dead jokers didn't. Be wise. Be humble, even fearful. God controls, not you or anyone else.

Good examination of DNA evidence might prove eye witness reports wrong. But we still haven't found any way that DNA proves or disproves gravity being real... at least without a lot of convoluted interpretation of DNA properties. Yet we have eye witness accounts of all the people that have ever lived on earth that gravity exists. Or do you have some DNA evidence that shows that gravity doesn't exist?

So, I totally agree that science works. Science theory works to substantiate science one way or another. Science theory itself isn't the point of science that is being substantiated by the theory.

Just for you, I'll repeat it again. What factually exists is adaptation, simple change, and like-begets-like. Evolution theory evolution has not been proven.

The funny thing is that loads of evolution thinkers who talk about evolution come right out and admit that there isn't any real evidence for evolution. Of course, they hide these kinds of statements... like at the end of their books.

This is the thing that makes evolution into the hoax that it is... not that a bunch of evolutionists are trying to find some proof of it.

To say that evolution and gravity are theories is to say that they are not known to exist factually.

Gravity exists. People use it all the time everyday.

Evolution doesn't exist that we know of.

Why do you think that time is meaningless for God? Just because you can't understand the thinking of a Guy Who made a whole, gigantic, tremendous universe that includes time. You might do all kinds of stuff that you know is useless, but why do you think that God acts that way? Are you stupid enough to think that you can match thinking with Somebody Who can build a universe simply by speaking it into existence?

Actually not pointless. Why not? Because even if God knew it all already, we don't know it until we find out. God isn't simply going to dump you into Hell because He knows that you won't accept salvation. Rather, He is showing you by your life that you were the one who DECIDED against salvation. God is being quite wise in this, so that you don't have any excuse to use against God on the Judgment Day.

What's really funny is all the people who believe science theories to be true, real, and fact. Then someone comes along, and changes the theory... and its believers are found to be just what they are... religious nuts who aren't even smart enough to realize that they have a religion in their science faith.

At least formal religious people know that they have a religion.

The price has to pretty much always remain constant across all exchanges, because arbatrageurs make it efficient like that.  Yes, bitcoin might sell at slightly different prices between exchanges, but that doesn't last for long as traders exploit the discrepancy.  Mt. Gox was a notable exception to this rule, and we all know why that was.  Stock exchanges are even more efficient than crypto ones, though there are far fewer stock ones and so that makes sense.

I think whales started it.  I don't think this was a collective action on the part of all the small players in the market, but who knows.  Ultimately I don't really care what kicked shit off--I'm just happy the breakout was upward rather than downward.