If a transaction is containing many inputs, the transaction virtual size can be high but the signature is just one. Or is that wrong? Or is the high size of the transaction that result to the issue?

Did you mean transactions that are broadcasted using a multisig wallet? If it is multisig, I do not use it as a multisig but as a single signature wallet.

I just don't know the legalities of building a business around that.

Are there some recommended approaches for running Bitcoin Core on a laptop with constrained storage capacity?

Is it possible to use an external hard drive as the data directory (datadir)?

How does this setup work, and would I need to pay attention to?

That's true most of the Operating System disable default Bluetooth by default but sometimes the users enable it and don't really care much about it because of the short range it has. Some people enable to it connect Bluetooth speakers and headphones and don't really care much about security when it comes to Bluetooth connection and that's can make things easier for hackers.

The same answer here as well like most people don't really care much about Bluetooth when it comes to security and they may not disable it only to connect some Bluetooth enabled devices.

For instance, do we know which hardware and software are always good sources of entropy and which aren't?

That's a first step , but with blocksize of 1MB and such fees not much can be created on BTC in massive scale .

I have a vision that I believe aligns perfectly with the values and aspirations of this community - to bring Bitcoin closer to everyday life, one street at a time. To bring this vision to life, I am embarking on a journey to launch a Bitcoin snack vending machine initiative. These vending machines will not only provide convenient snacks but will also promote the use of Bitcoin in a tangible way, fostering awareness and understanding of this groundbreaking technology.

Once online, this is the Pool where the Nerdminers connect to:
https://web.public-pool.io/#/

We're Not Understand You're!

OP, please speak (write) English. 

Of course one of the most important things to understand as a newbie in the crypto space is how to secure your digital assets. Therefore I decided to give air gapping a try In other to understand air gapping I tried air gapping an old windows PC today  since I didn't know a lot of technical stuff about the internal components of the computer I decided to uninstall all network drivers on the computer I tried doing this from my windows control panel.
Will this still count as an air gapped device or do I still have to remove the hard ware  networking components from the PC board?

And will it be possible for an hacker to install those drivers remotely?

UPDATE - Electrum 4.4.6

Di catatan rilisnya (https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES) tertera August 18, 2023, namun jika dilihat di https://download.electrum.org/ disana tertera 2023-08-21 02:15. Dengan kata lain selang beberapa hari ada beberapa perubahan sebelum benar-benar di publish untuk versi ini.

Versi ini merupakan security update*, jadi termasuk update yang cukup penting -imo.
Saya perhatikan fitur Lightning masih mendapat porsi perbaikan/pengembangan yang cukup sering.

--snip--

# Release 4.4.6 (August 18, 2023) (security update)
 * Lightning:
   - security fix: multiple lightning-related security issues have
     been fixed. See disclosures:
     - https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/security/advisories/GHSA-9gpc-prj9-89x7
     - https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/security/advisories/GHSA-8r85-vp7r-hjxf

These are several interesting points, but in my personal opinion, you must first convince game companies to use your wallet before convincing players. Most games use popular wallets and give the option of connecting two or three wallets, and players cannot choose a different wallet by their personal choice.

Other gaming companies make their own wallet and force players to use only their custom wallet and have no other choice.

I need it to my test which I implement my own trained AI.

Since no one on this thread is coordinating coinjoins themselves, it's proof that all the petitioners don't actually want to circumvent coinjoin censorship, they just want to harm the reputation of open source software.

Aren't the 2048 rounds of HMAC-SHA-512 as PBKDF2 there to also make the derivation from the initial seed computationally expensive so that brute-forcing is rendered considerably slower?

I don't know much about SHA-512 compared to SHA-256 in terms of computational complexity and expense, though.

That's an interesting approach for dice, and one I had not seen before. It is essentially the same basis as the Von Neumann debiasing algorithm for coins I linked to earlier in the thread, where you flip twice and discard the result if the two flips are the same, but adapted for dice.

Having said that, it's also far more complicated. I like to keep things simple and would just stick to coin flips.

I saw Andrew Poelstra talking about this on a "Bitcoin Layer" podcast recently. I have casino grade dice, with the sharp edges. Are these really biased? I assumed the casinos would demand some controls during manufacturing to try un-bias the dice.