God will comeback again but theres no exact date when he return for second time. Second coming of jesus christ for sure more people will really believe that gods exist and they believe jesus christ as their lord and our saviour to all our sins.
Can you explain to me what's the point of god ''waiting'' for some date to comeback when time is meaningless for god? It literally makes no sense, also consider god already knows who is going to be a faithful person and who isn't so the whole living on earth thing before going to heaven is pointless. |
|
|
|
^ not yet legendary  Scrub, look at all that fake merit, 1k+ merit and not even legendary, this system is flawed, reported. Can I see mine too? Although I only have like 120 merit |
|
|
|
|
I don't know basing most of your technical analysis on SMa's seems like a bad idea. It is not the first time that bitcoin breaks the 20 moving average and then drops right down, however it does look like a big move is going to happen soon. It basically reminds me of the market before the last crash, lack of volume, sideways trading, even though it's a bit more bullish than last time, not exactly sideways but still quite sideways for something as volatile as bitcoin. Perhaps a big bull breakout will happen this time and we can recover back to 6k+ but who knows, until we have some clarity you can't be sure.
|
|
|
|
Now you know how I feel. I think you might be the dishonest one.
You do know that people who wrote the Bible did not know that we live on the globe, do you? Or you are just pretending that they knew?
Who is the dishonest one? It took millennia before the helio-centric model was accepted. Your Christian ideology was against it along the way.
Yes I am aware of the history of the heliocentric model and the persecution of Galileo. It was understandable for the ancients pagan and Christian to believe the world was flat. It is a very different situation today with the tools we have at our disposal. The persecution of Galileo was not so understandable but all centralized human power corrupts and religions organizations are not immune. Regarding honesty I think I have done more the anyone else here except maybe BADecker to comprehensively and exhaustively lay out my views and the logical foundations of my position. You can disagree with me or believe me utterly mistaken but my position is honest and derives from a genuine desire to seek truth. Is it really a desire to seek the truth or a desire to seek hope. We are all humans, most of us think about the same things deep down, death, life, meaning, I admit I have faith and beliefs that are irrational sometimes when I think about death or if life has any meaning because otherwise my life would be, well, meaningless. I'm sure you also do that and you are not really looking for the truth if the truth is actually something along the lines of: the universe doesn't care, no one cares, everything is meaningless universally and we are all going to die and that's it. No one wants that, let's be honest, I don't however I also cannot force myself to believe in a God, the small hope I have is that perhaps life is not meaningless, maybe there is something, maybe we cannot even comprehend it right now, who knows. |
|
|
|
Since December last year that bitcoin fall below $4000 it has make several move of crossing above $4000 and it always get dumped after few days. I think a strong resistance has been created a little above $4000 and that is why we have not see a good recovery after this bear market. As at this moment bitcoin is trading around $4,052 across most of the popular exchange and my question is will bitcoin get below $4000 again or it is on the part to break the resistance level that has been pushing it backward?
The support above 4000 is getting stronger. Recently, the price tried to break above 4100 and for a while, it succeeded. Slowly but surely, bitcoin's price is breaking the resistance. This may go on for a while but I think 4500 is max before it sinks again. Good analysis there. I was also thinking the same. Bitcoin's price will gradually recover though it may experience a roller coaster ride, but most probably it'll head for a positive direction. And, yes $4.5k will be the next projected resistance level. So many fakeouts lately, I don't trust any support/resistance anymore, at this point we need a huge bull/bear move to really know where the market is heading. In the past few months bitcoin has broken several daily resistances and all of them had no follow through, just fakeouts, it's a very messy environment right now. |
|
|
|
So, it is you stupid FE Christians that are helping atheism to grow more than ever. After all, the Bible is meant for salvation... not to prove the shape of the earth.  I honestly can’t tell if these flat earth folks are religious idiots who genuinely believe their flat earth blather or atheist idiots seeking to attack Christianity via some form of misguided association fallacy. So far I can only conclude that they are idiots. It's funny that a religious person would call another religion person an idiot when you believe in nonsensical shit too, you know, a powerful being and magic. Flat earth can be proven wrong just as easily as the bible, we know the age of the universe, earth, we know evolution exists, basically any scientific discovery disproves the bible. |
|
|
|
^^^ I've posted images that indicate there's a d...<snip.. blah blah blah ~ load of the usual trolling bollocks~ blabbity blah blah blah...>
Hey dude! Your April Fools 4th anniversary of the longest running nonsense troll thread on Bitcointalk is approaching! What's say you, me and xempy celebrate and toast to the frisbee earth with an onyx metallic dome complete with a star and sun projector do-hicky on the firmament, or some such thing....all created by the supernatural invisible, almighty sky fairy. I will piss myself if on April 1st notbatman comes out and says the whole thing was really a troll and closed the thread. |
|
|
|
^^^ LOL! It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened, would make the 13.5 billion-year-old universe, millions of times too short for evolution to even get going. And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years old that the Bible says, evolutionists are the laughingstock. Either way, evolution is simply a passing philosophy... or for people like af_newbie who are serious about it - a religion. ''And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years '' Science already proved it's not using dozens of different methods. - Science never proved such. And they even state it by calling their own calculations "theory." All science has done is to formulate ideas that interpret observations in ways that they want, not in ways that are necessarily factual.''It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened'' That was already debunked and I linked it several times but your alzheimers is affecting you again, http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/ - Again, your debunking has to do with limited, circular thinking. And it is based on old data.Again, badecker, you can't win, science always wins. One of them it's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating and it's not a theory, even if it was a scientific theory, I know you have no problem believing in gravity, do you? That's a scientific theory too btw. ''Again, your debunking has to do with limited, circular thinking. And it is based on old data.'' Nope, ''the mathematical impossibility'' of evolution is based on old and wrong data as shown in that link and many more. Now you are starting to sound like notbatman in his flat earth thread. Gravity is not a theory. It is a fact, used by everyone every day of his life (except for folks on the ISS, of course). Gravity theory is the theory, not gravity fact. As I said in my previous post. New findings regarding the complexity of life show us that random chance can't bring about evolution in anything near the scientifically accepted age of the universe. But that is only if evolution happenstance worked the way that evolutionist say that it does. The fact of the matter is that evolutionists have it backward. How? Because they avoid the increase in the things that would destroy evolution, but focus on the things that increase evolution. In other words, the longer you roll the dice, the more chance you have to roll a particular sequence. But the greater the chances that you won't roll that particular sequence at the same time. Evolution is a complete fantasy hoax. ''New findings regarding the complexity of life show us that random chance can't bring about evolution'' Where are these new findings, can you link it? As the post above said, gravity is a scientific theory but I'm sure you know that, you simply ignore it on purpose because it fits your argument, as usual. |
|
|
|
^^^ LOL! It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened, would make the 13.5 billion-year-old universe, millions of times too short for evolution to even get going. And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years old that the Bible says, evolutionists are the laughingstock. Either way, evolution is simply a passing philosophy... or for people like af_newbie who are serious about it - a religion. ''And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years '' Science already proved it's not using dozens of different methods. - Science never proved such. And they even state it by calling their own calculations "theory." All science has done is to formulate ideas that interpret observations in ways that they want, not in ways that are necessarily factual.''It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened'' That was already debunked and I linked it several times but your alzheimers is affecting you again, http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/ - Again, your debunking has to do with limited, circular thinking. And it is based on old data.Again, badecker, you can't win, science always wins. One of them it's called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating and it's not a theory, even if it was a scientific theory, I know you have no problem believing in gravity, do you? That's a scientific theory too btw. ''Again, your debunking has to do with limited, circular thinking. And it is based on old data.'' Nope, ''the mathematical impossibility'' of evolution is based on old and wrong data as shown in that link and many more. |
|
|
|
^^^ LOL! It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened, would make the 13.5 billion-year-old universe, millions of times too short for evolution to even get going. And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years old that the Bible says, evolutionists are the laughingstock. Either way, evolution is simply a passing philosophy... or for people like af_newbie who are serious about it - a religion. ''And if the universe happens to be only the less than 10,000 years '' Science already proved it's not using dozens of different methods. ''It doesn't take much of a scientist at all, to figure out that the odds for the complexity involved in evolution to have happened'' That was already debunked and I linked it several times but your alzheimers is affecting you again, http://answers-in-reason.com/religion/mathematical-impossibility-evolution-debunked/Again, badecker, you can't win, science always wins. |
|
|
|
^^^ I've posted images that indicate there's a dome, you're a liar if you claim I haven't. In fact this is at least the second time you've made this accusation you fucking shill. Also it's better to have images that only provide limited evidence of the dome than showing provably fraudulent photographs of a globe earth.
You want to claim the lights in the sky are giant heavy balls billions and billions and billions of miles away, million mile wide thermonuclear bombs that never stop exploding with no proof what-so-ever. You're sharp as a bag full of wet mice if you believe any of that garbage, the Sun and the Moon and the stars are small close projected lights.
Watch the Sun travel across the sky, you're an idiot and a fool if you think it's not moving.
''images that indicate'' Because it's really hard to have direct evidence that there is a huge fucking giant dome above our heads? What about the projectors mate, what's up with that, where the hell are they? Again, nothing huh? It's always like that with you, claiming crazy shit but 0 evidence and it should be really easy to provide evidence of a huge giant dome or huge projectors or a huge wall of ice that covers the entire earth and yet, nothing, 0 photos or videos even in 2019, crazy huh? |
|
|
|
That's a ridiculous meme. You can't jump of the edge of the pancake earth, ffs. Why, its surrounded by a circle of huge antarctic glaciers and is guarded by an army of secret government mercenaries who will shoot you on sight if you try to get too close. Just ask Batty or his sockpuppet pal Xempy, they know all about these evil government conspiracy thingies... It's funny because he keeps mentioning these huge things like a big dome above our heads or insane projectors that are projecting the sun and other shit all the time and yet no one has seen them, ever, no pictures, videos, nothing, there is always some sort of excuse as of why not. |
|
|
|
Flat Earth map (1943):  Damn, Australia is awfully close to the huge giant ice wall, I would be careful man, the 1 quadrillion volts from the dome might zap them someday. |
|
|
|
Really they are discriminated? I think this depends on your surrounding not in all the places people do discrimination like these and I think being bald is more fashonable in 21st century.Just get older bro.  Yeah bald, tall muscular, good looking, famous actors are not discriminated, what a surprise? |
|
|
|
^^^ It's funny how this globohomo can't understand the optical effects of perspective and convergence when he needs a boat to sail up, over and behind the curve. However, when he needs to explain crepuscular he claims perspective is the sole cause and that flat earthers don't understand science.
I am perfectly aware of how you explain the disappearance of objects behind the horizon as the result of perspective and refraction. However, both know that a person who claims that crepuscular rays can't be made by a distant light source doesn't understand the science. Very well said, optical effects only exist when he wants them to. |
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks guys, I got it now!
|
|
|
|
Does the wallet have any memo thingy or an extra string of verification code?
AFAIK, XLM has a mandatory memo whenever one needs to withdraw or deposit.
I'm using www.myetherwallet.com because IOST is a token so no I don't believe so. |
|
|
|
|
I was trying to deposit some IOST to binance and this appeared ''Both a MEMO and an Address are required to successfully deposit your IOST to Binance'' I never had that before, I was trying to send from MEW but I don't know what the heck it means.
|
|
|
|
How in the world can you prove that your God influences the actions of people who contemplate him? Aren't hardcore Atheists not God's children? Aren't billions of Hindus or Chinese Buddhists not God's children?
You need to start by recognizing that all thoughts, words, and actions are controlled by cause and effect. Once you realize this, then you can start to figure out how you might influence all cause and effect, to see if you have any control whatsoever. It can't be both badecker. It's either free will or not. I agree with you. Imagine a wealthy quadriplegic. He has free will. But he can't do anything. So, he gives his free will orders, and others do it. Or imagine AI that comes to life, in its early stages. It has artificial free will, even though it may not realize it. This is said right in the name Artificial Intelligence. Cause and effect shows us that we don't have free will. If we have free will, it is in a form that we don't scientifically understand, yet. But the fact that we have such determined artificial free will as we have, suggests that there is free will in us in some strange way. Think of the implications of us having free will when all we can see is artificial free will. The basic implications of this are twofold (without looking at the God idea): 1. We are all artificial intelligence, or; 2. Either we free-will control C&E through some kind of space/time "hacking" of the basic initial cause(s) of all things, or our fundamental science/understanding-of-physics is completely wrong. ''But the fact that we have such determined artificial free will as we have, suggests that there is free will in us in some strange way.'' Right.. whatever makes you happy bro. If we have the tiniest amount of free will then cause and effect is meaningless, again, it cannot be both, if there is no free will and everything has a cause that has a cause, etc, then it's gods fault. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
