Each time I am not logged in and I receive merits, I always have this thoughts in my head: "where, where, who sent me merit, where, who, who...oh, here, why, why now, why"Why do we have to be logged in to find out who sent us merits? I mean, we can go to https://bpip.org and find merited post, but can this be somehow implemented in forum, for "guests" I mean...? |
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to find out on which date someone supported or opposed flag?
|
|
|
|
First off all, little warning to users(and guests) with epilepsy: don't click link to site because everything goes up and down, I feel like some earthquake thing is going on. Use archived linked instead.
Topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237675.0 ( http://archive.is/8PLxq) Site: https://rebitcoin.co ( http://archive.is/x6PWe) Account: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237675.01) No team 2) No company 3) Brand new account 4) Oh, this is just not realistic, seems 5-7 months profit is "up to" 400% (I like how they say "maximum return" AKA "up to" and place so high percentage)  5) Like any other good pyramid lending platform, lucrative affiliate program is "must have":  6) "More you invest, more you profit" and on top of "up to 48% monthly", investards will get daily bonus:  ...this just screams "invest, do nothing, earn, passive income, ask nothing, get your friends and family in here, lets all make money"7) "Why would that be all, lets spice things up so whoever click our website will see only profit. Target price start with 20$, but, how time goes our target price is increasing:" "...and increasing:" ..."our token will worth 3000$ in 2021.:" "...and, when we hit 20 exchanges, our token will reach its peak and will stop increasing its price at that point."Well, if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Update: user Rikafip exposed their plagiarized whitepaper https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237984.0
Topic is for flag purposes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1532EDIT: flag for account #2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1663 ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5237983.msg54217324#msg54217324) |
|
|
|
The virus is now s̴͜͠p̶̰͝r̷̰̅e̶̦̽a̵̼͂d̴͉̑ỉ̷̖n̸̙̏g̷̬͝ even online; practice social distancing! Forum administrator theymos (might be referred as "he", "admin") is wanted in several countries for committing criminal offense of spreading false information about virus which he claims that it "is now spreading even online". Many indignant world leaders told their citizens to not engage in any kind of social interaction with admin as they will be subject of this investigation. Chinese president Xi Jinping said: In these hard times and world wide pandemic, he just can't hide behind term "virus". We shall do all necessary measures to stop this madness and spreading of information which are false. ...at the end of very short media press conference, he added: ...we are doing our best to track down all associates including, but no limited to the other forum administrators, global moderators and staff members. |
|
|
|
|
What is forum policy regarding users who are creating topic after topic and are either:
1) copy/pasting random articles
2) spamming links to blog
|
|
|
|
|
Jedan mali merit giveaway, znači ispričajte svoju BTCBTCBTC priču i zgrabite 5 merita
Pravila[3]:
1) mora biti nešto vezano za bitcoin (može i za shitcoin ali opet mora imati veze sa bitcoinom)
2) priča ne mora biti istinita, što se mene tiče može i o tome kako vam je zmaj pojeo bitcoin, mašti na volju, ali mora biti zanimljiva i konstruktivna
3) po osobnom izboru dajem po 5 merita, broj korisnika koji će dobiti merite nije nužno određen[1]
4) giveaway nije vremenski ograničen
5) maksimalno 1 priča po korisniku[2]
6) novi i nedavno aktivirani računi ne mogu sudjelovati(ako ih uočim)
[1]U slučaju nedostatka merita a budu dobre priče, budem poslao merite kad ću ih imati.
[2]"No multiaccounts!"
[3]Pravila se mogu promijeniti u svakom trenutku.
|
|
|
|
Why oh my? Case number one: Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not?
No and no. [...] Of course, conversation continued in trolling spirit, tecshare again: Is not my rating for Vod valid? Are Vod's negative ratings for me not invalid? Convenient you suddenly can't be bothered when a direct question is asked.
[...]
Suchmoon replied again but tecshare continued with trolling: Is not my rating for Vod valid? Are Vod's negative ratings for me not invalid? Convenient you suddenly can't be bothered when a direct question is asked.
I already answered in the shortest and most direct way possible, literally in the post you just quoted. I can't help you with your compulsive lying issue, sorry. Oh I am a compulsive liar now? Refractory projection much? Are you taking lessons out of Vod's book now? Trolling continued: Since you answered this question, please quote your answer for clarity, that is unless you are going to take another page from Vod's book and just keep claiming you did while never actually doing it.
Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not?
No and no. Stop using theymos as a crutch when it suits you. He also said "it'd be best to forgive". Until you, Og, and Vod start seriously working towards deescalation I can't be bothered to care about it anymore. Five minutes of being adults is all it takes. Look at Lauda+Quicksy = ♡. You can do it too, I believe in you, don't let me down. [...] It seems pretty clear you didn't answer my question at all
Quit lying, the answer is right there, you just disagree with the "no". My agreement or disagreement is irrelevant. You in fact did not answer my questions. You replied, but you didn't answer them. That is not the same thing.Trolling continued and moderator at some point removed some posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5210651.msg53938737#msg53938737. Case number two:[...] This thread itself documents several instances of negative rating abuse by Marlboroza, of which he was forced to remove under public pressure.
Who forced me exactly  [...] [...] You were forced to do so by the same people advising you that these abusive ratings only make you look bad, like what happened just now. [...] Who forced me?
I have no idea. You tell me.^ Don't be. Example: 1) find nutildah's post 2) say something irrelevant for topic(again) and make sure it is something about nutildah which will make them respond (it can be word or one sentence, but strong enough to cause reaction) I act because I don't enjoy my character being discussed this way.
You're not the first member to be analyzed in this fashion and you certainly won't be the last. Weeks after getting on DT my reputation was thoroughly savaged. If you can't handle criticism then don't dish it out. If you must know, I distrusted you because I don't trust reformed shitposters that suddenly decide to take an interest in forum issues. You're trying too hard.
Seems as if my instincts were correct here. You should have taken this as advice to tone it down a bit, but instead you ramped up your involvement in the drama even more. You apparently have lots of alt accounts on the forum which makes your obsession with DT (perhaps quest for eventual DT status as it would appear) even more disturbing. I want to be clear that I do not wish to pass any kind of judgment on hacker.
That's all well and good Quickseller, and thanks for chiming in with your analysis, but could you please stop posting under both of your accounts in the same thread? Its getting rather insulting that you insist we pretend you're not Quickseller (you are -- I'd rather not open a thread in Reputation about it). If you're gonna post in a thread, stick with one account. Kind of weird that you are using an alt to post in a thread that is largely about alt accounts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of. 3) wait 4) nutildah replied, triggered by troll: Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of.
When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. 5) Bingo! Continue to troll nutildah in not related thread 6) deflect thread more using "nutildah - bill gator" "argument" I mean I am not in control of any accounts accused above others than this ( not logged in from 2 years ). K, doesn't mean you don't have alts. Yeah you like to analyze them real good don't ya? Get up in there deep. Funny how these deep dives always seem to happen when people speak critically of a handful of users here and all of the toadies hop out from the dark to form Doltron. This is just the usual retribution for the crime of open discussion as if the most vocal characters here aren't engaged in exactly all the things they are running around accusing these others of.
When I said my reputation was savaged weeks after being added to DT, I was referring to actions done by yourself and subsequently cryptohunter. You're in no position to be talking about "usual retribution" here as you tried your hardest to shit on me over an issue you supposedly don't care about, all because of some stuff happening in P&S. Don't play that tune for me, bullshit maestro. That wasn't retribution. Retribution for what exactly? When I am talking about retribution in this context I am talking about abusing the trust system to punish people for speaking out. All I did was talk about your history here, I never used the trust system against you. That was me using your own standards against you to show what a total hypocrite you are as you run around accusing people of shit you yourself are guilty of. You were trying to destroy Bill Gator's rep for speaking out using the fact that he purchased the account as the sole crime he was supposedly guilty of, yet you yourself were engaged in the same activity. Yes yes, you claim you never actually sold it, but you can never prove that, and we all know how much you enjoy speculating, so lets use logical speculation to assume your account was sold too since you can't prove yourself innocent. See how much fun the guilty until proven innocent standard is? People like you Vod, and Suchgoon keep saying this kind of shit like it is just so obvious I am abusive of the trust system you need never actually give any examples. Then when I press the issue you just again pretend it is self evident and scurry off to your clown holes, or argue over meaningless shit until the topic is sufficiently slid to another subject. 7) hope nutildah will respond again 8 ) drag more people into trolling system 9) hope Vod and Suchmoon will reply 10) rinse and repeat Case number 4 (trolling using TRUST SYSTEM): Topic seems quiet lately  Core tenets:
1. A standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws shall be documented in an objective and observable way before negative rating or flagging users.
2. Accusations without some form of documentation should be minimal.
3. Users who regularly and repeatedly ignore these standards should be excluded from trust lists.
4. Users who follow these standards should be included in trust lists.
5. Users who are subjected to accusations and ratings without any form of documentation should be defended and supported as much as possible.
There is no inherent hierarchy. Anyone is free to call themselves a member of The Objective Standards Guild as long as they follow its tenets. Using the avatar below and linking to this thread in your signature is encouraged. Lets work together to bring a balance of power to this forum and check its culture of rampant and systemic abuse. Feel free to suggest your own inclusions and exclusions based on these standards.
This is trust abuse according to rules of this guild, not to mention some ratings are real trust abuse (note: I didn't check references of unmarked negative trust ratings)   5. Users who are subjected to accusations and ratings without any form of documentation should be defended and supported as much as possible. Do correct thing @TECSHARE and thank you for this topic. He completely ignored this, like any other troll would... Cmon, let him act on this one to show he stands behind his words.
Or maybe just let the topic die already since there's clearly nothing positive coming out of it? Objectivity was seemingly never the objective, heh. Maybe you can throw some more circular logic at me. This forum needs objective evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreements, or violation of applicable laws before negative rating or flagging in order to prevent abuse of the trust system that it self can be used to extort people into removing valid negative ratings or flags. Without this, it is a simple task to simply abuse the system to cover up crimes and abuses. ...while lecturing others how to use trust system, he is doing something completely opposite, user in question is part of TECSHARE's trust network, not to mention that TECSHARE it the same topic completely ignored these facts (cases number 5,6,7): None of the people objecting here want to have an honest debate about the topic, that is the problem.
Nonsense! I want to have a honest debate about the topic, seems you don't. I don't see any logical explanation why you don't want to address these not-by-standards-suggested-inclusions-of-yours:  You invited me to topic, I have read it, you said I am trust abuser, you suggested to include those accounts (claiming they are by standards of this guild) and now I ask you why is something which you call trust abuse suggested inclusion? Can you please provide proof of connection https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53889824#msg53889824In topic about TECSHARE's removed off topic replies, TECSHARE accused moderator that he removed his own topic (it is documented by nutildah)... As usual the fucking trolls make an assumption and state it as fact. I did NOT delete my thread. [...] Of course, tecshare is not interested in any kind of discussion, he simple replied: Just because you are allowed to do it doesn't mean it does not reflect poorly on you. Thanks everyone for helping me draw more attention to these issues. Much appreciated.
(there are more tecshare's trolling in that topic) Case number 9 TECSHARE VS moderator:Accused moderator that he removed post, while flying hellfish said he didn't do it [...] Since I didn't delete the post I don't know which thread it was in and in reality everything after that is entirely moot.
...Tecshare continued, even if it was explained to him several times... I think he just overlooked the possibility that you were responding to my post in a thread I didn't post in.
Are you accusing him of lying about deleting your post? Seems unlikely to me, but this isn't the first time he has explicitly told you that he didn't delete a post from your "FLYING HELLFISH - SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP" thread, and you seem to just not care.
If you think he's lying, call him out on it and maybe we can get to the bottom of it.
If you don't think he's lying, then remove the posts he says he didn't delete.
Or do nothing if you don't care if your accusations against FH are accurate or not. I don't care what he did or says. A moderator deleted those posts, this is a fact as evidenced by the quotes. Him claiming not to have done it in a section he is in charge of and just saying it was "some one else" is not a resolution, even if he thinks it is for him. I have absolutely no way to verify anything he says. Me having a log of these acts harms no one, and the only reason this thread exists is so the usual dingle berries have some ass hair to cling on to and create a circus out of it. Be my guest. Clown away and draw even more attention to it.
There are more examples, I will probably post them at some point so reserved... If anyone has example, feel free to send me PM and I will update topic. |
|
|
|
I was searching for one topic and I just couldn't find it so I asked in meta about it. Several users said it is because account is nuked, well, it could be some other reason but for now it certainly looks like it was nuked just after and because accusation thread, so why is account Neopotism nuked?
Local rules: user with account number 1018510 is not allowed to post here. |
|
|
|
I am just curious about this topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5219960.0, as it doesn't exist any more. What happened, why is it removed? 
Locking this, account is nuked after accusation thread therefore accusation thread is removed as well. |
|
|
|
I might refer to account Timelord2067 as "user". I just noticed this post in other thread: Cue the hurt feelings... - Grow some balls...
- Harden the fuck up...
- Put them on ignore...
- Have a wank
- Go for a walk outdoors and enjoy the first day of the new year.
Get to work wanker. This user is lying, it is not first time that they accused me of trolling, it happened before. I told them to send some funds to charity and when I complained that I am not happy how they handled funds user accused me of trolling https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg51665603#msg51665603. Of course, user created frivolous red flag and accused me that I am spreading FUD because it wasn't like they wanted to be https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157840.msg51590072#msg51590072, not to mention that they lied that they didn't say something and accused me of FUD. There are many examples, for example, user created topic 100% of Quickseller's Flags are false. and because of lack of arguments user tried with ad hominem attack https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5165940.msg51857052#msg51857052 and lied about my reason to support some flags, then, because of lack of arguments, user literally attacked forum member xtraelv and accused them of plagiarism. In this post this user accused forum member mikeywith and me that we are spreading FUD and of course, adds some ad hominem at the end of post and previously tried to pull the same attack here, not to mention reason why that started in first place. ^ In this post timelord2067 said respected user is a troll (obviously trolling)[1], of course, not giving credit to author of that post is OK according to user, but, when someone(me) actually link thread they start trolling right away, followed by "...hey marlboroza, this " link to walletexplorer" will assist you..." , followed by my respond and post which is quoted in topic User (in this post) accused member Vispilio of stalking them while in previous post user specifically mentioned and highlighted forum member Vispilio and linked this post where user also accused them. ^ Why would that be all, user created some weird flags not supported by anyone and opposed by many members (except flag on account wolwoo). After accused and while not receiving answer to question "why am I in this thread", I used the same way to connect accounts as timelord2067 is using (even thought it was parody), timelord2067 quoted my post, redacted it with word " FUD" and again used ad hominem. After pointed it was parody to his connection, and after very simple question "why their connection is good and my is bad" user again accused me of spreading FUD and again, uses ad hominem attack. And, again, in that thread, user lied one more time. Then forum member nutildah posted very good and on point post and timelord2067 redacted their words and accused them of "FUD". There are more examples. Anyway, today I noticed new feedback in my trust page (I just had to unignore user too see what respect they are talking about):  It was very bad idea to return to known alts thread (unignoring user was also bad idea), I even said somewhere in that thread that I won't return, user very likely misunderstood me, but how they don't remember me saying that I won't return to known alts thread? And I didn't ask Timelord2067 to investigate this, wth What respect, what FUD, what trolling?
Edit: [1]actually, that isn't really what that forum member said, they completely took things out of context and/or missed point. |
|
|
|
What do you mean it is not your reddit account and you have nothing to do with ICO bumping service? AB-CHAIN project really a good project because their team are good one. But AB-CHAIN project need more promotional work to hit in the top list.
In how many exchanges will be listed AB-CHAIN project?
Hello, we are integrating now with Etherdelta, preparin listing at Gatecoin and later at HitBTC, also negotiating with several other exchanges In general, this is good news for all investors in this project. Only you can not say with which exchanges you are still negotiating? Hi Inskchen! At this moment we can't name other exchanges. Only Etherdelta, Gatecoin and HitBTC. This is excellent news developer. If you have a bounty company it is not too late to join? I like working with such active teams. Hello Travel Token! You are welcome to join our bounty campaign! Here is a link to the bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2186635.msg21944536#msg21944536yesss, we have enough time to earn some bounty abchain tokens; until march if you get enough stakes which hopefully means u get also many tokens so that after getting listed in hitbtc, u have enough for lambo  yeah, it is good to know that ab-chain is doing their bounty campaign now. Im sure many members will join this and this will make more investors to come and join the ico. Well, if the offer is good enough then probably many people would likely to enjoy this bounty campaign. Especially the project seems to have a potential so I think many will join the bounty. Also, the team already plan to get listed so probably this will have a chance to get success. Yes, as this project is already planned to list this coin on a popular exchange many people are getting attracted towards it and its crowdsale. I think they should organize a bounty camping, which will surely increase their investment and more people will support this project in this community. What is this then? Not ICO-bumping-pyramid? How it is not your reddit account but everything else is yours except that account which used your telegram?
Because of things mentioned here, I have no reason to believe this is not true https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213377.msg53482149#msg53482149. Important posts to read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53502238#msg53502238https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53513566#msg53513566https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53987190#msg53987190https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg53995165#msg53995165https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54171090#msg54171090https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54186125#msg54186125https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54186418#msg54186418https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221633#msg54221633https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54221706#msg54221706----------------- To sum hacker's important replies in this topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54227233#msg54227233AKA: I was not involved in any type of paid posting promotion rather was just filling my signature campaigns post requirements.
And, after 4 months: Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1412 |
|
|
|
Some users are spreading nonsense lately, so to clear few things to those users and let this thread serve as reference to other threads, I'll lock and won't bump other threads about ban evaders, just this one maybe: Thread 1Thread 2Thread 3Thread 4Thread 5Thread 6Thread 7
Problems and as you correctly noted "endless dramas" arise when some public avengers and vindictive members take it upon themselves to use the righteous pretext of "cleaning up DT / Forum / whatever" to pursue their so blatantly bitter and spiteful personal vendettas against certain people or groups of people, in this case the Turkish section
Timestamps: June, 11, 2019 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg51431869#msg51431869 Lauda complained about scammer ending up in DT, Matthias9515 aka BlackNavy said Lauda is lying and I confirmed lauda's claim https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg51434966#msg51434966September 04, 2019 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg52357641#msg52357641 it was pointed that scammer ended up in DT for second timeDecember 04, 2019 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg53258565#msg53258565 it was pointed that scammer ended up in DT for third time. December 04, 2019, it was pointed that scam account goraset is evading ban https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206872.0, and of course, I checked who included them https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg53261771#msg53261771 which resulted in another research: December 04, 2019 it was pointed that account who included goraset is also evading ban https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5206971.0December 07, 2019, my investigation took me further https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207720.0December 07, 2019, even further https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207741.0December 07, 2019 and further https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207811.0, and at this point Vispilio is desperately trying to troll me December 08, 2019, I've found out that user Veleor already connected some accounts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5208015.0December 08, 2019, I've found more ban evaders in goraset's trust network https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5209475.0December 14, 2019, more accounts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg53345976#msg53345976 ( note: account Zonnk at the bottom of post) Finally, my latest discovery showed me that DT1 account who included goraset in first place ( not to mention bchconnect promotion and user trying to make fool of everyone and obviously lying about it - "I didn't promote anything" and user Vispilio meriting a obvious lie) actually self voted for himself https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg53348632#msg53348632. |
|
|
|
While researching merit distribution on one account, search result pointed me to this post: Vod's website showed that next users are banned: https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=ugurum15https://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=hasyurthttps://bpip.org/search.aspx?q=BiboxaxI think they are evading ban: İco çılgınlığı biteli çok oldu. Bir ara ieo çılgınlığı başlayacaktı ama nedense çabuk söndü. İlk başlarda binancenin ieo karı iyi kazandırdı ama devamında binance sadece kendine dogru yonttugu için artık eskisi gibi ilgi görmüyor bence.
Some merits:  EDIT: there is more accounts in post number 2: walarmorguluskartepeEDIT 2: one more account ( post for more details):
Local rule: account Quickseller is not allowed to post in this thread, his maybe alt accounts are affected by this rule as well. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
