I have 3 payouts from multipool that are not showing on bittrex. Was it confirmed that Flound updated multipool wallet? I can't find the transactions in http://nautinsight.buddylabsapps.com based on my bittrex deposit address or the tx's that I got from multipool. You should never ever have any pool pay out directly to an exchange... it should always go straight to a wallet. But not sure about bittrex. It's not realistic to try and maintain 20 plus wallets for different coins... |
|
|
|
I have 3 payouts from multipool that are not showing on bittrex. Was it confirmed that Flound updated multipool wallet? I can't find the transactions in http://nautinsight.buddylabsapps.com based on my bittrex deposit address or the tx's that I got from multipool. |
|
|
|
|
Wait I think I get it now. The plan was to so complicate the way these things work that there was no possible way anyone could figure out if they were being paid correctly. So they have a random number generator that spits out payouts and nobody can complain because everything is completely opaque.
|
|
|
|
|
I was on here warning people about them 9 months ago. And I wasn't the only one then.
|
|
|
|
I say reinstall your windows..
^this^ |
|
|
|
How do you know when a girl is too young ?
<Dumbass pedophile horse shit>
And this is why we can't have nice things in this forum. |
|
|
|
Wow. It looks like this thing is unraveling much faster than I expected.
You are probably going to have to wait for a long time to see the end. Well that's what I was expecting but it sounds like the big guys selling is putting some fear into the masses. If this is a ponzi (which I totally believe it is for whatever that is worth) then fear on the part of investors is just the kind of thing that would make it fall apart. |
|
|
|
|
Wow. It looks like this thing is unraveling much faster than I expected.
|
|
|
|
Hey wizkid, you see the news about shellshock bash vulnerability today? You may want to take a look at it. I don't know enough about mining to know if that could be used to exploit a mining server but after that person used an exploit to steal all that NMC from Eligius, you may want to look at what this new exploit means for the webserver (if anything).
That vulnerability is being overblown to epic levels. It requires something else on the server to allow an external connection to run commands on the local shell. I'd call *that* the vulnerability, not bash. I don't know enough to know how dangerous it is but it sounds pretty bad. People say it is wormable which would put it on the bad end of the spectrum. Also from what I have read it sounds like a number of fairly common CGI scripts can be exploited and you don't have to be using them in your webpage they just have to be in a path that can be called via URL. Of course having CGI scripts in a path accessible via URL that aren't even being used would be a little sloppy but if a default apache implementation left some somewhere and they were never removed it could mean the server is vulnerable. Regardless, always better to be on the proactive side of these things. |
|
|
|
|
Hey wizkid, you see the news about shellshock bash vulnerability today? You may want to take a look at it. I don't know enough about mining to know if that could be used to exploit a mining server but after that person used an exploit to steal all that NMC from Eligius, you may want to look at what this new exploit means for the webserver (if anything).
|
|
|
|
The MSM and the FTC are saying it now. Acceptable enough for you mate or is it all still rumours as far as your concerned?
Id feel like a real dick about now if i had taken such a combative attitude on the issue.
I never denied it, just questioned the report due to a lack of real corroboration. I've witnessed enough of these dogpiles to know that you can't believe everything you read on the internet (or anywhere else for that matter). As far as being a dick is concerned I'd feel more of a dick for joining the mob and finding out later it was all FUD. If it had been anybody but BFL I might agree with you but nobody deserves this more than those a-holes. And Josh can't seem to refrain from telling lies and being a complete dick to everyone he deals with so in my book the entire bitcointalk forum can be totally excused for wanting this to be true and dog piling even before it was fully verified. BFL earned this in spades. |
|
|
|
I'm just glad I got my two Monarchs and refund. The 2nd Monarch was delivered last week and I received the refund the same day the 2nd unit was shipped. Now I don't care if they fall off the face of the earth.
Good riddance!
Well I understand those monarchs are prone to failure so you may not be done being upset with BFL just yet. |
|
|
|
|
I missed in buried in this thread somewhere but what is to be gained by updating the version of cgminer in these?
|
|
|
|
getting harder to read this thread with all the trolling going on  gona ignore the whole lot of you guys  I have more ignored posts than I do normal ones at this point. |
|
|
|
Somebody added a whole bunch of hashrate to the pool today. Glad to see it. I have been forced to move miners a few times due to pool not growing with the network hashrate and eventually shriveling up and dying. Eligius is still behind the curve on that one overall compared to when I started here, but a 20-30%ish jump in one day is nice to see.
While the jump is nice, I believe it is from the same person/entity who jumps on from time to time... and leaves soon after. Hopefully they've determined that it would be best to stay this time, since this is the longest I've seen them around. They left. Bummer. |
|
|
|
|
Somebody added a whole bunch of hashrate to the pool today. Glad to see it. I have been forced to move miners a few times due to pool not growing with the network hashrate and eventually shriveling up and dying. Eligius is still behind the curve on that one overall compared to when I started here, but a 20-30%ish jump in one day is nice to see.
|
|
|
|
Very nice find! The doosh could of at least said thank you and even paid back what you lost finding the problem (and even a hashlet or 2), what does he do? LIES... Phil goodnight  So six minutes after I post I get an email from them telling me oh your emails were in my spam box . We would have rewarded you well but you posted it on bitcointalk so we are not helping you or rewarding you. I was not looking for a reward as much as I was looking to get my testing funds back. Frankly they may have been robbed a lot of btc. As nicehash has had some wild crazy high payouts on sha256. At times 2x the norm I am pretty sure they were being exploited in that pool as I was able to duplicate the method of attack at my own expense. You still like the company? |
|
|
|
|
Anyone know if that most recent firmware that says it is compatible with the S3+ also works on the earlier batches? I haven't kept up with this thread the whole time but I have a batch 2 that has never done very well and I wondered if that might help it out.
|
|
|
|
Many people are too pessimistic. Sure if this was a new company I would be a lot more worried. Sure GAW is not being transparent with zenpool but they have a great track record. A lot of the competitors are now following (look at BITMAIN) so it means this new idea is pretty good and is making profits for the hosting company. It does not mean this is a scam. ROI is a different story though
Bitmain makes their own asics and everyone knows it since they sell them. Gaw doesn't make their own asics. Kind of a big difference. But you are right, cloud mining seems to be gaining a lot of traction at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
