|
Back up for the moment at least...
|
|
|
|
|
This is the same problem on every pool although it is true that the minimum is 5 times higher on bitparking. But I have on at least 3 different pools found that I had to go back and do more mining to get the last scraps of my earnings out of their pool after I had decided the pool sucked and wanted to leave it. Rather than spending much time and effort trying to publicize it you can always just go back and mine there until you can get your payout (and then you could get the rest of your NMC and IXC out too). You could also ask people to help you reach the payout threshold and mine on your account. I have seen that happen in the forums for other pools and people have stepped up and done it.
|
|
|
|
|
Something is not right. All of my miners are up and submitting shares but the stats page shows about half as many shares as I would expect to see at this point in the round. Looking back at the miner logs I do not see any signs of disconnects on my end.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like somebody gave 'er the 'ol reboot.
|
|
|
|
Is getwork down? My getworkers are not working  |
|
|
|
Can't get pooler miner to work on your pool silverwolf. C:\Users\Admin\Downloads\SBC>minerd.exe -o http://swmining.mine.nu:8350 -u myuser.1 -p mypass [2013-06-13 09:19:19] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm. [2013-06-13 09:19:19] Long-polling activated for http://swmining.mine.nu:8350/LP[2013-06-13 09:19:19] JSON-RPC call failed: { "message": "upstream RPC error", "code": -2 } [2013-06-13 09:19:19] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds ^repeat every 30 seconds... Any ideas? I have never had much success with cgminer on any of my mining rigs. It seems to crash a lot. I have never seen pooler miner crash though. Let me check into it. It should be working now, give it another try! There was a typo in the config file for pushpool. Sorry about that. Sweet! Working like a champ now. |
|
|
|
|
That's what I am seeing also. Shares are submitting though.
|
|
|
|
Can't get pooler miner to work on your pool silverwolf. C:\Users\Admin\Downloads\SBC>minerd.exe -o http://swmining.mine.nu:8350 -u myuser.1 -p mypass [2013-06-13 09:19:19] 4 miner threads started, using 'scrypt' algorithm. [2013-06-13 09:19:19] Long-polling activated for http://swmining.mine.nu:8350/LP[2013-06-13 09:19:19] JSON-RPC call failed: { "message": "upstream RPC error", "code": -2 } [2013-06-13 09:19:19] json_rpc_call failed, retry after 30 seconds ^repeat every 30 seconds... Any ideas? I have never had much success with cgminer on any of my mining rigs. It seems to crash a lot. I have never seen pooler miner crash though. |
|
|
|
Is all broke right now. Makes me sad.  |
|
|
|
18100 18120 18121 18128 We are now the unhappy recipients of 4 invalid blocks in last 24 hrs  Nothing to see here. Working as designed. If there was a problem Slush would already be fixing it. Rah! Rah! Rah! Go Slush go! And so forth... |
|
|
|
Agree! He is probably investigating and fixing pool crash.
Why are you using Ufasoft? Do you get better hashrate? And why don't you add backup pools? Not supported?
Umm kind of a mix of laziness and doing what was easy (which is also laziness). These are VM's so the very first one was built using guiminer (on Slush's pool) which supported using ufasoft (which is a CPU miner). Then I just cloned it a whole bunch of times. I could switch it but now there are a lot of clones that would have to be switched. Since these are CPU miners there really is no such thing as a "better hashrate". Hashrate is horrible. But horrible times a whole lot becomes acceptable. The ASICS will make all of these machines meaningless inside of 6 months so I'm just looking to make them earn a little until they get deleted. EDIT: did we just find a block at server reboot there or did it just look like it because of the reboot? |
|
|
|
|
doublec must be working on the backend. They all started working for a bit and now they all are throwing that error again. I'll just wait for a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
Error 80072EE2: The operation timed out.
This is ufasoft miner on port 15098
EDIT: I have quite a few miners using the same account so one of my miners somewhere may be connecting but it would take me a while to remotely access them all and see what the status is. First 8 I checked seem to be doing what I copied above.
EDIT2: Based on the stats on the website it looks like I have one miner somewhere submitting shares but all configured the same in terms of software and account they use to mine on.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I seem to be seeing the problem back again also.
|
|
|
|
What I have seen is that my miners report normal activity with no connection problems and yet one of the miners has no accepted shares reported on my account log on Slush's pool. The first occasion showed over six hours since the last share had been accepted; the second occasion showed over nine minutes without a share accepted. On both occasions, the time since the last share accepted matched the time since a block was found on Slush's pool but not necessarily the last block. It appears as if one of my miner's shares were no longer be credited after the pool's 'block found' event processing.
On both occasions, I stopped and restarted GUIMiner for the affected miner and share accepted activity on my pool account log resumed normally. The shares lost were not recovered.
Yup. I reported this exact phenomenon last week (among other issues) and the general consensus among the self appointed spokespeople for the pool is "Nothing to see here, stop complaining, working as designed". It was repeated issues, no word from Slush, and an almost hostile atmosphere from those who either don't have problems or can't be bothered to notice if they have problems that led me to move most of miners to other pools. I will say this, having my miners spread out on different pools and participating in pools with much clearer reward systems makes my daily reward look much more reliable so far. |
|
|
|
|
Well as dishwara already pointed out, Slush's forum account is showing that he (or someone) is logging in to it. But I agree with Lucko in that I have seen way too many anomalous payouts and missing shares in the past week or more to just think all is normal. I already moved more than 20 of my miners elsewhere and only have one miner left on Slush. Organofcorti posted a link a few pages back to a post about spreading your hashing power over several pools so I went that route. I get less per found block on each pool but I get some kind of payout for a lot more blocks each day. Plus since I put miners on both bitparking and bitminter I am also getting some alt coins. I've got a pile of devcoins already whatever those are, woot!
|
|
|
|
They came for MTGox, but I was not MTGox, so I did not speak up... (That said, dude knowingly lied on his application to the bank, this is a "clean" bust. Still, a bad sign.) Well technically he check the "no" box in 2011 and it was only a couple months ago that the government clarified that they consider cryptocurrency to be money so he did not knowingly lie on the application. The government always considered Dollars to be money. And Mutum Sigillum transmits money to and from MTGox and it's various customers. It exists solely for the purpose of transmitting money. One of the questions he answered no to was: "Does your business accept funds from customers and send the funds based on customers' instructions (Money Transmitter)?" The other was "Do you deal in or exchange currency for your customer?" Even if Gox was outside of those particular regs (until the FinCEN ruling), Mutum Sigillum wasn't. They accept and send dollars, also Euros and other money. I have a bank account setup specifically for sending and receiving money from my paypal account. I use my paypal account to buy and sell stuff online all the time and I send money back and forth from paypal to my bank account. I also transfer money from that bank account to my other bank accounts. Does that mean I am a money transmitter? They setup a bank account to use with their dwolla account. The only difference I can see is that on the end of those dwolla transfers they are buying or selling bitcoins to people as opposed to real world goods as I do. My read is that after the announcement a few months ago they should have starting playing ball with FinCEN. They apparently didn't and now they are paying the price. What he did or did not say when he opened the account will probably mean absolutely nothing when all of the legal dust clears, |
|
|
|
They came for MTGox, but I was not MTGox, so I did not speak up... (That said, dude knowingly lied on his application to the bank, this is a "clean" bust. Still, a bad sign.) Well technically he check the "no" box in 2011 and it was only a couple months ago that the government clarified that they consider cryptocurrency to be money so he did not knowingly lie on the application. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
