How much of the hashing of XMR is contributed by botnet or larger server farms? If we use the larger scratch pad size, 3MB instead of 2 MB, then high end CPU will not have bigger advantage. Intel 4170 has 3MB L3 cache, so it is effective for 1 thread; Intel 4770k has 8 MB, so it is effective for 2 threads, the ratio is 1:2. For 2MB scratch, the ratio is 1:3.
Well, using the data "thousands of PCs", we'll assume ... 2,000. Lets assume 1 mining thread, which on a modern cpu is about... 50 h/s? Thats probably low. Even my xeon 771's can get ~30 h/s per thread. Those numbers give 100kh/s. One zombie computer produce much less hashrate. Not to mention the high stale mate and connection problem. Most bots are in China and Russia where the Internet connection is one of the worst in the world. Chinese bots require a proxy to mine that could go offline anytime and add a huge lag time. Honestly, bot-mining is not worth the investment of time and the hassle. There are better way of getting money if you've got the skills. Even without the skills, it would be much easier to find free electricity or steal electricity than bother setting up ten thousand bots.
|
|
|
this is a hard coin to mine , that is all I know if someone has a better miner it would not be the first coin where it was not shared with others
Agree. It probably happened to all existing cryptos since Bitcoin. Basically, someone is mining with access to thousands of PCs. This could either be botnet or very lucky system administrators with system users that don't need 100% of their CPU time. In either case, someone is getting boatloads of Monero for free. My assumption is that these coins are dumped to extract the most profit. But who knows. They could be hodlers.
Either botnets or admin computers are far from being free. It requires very high skills and comes with high risks. It is not free if you consider the time spent in learning all the skills to become a successful botnet owner (it probably takes years) and the time spent on spreading viruses and hacking computers. Not to mention the constant fixing and setting up the most effective way of using bots. Zombies computers are never under your total control, you could lose most of them anytime. Using the computers of your company to mine is putting yourself at a high risk of getting fired and being sued. I am not encouraging botnet mining or system administrators abuses. I just pointing out that it is much harder and complicated than what most people think.
|
|
|
Tutorial for VPN creation ?
|
|
|
Is there such thing as a "well trusted and connected nodes list " ?
I put myself in a situation of a merchant that want to prevent race attack.
|
|
|
I buy and sell on polo. So sometimes I have few, sometimes I have a lot.
|
|
|
Good team play on Europe server too. I "[XMR] Monero" teamed with "[XMR] Monejito" and "EA". We ate all the damn Doge.
|
|
|
That's 334397NXT for 1 BTC but that's not on the first days of trading, the price already skyrocketed 10 times. I remember the price being much lower. Probably about .0000003 (30 satoshis) or .0000005 (50 satoshis). So you could buy a lot of Nxt for few BTC and multiply them with trading (buy lower sell high repeat). I personally make over 800K NXT with about 1 BTC.
Exactly. If you made that much off those wild ups and downs think about how much the person who had a dominant share of that market would make causing those ups and downs. Even though 33 Satoshi is a big difference from 1 or 2 I guess you proved me wrong there. Still think Nxt is pretty shady. But I don't feel like early adopters scammed me on the exchange ! I could have invested in the IPO but I didn't : I didn't had the balls to invest at that time and that's it. I'm not gonna complain. I am actually happy for the IPO investors and I learned a lot from that experience. They are not fake people, I'm friend on Facebook with one early adopter. Everyone that participated earned something. Again, there are no victims. So why the hate ?
|
|
|
10 clés USB avec sauvegardes cumulées (genre, j'ai 20 dossiers avec des dates donc 20 fois la même chose). pour les fichiers, 1 disque dur externe copier-coller et 1 disque dur externe avec clonezilla (image système complet).
Damn...
|
|
|
Et que se passe t-il quand les joueurs on marre de jouer ? Il faut les forcer à miner pour les joueurs restants ?
L'algo prévoirait des seuils progressif liés au nombre de nouveaux arrivant ainsi qu'au nombre des joueurs plus anciens pour garder une masse de forgeur idéale. un ratage... ça dépend du point de vue. en terme de spéculation, l'OP l'a dit il s'en branle. Je parle de sécurité. Prendre le contrôle d'une petite alcoin est très faisable et l'on a déjà eu des cas. Personne ne va sécuriser le réseau d'une altcoin pour la beauté du geste. Par contre, des hackeurs ont en trouve. S'occuper d'une cryptomonnaie est un métier à plein temps, cela implique donc de laisser tomber le développement du jeu vidéo. Or on créait cette altcoin pour quoi déjà ?
|
|
|
Le jeu devrai être disponible autant sur Mac que tous les autres OS, dans le sens ou il sera jouable depuis un navigateur.
ben alors pourquoi pas faire un fork de NXT ? Le POS a pour avantage de consommer très peux de ressources. un navigateur peux sans problème faire tourner la forge moyennent un gros taf de dev. pas besoin de bouffer des ressources CPU pour hasher dans le vent alors qu'un raspberryPi peux très bien supporter la forge en Proof Of Stack. un nouveau joueur reçoit X jetons et peux donc les dépenser dans le jeu par exemple ou les utiliser pour forger à sa guise... par exemple pourquoi pas revoir l'algo de nxt pour inciter les petit épargnants à forger et ainsi faire monter rapidement le réseau P2P en performance. L'algo prévoirait des seuils progressif liés au nombre de nouveaux arrivant ainsi qu'au nombre des joueurs plus anciens pour garder une masse de forgeur idéale. Créer sa propre blockchain/cryptomonnaie est de toute façon une très mauvaise idée. Un ratage assuré. On ne peut pas être développeur de jeu, s'y consacrer à plein temps et en parallèle s'occuper d'une crypto avec sa communauté de troll/râleurs et se taper toutes les attaques réseaux et les bugs à fixer. Surtout qu'il n'y a aucun intérêt à lancer une nouvelle copycoin juste pour un jeu. Pourquoi faire ? A part les gens qui jouent au jeu (ça ne fait pas beaucoup de monde) qui va se faire chier à sécuriser le réseau ? Et que se passe t-il quand les joueurs on marre de jouer ? Il faut les forcer à miner pour les joueurs restants ?
|
|
|
Voidspace est juste en projet non ? Si vous n'en avez toujours pas entendu parlé, Voxelnauts est une bombe. Je n'ai pas vu de jeu plus ambitieux et avancé. L'une des features : Les joueurs seront libre de créer du contenu et de l'échanger entre-eux grâce à la blockchain. Le jeu est entièrement compatible VR (Oculus Rift, Sulon Cortex, Avegant Glyph...) Voxelnauts VR MMO Kickstarter Trailer HD Voxelnauts VR MMO Trailer Interview Voxelnauts - MMO Metaverse with Modding & VRVoxelnauts TwitterContrairement à tous les RPG et autres MMO, il n'est pas possible -du tout- de gagner de l'or en tuant des monstres ou en terminant des quêtes.
Normal, c'est un travail sans aucune valeur pouvant être automatisé par des bots. La création de contenu peut être en revanche très rémunératrice comme dans Second Life 1 et 2.
|
|
|
Bullshit lol Le Figaro qui écrit ça ? WTF ? En plus le métier de tradeur est en train de disparaitre avec les bots de trading à haute fréquence. Je me souviens d'une interview d'un tradeur Américain disant que le métier n'existe déjà plus aux USA car le pays est quadrillé de lignes en fibre optique privés.
|
|
|
HAHAHAHAHA Wow dude. If your going to lie you should do a better job of it! You could literally never buy 70% of Nxt with 10 bitcoins even if it were to crash since bitcoin doesn't divide enough for you to do so. Say 1 Nxt = .00000001 btc or 1 satoshi (the smallest possible unit of bitcoin) then you could buy 100% of the Nxt network for 10 btc. If 1 Nxt = .00000002 or 2 satoshi then 10 btc would buy 50% of Nxt's network. But ok let's say you were just talking in generalities. Show me the exact exchange, date, time and include a picture cause I'm calling BS. Prove me wrong if your not lying.
You can never buy 100% neither 70% on an exchange : when the demand increase, the price increase. Basic trading. He was obviously exaggerating but he is not far from reality. I was trading in the first days. The problem is that the exchange is dead a year ago and we cannot access the database. The only thing I could find was a screenshot of one of my buy order from a thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770252.msg8787782#msg8787782That's 334397NXT for 1 BTC but that's not on the first days of trading, the price already skyrocketed 10 times. I remember the price being much lower. Probably about .0000003 (30 satoshis) or .0000005 (50 satoshis). So you could buy a lot of Nxt for few BTC and multiply them with trading (buy lower sell high repeat). I personally make over 800K NXT with about 1 BTC. That was good old times. What were you doing at this time ? Don't be angry that you missed an opportunity, there will be plenty of others but I can tell you that whining like a baby and acting like a victim will never give you any opportunity and lead you nowhere. Yes, every time you come back to justify yourself in this thread, you are missing an opportunity. (but you make us laugh)
|
|
|
Normalement make oclengine Mais il faut que tu aies le SDK de ta carte graphique d'installé (un peu comme pour les mineurs graphiques): AMD APP SDK ou NVIDIA CUDA SDK
Un sacré bordel au niveau des packages Nvidia Cuda et co. De toute façon j'ai mon adresse en SEX : 1SEX12SXKsnZvfZhSPdoHnkRsLyPjWCB3 C'était très intéressant...
|
|
|
As-tu installé libssl-dev? (libssl-dev pour Ubuntu, peut être openssl-dev pour d'autres distributions)
Je progresse, j'ai bien installé libssl-dev et voici ce que j'obtiens : make cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o pattern.o pattern.c pattern.c:32:18: fatal error: pcre.h: No such file or directory #include <pcre.h> ^ compilation terminated. make: *** [pattern.o] Error 1 J'installe libpcre3-dev et libpcre3-dbg, j'obtiens : make cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o pattern.o pattern.c cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o util.o util.c cc vanitygen.o pattern.o util.o -o vanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o keyconv.o keyconv.c cc keyconv.o util.o -o keyconv -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread Ça semble avoir fonctionné, je vois vanitigen en exécutable : Par contre je pensais que le package incluait la version GPU oclvanitygen ?
|
|
|
Au fait, pour éviter ce genre de drame, vous utilisez quoi pour faire vos backups ?
|
|
|
Help ! J'ai un problème pour compiler sous Linux : make cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c vanitygen.c:26:25: fatal error: openssl/sha.h: No such file or directory #include <openssl/sha.h> ^ compilation terminated. make: *** [vanitygen.o] Error 1 Un problème de openssl ? Je l'ai bien installé pourtant.
|
|
|
5 people with about 10 sockpuppet accounts each on this anonymous forum received the bulk of NXT. The other 20 forum accounts received just small amounts of nxt as they where told not to sent a lot of bitcoin (the max was 1 btc) Strange fact still remains that you could buy almost the same amount of coins once it hit their exchange... its not like NxT was that expensive that time. With only 10 btc you could almost buy 70% of the coins. So true. I didn't buy at the IPO because I could not figure out the potential value. Once on the exchange everyone could buy multiple millions of Nxt for few BTC. So why the haters didn't buy on the first exchange ? What is their excuse ? Haters' got excuse for everything. It is always the fault of the others. The world is conspiring against them. They love being the victim of a big powerful mysterious group of people. Sound like sadomasochism isn't it ?
|
|
|
So all you are likely to get here are comments from n00bs that don't really know what is going on. Or general statements from experts who don't want to spill all the beans yet.
It is our duty to educate the noobs.
|
|
|
|