bitaddress is legit ... no problems that ive heard of.

It doesn't matter if:

the company gets paid by the people they are writing about,
the company accepts advertise from the people they are writing about,
the company doesn't accept money from the people they are writing about,
the company doesn't accept money at all,
the company is for profit,
the company is not for profit,
the company is losing money,
the people who work for the company get paid by the people they are doing the story on,
the people who work for the company are salaried reporters,
the people who work for the company are freelance reporters,
the people who work for the company give their info from various sources (news feeds, etc ...)
etc ...


if the person reading the story reads the stories with a degree of intelligence.

Was this a genuine bug in the person's software?

Thank you. It was just for fun.

If there's enough interest, I may consider making some more. For now these are just for my personal stash and to help get some friends involved in the revolution.

I thought I read somewhere that withdrawals were supposed to resume around then, but I am not sure.   They definitely don't always go with what they say in their press releases...

I agree, it would totally make sense for the bigger players in the industry to pay the most visited BTC news websites to post positive info about their company.  Sucks that the news we receive is so convoluted, but that seems to be the case with any kind of news these days.   You can never really 100% trust what you read...

They sometimes note it when an editor is a co-owner of a mentioned company.