Long time no see I ran across an old backup of a dead PC and found old scfi coin wallets qubit v3 KED and others. I I can recover some from old versions great But I will be getting new QT from your site.I have the wallet but not the QT for DPZ anyone know where I find it. A friend and I want to bring it up if we can. |
|
|
|
Thanks updated my .conf file. still stuck on block 314336. hope to get upto date I do solo mining on GPU along with BlakeCoin. Blake is algo not Bake's 7 sci FI I only have 2 peers but both are 2.5.6
The second one is mine (a linux machine), compiled 2.5.6 from source: git clone https://github.com/scificrypto/Federation-Credits.git
cd Federation-Credits
git checkout master
So 2.5.6 is the latest version, yes. Again, as far as I remember, this was just an UI color/theme change. The latest compiled Windows version I can find is 2.5.5 from the google drive link above, have it running on a Windows machine. Both working fine together since... forever.  There was a compiled 2.5.6 version for Windows available on the scificointalk-forum, but can't find any reference to this one anymore, sorry. Just checked the node and have at the moment three 2.5.6 and three 2.5.5 peers. Here you have their IPs, but guess some of them will not allow inbound connections: addnode=99.192.82.190
addnode=64.71.72.56
addnode=142.68.146.143
addnode=2.94.237.180
addnode=45.50.28.121
addnode=119.123.48.54 Last block is 314351, created on Thursday, 18. January 2018 22:11:50 GMT. |
|
|
|
I only have 2 peers but both are 2.5.6

[
{
"addr" : "64.71.72.56:17009",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1516404062,
"lastrecv" : 1516404060,
"bytessent" : 2319,
"bytesrecv" : 9581,
"conntime" : 1516400510,
"version" : 77100,
"subver" : "/Federation Credits:2.5.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 314351,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "51.15.130.151:17009",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1516404115,
"lastrecv" : 1516404117,
"bytessent" : 245,
"bytesrecv" : 8954,
"conntime" : 1516404114,
"version" : 77100,
"subver" : "/Federation Credits:2.5.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 314351,
"banscore" : 0
}
]
Yes, that's the version I'm using since... forever. The last block I've received was created on: Thursday, 18. January 2018 22:11:50 GMT. |
|
|
|
|
I have version 2.5.5.0 is there a newer version? if so where?
Also need latest FFC (FireFlyCoin) my current client will not update
|
|
|
|
cassieheart here is the owner of QBT. Hello, i am looking for the developers of the sci fi coins, perhaps the Grand Negus? I want to get him on air, we want showcase GPL specifically as our cryptocurrencycheck.org coin of the week one wednesday. We also want to devote an entire episode one day to sci fi crypto coins, i am a bit of a sci fi guy myself, and had to buy GPL as soon as i saw it. I have two of my co hosts basically arguing over who gets to be on air the night we get you guys on. Please contact me at will@calltofreedomlive.com and also feel free to listen, we are the only live drive home, call in, crypto focused, political talk radio show that gives you two chances to win free coins every episode. Feel free to listen in at LRN.fm one day from 4-7pm EST mon-fri and PLEASE, get back to me about getting Grand Negus, and the KED and Cubits developers as well. thank you |
|
|
|
|
Like #3 with 10-100 no halving or long slow halving.
|
|
|
|
|
Good bars good service. all around good job.
|
|
|
|
Anyone now what are the fees in NAV?
Thanks
Small, not worth talking about. As many satoshi as it takes for bitcoin transaction, its roughly the same number in NAVtoshi for the NAv transaction and you can probably make it happen for less anyway. But the price of the coin is 10000x smaller so its insignificant. private transfer fees are much higher and can vary by owner. see navtechservers.com for current fees |
|
|
|
Any amount for POS but more you have the more often it will pay out. But I'd say ~1000 go to Navcoin.org and download the NAVPI image this will make a bootable SDcard for the pi that you will use browser to add and maintain NAV coin. If you have no PI experience you can order a pi with same software preinstalled from the navcoin.org store. The software is free, but the PI costs and has to be shipped from NZ so can take a while. Hey.
How many coins are needed to start mining?
and how to install a purse on the Raspberry?
|
|
|
|
dev, I asked for an answer on the Cubits coin, news or updates ...... - I never got a response - today the growth was $ 0.020017 USD (1132.09%) .... because there was no answer - before that I sold 22,000 coins, you are an asshole.
There is no Dev on this coin. There was a contract to create it years back. Vamp is offering a share of new SCIFI coin based on QBT holdings, No sending of coins needed this time. |
|
|
|
Why do followers of a coin have to have a (even little) technical knowledge in computer science? the idea if you make using NAV as easy like google wallet or PayPal. There are many people here who want to pump if that means make the value of the coin go up. Most wont dump until they need to sell it to pay for new home or other huge purchase. Wow never saw a worst shitcoin and a noob comunity then this.
I went through the last 30 pages. Not a single nav owner has (even little) technical knowlegde in computer science - all they do is trying to pump and dump.
But i have to say: 2+$ p&d - respect. Scammed a lot of noobs out of their money.
|
|
|
|
If you are worried about too few Navtech Servers. Either spin up some of your own or offer a bounty for someone else to do that. I had 1.0 servers and I'm waiting on guide to install new version on my old severs. If we only could get rid of all these "moon", "rocket" useless posters and keep this discussion more interesting. Posts like "mark my words, this is going to moon" are anywhere on this board, even for very dead shit coins. You do not realize it but posts like these stink of desperation and in my opinion turn off potential investors much more than a civilized discussion about the technology. They stink as desperate tries to pump a coin, but they do not work. What works is solid and valid arguments. Why is this coin undervalued? Show graphs, compare it to other similar coins. I am a NAV holder yet I see nobody here worried about the fact that the sub-blockchain and NAV masternodes are very centralized. This makes NAV a a very risky investment. Yet nobody ever speaks about those technicalities (on which more light should be shred, and I'd like to know more, especially if I'm wrong). No, here I am surrouned by "this coin's so good hehe" that just make me wish to dump this coin I've been supporting for ages. In the end, the only people worried about the price of a coin are people that will dump it sooner or later because they don't believe in the coin. https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F3UeZKcg.jpg&t=581&c=B_aQVWscs5DNhQ |
|
|
|
Can we host navtech servers?
Because if not...It doesn't seem very decentralized..
They say decentralized, you should be able... yes you can a guide is being worked on to help you do it. but yes anyone can create a cluster of Navtech Servers (Min 2 needed) it's all on github. the max amount you can send over a NavTech Severe is set by the creator and should be limited to 1/3 to 1/5 the Nav 'pool' the server has at it's disposal. Nav from the pool gets sent to the address you entered and the Nav you send gets added to the pool later as part of the anon send. Servers with a large pool can handle many small tx or a few large tx in the same block that way. |
|
|
|
|
When I do't have the GPU doing anything I turned GPU mining back on. But by design The blake family coins are meant to be mined while the GPU is busy.
I am able able to play Some steam MMO games fullscreen just fine with the blake coin miner running.
|
|
|
|
Lately there are many problems with staking. I wonder when that will be fixed?
There were some issues (staking stops and must be restarted) in ver 4.0.0 to 4.0.3 but fixed in 4.0.4 |
|
|
|
bfgminer 5.4.2 works for me bfgminer version 5.4.2 - Started: [2017-09-17 21:36:56] - [ 0 days 00:04:49]
[M]anage devices [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]uit
Pool 0: 127.0.0.1 Diff:19m -GWork LU:[21:41:18] User:mogrith
Block: ...2dfd1ee5e7f4b34a Diff:0 (141.9kh) Started: [21:41:18] I:?
ST:3 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[ 48/ 22 B/s] E:0.00 BS:30m
1 68.0C | 403.7/385.6/455.1kh/s | A:1 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCL 0: 68.0C | 405.2/386.1/442.5kh/s | A:1 R:0+0(none) HW:0/none
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2017-09-17 21:41:18] Found block for pool 0!
[2017-09-17 21:41:18] Accepted 002090ea OCL 0 Diff 30m/29m
[2017-09-17 21:41:18] New block detected on network
[2017-09-17 21:41:18] Network difficulty changed to 0 (141.9kh)
[2017-09-17 21:41:18] New block detected on network
bfgminer --scrypt -I 15 -S opencl:auto -o http://127.0.0.1:19918/#xnsub#skipcbcheck -u userinconf -p passinconf links to bfgminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877081.0 |
|
|
|
don't have an answer but you might get a faster response by posting issue to github  https://github.com/NAVCoin/navcoin-core/issuesHello,
I am trying to compile latest wallet but it's driving me crazy, can't understand where is the problem as I could compile the previous wallet without this issue. Any help is more than welcome.
In file included from qt/navcoin.cpp:9:0:
qt/navcoingui.h:148:14: error: redeclaration of ‘QAction* NavCoinGUI::toggleStakingAction’
QAction *toggleStakingAction;
^
qt/navcoingui.h:128:14: note: previous declaration ‘QAction* NavCoinGUI::toggleStakingAction’
QAction *toggleStakingAction;
^
In file included from qt/navcoin.cpp:9:0:
qt/navcoingui.h:247:10: error: ‘void NavCoinGUI::toggleStaking()’ cannot be overloaded
void toggleStaking();
^
qt/navcoingui.h:235:10: error: with ‘void NavCoinGUI::toggleStaking()’
void toggleStaking();
^
Makefile:8064: recipe for target 'qt/qt_navcoin_qt-navcoin.o' failed
make[2]: *** [qt/qt_navcoin_qt-navcoin.o] Error 1
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
