NAV is now on Crypto-trade.net https://crypto-trade.netnew exchange low volume not in USA not sure where but chat box has a lot of Cyrillic messages |
|
|
|
It's up to you to buy or not. right now there is potential is that when the FPS and MMO games come out there will be a use for these coins. Merge mining means you can get all the coins for no extra GPU cost. Will hype when there something concrete (would that mean it's not hype?) You guys should consider a rebrand, get new blood in here.
rebrand just to get more people hmm think many other coins may do this name/brand change but not here its bs without a good reason to do so!!!  *note not worked out so well for some big name cryptos rebranding lol  easier and more effective way is just to add more coins to merge but guess you did not think of that because maybe you think one coin rather than a family of coins  still plenty of room to merge for more coins but finding non scam devs is hard + they need a reason for use case which can be even harder to make happen currently there are more than enough blockchains in the merge for many more projects/platforms/services than are currently being worked on  At some point quality will start to outweigh hype in the coin market, maybe when people start to research coins themselves instead of relying on what pumpers say, then Blakecoin should do okay. |
|
|
|
45.50.28.121 is my node
have no peers no nodes connected but show networkhashps" : 2306015
so where are they from?
no connect port? 19919 |
|
|
|
19:17:13  repairwallet 19:17:33  { "wallet check passed" : true } Sent TX are still there both have a - in front but one all digits are red ( -3500.001)the other all digits are black (-4958.0001) I started it last night will check it when I get home tonight. I have 2 transactions that show in my wallet with over 4000 confirms but not in block explorer on in destination wallet.
Status: 4670 confirmations, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 21:02
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -4958.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -4958.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: bae3bcff9c4de6b1d7ec1cd9be06825010e5e0d694a89dd811df33a24f272b02-000
Status: 4761 confirmations, broadcast through 7 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 20:20
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -3500.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -3500.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: 8578f5257203db56809846d08c0a12cb2fea0db6fa56fb78856acf49f1d209f3-000
wallet is ver v3.6.0.0-UT-ZAH-HA-DEZ-BIN on TOR
I can't see either of those Transaction ID's on the block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/Can you try to run "repairwallet" from the debug console and see if the funds reappear in your wallet? |
|
|
|
I started it last night will check it when I get home tonight. I have 2 transactions that show in my wallet with over 4000 confirms but not in block explorer on in destination wallet.
Status: 4670 confirmations, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 21:02
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -4958.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -4958.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: bae3bcff9c4de6b1d7ec1cd9be06825010e5e0d694a89dd811df33a24f272b02-000
Status: 4761 confirmations, broadcast through 7 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 20:20
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -3500.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -3500.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: 8578f5257203db56809846d08c0a12cb2fea0db6fa56fb78856acf49f1d209f3-000
wallet is ver v3.6.0.0-UT-ZAH-HA-DEZ-BIN on TOR
I can't see either of those Transaction ID's on the block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/nav/Can you try to run "repairwallet" from the debug console and see if the funds reappear in your wallet? |
|
|
|
|
I have 2 transactions that show in my wallet with over 4000 confirms but not in block explorer on in destination wallet.
Status: 4670 confirmations, broadcast through 8 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 21:02
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -4958.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -4958.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: bae3bcff9c4de6b1d7ec1cd9be06825010e5e0d694a89dd811df33a24f272b02-000
Status: 4761 confirmations, broadcast through 7 nodes
Date: 9/9/2016 20:20
To: crypto-trade NXxFBeCbE7dA47JswGZpctEmCJQ4sfy1Ko
Debit: -3500.00 NAV
Transaction fee: -0.0001 NAV
Net amount: -3500.0001 NAV
Transaction ID: 8578f5257203db56809846d08c0a12cb2fea0db6fa56fb78856acf49f1d209f3-000
wallet is ver v3.6.0.0-UT-ZAH-HA-DEZ-BIN on TOR
|
|
|
|
I've opened an account and put some BLC and LIT up for sale. they Have UMO but it's in maintenance right now. 0 trade fees since they are very new. Will try to get the rest of Blake family coins up. |
|
|
|
45.50.28.121 is my node
have no peers no nodes connected but show networkhashps" : 2306015
so where are they from?
The value is calculated from the time and difficulty of previous blocks. This "past performance" value will be totally bogus if new blocks are not being regularly added to the chain. Thanks If there are some connections I can do a little solo mining to help keep it going. |
|
|
|
Hi  short question, how many coins are needed in a wallet to run a processing server and by this to earn Nav Coins for processing transactions? cheers Just from reading here 50K NAV is what was used. I don't know if that is requirement or not. This is for a ANON server. |
|
|
|
|
If there was a way there would be no gambling sites. they would have all gone broke from someone winning all their coin.
|
|
|
|
|
45.50.28.121 is my node
have no peers no nodes connected but show networkhashps" : 2306015
so where are they from?
|
|
|
|
Had to reboot over the weekend and did not bring bells back up will try again tonight. doubt it. no one seems interested in it. Hsd my wallet up but no connections. I can try again later on 6-7 hrs from this posting need node |
|
|
|
doubt it. no one seems interested in it. Hsd my wallet up but no connections. I can try again later on 6-7 hrs from this posting |
|
|
|
Once Anon is out I think Nav Team should contact with the Brave Browser https://www.brave.com/ Devs they are looking for a way to send anon micropayments “Standardizing anonymous micropayments will take years of effort before something cross-browser can be added to the Web’s specifications,” said Eich, adding that he hopes to build “a truly private (even decentralized) eventual standard for web payments.” |
|
|
|
Thanks lots of good info. I would have no problem with a NAV deposit in escrow to run an anon node. but it would be nice not to loose the stake on it if it's a multi thousand deposit for a year or so. on the other hand fees may be worth more. I have some old PCs or a netbook I can use besides a PI for staking. just a question when the anon stuff is released and open sourced. Can anyone create a anon server? So anon servers are decentralized not just run by the Navcoin team? I'm preety sure this is correct but want to make sure.
Also if I an running a anon sever will it collect the fees on it's transactions? and how does the network decide which sever gets a transaction?
Thanks
Been following since Summercoin days
Yeah this is correct. Anyone who wants to participate can. There will be some technical skills necessary because the system will need to run the navcoind and subchaind daemons which are compiled on Linux. It should be accessible to anyone with some basic Linux experience and we will fully document all the setup steps. The other consideration is that we will need to distribute the subchain coins as they are the fuel for the anonymous transactions. However they are essentially redeemable for Nav at 1:1 and we need to protect the system from abuse. The solution Dash implemented in this regard is to get their anon participants to put forward a deposit which is refundable when they stop participating. We are currently looking at various solutions to this problem and will release full details closer to launch. Yes, whoever sets up a server will earn the percentage from the anon transactions which that server processes. The current idea is that similar to how you configure the TOR nodes in your navcoin.conf file, you will be able to add also the anon server addresses you wish to use. This gives the users the ultimate control and responsibility for which servers they trust and use. We will offer the official navcoin ones which anyone can use but if your mate sets up a server you want to use instead you can use that by simply updating your configuration file. We are implementing as many security checks to the system as possible, attempting to mitigate any possible attacks but in the end of the day trust will need to be built between users and whichever servers they decide to add because it is impossible to patch every single attack vector in a decentralised system like this. As mentioned, I will be putting out updated whitepapers on both the anon system and decentralization which will fully explain our implementations in the near future. hm interesting. So some kind of reward for your node if you enable it to be utilize for ANNon. i like it. Hope the reward is small and the entry price to become such node is also not too big. Please share more about this. or get that update on the white paper. interesting to see what it will be. Would the rasberipy wallet be used for this? Seems like its ideal use case. From your recent talks. its seem like Annon feature seem might be ready for public much sooner. ps: OS wallet? We're still figuring out the best approach and will happily publish all the details once we've figured out what they are. We aim to have a low barrier to entry, but we also need to maintain the integrity of subchain and make sure its not worthwhile for people who posess subchain coins to attempt to use them maliciously to extract nav coins from other anon servers. You can hopefully appreciate the quagmire caused by handing out the subchain coin which we use to direct real nav coin transactions. In terms of running it on Raspberry Pi I don't know if that will be possible. From my experience, raspberry pi's struggle to run one bitcoin daemon, let alone two at the same time. We will put together some minimum spec suggestions when we bundle it for release. Shahim can probably speak to the current server specs which we run our servers on. Yes, I believe this approach is going to give us decentralisation much sooner than previously expected and also provide a more secure environment by allowing users to choose which anon servers they use. More details to come OSX wallet is on the list, soopy is looking into fixing the make file for it this week! |
|
|
|
|
just a question when the anon stuff is released and open sourced. Can anyone create a anon server? So anon servers are decentralized not just run by the Navcoin team? I'm preety sure this is correct but want to make sure.
Also if I an running a anon sever will it collect the fees on it's transactions? and how does the network decide which sever gets a transaction?
Thanks
Been following since Summercoin days
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to see the word spread.
Using TOR for this was not hard to do and is working fine for me
With The RaspBerry PI Saker image be able to do TOR also? Or will that be a further enhancement?
|
|
|
|
I'd also like to see NAV on open baazar (distributed stores) and Open ledger (distributed exchange) while they are not anon NAV would still be a good fit. I like Nav and i like Monero too. I think Monero is undervalued since long time ago, and it's undervalued too because there's no official GUI yet, the same way I think nav is great and has potential to grow. I have my stack of Moneros, and atm I'm fueling my stack of Navs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
