Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 12:43:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 1038 »
381  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2020-08-27] DCG is betting $100 million on mining Bitcoin in North America on: August 29, 2020, 09:51:13 AM
i'm not surprised. hashpower has been quietly moving from china to north america for the last couple years, and mining industry insiders have been speculating this would continue post-halving---especially if prices remain high, as they have.

We read a fair bit about mining launches in North America. I haven't come across many updates, or much confirmation that they actually got rolling, after the initial announcement has been made. I guess it's in miner interests not to reveal where they set up if they manage to get a scoop on power or premises. It might be more diverse than we think. Dunno.


Decentralization of that power is certainly desirable for Bitcoin, this would definitely give it more credibility in the eyes of investors who, to put it simply, do not want to invest too much in something that is in some way controlled by China.

Perhaps we need that China shock to demonstrate how ready mining is to abandon it and how ready mining elsewhere is to take up the slack. I saw a Mr Ripple drooling on about 'China' reversing Bitcoin transactions. Puh-leeze.

Every time people fretted, or FUDded, about Bitcoin's dependence on something like Silk Road or the piece of shit zero fee Chinese casinos, when they died Bitcoin shrugged it off and became ever stronger.
382  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: August 28, 2020, 11:03:26 PM
I'm hoping it creates a hive mind. I can't wait to be drowned in the insipid and fascistic thoughts of Twitch and Twitter shitlords.
383  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Anyone else having trouble earning Merit? on: August 28, 2020, 06:56:14 PM
Start by forgetting the altcoin section if merit is your desire. No one has any there to give out. After that try a post that is more than a redirect to Steemit. Looks like most of what you're linking to is your writing, but your writing isn't on this forum, it's over there.
384  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Virtual trading before actual one - pros and cons on: August 28, 2020, 05:55:01 PM
I think it can be handy to familiarise yourself with the pure mechanics of trading. Beyond that in trading you live and die on the mastery of your own emotions and if there's no actual money on the line then virtual trading won't scratch the surface there.

I'd do virtual first just to make sure I wasn't making any obvious mistakes in executing trades. Then I'd switch to very, very modest amounts to see what happened.


I have my doubts that even trading with a small amount of money is that beneficial because then we go back to square one to the problem of trading with a virtual trading account in which you are not going to care about your losses, it is obvious that trading with a small amount of money is better than trading with virtual money but if the amount of money is still small then even if you lose you're not going to be that affected by it.

It is only when you trade with enough capital that makes you feel nervous about losing it when you can truly experience what is trading for real and that means that one single mistake could be enough to destroy your account, then my opinion is that the most important skill to learn is how to manage your risk and limit your losses.

Your small amount may turn into a large amount and then you get that experience for very little risk. Anyone diving straight in cold is likely to end up crippling themselves before they got started.
385  Economy / Speculation / Re: Institutional Money Observer on: August 28, 2020, 05:44:37 PM
The problem with rehypothecation: Fidelity or another central counterparty can transparently keep 1M coins in a cold storage address, then pledge and re-pledge that collateral 2 or 3 times over. Nobody will be the wiser, but it will drastically inflate the number of "BTC" on the institutional market, suppressing spot prices through arbitrage. As long as very few traders are taking physical delivery at settlement (as is the case in most Wall Street commodity markets) this is a pretty handy way to keep a lid on prices.

Makes sense. I can't imagine any of them bothering with a proof of keys day, not even standard Bitcoin fans appeared to be arsed with that.

Presumably there's a legal requirement to declare your operation is carrying that out? Again, hardly anyone's gonna care since they're primarily pursuing dollars.
386  Economy / Speculation / Re: Institutional Money Observer on: August 28, 2020, 05:34:37 PM
do we have IMOsMerits here? 

No. They are explicitly excluded here because it breaks noob hearts when they figure out it doesn't raise their real figure. Poor mites.

Another thing I'm interested is whether money heads more towards the raw buying of the thing itself or prefers to continue to dance around it with infrastructure investment as much of it has done in earlier days.

There's got to be a point where you let go of 'blockchain not Bitcoin' in the face of gains comparing them. If we take Circle, they must have thrown away several hundred million dollars or more on shit investments since they entered in 2014 or whenever it was. I hope for their sake they owned some too but I wouldn't be surprised if they never did.
387  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Winklevoss Case for $500K Bitcoin on: August 28, 2020, 05:27:28 PM
In my opinion Winklevoss is doing this absurd price forecast because they want people to buy a lot of bitcoin for the price to increase a lot, they went to talk about this forecast just now that the price was almost falling below $11000 and in my opinion this was not conscience

They've been consistently and quietly bullish all along. Nothing has changed. They wouldn't have bothered building Gemini if they didn't have a deep rooted belief in it and a desire to uplift it, they could've just sat back on their holdings.

Where we're at now is still comparative chump change. If and when it gets to six figures that's when the truly gargantuan pockets start to pay attention and they're the ones who move markets. So far it's been LARPing compared to that.

If someone's expectations can't wrap themselves around that scale then someone will be along shortly to buy it off them who does.
388  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2020-08-27] DCG is betting $100 million on mining Bitcoin in North America on: August 28, 2020, 01:47:53 PM
I agree with that concept but it has a large 'you first' element.

I'm sure every one supports less china as long as they don't have to subsidise it.
389  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2020-08-27] DCG is betting $100 million on mining Bitcoin in North America on: August 28, 2020, 11:30:28 AM
An interesting article, not only because of the mining farm itself, but also because of the context in which the article was written. Silbert looks at this endeavor not only from a profit perspective, but from a geopolitical and economic perspective that goes in the direction of relocating mining power and creating new jobs in the US

That struck me too. No one lasted very long pursuing anything other than ruthless profit so I dunno how he's framed this with his board or whatever. They're not going to care about future geopolitics if they're burning untold millions per month today.
390  Economy / Speculation / Re: Bitcoin ETF by 2nd quarter of 2021? on: August 28, 2020, 09:49:00 AM
I am not certain what this is, however, I speculate that it might be an ETF.

They wouldn't announce something that has no legal right to exist. That would be a waste of their time and money, and everyone else's. An ETF is only one form of wrapper. There are many others ready to roll right now without having to speculate or smack your head against a brick wall.
391  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Archer v. Coinbase "Not your keys, Not your coins" on: August 28, 2020, 09:35:15 AM
Most of the people I introduced to Bitcoin now turned defidiots, icomonsters and such (90% of them).
Why? Because most of them don't understand Bitcoin! They only want to get rich quick.

I support their right to sell out.

What irritates me about this case is that the whinee wants something they could've and should've done for themselves. If they can't see that expecting Coinbase to do the same when it's a shit ton of hassle for no gain and possibly a security risk then they're a stupid, mindless slut.
392  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Coinbit shutdown by South Korea authorities on: August 28, 2020, 08:57:26 AM
Incompetence in the sense of allowing it to flourish.

Everry step of the way the south Korean government has been way behind and appeared to be laying there farting in its own juices while people ran rings around it.
393  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Market Cap and Trading volume on: August 28, 2020, 12:22:17 AM
I wouldn't pay much attention to market cap at all. Volume is much, much more relevant and important, but it would have to be volume on exchanges with some credibility. If the volume isn't there then everything else is meaningless fiction.

Most of the obscure shitcoin action takes place on exchanges that can't be trusted to tell you the truth. I've looked at order books that were 50 dollars deep with millions of dollars in trades happening like magic just above those 1 cent 'walls'.

If there isn't volume you can't realise any profit. I've seen people say 'holy shit, look at that Xcoin pump. Whoever got in early must be rich.' Then you look at the volume of that $100 million market cap coin and you would completely squash the market flat trying to complete one $500 sell.
394  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I can't wait until I can pay using bitcoin at the supermarket on: August 28, 2020, 12:09:46 AM
Well, more likely, Bitcoin will be accepted to markets as a mode of payment, once its market price stabilize.

The price will never stabilise. It will calm down as the whole thing grows but sooner than we expect its inflation will become effectively nominal. Even if all the action stopped and it sat there and did very little it would still be worth ever more in the currencies it's presently measured against.


Bitcoin has a lot of competitors, and some of those are Defi by ETH, then there's chainlink and lastly Polkadot.

Yup. I expect if I ever attempt to pay for something in Walmart in 2028 with Bitcoin I'll have a rotten fish thrown in my face as they yell 'don't insult us. Get yer Polkadot out, you skinflint fucker.'
395  Bitcoin / Press / [2020-08-27] DCG is betting $100 million on mining Bitcoin in North America on: August 27, 2020, 10:38:39 PM
https://fortune.com/2020/08/27/bitcoin-mining-dcg-foundry-north-america-btc/

Barry Silbert made an announcement of an announcement yesterday. Guess this is it.

From reading this I didn't realise Bitmain's plans to mine in Texas had gone up in smoke. Hope this lot have done their sums.
396  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I can't wait until I can pay using bitcoin at the supermarket on: August 27, 2020, 10:03:02 PM
I've written something similar in the past and it wasn't met very well by a few members. Someone even told me that I was dreaming, while I've explained that with the Lightning Network development this will be a reality.

I understand that the narrative currently is to pass Bitcoin as a hedge to inflation and perhaps a way to cure all financial disease and fix everything. This is not true and everyone knows this. Bitcoin has two purposes which are interconnected. It is both to be used as a method of purchases and has also features of a store of value asset. It can't abandon any of these as it will fail in the other too.

I think it'll be technically possible but users simply won't want to do it en masse. You don't spend what you think will be worth more in future, especially if you have a more common alternative that does the opposite. It goes against both logic and human nature.
397  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Coinbit shutdown by South Korea authorities on: August 27, 2020, 09:56:22 PM
What is it with the South Korean market and incompetence? You'd think they would've got rolling with impressive techno sheen but it seems to have been a chaotic improvisation from the start and it's continuing.

I'll bet the majority of places outside the top bunch are doing the exact same thing, and the top bunch did it themselves too in the early days.
398  Economy / Economics / Re: Another company buying bitcoin as capital allocation strategy on: August 27, 2020, 09:34:20 PM
I have a feeling they aren't investing cash they would need for day-to-day operations. Regardless, they are either going to look brilliant or completely retarded, depending on what the market does. Cheesy

I wonder. The companies arriving now should do well. But that won't be the majority of course. They'll arrive just as it's priming to bone them up the botty. No reason why they won't be like every other starry eyed newcomer and they'll go overboard.

When a Bitcoin crash starts destroying conventional companies with otherwise no relation to it that's a rather different matter to us wingnuts getting a kicking.
399  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I can't wait until I can pay using bitcoin at the supermarket on: August 27, 2020, 07:41:35 PM
The last thing I would ever want to spend my hard money on is a bunch of stuff that's going to emerge from my anus or willy a few hours later. That's what your depreciating fiat is for. My weekly shop bought with BTC in 2011 would now be worth one million dollars.

 If it's to be spent, spend it on something productive or enriching. It will forever be the spending of last resort which means I don't think it's ever going to become a widespread currency.
400  Economy / Speculation / Re: Institutional Money Observer on: August 27, 2020, 06:03:45 PM
but at the end of the day this is bitcoin and they can't ruin bitcoin because it is decentralized and nobody has power over bitcoin.

While they can't touch the core of it, they certainly can screw with the price and acceptance. Fractional reserve/ paper Bitcoin is the one everyone's waiting for. They've never not done it in any other market so I can't see any reason why they'd make this a special case.

The difference between Bitcoin and everything else is that it's instantly verifiable and deliverable and anyone can store and trade it themselves. However it's pretty clear many people don't give a shit about that and Wall St will run with it.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 ... 1038 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!