Also note that the "master" branch is not intended to be stable. Each release tree carries its own branch and tag. I can't expect them to know which repo to use, but even the official repo had a branch ltcd-1.0.1 and tag litecoindark-1.0.1 that was newer than the rollback and did sync properly. Maybe I should reconsider this policy due to the many who do not know how to checkout a branch...
Dude, with respect maybe you should reconsider this policy for those of us who do know how to check out a branch but expect master to be stable. +1 hence master. |
|
|
|
Here are the seven proposed to be on the Authorization Committee as described in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=762346.msg8748412#msg8748412Dom P EvilDave Emoneyru n3lz0n Steve idev pnosker I believe all but "Steve" have the same handle in BTT and NXT, hopefully this will be confirmed. So if there are any objections to any of these from serving on the Authorization Committee, now is the time to object James Are any of them the SuperTraders? |
|
|
|
The timing initially will be when there is a meaningful amount to dividend out. I think a couple months after the InstantDEX is live is a good estimate, so I am hoping to make a xmas time first dividend. Once things are going smoothly it will become a regularly scheduled event.
James
Will there be a way to view the outstanding balance of dividends? |
|
|
|
If you had 100 btc to divide between BitcoinDark and Supernet tokens, what would you do? ........WWJL777D?
I did 75/25 |
|
|
|
|
Building LevelDB ...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/src/litecoindark-staging/src/leveldb'
g++ -I. -I./include -fno-builtin-memcmp -pthread -DOS_LINUX -DLEVELDB_PLATFORM_POSIX -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DBOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS -I/home/src/litecoindark-staging/src -I/home/src/litecoindark-staging/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=1 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/src/litecoindark-staging/src/leveldb/include -I/home/src/litecoindark-staging/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c++1y -c db/builder.cc -o db/builder.o
g++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++1y’
|
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 176 BTCD. Cheers! |
|
|
|
The latest shift for the BitcoinDark multipool paid out over 176 BTCD. Cheers! |
|
|
|
I don't see much detail other than a link to manually get coins swapped over that aren't already on polo.
What was required of the stuff we have at polo?
What if we sent stuff to polo after the swap was completed that's v1?
If it was on polo, it got swapped. If you're still sending there, it's gone. You need to use the swap link. |
|
|
|
Ok, how do we "trade in" our CGA?
Most of mine is already on polo, but I haven't seen anything in polo about it, except seeing a notice that the coin swap is done.
look at the OP. Details are there. |
|
|
|
Yes, just sit back and hammer the pools, just 39 Blocks before it goes balistic..
no one has the src's yet... |
|
|
|
I also have a question. I understand that SuperNET allows users to use features of different coins, presumably coins with the best current tech. So let's say BBR currently has the best anon tech, but what if in the future a new coin comes out with something better and joins SuperNET. What would happen to BBR? Would anyone have an incentive to continue using BBR's older anon tech? Likewise, would BBR still have an incentive to continue being in SuperNET if no one uses their anon tech? And this goes for every other feature out there too, not just anon sending.
Once the SuperNET support is added by a coin, then not sure why they would want to stop getting revenue sharing. It is not like the SuperNET is charging the coins, rather SuperNET is revenue sharing. Also, once people are using something and liking it, the release of new tech that is "better" doesnt mean everybody just stops using it. The network effect would keep people using it. Regardless of which specific tech is most popular, the SuperNET will presumably be offering it, so as such it represents a diversified approach as opposed to any specific component By "revenue sharing," do you mean revenue sharing for the individual coin holders or revenue sharing for the coin developers? currently 20% of SuperNET revenues are allocated for the coin communities, presumably they would chose to support their devs Are UNITY holders included in this 20% of SuperNET revenues allocated for the coin communities? I am not sure since UNITY in not classified as a coin. If not, then perhaps it is best to just hold the individual coins that are already included or likely to be included in the SuperNET. I currently hold over 500 SuperNET tokens and I am trying to decided if it is best to hold UNITY or best to hold the already included or likely to be included coins. 50% of revenues go to UNITY holders sry, when you say UNITY, what do you mean, exactly? I found one asset called UNITY, maybe a Scam? thanks Once the IPO is over, the TOKEN is transfered into UNITY, which will be the official tradable SuperNET coin/asset |
|
|
|
Hi everyboby, I am sure I am missing something, but I am a little bit confused about who the smack is mining the shit out of this coin and how. Can someone explain how this coin gets about 50.000- 100.000 coins mined daily but on the kickass pool, on SHA there are only 20 GH's?
I have been mining with 3 S1 (550 Gh/s) on kickass for about two weeks now and now I get about 120 coins/day, meaning that the whole pool could get about 2400-3000 coins daily. How much do the other 19 pools make? Do they make the same, are they more profitable? Is there such a chart showing how much a pool made and what type of technology brought more? Is mining with scrypt more profitable on this coin? (Hardware price cost wise, not electricity consumption wise)
Looking forward for your thoughts and eagerly waiting for the screen cast,
Beli
With about ~45Th/s I'm getting ~25-30 blocks a day... Yeah and how much you loose on that compared to mining f:ex Bitcoin you should average 0.75867721 BTC/day and now you average less then 0.275 BTC at current exchange rate, as i wrote, better to mine something else and buy NEOS. Well, I don't mine it all day, only when it's worth it. Yes exactly. Who carry you when its not profitable!? Soon... No one.. yeah it'll get less lucrative I would imagine. Just picked up 8 blocks in the past 20 mins... |
|
|
|
Hi everyboby, I am sure I am missing something, but I am a little bit confused about who the smack is mining the shit out of this coin and how. Can someone explain how this coin gets about 50.000- 100.000 coins mined daily but on the kickass pool, on SHA there are only 20 GH's?
I have been mining with 3 S1 (550 Gh/s) on kickass for about two weeks now and now I get about 120 coins/day, meaning that the whole pool could get about 2400-3000 coins daily. How much do the other 19 pools make? Do they make the same, are they more profitable? Is there such a chart showing how much a pool made and what type of technology brought more? Is mining with scrypt more profitable on this coin? (Hardware price cost wise, not electricity consumption wise)
Looking forward for your thoughts and eagerly waiting for the screen cast,
Beli
With about ~45Th/s I'm getting ~25-30 blocks a day... Yeah and how much you loose on that compared to mining f:ex Bitcoin you should average 0.75867721 BTC/day and now you average less then 0.275 BTC at current exchange rate, as i wrote, better to mine something else and buy NEOS. Well, I don't mine it all day, only when it's worth it. |
|
|
|
Hi everyboby, I am sure I am missing something, but I am a little bit confused about who the smack is mining the shit out of this coin and how. Can someone explain how this coin gets about 50.000- 100.000 coins mined daily but on the kickass pool, on SHA there are only 20 GH's?
I have been mining with 3 S1 (550 Gh/s) on kickass for about two weeks now and now I get about 120 coins/day, meaning that the whole pool could get about 2400-3000 coins daily. How much do the other 19 pools make? Do they make the same, are they more profitable? Is there such a chart showing how much a pool made and what type of technology brought more? Is mining with scrypt more profitable on this coin? (Hardware price cost wise, not electricity consumption wise)
Looking forward for your thoughts and eagerly waiting for the screen cast,
Beli
With about ~45Th/s I'm getting ~25-30 blocks a day... |
|
|
|
Is there anyway to tell how much has been invested in the IPO already?
gosh, have you read back like 5 posts? Was writing the post before it was listed, didn't read the new replies before posting. My bad. ^_^ |
|
|
|
Do any of the block explorers allow you to check address balance?
I posted one a while ago, not sure if they took the time to add it to the OP or not... which is really... quite a mess. Here is it: http://stakexplorer.com:1234/ |
|
|
|
Is there anyway to tell how much has been invested in the IPO already?
gosh, have you read back like 5 posts? |
|
|
|
Do any of the block explorers allow you to check address balance?
I posted one a while ago, not sure if they took the time to add it to the OP or not... which is really... quite a mess. |
|
|
|
Is there a way to tell how many tokens have been purchased to date?
There is usually a daily report... but I can't say I've seen it lately... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
