Yes, probably idex and bilaxy will list them after swap

I am not selling my tokens either but i don't have any hope. Sparkster's team is the worst team in the crypto world. They are clumsy. No-one would trust them after such a performance.

I think libra would be successful and their owners earn a lot of money but at the end, people would look for something cheaper and decentralized and crypto will come aid. It is not a threat to crypto, i think it is an opportunity.

I can't say particular one is safest but bitfinex seem to be, too big to fall so i am choosing usdt when using stablecoin.

Also it has the biggest volume.

I look at two things when looking for an exchange.

The first one is volume (not fake volume, real one) and the second is, where is my token is traded on. And i try to avoid scammy ones like yobit or hitbtc.

If i had a say, i would say kucoin is most trusted exchange till today. But today my mind has changed. Because they lied.

First, they announced sprk listing two days ago and a couple of minutes before it is live, they said "technical difficulties" postponement. And it was an erc-20 token so what would have happened?

Today, they announced that sprk decided to withdraw their listing application (yeah sure) and they won't list it. Because their announcement lots of people bought sprk and now they got rekt. It felt like manipulation and also complete bullshit. Now for me, kucoin is just another shady exchange like most of it.

35m $ raised ico. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sparkster/#markets

And exchanges are idex, bilaxy and coinexchange. they had a whole year to secure a deal.


They finally told major exchange is kucoin (it is an ok exchange but everybody expected bigger) and yet kucoin postponed at the last minute telling that they are having technical problems (it is an erc20 token).

I think the current pump (%5) caused by binance. They had lots of US citizen customers and they are just selling their alts and buying btc.

I wonder how things will happen from now on. Binance volume will drop obviously but binance US will get the difference or it won't be used by US citizens much.

Neo didn't bring anything to the table besides neo/gas. Neo was Chinese ethereum and the expected thing was Chinese ico's would you NEO. And it was going well but at some point, Chinese government decided to ban crypto so NEO became a deserted chain. There is some projects choosing them very rarely but it is not enough. And no-one just buy it to get %6 yearly gas rewards.

Most ico projects end with failure after 2017.

The reason is simple, past experiences. Lots of ico's raised millions of dollars which didn't produce anything and lost most of the value. If you lose %90 of your investment with an ico would you invest anything else? I won't and also investors won't. So because they are not investing into ICO's, they are failing and bounties are getting no value at all.

Facebook and crypto. This two looks like very opposite things and i will not touch any of their stable coin. But on the other hand, it may be good for ecosystem.

With facebook more people can learn about crypto and may try real crypto. That means fresh money into ecosystem which can be good for all coins.

Even i accept technical analysis can be applied to high volume coins, i must single out XRP.

XRP doesn't have any limit on supply and mostly held by the company behind it and they are setting the price. They can manipulate the market and they can mint billions of new coin. So i always choose to stay away of it. About 0.40$ resistance if the company wants, they can easily break it in a couple of seconds.

IEO become mainstream and now every failed ICO is making an IEO. But you are good as the exchange you used for IEO. There are tons of exchanges but there is only a couple of good one and has real volume. If you see an IEO on an exchange you don't have any clue about it but says they have 500m $ daily volume. Just check their so-called most volume pair and see how they fabricate orders out of thin air and leave that place.

I think all institutes which don't seek profit should accept any cryptocurrencies. I mean they are mostly getting funds by donations so why should they say no to any kind of money. If i were an administrator of a church or foundation i would put a huge Accept Bitcoin&Altcoin banner.

In normal conditions, synching wallet and downloading snapshot should be the same. But when you try to synch blockchain from start it is having errors (at least mine and many others had that problem ) and that snapshot fixed that. So if they solve the problem with synching from the start, this won't be needed.

I couldn't help myself but i checked the website. I knew it was a scam when i read that a mobile phone will mine 2eth in a month.

They also have a subscription plan which you earn monthly 0.20 eth in return of 0 investment If they decide to go with PONZI path maybe 1-2 month you can earn 0.20 eth. Otherwise, it is a scam and you shouldn't pay any cents for it.

As far as i remember they faced a %51 attack on their blockchain so just changing algo would save them from future attacks?

I think they should choose a method like dpos which is nearly impossible to face that kind of an attack.

ICO's paying a great amount of Money to have paid article run on crypto websites like CCN. Isn't that enough to run that website? Also, there are other advertisement options besides Google they are not like Google but still lucrative enough for a website like CCN.

They should be taught on schools, how not to run a business.

First, they locked tokens for a whole year even it was a hyped Project. The hype got lost, but people waited at least for a good Exchange because they raised 30m $ and promised top 5 Exchange.

And now they finally unlocked with IDEX and BILAXY and so-called upcoming major cex. I don't know any major cex want to list this mess but even they want they had a whole year to secure that deal. But right now they are like students trying to do homework last minute. Really a disaster.

My money is lost %84 in fiat even %70 in crypto. Now waiting maybe they really list on some major Exchange and maybe i can get some of my loss back, i am denying my decision to invest from the time when they started to prolonge lock period.

First of all IEO or ICO is not something that different. They both sell the same thing. A utlity token which has value in the ecosystem but brings no profit share. Even if project become success tokens may not become valuable because of the constant circulation. IEO is only different than ICO is that company not selling that tokens, they are using a guaranteer exchange for selling them.

On the other hand, STO means you are getting a token which is bringing a share of the profit. If the company has success it is certain that token will get value also you will get passive payment just to hold them. So of course, STO is better.

If it is an altcoin and web wallet official, i wouldn't mind because it is just a scam and even you have that coins in your own wallet, tokens will be there but they will worth nothing so not a big deal.

If it is bitcoin or one of the biggest cryptocurrencies that won't come out scam (like stellar ethereum), i always use official wallet and wallets give me private keys (like myetherwallet).


So i am not scared at all.
If you don't want to scare too, only use official wallets and don't trust 3rd party service providers.