Would love to add but it REALLY needs to be a public github source. We cannot add a coin from a tarball that can be modified secretly at any time.

After one HELL of a time getting it to recompile, SPC is back up on AllCrypt.com

Can I get a dev or someone who knows something to contact me?

We have a user who sent a deposit, transaction ID eb4c8baff0de0ba0c317daa9f02e5d96797fdc25ca9def059460c9ac6c154c77

We never got it. We look for it, our wallet has no idea what that txid is.

I asked him for his version number, he says 0.7.3

I told him wow, he must be on really old software - we recompiled from the git last week and we're on version 1.8. He sends me the link to the git, says he downloaded the wallet 2 weeks ago. The git shows version 0.7.3 - but the linux is reporting 1.8 - and I personally downloaded from the git and compiled about a week ago. I just now as I'm writing this checked the block explorer - and both our wallet and the explorer are on block 27136.

So why's the git say 0.7.3, why does our customer have 0.7.3, but we have 1.8, and when he sent us LAT to an address we control the transaction was unknown in our wallet?

Confused.

So either common sense (You don't need me to protect you from it) or opinion, where mine may be different from yours. Got it.

My POINT in asking that question is what YOU deem to be a scam coin may not be right or accurate, and it's not my place to deny a coin based on OUR opinion. The "seems to good to be true" - well - Not sure how a coin could be too good to be true. I cant imagine a situation where that would be the case - they all have pros and cons and I'm not sure I've ever seen a coin that was "too good to be true".

While just another scrypt coin may be a worthless copycat pile of crap, that doesnt mean it's a scam. And again - not sure why *I* need to protect *YOU* from yourself or your own stupidity for investing in it.

The magical 1% premine limit. Depending on what the premine is for, there are legitimate reasons to premine more than 1%. Just because it's more than one does not automatically equal scam.

And if the devs ask for BTC upfront for an IPO, I also don't see how that automatically equals scam. Sure, it seems likely, or, they can be completely legitimate.

My entire point is that if you want an exchange to vet these coins for you, so that you can be without effort and wholly without personal responsibility, I have absolutely zero pity if you lose all your money, because you're lazy and have no sense of responsibility. And to make an arbitrary list of "this is automatically a scamcoin" serves no purpose. First of all, some of that is based on opinion. Second, there are plenty of times where you could violate one of those "rules" and still be wholly legitimate. Aurora (to the best of my knowledge) failed, but not because it was a scam, but because it just wasn't well executed. And that had a hell of a lot more than a 1% premine. Or, was that a scam too?

And last - if the list is so cut and dry, why the hell do you need ME to vet the coins for you? If it's that frigging simple, I'd hope that any halfbrained nitwit could figure it out for themselves.

This whole "not my responsibility to make sure I make intelligent decisions, I need an authority to diaper and babysit me so I'm not stupid" mentality pisses me off at my core. Take some fucking personal responsibility and make a decision for yourself, and stop asking for someone in authority (or running an exchange, or moderating a forum, etc) to protect you from your own mental handicap. My god, how weak are you?

tl;dr: I'm not vetting coins based on arbitrary "its a scam" rules people make up. Obviously crap coins with zero support, we don't add. Coins that seem like they have half a chance of moving at all, sure, we want to give them a shot. We're not big mommy and daddy government here to make your decisions for you, and to put a boot on the neck of something that could be awesome, just because we think we know better. Anyone who wants crypto to thrive, who is ASKING for that sort of thing, needs to rethink why they are behind crypto in the first place.

I mean, hell, MEGAman came in here and called JPC a scamcoin. If we went by HIS defition and intrepretation, your JPC wouldnt be on any exchange.

Well thank god we didn't listen to him huh? But - we'd BETTER listen to the SAME EXACT argument and apply it to a DIFFERENT coin though, because THAT coin is a scam. JPC isnt. The other is though. Same critera.

THAT makes sense.

As for the other post about poloniex rejecting supercoin, and the github scources, and scanning the code - thats not a scamcoin issue. Thats an unsafe, can hurt the system, is an absolute fake coin that exists only to spread malware or some other bad crap. And yes, any exchange that has half a brain does that.

How praytell is an exchange to do "due dilligence" and to protect you from "scamcoins".

What criteria is universally accepted that we should do, to make it so you don't have to use your brain, or think, and protect you from your own bad choices?

Which coins do we take and which do we reject, that everyone will look at and say "Yes, they made a good call there"?

Let us know the magic formula. Please.

To further that analogy - a road CAN become congested and worthless to travel on when filled with crappy slow cars.

An exchange is not like that. We can have 8 great coins and 400 worthless piles of crap. The piles of crap do not detract from the other "good" coins.

It's not even like putting a good store in a shitty part of town. The bad crowd would keep away the "higher class" shoppers. It's an online exchange. The presence of shit coins has no effect on the others.

I've heard the argument that allcrypt has crap coins so it's a bad exchange, but I just don't buy that.

We offer all coins a chance. It's not up to me to judge who is "worthy" and who isn't. If only 3 of the coins we host ever "make it" - it won't be because of the presence of, or the lack thereof, other coins.

All "the" nodes? We have 11 connections.

And we let you trade after just 1 confirmation. While JPC is fast and 10 confirms are pretty quick, 1 is faster.

I should get some screengrab software and do a speedtest and post it on the blog.

I personally believe that ALL coins should have a chance to be on an exchange, not just the ones that are cherry picked for whatever "reasons" the exchange chooses. It's why I started AllCrypt.com. "All" in the name being on purpose - we want to support all coins that will also support us.

I see the arguments against being the graveyard, but, we also have filtering options to hide all those coins. And as we find coins that are too dead, or too much work to keep on the site, we remove them. Which isnt many.

OR - OR - You were NEVER REMOVED from a BTC market on AllCrypt.

My god. I'll never understand the sheep mentality.

Newest version, 7 connections, no new blocks in 4 days. If someone has insight or a solution please contact us through the support forum on allcrypt.com

No new blocks in almost 2 weeks. Wallet newest version. Reports an error: "Warning: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade." - which causes all of our RPC calls to the wallet to fail.

Asked for help twice, no response, ISR is being removed from AllCrypt.com today.

Thanks for playing.

On 1.5 with 11 active connections, and we havent received a new block in 10 days. We're stuck back on 128,795

Whats going on?

Or thrive on a good exchange for free.

Oh. Wait. Nevermind.

Tried to add the coin to AllCrypt.com but even with the nodes in the OP, we have 0 connections.

If the coin has working nodes, open a support ticket on AllCrypt.com and let us know.

Not arguing or even hinting that you are wrong: but when you say a 6% premine guarantees it will fail, back that up.

Why does a 6% premine absolutely guarantee it?

Thank god it got on mintpal huh?

It blew up on allcrypt. Thrived when added to bittrex.

10BTC later it hits mintpal, and spirals.

Bravo

Well, didn't take long for the second round of FU AllCrypt to hit. Hot wallet depleted in less than an hour as millions were withdrawn.

Ill refill it soon. But since it's a cold wallet and it's midnight on a Monday, it requires a drive.

And MintPal is praying to god they do, then JPC retaliates. And you fight it out to their profit.

Thats an extremely good point. If the value of your coin is based off of what exchange its on - then your coin has problems.

An exchange can bring exposure - but a coin should have value regardless.