sure..typically breaking up or down thru span A or B..what I call the top and bottoms of the cloud indicates that the other span above or below will be tested
you have to keep in mind that Span A and B swap places depending on if the candles are 'above or below" said cloud
5:26
for instance on the daily..which is the chart I was talking mostly about...we are battling right below and on Span B
5:27
actually on a steep vertical which I typically infer as 'slippery'
meaning price will tend to slide up and down quite easily along that axis
5:29
then Span B is a long straight horizontal...what I call 'hard'..price ranged there and people where comfortable buying and selling at that range...a 'hard' spot if you will
5:33
Now to answer your specific question...if there is a solid break above a Span...and a close above said span..then you typically can expect the Span above or below to also be challenged..
ranging inside a 'cloud' indicates market indecision as well and will be followed by a sharp break away from that price range





5:33
there you go...ichimoku in a nut shell

Detailed word for a n00b like myself please thx

And don’t be to toxic, have read WO’s can get a bit when we DIP
 

-snipped-

Nooooooo!  Satoshi would not spam the UTXO set.

PSA:  Never use burn addresses!  They are bad for Bitcoin, bad for nodes, bad for scalability.  If you want to destroy bitcoins, place them in the amount field of an OP_RETURN output.  That is unspendable, according to consensus rules; thus, the output is pruned from the UTXO set.  Auditors of Bitcoin’s supply typically also subtract OP_RETURN amounts from Bitcoin’s supply cap.

The UTXO set size is one of Bitcoin’s biggest scalability issues (so to speak).  Please don’t make it worse by polluting the UTXO set with bloat that nodes will need to track forever and forever.  Be environmentally responsible!

See how I irrevocably destroyed one satoshi in a sane and responsible way (txid 000000000fdf0c61...).

---

And just to add to all of this good TA...

If we take the TA out of the equation and just go by sentiment alone:

1. Average Joe public participation is still low, and overall volume extremely low.

2. Didn't see anything "parabolic" happen with Bitcoin. There was no blow-off top moment.

3. If the Coinbase IPO was the big "sell on the news" moment, then it was the absolute lamest moment in Bitcoin's entire trading history. Everyone knew it was coming months prior.

4. Whale traders in bear markets plan on short/dumping for a least 24-30 months straight after a top (unless we have a double top within the same year). I can't even fathom this happening right now with all the bullish announcements still to come.

So I think anyone selling it all rn is going to be woefully out of position and sad over the next 6-12 months.

-snip-
This is where nullius really stops following the Wall before it eats all his time again.

You jinxed it.

Giant, likely insurmountable sell wall on Bitstamp. Looks like another humiliating leg down is eminent.

Did that go better then expected or not?

OT: Hedgefund Greylock Files for Bankruptcy After Losses Spur Withdrawals

https://www.bloombergquint.com/markets/hedge-fund-greylock-files-for-bankrupcty-in-new-york

But...bbut...I thought CNBC said that emerging markets were the way to go? That I would soon be rich? /s    

Is it wrong for me to admit I am sexually excited by the notion of hedge funds being absolutely destroyed ?