well the graphics need to be way better this game has no aesthetic value whatsoever.
So what will happen to all the MOTOcoins, flushed into cryptoland, lol
would you just clone the MOTOCOIN source for the playcoin?
Please let me know about the link to that bot.
Also though what use would it be to mine with the bot and maintain nodes if you think this currency will fail anyways?
It seems like a conflict of interest or a bit of an unnecessary conundrum I'd rather not be invovled in if this currency is fated to fail... or already has failed.
Oops, I totally forgot to upload the bot. Do you still want it or have you changed your mind? I would clone motocoin and then make the improved map generations happen on the first blocks. I don't really know c++ but i'll try to figure out how to create it. |
|
|
|
why don't you have any? And why are you in the thread though, don't you want any, aren't you mining?
I'm curious how many miners there are, lol...
Nope, I just check here every now and then to see if HMC is back. I guess i'm still interested in the whole Proof-of-Play concept, but I don't think Motocoin will succeed, largely because of the premine, and also because bots ruined the coin in the beginning. But hey, we can always launch a new coin called Playcoin. Who's with me? It will contain the new map generation method to dispose of bots pretty well. |
|
|
|
I tried to fetch the bot but that link is defunct. can anyone upload the bot somewhere else.
Also my question though is, does it help to strengthen the MOTOcoin network if I do this?
Yes it does, and I'll start uploading it now. If you let your computer mine, you will function as a node and you will also be creating blocks so that transactions can go through. I probably wouldn't worry about it though, but then again, I don't have any motocoins. |
|
|
|
is there any way I can help?
I have a nice GPU though I wouldn't know how to implement the bot that was posted a few previous messages ago... someone posted the bot on github...
Necromancer, I think?
Not sure.
but I have 2 very good computers if any computational power would be useful... if I had the bot and knew how to run it. Couldn't that help with nodes somehow?
Not sure what a node is in this case. but yes, 2 possibly 3 very good computers that could be put to good use to help the MOTOcoin network if its any consolation to my lashing out at HMC...
All you need to do is download the bot and go the the motocoin directory with motogame.exe. Rename motogame.exe to something else and then put the bot into that directory, and rename the bot to motogame.exe. (unless it is already named motogame.exe) This bot works off your cpu, not gpu btw. |
|
|
|
then where is WilliamLie2 why is he also dead quiet. they just dumped this shitcoin after they pumped it... typical pump and dump action lol. I just did a whois on the domain name hunterminercrafter.com I found his postal adress and telephone number, he's from NobbyBeach Australia, perhaps you'd like to give him a call and see if he's dead or alive, and then maybe I will retract my statement. Wait, let me call him for us: let me quote" Domain Name: HUNTERMINERCRAFTER.COM Registry Domain ID: 1847680539_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.publicdomainregistry.com Registrar URL: www.publicdomainregistry.comUpdated Date: 2015-04-04T23:58:48Z Creation Date: 2014-02-21T22:40:00Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2015-02-21T22:40:00Z Registrar: PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com Registrar IANA ID: 303 Registrar Abuse Contact Email: Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1-2013775952 Domain Status: REDEMPTIONPERIOD ( https://www.icann.org/epp#redemptionPeriod) Registry Registrant ID: Registrant Name: Domain Admin Registrant Organization: Privacy Protection Service INC d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org Registrant Street: C/O ID#10760, PO Box 16 Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator Note - Visit PrivacyProtect.org to contact the domain owner/operator Registrant City: Nobby Beach Registrant State/Province: Queensland Registrant Postal Code: QLD 4218 Registrant Country: AU Registrant Phone: +45.36946676 Registrant Phone Ext: Registrant Fax: Registrant Fax Ext: Registrant Email: " the site was updated on the 4th of April 2015 if you notice the stats. ALSO, this number is in Denmark, its privacyprotect.org's number, however apparently HMC is from Australia and doesn't wish to be found/ phoned. Don't delude yourself into thinking something bad's happened to him. Something bad's happened to MOTOcoin. he DUMPED IT! le lol! Le evidensss! And why do you quote him as saying Will rushed MOTOcoin and that he's working on another coin, from the horse's mouth, he doesn't give a shit about MOTO and just left it to die/sink along with its followers...  No no no no, I would not think for one minute that he dumped motocoin, he have talked a lot in PM's and I sortof got to know him. Plus, if he did dump motocoin, then the last time he was online would not be as it is right now. I am also from australia but HMC's general statistics show that he was most active at midnight (in Australia) so I really doubt that he is actually from Australia, maybe that website has nothing to do with him. |
|
|
|
Well good luck to HunterMinerCunt and his new Shitcoin! May it also sink to the bottom of the ocean like
Motocoin to be discovered as made of nickle and tin as much as this shitcoin, lol.
Dude you really suck. Hey HMC, So... Hows that human-mineable coin you're making coming along?  Is it close to being complete? I hope you haven't forgotten about me. We are finished with most of the design work, and have started implementing the work proof functions involved in the game. We're a bit "behind schedule" partly because we decided to take steps to make our game "compatible" with some existing games and tools, but mostly because I'm working more or less alone on it as some of the key pieces of it are downright "too complex" for the other developers involved. (The science behind the coin is inter-disciplinary, but I can't say much more than that as it would be too telling.) Day-job work consumes most of my time lately, as well. I'm still aiming to start testing before the new year, but we may be looking at a Q1 launch, instead. In any case we are not going to rush something out just for the sake of having something out. Instead, we're looking to build something worthwhile and will take any necessary time to do so. We don't want the same sort of drama that hit MOTO (just because Will rushed it out) to keep our coin similarly stagnated. Also, if anything *at all* comes up during private testing, we will not hesitate to delay our launch further. We are working self-funded specifically so that we don't have to live up to someone else's expectations of delivery and can focus on stability of our innovations instead of meeting some investor's goals and deadlines. (We even turned down a considerably sizable investment offer simply because they wanted to set a specific launch date.) It will be done when it is done, not sooner. This is the only way to make a good project.  Obviously something really bad did happen to HMC. |
|
|
|
why would u just abandon this, that's so childish, i think they're making another cryptocoin this was just a disaster test run. cant anyone find someone to convince them?
where can we find a dev who would be interested?
maybe a korean bitcoin fan...
they love dem games, lul
Since HMC doesn't seem to be coming back I might as well say that he and some others were creating another coin, with a different, more accurate POP mechanism. He didn't give any details away in his PMs though. |
|
|
|
This particular example isn't what we should have, but I like the idea of nodes firing off messages around a distributed decentralized network.   yup ... thats it ... can this be done mate? ... #crysx You see, the thing with 3D animations is that you actually need to model the drawings in 3D, and I am not very good with that. But I would like to learn how to do it. I should probably watch some blender modelling videos. I also would need to texture the models, and that takes a while. Unless I can just give them a colour. When I have the time I will go and watch some videos on using the sculpt tool in blender and hopefully I'll be able to fulfil this request. |
|
|
|
|
Hey everyone, do any of you have any requests for animations? I'd be happy to make some.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you guys miss where I said that a smartnode can handle more spr than it holds? (same for dash's masternodes)
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about leaving the project guys. I hope you understand, I have lost interest.
|
|
|
|
So, will masternode payments still depend on a score, because if so it will defeat the purpose of them being dynamic.
I must admit that was something I didn't care for with the original SPR masternode testing. I didn't understand the benefits of the highest scoring masternodes getting paid. Am I missing a really obvious benefit? Surely the network can only be fair if all masternodes get paid roughly the same amount over a period of time? Why define a max number of masternodes? Surely the ROI, coin supply and value of SPR will define this organically? People won't run masternodes at a loss for long... I also remain to be convinced of the dynamic masternode model other than its brilliant ease of setup. Once again...am I missing a fundamental advantage? The score was designed to sort the men from the boys. Servicenode owners will try to load their nodes with as little SPR as possable (so to have move nodes/profit). This create's instability in the network, as people are getting kicked off the list because of the small amount in the node. So to create some stability, long term nodes that are well funded get a higher rating and probably more SPR block rewards. That's my understanding anyway But then it would remove the competition if they were paid more, and hence defeating the purpose of a limit. Their not paid more because that's in the code. There paid more because they're more consistent, handle more transactions and respond 100% of the time. Also the larger your servicenode balance is, the larger transactions your node can handle. And we need the ability to handle large transactions so we need large wallets. Am i right in saying Dash nodes can only handle 1000 dash at a time? No, you are wrong. It doesn't mix any dash with its own, the dash always stays in the masternode so it makes sense. So if 1 Dash masternodes were possible, they would be able to handle 20 999 999 Dash. |
|
|
|
I wish there was a way to limit each user with 1 masternode, that would be perfect.
If there was a way (probably only possible with a centralised coin) I'm sure it would be done. |
|
|
|
So, will masternode payments still depend on a score, because if so it will defeat the purpose of them being dynamic.
I must admit that was something I didn't care for with the original SPR masternode testing. I didn't understand the benefits of the highest scoring masternodes getting paid. Am I missing a really obvious benefit? Surely the network can only be fair if all masternodes get paid roughly the same amount over a period of time? Why define a max number of masternodes? Surely the ROI, coin supply and value of SPR will define this organically? People won't run masternodes at a loss for long... I also remain to be convinced of the dynamic masternode model other than its brilliant ease of setup. Once again...am I missing a fundamental advantage? The score was designed to sort the men from the boys. Servicenode owners will try to load their nodes with as little SPR as possable (so to have more nodes/profit). This create's instability in the network, as people are getting kicked off the list because of the small amount in the node. So to create some stability, long term nodes that are well funded get a higher rating and probably more SPR block rewards. That's my understanding anyway But then it would remove the competition if they were paid more, and hence defeating the purpose of a limit. Edit: And what do you mean instability? How will it be unstable? |
|
|
|
Surely the network can only be fair if all masternodes get paid roughly the same amount over a period of time?
If you're not posing a merely rhetorical question, what's the definition of “fair” in this instance? Cheers Graham It wasn't intended as rhetorical. I guess my roots are deeply set in DRK where the idea was that the entry point for a masternode was fixed and that over a given period of time, all masternodes would receive a similar return on investment. In this context, I am using fair to refer to the fact that in order to run a service node, it will cost the owner money to run it. If the service node owner is not guaranteed roughly the same income as other service node owners is there a chance this will mean that some service nodes will generate less income for doing the same amount of work at the same expense therefore causing an "unfair" situation? I guess the advantage is that it will drive the price of Spreadcoin up if it succeeds. |
|
|
|
|
So, will masternode payments still depend on a score, because if so it will defeat the purpose of them being dynamic.
|
|
|
|
Guys, I totally forgot to say that I figured out a problem that Spreadcoin really does fix.
"Hackers" cant install spreadcoin miners on people's computer because the private key will be leaked.
well - they CAN install it - but the private key would easily be had ... ... #crysx Yeah, and if one person finds their virus then they can take the coins if they make their fee higher (I think) and withdraw at the same time the hacker does. |
|
|
|
|
Guys, I totally forgot to say that I figured out a problem that Spreadcoin really does fix.
"Hackers" cant install spreadcoin miners on people's computer because the private key will be leaked.
|
|
|
|
Its through now but before I hadn't received anything in my wallet for a while. (my time it was 5:27pm when I posted that and if you check the time in the screenshot you can see that something must have broken at Bittrex) Looking at my wallet I finally got the spr at 5:47pm. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
