"prices similar to ebay" well there is your problem. ebay and paypal charge sellers 13% that they have to make up for....accepting bitcoin costs you at most 1%


apmex individual dollars of 90% are at $14 that is not bulk (imo LOL)
free shipping on orders over $99 as well...

and im guessing they would not have stock issues...


just pointing out...if you are serious about sales take the advise if not so be it

90% "junk" silver $1s worth is 11.94 usd silver content

even with shipping included what is the justification for $18 per dollars ? it does not cost $6 to ship 4 quarters let alone if more then a dollars worth was bought and combined shipping

i see it being sold by some big name places for ~13 per $1

A true numismatic detected
Thanks for sharing and good luck with the sale.

Dumb Q

What does ICG MS64 FB 1944-S mean?  Well I know what the 1944 means, but what is all the other stuff?

Your wallet is your bank , Be the bank of yourself . You have the control of all your money , you don't need a bank. I think you didn't understand what is the sense of bitcoin....

And thats the opposite how crowdfunding works. There have been many crowdfunded ideas on both coinfounder and bitcoinstarter, so it's not the case.

Some guy asked 5 BTC for a new laptop and he raised funds for that, it's silly but people do waste money. Now instead of them wasting 5 BTC on some random guy's laptop, he could just have funded my idea which actually gave them profits and not lose them money.

Even if it would not be a succes (which I doubt strongly), what the more likely?

• Invest in my project, risk small amount (I only ask for 0.005 BTC now) and see what happens ? There is a good probability that you will gain profits

• Give 5 BTC to a random guy to buy his laptop and never see that money again.

So which one do you think has more risk or opportunity?

If a random guy can ask for any donation for any BS idea, then I can ask too for a very innovative business idea. So let's be fair here man.

Very well, I`ll put some of my own capital into it, hopefully people will gain more trust then.

Although I think its good to be anonymous, this would be an anonymous "fund" , because in my view privacy is the NR.1 priority.
I won't request any info from the customers, they wont request info from me, as simple as that.

Look at the NXT based assets, completely anonymous yet they have 1m$ in it, and they are NOT scammers. The same way my asset would work, except that i`d be more innovative.

I think I was the first one to come up with this complex idea of investment, others were only investing in gambling sites or lottery.
This one is investing in diversified assets, with a good risk management, i think people should consider that as a great option.

I know that I have small trust because I`m a newbie, but clearly, people should invest in the "idea" not the "man". That is the other reason my I keep my anonymity, so that people to not confuse my identity with my project, we have to separate these 2 concepts.

Business is business and chit-chat talk on forums is that and its not identical.

Anything Australian?

Marking this to remind myself to check back. Nice coins.

Well then you must be a perma-bear. The bitcoin has made many people millionaires, average people, who just bought / mined it at the right time. So why can't I (with a record of trading experience) do the same if not better?

Only crappy bonds make you 2%/year, but this is Bitcoin we are talking about, the potential is much bigger.

Any other slabbed coins from other countries?

Well, if thats the case then yes. Many people became millionaires in the BTC bubble, so why can't I ride the altcoin bubbles and become millionaire together with my investors ?

Do you lack the faith in me or in the altcoins, because at this point I don't really understand what is your problem with my project.

EDIT: I`ve uploaded proof that the address is the official address of the stock and from here the stocks will be issued

Not to nitpick, but,  either post negative trust or collect the collateral not both, collateral is used to secure a loan so that there are no negative repercussions from not being able to pay the loan. What you are doing would be like a bank who gave you a secured loan and you didnt pay the payments but they took your security deposit and paid the loan then gave you a bad mark on your credit score. SO for me I think you should have to pick one or the other either collect the collateral or leave negative trust.

I would not say its easy, because its not, but it can be done.

99% Of new crypto currencies are BS, but if you have a taste to find the other 1%, that can explode really fast making 300-500%/ week.

Of course like I said, I would only invest small amount 1% in each, because they are very volatile, and to diversify the risk.

But overall, it can be a nice investment.

I would not look for 300%/ week, i think even 2-3% (above the bitcoin depreciation %, so in total about 6%)  / week is already a success.

Indeed, that is why i would diversify, and invest just like if it were a portfolio in real life.

Have you heard about investment diversification?

It means that i dont put 95% of the funds in 1 investment, heck not even 10%.

I initially though about 3% or even lower, depending on how the investors would want it. So if one turns out to be a scam, we only lost 3%, thats managable.And since the others will make more than 3%, all risks will be covered in the reward.

BTCJam can easily give 0.5%/ week, so does any other loan out there, compound that and that could give 100%/ year - the dividents, it's not hyip but the numbers dont lie. Worst case 10-20%/year, i think its a really good investment.

Well then you forgot to do your homework, its not my fault that you haven't heard of them. Ice dice's owner is a respected member of this forum.

I know that BTCJam is prone to defaults, but i can calculate the risks and the probability of the defaults, by checking each loaner's background, and evaluating his competence.

Further more even if he defaults, i told you we will lose only 3%, but if he doesnt, we gain 20%. I think that is a good RISK/REWARD ratio.


Check it again please, NXT coin right now is in an weekly uptrend, right now it hit 6100 satoshi, i think its a really good investment, for the long term of course.

Mastercoin if you look closely has a very straight price line, its volatility is big, but the price doesnt have a trend, once new features are added there, an uptrend is very likely there.I wont invest in it right now, but it will be on a watchlist.

Bitshares is pegged to the USD, and as the rhetoric of the FED will hold it could be a good investment short term, but not a long term one, i would buy it at dips, and sell it at tops, its more a tradable currency rather than a investable one.

Add SuperNET to the list, they will soon finish new feature uppgrades, it could be the next hot crypto out there, I heard that they are working on a decentralized exchange and multiwallet bridge, it will be exciting.

Also Ethereum, and various other crypto currencies could skyrocket, I would even invest in those which make 300%/week, but only a small amount (~1%), to hedge against BTC's depreciation.

I think you are just a troll. Do you even realize what you spell out?

You can't even put things in perspective. First of all, why would the investors need to be paid asap, a stock just like any other investment is a longer term investment. Dividents will be paid out weekly not every second,  and that "30%" that is lost would be lost over 6 months not suddenly.

I emphasized that PHASE 2 and 3 would take months!
IT IS NOT A GET RICH QUICK SCHEME!!!


So no fund would be lost, because i will adjust the supply according to demand. Meaning that with the rate that new people come into the business, by that rate i will give out new IPO's.

I wont just dilute the market with a billion shares/day, you are confusing me with the FED  

So let me say 1 last time, i`ve planned out everything very specifically, the price will have a steady (not bubble or not HYIP) increase. The price would not crash neither because i would increase the dividents if this would happen, or stimulate the demand with special methods!

You criticize me that you think i`m no good trader, but yet you live in fantasy world and think that shares should make 60%/second isn't it? Well tell me 1 single share in the universe that made that much ROI at that frequency!

You see, you are so obsessed with criticizing me that you fail to see my clear points.

INVESTMENTS:
-Casino shares ex: Ice Dice good give game to invest
-Loans: BTC jam
-Mining: maybe you have a point here (i`ll invest very tiny amounts of the portfolio here)
-Bank: none existing yet but i`ve seen that they will be one soon, i`ll be cautious here
-Other crypto currencies with stable price and good yield (NXT,Mastercoin,Bitshares,etc)

You totally misuderstand me or you have no economic knowledge. First of all, dividents will be paid out from the issuer (me) until i reach a 15% level, after that trading and new capital that flushes in will hold it's value.

As people see the huge increase in demand they will buy it, but i wont let it go into a bubble phase because i will sell my shares to control the price.

Why would anybody invest in it if its given out for free? well because faucets would give out tiny amounts 50-100 or less, while with cash investors could buy more of it. Just like with bitcoin why would anyone give out this from faucets if you can buy it from exchanges ? You see my point.

Yes later on it could be integrated into faucets, so that ad revenue could be also paid or earned in my shares. It could take the role of a currency too.

 If X advertised wants to advertise his website on a faucet he can pay 200 shares to the faucet owner, and then he can give out 180 shares, and keep 20 for himself. It would be a complete money-flow cycle in the crypto economy and no share would be valueless.

Also if the price will rise, controlled (which it will) faucet owners, casinos and other online crypto websites could use it too, making it just like a currency but it will be a share basically.

I told you that i will invest my earnings from the phase III. sellout into faucet websites that are willing to do business with me, that will more than enough cover the divident costs.

You see it's all plannned carefully and well-thought, acusing me of being a scammer is just empty words, when i clearly explain here the entire business model.

PS: I`ve updated the model, so please check the picture in post 1, you will understand it better, sorry for previous picture I left out the most important fact which is, how would the stock gain value, now you know, it would gain from investments into: casino shares,faucets, loans, etc.

Not just me but everyone who invests would be anonymous, it would be a totally anonymous investment option.

Besides nobody said that you have to invest 1000 BTC in it, if everyone would just invest 10k satoshi into it, then we would get it running really fast. You can get 10k satoshi in 1 hours work so you dont risk really much. You can invest any amount you can tolerate to risk, its your decision guys.

Dont confuse it with preferred stocks, that is a different technical instrument. No it's all common stock, in the sense that all dividents are equal. What I mean there is that 0.1 gets 20k shares, that means that those guys get in total about 1 million shares, the rest will be distributed amonst faucet users, and/or can be bought at a lower than market price.

I will distribute them this way until I reach a 50 % ownership ratio, then i`ll sell the rest at a below market price or market price, until I reach about 15% with my friend.
Of course i wont push out all of it at once, it will be a gradual and rhytmic sale, to not distort the price. Because the maximum pool will be 10 million, yet at the beginning I will hold about 95% of it, so i have to sell it and distribute it slowly until I reach about 15%.

Also this mechanism will also prevent the stock to become a bubble,because if the price rises too fast and creates a bubble due to excess demand, i will quickly liquidate more shares from my pool and this will slow down the increase in price so that the supply could meet the demand.

It would be just like if I were the central bank of it, its just that i`ll manage it better than most CB do. This "monetary policy" as you call it, would ensure that the stock price is always stable and growing.

If the demand would fall , then i will increase the dividents.

I think its a very good monetary policy