everyone is still getting massively screwed on btc losing value and the loss of capital during that time span but i still respect the effort since not many scammers do this. good luck anyway.
On a sidenote: If KLYE indeed manages to pay back his investors in whatever time frame necessary, KLYEMAX will go down in history as one of the select few BTC securities with a positive ROI. I will infact repay this debt, Its a matter of me redeeming my honour not only to my investors but myself as well! Hoping BTC prices continue to fall allowing me to repay larger amounts through purchase of BTC. Dividends were paid out in the beginning and shortly after the dicing incident, and when investors are indeed paid back in full they will have made a small amount > invested. Prices got really low a few days after you said this. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777829.200Also looks like your still generating some BTC there. |
|
|
|
" The Bitcoin Jupiter Fund (BJF) is a Registered investment company. Registered investment companies are registered under the 1940 Act and subject to significant disclosure and ongoing compliance obligations. As registered investment company securities are also registered under the 1933 Act, they may be offered to the public" Bullshit Ok so the price is now falling again.
We'll hit $200 in the next week.
Get the f*** out of bitcon or you'll go broke soon!
Your response to a thread about a dream of BTC going sub $100: your dream will come true
Bitcoin is good for making money haha
No seriously ask yourself. I want to make or loose my cash. If make, go invest in something else. If loose, bitcoin
this is a joke but also serious
You don't really seem to have a strong grasp of the BTC market. On another note, do you have any clue on how expensive it is to register as an investment company in the US? Il wager this never happens. |
|
|
|
|
rocketlawyer.com
--> Joint Venture agreement <--
|
|
|
|
That shows under 10,000 uniques, which is very far from 89k. Not to mention the 10,000 uniques is likely fake as well. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/bitcoinregister.netAs the user above me said, if your getting this many uniques you should have an alexa score. |
|
|
|
So far 2 new writers. Keep it coming  |
|
|
|
I definitely should have specified those terms in the original post, but as I can not edit it -- would it be overly burdensome to refund the losing bids prior to the end of the auction? If prior to a refunding happening, multiple bids come from the send 1st ending address they can be treated as a single bid. I'd hate for people to be mislead by what i wrote on the first page, unless they read an amendment on page three (although really, I'm not sure they should be bidding if they can't get through three pages..)
I'm not particularly set on doing it the way I said, it just seems like the only way that makes sense. No bid is a losing bid until the auction is over. The auction is only for a week (or so, possibly a little longer if we need to deal with last minute 'snipes') so it's not like we're tying anyone's coins up for very long, and refunding all losing bets at once makes it a lot easier to keep track of what coins are going where. I should also mention that the auction address is an address in the Just-Dice hot wallet. There's a chance that the coins will move before the auction ends, due to old Just-Dice investors withdrawing their coins (it has been months I know, but some people are still only just realising that the site is no longer accepting bets). I have more coins in offline storage so don't worry if it looks like I'm spending the auction bids! sounds legit ! lol  Dooglus made well over 1000 BTC from commissions from running his Just-Dice site, I dont think anyone is worried about him running off with the auction bids |
|
|
|
|
Hiring several article writers for longer term commitments:
Requirements:
- Must speak english (no broken english)
- Must use skype
- Must have a good grasp of crypto-currencies
- Minimum article length is 500 words
- Must be able to write at least 1-2 articles a week
Payment:
Message me and we will work it out. Payment will come in Bitcoin, paid once a week for all articles written that week. First couple articles can be paid on a article to article basis.
If interested:
Message me on skype: acoinllc
|
|
|
|
Job over $100 - 10% up front, 90% escrowed with terms agreement.
What is the point of having 10% paid upfront if 90% is being escrowed? The funds are being escrowed anyway, so it's safe for you to start your project. Fixed price job. i take 10 percent up front, on the off chance the client is a scammer and tries to get his money out of escrow when receiving the code. this is pretty common on freelancing programs. clients will hire you accept the work, even pay you, then after they take the code they do a chargeback or claim you didn't deliver the code. it's a checksum of sorts. this term only applies to fixed price jobs, not hourly jobs. It doesn't matter atm anyway. I'm booked solid for the next two months other than the weekends. You have negative feedback. You should accept funds in full escrow |
|
|
|
|
Il buy finalvault right now
|
|
|
|
Just a heads up... If 'Mintpal' is a registered trademark for that company, they can sue you and take that web address from you. Dont spend a bunch of money on this.
They can only sue to take it, if the domain is being used to slander their company. And Im pretty sure Mintpal isn't registered anywhere anyways. Itd be cheaper for them to buy the domain off of you than hire a lawyer and go through courts. |
|
|
|
|
Put the funds in escrow first
|
|
|
|
|
How many deposits are on the site? Your asking a lot for a bidder to spot the site balance. Users should have their balances returned, and they can decide if they want to redeposit under the new management or not. For all we know there could be 500BTC on the site, meaning a bidder would need to have 520BTC+ tied up for 6 months... Assuming you don't run off with the balance in the meantime.
"a) I did not work with dmf "a fair bit". He invested 25 BTC in the site, I paid him back (a 7 BTC profit). End of story.", you also have a link on your homepage saying "Or if real-time isn't for you give dice.ninja a try", so you are directly supporting their site.
Whats the site profit?
|
|
|
|
You say that this is to become a highly competitive billion dollar industry... have you given thought to the idea that centralized gambling services may not be competitive in the wake of new decentralized gambling platforms? For instance NEOdice is about to be released which is a fully decentralized dice game that will get its provably fair random numbers from the nxt blockchain. This game will run as a DAC. Jl777's SuperNET platform will also include a full suite of decentralized casino games as well as p2p sportsbetting which will easily be able to take less of a house edge due to the game's ability to run themselves on top of a blockchain as a DAC.
I'm starting to wonder if just taking the old way of doing things and tacking bitcoin on top is not going to be able to compete with services that are actually taking advantage of the true power of the blockchain and decentralized tech to create brand new experiences, more cheaply. After all, isn't the whole point of this movement to decentralize everything?
After all, isn't the whole point of this movement to decentralize everything?
People need to start realizing that decentralization sounds fantastic and all, but really, its not as great as you think. Lots of crypto people are excited about decentralized exchanges / games etc. Outside of crypto, people hate decentral. Goodluck finding people to play on a decentralized platform, invest on a decentral platform etc. Than your forgetting about regulations regarding gambling and exchanges. Maybe you won't follow them, good for you, goodluck attracting actual investors or gaining new players. We live in a world that likes regulations. Oh, and no one is going to use NXT. The NXT asset exchange pretty much guaranteed it won't ever become big. Thats a nice instant ban if it ever starts to pick up pace, again, most people won't break the law to use a cryptocurrency when they can just use their fiat. I think CasinoBitco.in's real concerns should be when larger casino's start to accept BTC. A ban? You can't just ban a decentralized system running autonomous agents. What part of the world do you live in? Decentralized games and exchanges don't care about regulations. And as long as you have bitcoin you can get into any crypto system you wish friction free. So as long as Bitcoin isn't banned these other system will thrive as well. Anyway I am not looking for an argument here, I am simply stating some risks that we should be aware of as investors in a company. This isn't something to get all emotional about. The future will not care about our emotions or investments. You clearly didn't get what I was saying. Yes, they can ban it. They can make it illegal to use. And the rest of the world won't use something thats illegal. NXT's asset exchange directly challenges multiple US laws that will not be changing anytime soon. Not to mention unlicensed gambling. Maybe decentral will work for the tens of thousands of people that believe in decentralization, but billions of people follow the central organization of CasinoBitco.in |
|
|
|
You say that this is to become a highly competitive billion dollar industry... have you given thought to the idea that centralized gambling services may not be competitive in the wake of new decentralized gambling platforms? For instance NEOdice is about to be released which is a fully decentralized dice game that will get its provably fair random numbers from the nxt blockchain. This game will run as a DAC. Jl777's SuperNET platform will also include a full suite of decentralized casino games as well as p2p sportsbetting which will easily be able to take less of a house edge due to the game's ability to run themselves on top of a blockchain as a DAC.
I'm starting to wonder if just taking the old way of doing things and tacking bitcoin on top is not going to be able to compete with services that are actually taking advantage of the true power of the blockchain and decentralized tech to create brand new experiences, more cheaply. After all, isn't the whole point of this movement to decentralize everything?
After all, isn't the whole point of this movement to decentralize everything?
People need to start realizing that decentralization sounds fantastic and all, but really, its not as great as you think. Lots of crypto people are excited about decentralized exchanges / games etc. Outside of crypto, people hate decentral. Goodluck finding people to play on a decentralized platform, invest on a decentral platform etc. Than your forgetting about regulations regarding gambling and exchanges. Maybe you won't follow them, good for you, goodluck attracting actual investors or gaining new players. We live in a world that likes regulations. Oh, and no one is going to use NXT. The NXT asset exchange pretty much guaranteed it won't ever become big. Thats a nice instant ban if it ever starts to pick up pace, again, most people won't break the law to use a cryptocurrency when they can just use their fiat. I think CasinoBitco.in's real concerns should be when larger casino's start to accept BTC. |
|
|
|
Im not trolling, people should avoid your site. Maybe you should have let people know in advance that withdraws would be manual? In the off chance you don't lose users funds (either through running off / theft on site), your not running the site well.
Acoin, either you are trolling or you keep talking without having a clue. We've sent an email to every shareholder and owner informing them of the situation, plus we notified what happened on our major channels. Everyone involved with us knows of this little issue.Im not trolling, people should avoid your site. Maybe you should have let people know in advance that withdraws would be manual? In the off chance you don't lose users funds (either through running off / theft on site), your not running the site well.
Acoin, either you are trolling or you keep talking without having a clue. We've sent an email to every shareholder and owner informing them of the situation, plus we notified what happened on our major channels. Everyone involved with us knows of this little issue. I dont think Im the one without a clue |
|
|
|
Clearly that's not the case- Coinsortium, which you're promoting, has disabled withdrawals apparently. Your comment is either nonsense or a poorly worded threat; either way, people need to stay away.
It is not a threat at all. I meant that people here are too fast to judge and usually elaborate on erroneous assumptions. Or are outright trolls like Acoin Automatic withdrawal is disabled due to a site update so we swtiched to manual withdraw. Anyone who wishes to withdraw money can send a ticket and have it done in a few hours. Im not trolling, people should avoid your site. Maybe you should have let people know in advance that withdraws would be manual? In the off chance you don't lose users funds (either through running off / theft on site), your not running the site well. |
|
|
|
Clearly haven't done any due diligence before letting them on your site. So much proof its a scam / worthless operation.
Your site will go the way of Cryptostocks, its already enroute there
Those are baseless accusations that, in all honesty, aren't worth my time anymore. Keep spamming them if you wish. Hopefully moderation will discipline you. Farewell - ignore list for you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
