Here you go http://bitcoinmagazine.co.uk/subscribe/

I do not think you really need to change your existing subscription/order if you just want to buy more. You could have as many of the options listed on that page as you like. However, support@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk is where customers can get support when needed.

Since some found language on order page confusing we will review it and try to make things more clear. Thank You.

2 billion$ for cracking a typical password for anything remotely important

W39aJtv<w50>jcvOBJ20f<J36MDU{skK

Should not take more than a few milleanias. Good luck with this.

Rubber hoses and predators and bent senators are so much more cost effective than those datacentres.

Sure thing. I suppose it very much depends on whether one thinks on how he will continue with his ongoing hand to mouth existence or what kind of pension he will have X years down the road.

But a good one bringing visual aids into the argument, that is a strong move, indeed. No seriously.

P.S. there is an awesome book out there, google "How to Win Every Argument The Use and Abuse of Logic-Mantesh". Know it by heart and you could win this argument, even if you are wrong. Unfortunately some people get upset when you use black magic described there on them. Everything has it's downsides.

I would suggest that when talking about deflation in Japan it is not correct to look at commodities and energy prices and it's  derivatives or imported goods simply because those are not that much influenced by Japan's economy or monetary policy. You should really be looking at equities and local real estate prices and wages.

I'd say that the difference between what's going on now in US/EU and the Japanese scenario is that Japan had a little local screw up while the rest of the world basically minded it's own business. While it seem now we are on course to quite a global "cluster f*(^&" here.

silverbox, unfortunately your argument is a logical fallacy and therefore cannot be taken seriously. You use an anecdotal evidence and using wrong time periods at the same time.

To illustrate, it is like responding on statement like, say "in county X unemployment was rising during period from 1990 to 2006" by saying "no it is false because this guy I know got himself a new job in 2009".

As such, I have no choice but to dismiss your last post as utter nonsense, with all due respect.

sure

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflation#In_Japan

I love this little snippet:

I am wondering why Japanese were not able to "just buy things" using your model, for like decades now. They must be stupid or something. Or maybe there is some kind of magic bullet that is available to the fed but was never available to Japan's central bank.

lol, that's what they want you to think.

Who will they buy this stuff from once they bought all of it already? You do realise that we are talking about amount of money that is greater then valuation of all the hard assets in existence already.

I do not think it is the case. It is debt money. They only can print when someone borrows. However we have fractional reserve, that is already insane. It is simply a question of what's happening quicker new borrowing or defaults. What they do now is they are trying to balance this while hiding true defaults, sooner or later they fail at this "balancing act" and then we have either super inflation or super deflation or most likely both one after another.

As result of it this generation and the next generation will have no any further appetite for debt for quite some time. I think this theory is described reasonably well here http://kondratieffwinter.com/blog/k-wave/kondratieff-summary/

Here is an idea: create a chart of S&P in bitcoins.

Not necessarily. Bitcoin is cash equivalent, and cash is the only good thing to have in deflationary environment. For example, when S&P falls to 300, your bitcoins would buy you much more of S&P shares than you can buy now. Even if nominally Bitcoin exchange rates fall some too.

The point is whether you have free market that is self regulating or a central planning system. Do you think free markets would give you effectively negative interest rates as you have now?

And do not worry, you will see both deflation and hyperinflation. One after another.

This is actually soviet union 2.0. I can tell you from first hand experience of both 1.0 and 2.0.

I am with cypherdoc on this one. To compensate defaults (deflation) they are continuing to reduce bank's reserve requirements. It is effectively 0 or even negative already. The more they reduce reserve requirements the more difficult it is to fight deflation. Given that so many banks and now governments, particularly in Europe, are de facto insolvent right now, while PIIGSominoes  keep falling right on schedule, this is unsustainable. There is data out there that QE's have diminishing effect. The game is up and deflation is upon us. All assets but cash will fall in this scenario, gold and stocks and in most countries housing are the first to the block.

Moreover, the market has a tendency to inflict the maximum possible damage. It's so called "max pain" theory. See how everyone and his mother is into the gold right now and into shorting fiat by borrowing a lot. Everyone is playing the inflation card with ever increasing leverage, which basically means that there will be deflation to hurt the maximum possible number of people.

The worst thing one can do in deflationary environment is to be a debtor whose debts are secured on his real assets.

I am not sure now.

A statement on behalf of Bitcoin Magazine.

Goat ordered ads, subscription and website. After that he behaved very unprofessionally,  even childishly, while repeatedly obstructing our efforts to deliver the service he paid for. He then went public with libellous accusations, changed his mind way too many times, wasted significant amount of our time.

We have refunded him all his money and we have agreement with Goat on full and final settlement of this matter.

We refuse to have any business with this person in the future.

Bitcoin Magazine is a very young start-up business, we will review and improve our procedures based on our experience with this incident.

Dear Sir,

  It is inappropriate to continue discussing this matter here on the forum. Please contact adam@bitcoinmagazine.co.uk to resolve any issues related to the refund. We would prefer to not have any business relationships with you in the future. Thank You.

  You can find all the information about the company you may need on our website http://bitcoinmagazine.co.uk.

Faithfully Yours,

Dear Sir,

Matthew N. Wright is an agent and an officer of Bittalk Media Ltd. With reference to all matters directly related to Bitcoin Magazine.

Faithfully Yours,

Dear Sir you have 3 options:

1. Communicate with Bittalk Media Ltd in writing (i.e. email or snail mail) and agree F&F settlement as it was proposed or negotiate it, should you want to. Then get full refund.
2. Sue us, see http://bitcoinmagazine.co.uk/terms-of-sale/ . I, personally, at this point would prefer this scenario and I would personally defend this in the court.
3. Continue acting "in bad faith" as you are for a while now and get on every shit list out there as well as not getting any refund.

Let me also explain you that by refusing to communicate with Adam ( an agent appointed by the company) you are "acting in bad faith". Google it.

By refusing to accept refund you are "acting in bad faith".

This is final. Our position will not change.

Faithfully Yours,

Fair point. Thank You.