A cautious whale and a retarded dolphin both smash into the ship with the same amount of force.  . I bought as much Aeon as Ver holds Bitcoin, but nobody calls it RogerCoin. I like Aeon, and intend to be active in its growth and development over the years, nothing more. My holdings only serve to show my resolve in the matter. Based on the distribution chart on Bittrex someone holds 400k aeon there. Reading this thread makes me think it may be you. Why not move it to an offline paper wallet? I highly doubt Roger Ver would hold even 1% of that in an exchange long term. |
|
|
|
|
I read somewhere that Aeon plans to use the Monero db code once it is finalized and released. Are there any short term development goals for Aeon right now? Or are we essentially waiting on the Monero db to port to Aeon before more development continues?
I have used both 9.6 and the pruning branch and am happy with the results. Keep up the great work!
|
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg,
It would be nice if you stopped by more often to tell us what you are working on. I think more people here would like to help but feel like they are out of the information loop.
Best regards
|
|
|
|
If I recall the proposal correctly, it imposes a new rule on outputs. They cannot be spent in the next transaction unless a minimum mixin is provided. Correct me if I'm wrong. But what about the case when certain inputs cannot be mixed due to absence of ringsig partners?
There is an exception for that. Also, non-standard outputs can't be created any more, so they will eventually be "used up". What would be the reason for an absence of ring sig partners? I thought there were large numbers of mixins available for all but the largest size transactions (amounts higher than 99% of us even own). I cant find the link but somewhere I saw a listing of avaible mixins but value and there were many. Available mixins only increase over time right? There are outputs with uneven amounts such as 0.0002452113 that won't necessarily match any other outputs. In the future every output will be a multiple 1-9 of a power of ten, and indeed there are only a limited number of those (roughly 150, though the number in common use will be much smaller) and all except the very largest amounts will have many available. Thanks for the explanation. The power of 10 solution should work well:) |
|
|
|
|
4 votes for Kf2: XMRpromotions, ArticMine, 8XMR, LucyLovesCrypto
|
|
|
|
If I recall the proposal correctly, it imposes a new rule on outputs. They cannot be spent in the next transaction unless a minimum mixin is provided. Correct me if I'm wrong. But what about the case when certain inputs cannot be mixed due to absence of ringsig partners?
There is an exception for that. Also, non-standard outputs can't be created any more, so they will eventually be "used up". What would be the reason for an absence of ring sig partners? I thought there were large numbers of mixins available for all but the largest size transactions (amounts higher than 99% of us even own). I cant find the link but somewhere I saw a listing of avaible mixins but value and there were many. Available mixins only increase over time right? |
|
|
|
Just a warning to miners, you may have to update scratchpad sizes. I have miners connecting and not submitting shares. I noticed my nvidia miner had a scratchpad issue and it's probably happening to everyone using that if they updated the scratchpad size to be We have reached the point past that. You will need to change that, so probably Thank you for telling us this but can you explain in more detail what the meaning of this is and how we change the code exactly? |
|
|
|
33. f3
Yes. 33.f3 followed by Kf2 and Ke3 |
|
|
|
|
Will there be another testnet? Or is the next step a tagged release?
|
|
|
|
|
Re1 (XMRpromotions)
Rb2 (ArticMine, smooth, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
I like b4 better. Be6 seems likely followed by Rf6 and then we just move the bishop back. At least with b4 we are advancing our pawns to the point where black may at some point need to give something up to stop them. Probably not (and we still draw), but it is possible.
3 votes for Be6: ArticMine, LucyLovesCrypto, XMRChina
1 vote for Bxc6: nwfella
2 vote b4: XMRpromotions, smooth
Yes we both had the same reason for voting b4 last move. I think we should play Bd5 here. After Nd4 we have another chance to play b4. The position is now about even because of the time we just wasted. However like you said the most likely result probably would have been a draw after 27.b4 anyway (although I did prefer our position and thought we had at least some winning chances). After 28.Rxd6 black can play Kf8 (preventing 29.Rd7+ getting us out of the pin and threatening Ke7 and Nd4) making our material gain only temporary. 28.Rxd6 Kf8 29.c5 Ke7 30.Bd5 Rxd6 31.cxd6+ Kxd6 32.Bxc6 simplifies the game to a dead drawn position Don't be mad about me sharing any secrets. I am virtually certain that at least one or two of the Boolberry players saw the Kf8 idea before playing e5 (based on my observations of their skill in this game and in the games vs letsplayagame: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1148538.0) 28.Bd5 is the only chance we have to keep things somewhat dynamic. 1 vote for 28.Bd5: XMRpromotions I thought Be6 won a pawn:( If I had seen all of that I would not have voted for it. At least we did not lose any material:) 2 votes for 28.Bd5: XMRpromotions, LucyLovesCrypto |
|
|
|
The so called "verification" is another excuse to steal your money (others like poloniex isn't "cracking" down).
That was required by law no way around verification, AML and KYC. Polo will have to do it as well they just don't do FIAT so they are in a bit better shape. Really only BTC-e can avoid it for now. I'm also will to venture the margin trading is going to cause them problems with the CFTC. More exchanges should offer crypto only trading. No fiat, no margin = less complicated business model |
|
|
|
Do you have the binary they use to spread the miner ? I'd love to take a look at it... no. but download from torrent dirt rally iso almost 16 Gb...it's very lamerz this pool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Which address is associated with the hidden miner ? If this is true the warning should be better advertised on IRC, getmonero.org etc. |
|
|
|
LucyLovesCrypto, would only blue BBR logo shaped house make you happy or would you take purple one in consideration?  I would prefer to have a home that would promote the Boolberry brand, but would be happy if Boolberry is successful enough that I can use to to buy a home in any color! |
|
|
|
It's my opinion that white should play BxKn and then proceed to decimate the pawn structure
You might want to elaborate on "decimate the pawn structure". It seems to be that after Bxc6 bxc6 black can capture on b3 and a3 just as quickly as white can capture on d6 and c6. If your goal is to trade everything off and force a draw that would be a good idea. 27. Be6
2 votes for Be6: ArticMine, LucyLovesCrypto 1 vote for Bxc6: nwfella |
|
|
|
If you ask me Monero or Darkcoin? The winner will be Anoncoin  Anoncoin has the best name and was the 1st to have native I2P support but that is about it. Their Zerocoin plans were never completed. My vote goes to Monero or Boolberry. Darkcoin cryptography is not serious from an anonymity standpoint. |
|
|
|
Might be 1337 too. My cpu has been throttling for awhile and trying to isolate the issue. Rubit had too many flagged virus from virustotal so I used an exchange instead. I only install 99% of the wallets that are clean from virustotal.
I don't have the answer but want to say that virustotal can miss things. Use a VM unless you trust the software 100% |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
