h4: 1 vote (Morecoin)
Bg4: 1 vote (GoldTiger69)
If 17.h4 Qg7 18.Qg5 f6 Then if we ever play h5 black can close the position with g5. Lets trade our bad bishop. h4: 1 vote (Morecoin) Bg4: 2 votes (GoldTiger69, LucyLovesCrypto) |
|
|
|
|
b3: 7 votes (tifozi, Morecoin, boolberry, GoldTiger69, marcus1986, XMRpromotions, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
poloniexBBR markets frozen while we investigate issues with the network.
Posted by MobyDick
Now's the time to fire up a bbr daemon, run a miner, and support the network. Daemon will not sync, no solo mining. Did you try these priority nodes? Start the daemon with the --add-priority-node argument and use these peers:
print_cn
2016-Jan-31 18:08:21.914303 Connections:
Remote Host Peer id Recv/Sent (idle,sec) State Livetime(seconds)
[OUT]5.9.38.137:10101 a9046e7dadd740ea 296177(26)/110759(27) state_normal 2217
[OUT]66.228.33.249:10101 7b310d1ae9aae498 222316(27)/63471(27) state_normal 2314
[OUT]81.39.24.26:10101 1ed0c1e83bd84bfb 713628(24)/123872(24) state_normal 2341
[OUT]106.185.46.152:10101 1056f3d057a82878 291907(26)/111263(27) state_normal 2222
[OUT]128.204.214.119:10101 914c40381b15b1c1 2115695(26)/135045(27) state_normal 2335
[OUT]59.120.166.36:10101 ccd2aae0f31fa810 302456(26)/114974(27) state_normal 2309
[OUT]91.155.235.8:10101 af038b424f669694 305199(15)/116435(15) state_normal 2303
boolbd --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 --add-priority-node xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:10101 etc...
--add-peer arg Manually add peer to local peerlist
--add-priority-node arg Specify list of peers to connect to and attempt to keep the connection open
|
|
|
|
|
Ng5: 2 votes (boolberry, GoldTiger69)
Nd2: 3 votes (Morecoin, languagehasmeaning, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
|
It was 3rd before being frozen on Poloniex I think. What is the status of the network now?
|
|
|
|
However I have good news for everybody concerned: If David does not promptly return the correspondence, his CK character worth ~15,000 XMR will be frozen and necessary funds liquidated from that one to fulfill the MEW resolution that seems to pass.  This is the most disturbing statement I have ever read about CK and it has nothing to do with David. I am deeply concerned that rpietila as "king" or anyone would have the ability to independently freeze and liquidate assets of a CK player. Monero prides itself on decentralization and the absence of 3rd party control over assets. The statement above (which some may say is no longer relevant since David has responded) has caused me to lose some trust in CK. Please do not call me a troll because I have supported Monero for a long time. My goal is not to sounds negative. If the problem is technical then a committee should be formed to make decisions on freezing or liquidating funds. That much power should never reside in 1 person. |
|
|
|
Cloakcoin awaiting posa 3 ! This will be something real new as i understood from white paper.. Beta test was successful and code was audited ..
Maybe cloak have opportunity to surprise us all?
I bet it will! In 2014 there was a low of hope for PoSA 2 and CLOAK failed miserably to deliver on its promises. |
|
|
|
What caused the BBR spike today? With the lower hash rate and block explorer issues recently, the opposite might have been more expected. How do you explain this?  |
|
|
|
What does the community think about moving to a new unmoderated thread which we can control and keep updated?
Lets give him another week or two to see how his new project will help Boolberry. He will have a much easier time raising money for the new project if it is clear he has not abandoned Boolberry. He has an incentive to remain active here. Here is thread for discussion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887482PS About Boolberry: In any case Boolbery is my primary project, and since both this projects based on the same code base - it will be win-win for both of this project from technology point of view. ATM scruffy is working on BBR new wallet version since i want to have second developer who familiar with BBR code, so this took more time that i expected, but this is need for project safety, a lot of people were talked about it before in this thread. Zoidberg He says it is close to being ready for alpha: Hi! Yep, we fix some small bugs and improve some elements of design. PoS-minig works! Alpha is ready for 95% We can make it public for you. Do you guys want to test it ? http://take.ms/prAeK |
|
|
|
|
Qxh6 (boolberry, tifozi, newb4now, languagehasmeaning, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
|
Kb6: 3 votes (GoldTiger69, boolberry, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
|
What reason do you have for making another alt coin?
If it is a good reason, try to think of a unique name that relates to the purpose of the coin.
|
|
|
|
Publication in an academic journal should bring lots of attention. If the peer review proves successful perhaps more contributors will be attracted to this CryptoNote/Confidential Transactions project. |
|
|
|
|
Bxh6 : 5 votes (boolberry, tifozi, Morecoin, languagehasmeaning, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
|
6 votes: Kb5 (Morecoin Freeman, newb4now, boolberry, GoldTiger69, languagehasmeaning, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
I am with you. Time to make a decision and move on! |
|
|
|
Also I remember hearing about an anonymisation technique in which you have to trust the person who generated the first block to destroy the private key without writing it down, otherwise they have the ability to decrypt the anonymisation forever after. Is this using that technique ? If so why trust they don't have the backdoor key handy ?
Your memory is only partially right. There is a potential problem with trusted setup. They have said they play to do this in some public ceremony with multiple parties so that unless ALL of those parties collude, the minting process is safe. If all parties colluded they could print a unlimited number of coins undetected, however the privacy of transactions would not be affected. Essentially it is an economic threat of a poorly designed setup allowing parties to collude to print unlimited coins. There is not a privacy threat from collusion. |
|
|
|
|
6 votes: Nxe5 (Morecoin Freeman, languagehasmeaning, boolberry, newb4now, marcus1986, LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
|
I like extra pawns. Call me greedy
O-O 1 vote (languagehasmeaning)
O-O-O 3 votes (Morecoin Freeman, tifozi, boolberry)
Bxf4 1 vote (LucyLovesCrypto)
|
|
|
|
Outside this forum very few people have any clue what the heck is a Ring Confidential Transaction, however everybody knows what's a Soda Vending Machine We are not talking about "a Soda Vending Machine" we are talking about the "Dash N’ Drink" soda machine. How many people have a key to the storage locker (or garage) where it has been stored since it was displayed in Miami? The entire world (if they have internet access) can see and test the Ring CT code in GitHub right now! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
