Then fuck off if that's what you would do. If you had CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence like I said you would let the case build until it's solid. That is that
even if you have proof and such things you should give him his mail account back. |
|
|
|
Are there any stores online or offline that accept Monero?
https://steambitshop.com/ through shapeshift (they even show xmr as a payment option, but together with a bunch of other alts) and any bitcoin shop through xmr.to |
|
|
|
best thread ever, should be required reading. can we sticky it?
1+ for the sticky, this is going to be pure entertainment for the next couple of months, I believe Vod is also from Canada I am! Edmonton, Alberta  My identity is no secret. But QS's identity is secret, and he has previously stated that he wants to keep it that way. So, if he actually decides to sue you, wouldn't his identity be revealed? And since he doesn't want his identity revealed, he won't actually sue you? maybe he is using an alt to sue? |
|
|
|
There have also been no logical and/or factual arguments that counter any of my arguments, but rather nothing but trolls, scammers and shit posters who in no way address my arguments.
ROFL 95% of bitcointalk are trolls, scammers and shitposters now? just not sharing your opinion and trying to convince you that a dictionary is more trustworthy than you makes you think that? |
|
|
|
|
just an idea: wouldnt it be great if everybody could just edit the keys as he wishes?
eg. some people are the defaults but other can offer an alerting service too.
and anybody can decide which he wants to trust with alerts.
one question: are there different alert keys per person? are all alert keys needed to send an alert or is one sufficient?
|
|
|
|
preceisely what he does. Escrowing away for his alts  Thanks for proving my point, friend ok, you are saying that QS ONLY provides escrow for his alts? thats your proof? LOL |
|
|
|
Well I won't bore you with the details, friends. But over here ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1139462.0) I mentioned some concerns with the BiPolarBob user. But I am starting to think he is QuickSeller. When I mentioned this suspicion it looks like QuickSeller posted very fast and offered to Escrow for BiPolarBob (at a fee!). Evidence is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1139462.msg12402296#msg12402296Doesn't it seem strange, friends? An accusation-suspicion is made and QuickSeller pops out of nowhere to escrow for BiPolar Bob? It seems like I discovered his game so he is just being funny about it now. why else volunteer the stupid escrow for the alt of his? please bore me with the details and no... i dont think its strange that QS is escrowing for BiPolarBob. thats what QS do...escrowing away |
|
|
|
I am still in the process of my investigating but it seems quickseller and BiPolarBob are the same. I have started the accusation but I will build some evidence before making a big show of it
why are you hunting BiPolarBob? Did he hurt your feelings because you didnt receive something for free? Leave this thread alone please... QS is a problem big enough already. no reason to add you to this mess (btw whats your main account?) |
|
|
|
We're all alts of TC. This is all a dream, and everyone is dead when TC wakes up.
TC is hibernating. I had my doubts. So TC is responsible for everything that went wrong? Why the satoshi price isn't going above a dollar?  nono... you gotta Blame Vod |
|
|
|
Gleichzeitig war es bei der geringen Transaktionsbandbreite aber schlicht unmöglich all die Transaktionen über die Blockchain abzuwickeln. Man kalkulierte also damit, dass es genügend Idioten gab, die auf Gox und Co. handelten und so den Preis machten, während man selbst seine Schäfchen ins trockene brachte, um dann die Zurückgeblieben auch noch zu verhöhnen bzw. sich irgendeine "höhere" Moral zurecht zu legen. Wie zur Hölle soll so etwas funktionieren? Am Ende gibt es einige Gewinner und sehr viele Verlierer. Und der größte Verlierer heißt Bitcoin.
WTF was für einen Quatsch schreibst Du da? Es sollte jedem klar sein, das bei einem System das nicht staatlich kontrolliert wird und es keine Rückbuchungen gibt Eigenverantwortlichkeit an erster Stelle steht! Persönliche Freiheit beinhaltet immer auch mehr Verantwortung. Und bei MtGox gab es sehr viele Anzeichen das dort etwas nicht stimmt; Aber zu keinem Zeitpunkt wurde jemand gezwungen es zu verwenden. Das jett mit der Transaktionsbandbreite zu vermischen ist irgendwie lächerlich... Und Verhöhnen... nunja... Bitcoin als Währung verhöhnt niemanden. Menschen tun das und Arschlöcher gibt es halt überall. Darauf hinzuwesen das man bei Bitcoins halt selbst aufpassen muss sollte jedem klar sein: Was denkst Du bedeutet "Sei Deine eigene Bank"? Das Du die Gebühren bekommst? LOL |
|
|
|
Has everyone that paid escrow fees to Quickseller been paid back?
afaik he didnt contact his customers just waits for them to find out and contact him - in which case he publicly promised to pay back. so i'd say: no he didnt. but obviously i can't proof it. |
|
|
|
You are not paying for a neutral third party, the cost of using an escrow is factored into the cost of the item you are trading.
The very definition of escrow implies a third party. You are paying a premium for protection against scammers. When you are both the escrow and buyer/seller you provide no protection at all, so you are not entitled to any fee at all. You are taking fees under false pretenses, and it really bothers me that you don't see that. This is just Canadian insurance law - not sure about the other countries, but I'm sure they are similar. So you are telling me that you are willing to pay a higher price for an item solely because neither party trusts eachother sufficiently to send first to the other party? In other words: -You believe a widget is worth $100 -If you trust the person enough to pay first without escrow, then you would not pay $101 for the widget -If you trust the person enough to pay them first without escrow, then you would be willing to pay $100 for the widget -If you do not trust the person enough to pay them first without escrow, then the total amount you will be willing to pay is $101 If this is your argument, then why are you willing to pay more for the widget if you are using escrow?  if i sell you an item and say it is new and original packaged and the item you received is used and not original packaged wouldnt you call me a scammer? even when i tell you that i treated that item well and it is as good as new and there is no difference if original packaged or not... thats your argument regarding escrow. you redefine the word "escrow" to fit your needs. look it up in a dictionary! |
|
|
|
Seems to me that the stress test, also known as Bitcoin Giveaway, has failed to harm the Bitcoin transactions in any way. While Mem pool is quite large and tx back-log has also grown, it seems that the only back-log are the spam transactions them self. Real transactions are going through as usual does anyone else notice that btct has much "502-bad gateway" today? imho this stresstest only seems to be a forum stress test  bitcoin seems unaffected |
|
|
|
just leave him the appropriate trust feedback and stop feeding him. thanks.
Nunja, nur ich mach dem "Schaden"... Ihr könntet ja mal folgen... Don't feed the troll LG Christian done hast ja recht... |
|
|
|
3 different wallets, 2 different devices, 2 different internet connections tested. I have never had a problem with my wallets like this before. I just think it's a little fishy that all these things would coincidentally happen at the same time.
so please tell us which software you use and what errors you get |
|
|
|
|
i get that too sometimes. today a little more often
i guess ( !) many people are loading the coinwallet stresstest thread over and over again; putting huge load on the servers.
|
|
|
|
I'm assuming this is because of the stress test, but I can't get any of my wallets to load right now, and without that I can't get any transactions sent.
I need to send coins urgently right now. Is this hopeless? Why does everyone on the forum seem so nonchalant about this?
wallet loading problems hasnt anything to do with the stress test. the stress test would only affect sending coins (but it seems it dont do that atm) what error do you get? have you looked in the logs? |
|
|
|
Well, it's almost completely unanimous that using yourself to escrow is considered a big no no.
I suggest the community leaders tag anyone they catch doing this going forward.
as long as TC and Blazr thinks its Ok and stay on DT i dont think it wont happen... IMHO when QS come back in a few months he will be back on DT. so i just think DT is fucked... |
|
|
|
So, what, I uploaded a shit ton of these keys, it says I have oodles of btc in my blockchain acc, and I can't do shit with it... Fucking useless I guess, unless anyone has any ideas?
Basically it does not worth the effort, you are most likely to be able to pull out 0.005 bitcoin if you are lucky enough to broadcast a transaction with more than 500 inputs of 0.00001 bitcoin and get it confirmed by some of the nodes, that's $1 but will waste you a couple of hours time I learned something today. This experiment showed that several people don't fully understand how bitcoin transactions are constructed and how bitcoin ownership works. Several people seemed to think that 'sweeping' somehow automatically moves the inputs into their address without having to create a transaction. Sweeping does not move any coins and does not change coin ownership. Sweeping is just a layer that certain wallets provide that makes it look like everything has merged into one address when it really has just added a private key to your wallet. about what wallet you are talking? usually: import: import the address in your wallet and dont do any transaction sweep: move funds in your wallet and forget that privkey |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
