This looks interesting, is there a source code repo somewhere to inspect the written code and play a bit with it myself?
The base code is built from NXT. I will also open source a template for dAppsheet once it is finished. Thank you for the reply. I will be looking forward to it. |
|
|
|
I think 0.50Dollar really yes... For me it is so much underpriced if you looked all other Shitcoins...
You will see 0.50 @ the End of the Month, Mark my Words...
Yesterday someone tried to Dump with 20BTC... no chance...Price goes down and now the Ralley beginns again.
Just yesterday you said it would dump to 1500 sats, so which happens first? lol He is a troll who wants to manipulate the price and scare noobs, he is always doing this in waves, lisk and iconomi threads. It's really sad to see people getting manipulated into selling and buying just because one or more random persons on this forum scream for moon or doom. Almost sad as the person ridiculizing himself while tring to manipulate the market for pennies. Yeah... makes you wonder if people actually read into what DAR tries to achieve. |
|
|
|
Well, I guess I'm going to be flamed at for showing up here again... but what the heck. Re: the linking feature. It sounded really cool, but no one would tell me how it works, and apparently that's because it's closed source. I don't do closed source crypto software. I know good guy dev said trust us it's totally decentralized and we're not peaking at your private keys or anything, but cmon.
It's how HD wallets work, I think I've seen it in some BIP before. Nothing special there. And the code for it is on their public github repo. Huh, I don't even remember that. Anyways, I guess that's the rationale, but doesn't really show how "voting" was done. And even if every person holding a single gulden voted to abandon the airdrop, it still smells bad and seems like a bait and switch to me.
The main reason for stepping back from the airdrop was the costs involved to maintain the infrastructure compared to the amount of people asking for them and the many fraud attempts with that. The dev team decided to stop the giveaway and, if I remember correctly, asked the community what to do with the premine. I think most people agreed that using it for development was the best option. |
|
|
|
|
This looks interesting, is there a source code repo somewhere to inspect the written code and play a bit with it myself?
|
|
|
|
How many aurora coins are available in the market  Free on the market? Relative few, compared to the total. Most of it is locked up with people in it for long term, a part is held by the foundation and the market stabilization software (wallet peak #1 on Bittrex). The latter is in principal available for the right price. Then there is also quite an amount not accessible to non-Icelandic people, on the Icelandic exchange. For more metric, see also: http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/auroracoin/ |
|
|
|
It is interesting to see AUR garnering such attention, but I doubt many Auroracoin enthusiasts will partake in such an endeavour, believing in a more sustainable and organic growth pattern for their currency. Best wishes for your project  They seem to target only Yobit, which is only a minor exchange for AUR. I advice people to stay away from that exchange, as the owners are clearly incompetent. |
|
|
|
|
We're not here to beat Gulden, we're here to get Iceland using Auroracoin.
Lots of things have been done last year, not all mentioned here (and some that can't be disclosed). One of the most important things was fixing the blockchain by going multi-algo, things have been running very smooth since then. The summer holiday smashed a large hole in the development process, but last few weeks things are speeding up again.
As for the price, it is higher then before the new dev team started.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that wallet is me. I've moved some coins from the market, as it seems that it makes people nervous.
|
|
|
|
|
Wat tips (geldt voor iedere crypto) voor beginnende speculanten:
1) Als de koers sterke schommelingen maakt (zowel omhoog, als omlaag), wacht. Of plaats alleen orders waar je op wilt kopen/verkopen.
2) Staar je niet blind op de koers, het volume in de orderboeken zelf geven beter aan wanneer te kopen en verkopen.
3) Ga nooit 100% in of uit.
4) Als je puur wilt speculeren, gebruik alleen geld wat je kan missen. Ga er van uit dat je 100% van de waarde verliest.
5) Verdiep je in wat je koopt en hobbel niet als een kip zonder kop achter anderen aan.
|
|
|
|
Regarding the miners and rewards and such, I have a question back for you, taken into consideration the intention of getting AUR adopted into Iceland and assuming this will be the case somewhere due time: How would you justify the volatile risk of yet another exposure, where the value of a currency is mainly controlled by a few?
The current market is not very liquid and a large quantity of the coins are held by people known by the dev team. Roughly a month ago the Cryptsy wallet funds were transferred to Bittrex. Coins were held, which allowed us to catch them from being dumped by placing market orders. I think with no other coin, developers would have stepped up to protect the market at such dump. A relative stable price is IMHO also important for a coin. With halvings, the ones first in can hoard the majority of the coins. The more halvings due time, the less people can hoard due time. If a coin takes off, more people start to hoard, which means lesser rewards (halvings) will have to be divided among more people. Just take a look at the Bitcoin, and you'll get my satoshi hoarding picture.
Wouldn't it be fairer, to provide equal opportunities for everyone, where it does not matter when one would or could hop in anywhere at any given time, especially when there is to some degree some kind of altruistic intention to bring a foothold for this coin to real life everyday persons? Not bankers, traders, early-in-smart-guys and all that, but regular and (the) common people?
Most hoardings are done through buying them at the exchange, not mining. Miners also need to pay electricity bills and equipment upgrades, so hoarding is only limited. |
|
|
|
All I want to say with all the above, is that markets can grow with a static reward.
I'm also not touching the Gulden topic as well. But reading the quote above, I think you turned my point around. It's not that markets can't grow, but IMHO (in the case of Gulden) miners NOW will profit relatively more than those in the past, WITH reduced risk. But in general, mining facilitates the chain (and its economy), not the other way around. Mining should not be the main focus of a coin. |
|
|
|
Dropping the halving protocol and making the reward a static one could perhaps solve it easily?
A constant reward is IMHO not such a good idea, as it doesn't take into consideration that the market will grow. In a young market there is much more risk involved regarding success of the coin, which IMHO should also pay off for the miners. Later, if the coin really takes off, there is less risk involved. How would you justify this to the early miners? They get the same reward, more profit, for less risk. |
|
|
|
|
The rise of difficulty should counteract the ASICs, to some extend. The halving was made to (1) restrict the creation of the coin and (2) reward the mining effort, while the influence of newly created coins on the economy would have a reducing effect, allowing it to grow. Fees should take over the mining rewards at halving and eventually the stop of generation of new coins. The time of halving becomes less and less a factor on the market with each halving.
|
|
|
|
|
Have used Gulden (NLG) quite some times in the past to buy Fast food (not only pizza's).
|
|
|
|
|
There is no address in the code. The address is added during the mining process. Read into blockchain basics before asking such fundamental questions. The bitcoin wiki is a good place to start.
The current pre-mine addresses are the addresses where the coins were send to by the Auroracoin foundation after receiving them from the Auroracoin creator. The rest was sent to the burn address by the creator.
|
|
|
|
I NOT CONNECTED TO YOU I will have their ports AND SEEDS AND pchMessage.I Do not know how to edit and manage premine. I know I can select another altcoin.
In that case, build the code, have two wallets connect to each other, start mining and the pre-mine will show up in the wallet that finds the block. It's that simple. Do note that you will not be able to spend these coins on the real Auroracoin network. |
|
|
|
Auroracoin is running live and well (I'm a member of its dev team). It also passed beyond its litecoin base.
Why do you want to alter things in the coin specs? Why auroracoin? There are dozens of dead and abandoned coins that you could use for your experiment.
I'm not your enemy. I plan to create their own coins. I'm looking for a reliable COINS without error, something to the new currency of success, can you help? Sorry, I don't have time for helping you with that. I can give you a few tips: 1) Use a dead and abandoned coin, so you don't get strange results by connecting to a live coin. You'll get errors about invalid blocks if you try to do so. 2) Use the documentation on internet, you should be able to create a coin without too much problems. The most tricky part is the generation of a genesis block, but doable. 3) Most coin settings are in a single file these days, see src/chainparams.cpp. 4) First try to successfully generate a genesis block. A pre-mine can be implemented later again (wipe the blockchain, but reuse the genesis block). 5) For mining you need at least two wallets connected to each other. |
|
|
|
|
Auroracoin is running live and well (I'm a member of its dev team). It also passed beyond its litecoin base.
Why do you want to alter things in the coin specs? Why auroracoin? There are dozens of dead and abandoned coins that you could use for your experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
