|
Daily bump (will be removed tomorrow)
|
|
|
|
I like the idea however it will be hard for you to find someone that will take your offer. ACE works because they have highly trusted community members in their lineup, and bitcointalk staff like Lauda themselves. But this doesn't seem to be the case here.
Also, Coinroll sig campaign is currently the only sig campaign accepting posts to be counted that are made beforehand($0.0005 per post off your total post count), so if you can find a way to get these accounts that sign up enrolled into the coinroll campaign it migth as well be a good idea for stable income.
Maybe place ref links? Idk but that's the only other option i can think of atm.
Torcoin campaign is also paying bonus on the basic of total post count.You can check there signature thread for details and contact campaign manager. Thanks for the tip... At the moment, i'm looking for more interested community members, in a second stage i might start contacting campaign managers, like Torcoin to see if they're interested in the group's total potential. |
|
|
|
I like the idea however it will be hard for you to find someone that will take your offer. ACE works because they have highly trusted community members in their lineup, and bitcointalk staff like Lauda themselves. But this doesn't seem to be the case here.
Also, Coinroll sig campaign is currently the only sig campaign accepting posts to be counted that are made beforehand($0.0005 per post off your total post count), so if you can find a way to get these accounts that sign up enrolled into the coinroll campaign it migth as well be a good idea for stable income.
Maybe place ref links? Idk but that's the only other option i can think of atm.
The problem with coinroll is that it seems like namworld's campaign is pretty full, he only accepts legendary users nowadays  |
|
|
|
There is one huge flaw in your plan. You are looking for "lurkers", but those who fit your criteria are not likely to take the time to address this correct? They probably have tons of BTC from the early days.
Yeah, figured that out to  But hey, if you don't try, you'll never know @digaran: you're entitled to your opinion... I'm pretty sure this service is nothing for you, since the pay probably won't compare to bitmixer.io signature payments, however i disagree with you on several points: - I see a campaign like this as an honest way to make some pocket change, publicly saying that i should create a get-rich quick clone coin does not compare to running a group like this
- I don't think this task is beyond my limit... However, it might be impossible to find the right group of people, so the group might never be formed in the end
- In my opinion, a signature space exists to put in a personal signature. But if you don't have anything to put in your signature spot, like i do, i think you can rent it out. In my opinion, the value of a sig ad does not deteriorate if the group of posters gets smaller
- I never claimed wanting to attract local businesses
- Yes, i think i am capable of more or less judging which posters i'd like in my group and which posters i don't like... It is not determined by a single essay, but rather by the sum of all posts, feedback,...
- I know i can't compete with the cheap workforce of china, but what does that have to do with any of this?
- I also strongly disagree with the statement that nobody cares about the post quality. I stopped running a business on this forum a long time ago, but if i had a business, i'd rather have 10 people that write on-topic posts in proper english and have the respect of the community promoting my business compared to hiring 200 spammers that can barely string toghether 5 english words and make barely ontopic posts
But like i said, i'm not here to argue with you, you can have your opinion, as i can have mine... |
|
|
|
Does it mean a member of your group would not be required to post a minimum numbers of posts in any given period but will be paid on the basis of his posts history?
That is correct, however, if the group member makes a substantial amount of posts, they do count as historic posts during the next month (if we chose to auction off our sigspace on a monthly basis). I chose this format because: 1) in my opinion, it would take away most of the motivation for group members to start spamming, since extra posts would only account for a very small increase in pay (and their pay would only increase after a month) 2) because i myself am mostly inactive/lurking, and there aren't a lot of campaigns that would not accept me because of this. At the same time, i do think my 1500+ posts do have some value, since 1500+ posts means 1500+ backlinks (SEO) and it does means that a lot of quality search engine traffic should pass my signature on a daily basis. The reasoning behind point 2 is simple: if you force somebody to make new posts every day, their sigad will be pushed to the front page of bitcointalk all the time, and it will be seen by loads of bitcointalk members. If you don't force somebody to make new posts, his signature will be seen by people that actually took the time to search for a post where the member posted in. This means that i expect older posts to have a higher amount of targetted search engine visitors... This is a very good idea.I think there should be some ratio of thread created and posts for any member to be accepted in a group. What I mean is 500 quality posts plus atleast 10 or 5 Thread created (active threads). This will reduce the number of eligible participants significantly and even advertisers would find it attractive usually the op of a thread gets most exposure. At this moment, i'm struggling to find people that are potentially interested, which is normal since i'm aiming at recruiting less-active members, so i cannot expect them to stumble upon this thread straight away  But you are completely right, it would be a good idear to only accept people that did create at least a certain amount of active threads in the past. As soon as i have at least a couple more interested members, i might add this requirement for new applicants. Thanks for the feedback |
|
|
|
Does it mean a member of your group would not be required to post a minimum numbers of posts in any given period but will be paid on the basis of his posts history?
That is correct, however, if the group member makes a substantial amount of posts, they do count as historic posts during the next month (if we chose to auction off our sigspace on a monthly basis). I chose this format because: 1) in my opinion, it would take away most of the motivation for group members to start spamming, since extra posts would only account for a very small increase in pay (and their pay would only increase after a month) 2) because i myself am mostly inactive/lurking, and there aren't a lot of campaigns that would not accept me because of this. At the same time, i do think my 1500+ posts do have some value, since 1500+ posts means 1500+ backlinks (SEO) and it does means that a lot of quality search engine traffic should pass my signature on a daily basis. The reasoning behind point 2 is simple: if you force somebody to make new posts every day, their sigad will be pushed to the front page of bitcointalk all the time, and it will be seen by loads of bitcointalk members. If you don't force somebody to make new posts, his signature will be seen by people that actually took the time to search for a post where the member posted in. This means that i expect older posts to have a higher amount of targetted search engine visitors... |
|
|
|
Is this an attempted, and first, competitor to ACE - AD Campaign Experts?  Even if you apply, I can not guarantee i'll find sufficient members to form a sig campaign group... Even if i find enough members, i cannot guarantee we'll find a sponsor... Even if we find a sponsor, i cannot guarantee we'll be payed enough for this to actually be worth our effort...
This is going to be the hardest part in all of this. Unfortunately, with the forum being riddled with spam and random people, businesses are often settling for the cheaper option, not the better one (i.e. quantity over quality). I do wish you luck if you manage to assemble a decent team.
Note: You've made a newbie mistake by not making this thread self-moderated. Thanks I just realised my newbie mistake, but if this thread gets overrun, i can always close it and open a new, self-moderated one. As for being the first competitor of ACE, i think i'm aiming at a different audience, namely longtime posters that are mostly inactive/lurkers nowadays, but still have a huge amount of reasonable quality historic posts (like myself). I don't expect high payouts, but i tought to myself: why not try to make some pocket change by renting out our sigspots. |
|
|
|
List of potentially interested members: | *Username | * userid | * historic postcount | * Level | | *Altcoinhosting | * 513122 | * 1539 | *Hero | | *SmartIphone | * 374823 | * 1722 | *Hero | | *Merelcoin | * 548794 | * 671 | *Hero | | *BAGOBO | * 376175 | * 748 | *Hero | | *--- | * --- | * --- | * --- | | *--- | * --- | * Total: 4680 | * --- |
|
|
|
|
Additional info:Extra rules i would propose: - If a team member removes their sig, avatar, personal text or website link during the campaign, his part of the income will be refunded to the advertiser
- If a team member removes old posts and has an end postcount significantly lower as their begin postcount, his part of the income will be refunded to the advertiser
- If a team member receives valid -ve from anybody from DT (up to level 4), he will be payed for current month, but he will be removed from the team when the month is over
- If a team member starts making low quality posts, he will be payed for current month, but he will be removed from the team when the month is over
- The total postscounts and each member's cut will be calculated at the beginning of a new campaign. It does not matter how many new posts a member makes during the campaign, his cut of the profit is agreed at the beginning of the campaign
- Campaign funds will be helt either by myself, or by an other team member that has way higher trust than me (and can prove he/she is not using a sold account by signing a message with an old, staked address). In case the campaign would ever be auctioned off for more than 0.25BTC/month, we might have to look for an external, trusted, escrow.
- Payouts will happen the day after a campaign ends.
In order to be clear from the beginning, the auction rules would be something like this (can be changed if other's feel different about this): - We (list of group members) auction off our collective signature space, avatar, personal text and link to our website
- The bidder will receive his advertisement on at least x historic posts, but should understand only little new posts will be made each month (maybe put an average number of new posts/month combined here)
- we do not accept illegal or "risky" advertisements. This includes ponzi's, ico's, rom's, services that have active scam accusations, porn,... We deserve the right to decline any ad.
- if the service we advertise gets an active scam accusation while the ad is running, we reserve the right to remove the advertisement from our profiles and, depending on a case by case scenario, we can keep the funds, do a partly refund, or we can use the funds to repay victims of said scamming service.
- the signature add should fit in a Sr. member's sigspace, the avatar can not be offensive, the personal text has to talk about your business and the link to the website's title clearly has to mention that it's not our website, but merely an advertisement. We reserve the right to use a small portion of our sigspot to advertise this thread (in case we have trouble finding advertisements).
|
|
|
|
I'm searching for longtime members that are in the same situation as myself (only a couple hq posts/month, but a backlog of hundres of historic posts) to pool together our signature spaces, avatars, personal texts and websites in order to auction them off to the highest bidder on a monthly/bimonthly/trimester/semester/yearly basis.I'm searching for members that fit following criteria - currently not using their sigspot + avatar + personal text + website link (or willing to remove any content that is currently published in these spots), but willing to place an ad in this spot in return for some pocket change
- at least 500 historic posts
- no -ve from DT (up to level 4), unless it's for BS reasons.
- no -ve from DT (up to level 2), unless it's -ve from an inactive DT member AND the accusation has since been solved (but -ve was not removed because DT member is inactive)
- Sr., Hero or legendary members only
- applicant should have reasonable quality posts... Their english should be readable, their posts should be sufficiently long (not going to put an exact number here), no posts that are obviously sig spamming, posts should be spread out over all subforums
Payment: I would propose to auction off our signature spaces as a group, each group member gets a cut of the profits equal to his total postcount (for example: we have a combined postcount of 10.000, member x has 1000 historic posts, we get 0.05 BTC/month, member x made 1/10th of the total postcount so he gets 0.005 BTC minus the fees) In order to apply, either reply on this thread or send me a PM. I'm currently searching for team members, we're not auctioning off our sigspaces right now!!! Even if you apply, I can not guarantee i'll find sufficient members to form a sig campaign group... Even if i find enough members, i cannot guarantee we'll find a sponsor... Even if we find a sponsor, i cannot guarantee we'll be payed enough for this to actually be worth our effort... This is just a first step to see if anybody is interested!
|
|
|
|
Since the auction end date of 25/04/2017 has now passed, i'd like to make a final post in this thread. I'm still interested in this black trezor, and my bid of $35 still stands. I'm in the EU, so shipping shouldn't be to expensive, i can probably round up my payment in order to cover a bit of the shipping costs. At current preev rate $35 is 0.02570 BTC. I'm willing to "round up" my payment to 0.028 (that's little over $38 in fiat) to cover part of your costs. I think this is a fair bid, a 3 pack of new, sealed trezor's costs $276. If you're an affiliate, you even get 10% of this price back. This brings the price per new, sealed trezor to $82.8 for affiliates (plus shipping). That's why i believe that a $38 bid for an unsealed, second hand trezor is fair. I don't mean to offend you by making a low bid, it's just that this is really the maximum i'm willing to pay for an unsealed device... Since it's unsealed, it's more a collector thing, i can never completely trust an unsealed device with loads of BTC, so offering more than 45% of the price of a new, sealed one seems reasonable to me. You can allways PM me to make a deal if you're interested |
|
|
|
|
I'm not that active anymore lately, but i did make over 1500 posts in the past...
If you're interested, you can make me an offer, either in this thread or in PM under following conditions:
- nothing illegal, not even grey area... No ponzi's, hacked accounts, sold accounts, hacked serials, ico's, rom's,...
- i only accept BTC as a payment. If you don't trust me, i don't mind if an escrow holds the funds the whole year, and only releases it after the year is over
- no minimum post crap... I don't post that often, but your add will be on 1500+ historic posts. I might be a bit more active in the future, but don't expect more than 10-20 new posts/month
You can put your add in following places:
- my signature (max 4000 characters)
- my website url (title should reflect that it's a payed ad)
- my personal text
- my avatar
|
|
|
|
Helix Light provides better anonymity than bitmixer.
Our service's fee consists of 2.5 %
I've been on this forum for a relatively long time, and i haven't seen a single accusation from a bitmixer customer that succesfully proved there was still a link between his sending and receiving addresses... Can you prove bitmixer's anonimity is bad, or, at least that yours is better? |
|
|
|
Just looking through logs and saw this post linking to my Electrum DB backups.
I am not updating leveldb as often and shifted more towards RocksDB. Further, with the very short sync time for building the ElectrumX DB (versus the prior python electrum-server) the need for DB downloads is far diminished.
That said, I'll keep posting them every few weeks if that helps.
You're doing a great job It's been a while since i last setup electrumx, but IIRC, your backups did shave a couple of days off my initial sync... It's true the sync time is a lot lower compared to the "old" electrum server, i still think it's still relatively slow, and your backups do help new users |
|
|
|
|
If those are legal keys, i can try out a vouch copy if you still have one...
It'll take a couple of days before i can give a vouch tough, since i don't have a windows machine to test it on myself.
|
|
|
|
IF the trezor is not to old, and the case is not broken/scratched/... I bid $30 for one... (the OP did say you were also interested in selling them seperately?)
Shipping is international and have a high cost for me so i start auction from 50$. I have selled white trezor, i have only black which is NEW. Never used. So, basically 1 of the 2 is already sold and you're currently taking bids for the other one? It seems like you're from Italy (if i'm not mistaking), i'm also from the EU (netherlands, belgium, germany,.... not willing to disclose the exact language publicly, only in PM), i guess that would make a difference when talking about shipping costs? I'd be willing to up my bid to $35 for the black trezor, shipping included and shipped within the EU... |
|
|
|
|
IF the trezor is not to old, and the case is not broken/scratched/... I bid $30 for one... (the OP did say you were also interested in selling them seperately?)
|
|
|
|
i've been holding a (very limited) amount of LTC since over a year, so i seriously hope they'll rise this year |
|
|
|
I want to make an offer for this miner, it's a lot lower than your asking price tbh... Don't take this as an offence, but at my current power price, it doesn't make sense to pay $625 for a 150Mh miner. Personally, when i buy second hand hardware, i want it to ROI in a maximum of 3 months, new hardware can have a longer ROI, but second hand hardware has to pay itself back pretty fast in order for me to take the risk. In this miner's case: X11 => 150MH/s => 40W X13 => 150MH/s => 46W X14 => 150MH/s => 47W X15 => 150MH/s => 48W Quark => 150MH/s => 25W Qubit => 150MH/s => 28W https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc tells me that i'll make about 3 euro's/day after power costs have been deducted... That's why i'd offer 3 (months) * 30 (days/month) * 3 (eur/day) = €270 =~ $278 =~ 0.237 BTC , including PSU, shipping, packaging AND a reputable escrow... I'd be willing to go up to 0.25 BTC (including psu, s/h, escrow) if you can prove everything is impecable state (pictures of the gear with a paper with your name on it, screenshots from the running miner,...) Once again, i totally understand if you'd find this way to low, i'm not saying the miner isn't worth $625, especially for somebody with (much) lower electricity rates that accepts a longer ROI, but in case you're interested in my offer, you can always pm me Hi Altcoinhosting i understand you and your offer. im willing to sell this miner for 0.35 (430$) BTC, this is much cheaper than other auctions! the last auction was selld for 500$ kenscho 0.35 is a fair price, but with my incredibly high energy price, it wouldn't make sense... Good luck anyways |
|
|
|
I want to make an offer for this miner, it's a lot lower than your asking price tbh... Don't take this as an offence, but at my current power price, it doesn't make sense to pay $625 for a 150Mh miner. Personally, when i buy second hand hardware, i want it to ROI in a maximum of 3 months, new hardware can have a longer ROI, but second hand hardware has to pay itself back pretty fast in order for me to take the risk. In this miner's case: X11 => 150MH/s => 40W X13 => 150MH/s => 46W X14 => 150MH/s => 47W X15 => 150MH/s => 48W Quark => 150MH/s => 25W Qubit => 150MH/s => 28W https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc tells me that i'll make about 3 euro's/day after power costs have been deducted... That's why i'd offer 3 (months) * 30 (days/month) * 3 (eur/day) = €270 =~ $278 =~ 0.237 BTC , including PSU, shipping, packaging AND a reputable escrow... I'd be willing to go up to 0.25 BTC (including psu, s/h, escrow) if you can prove everything is impecable state (pictures of the gear with a paper with your name on it, screenshots from the running miner,...) Once again, i totally understand if you'd find this way to low, i'm not saying the miner isn't worth $625, especially for somebody with (much) lower electricity rates that accepts a longer ROI, but in case you're interested in my offer, you can always pm me |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
