J-Norm

Welcome to bitcointalk.

Received my silver physical bitcoin today to add to the collection.

Nice!

what evidence is contained in his deleted posts?

I'm not trying to make an argument.

Are you requesting a scammer tag because Usagi is making preferential payment for his bankrupt company? 

I think this guy starts getting tuned up after work.  If true he's probably half in the bag by now.  If you notices the crazy man goes beyond bad translation the later it gets int he evening.

Gineta,  lay of the Cerveza's turn off the internet and try to make nice with keltic fox when you are sober.

if the crux of this argument  is that preferential payment in case of a bankrupt company is a fraudulent crime.

Then someone should be working on a scammer tag for bitfloor, correct?

No one is trying to coerce you. 

What questions would you like answered?

The fact that Usagi evidently deleted hundreds of post would imply wrong doing.  IRL that is call destruction of evidence.  

Usagi,  I would suggest you restore those post or allow admins to restore or release.

In the mean time does anyone have a gpg signed contract that usagi broke or failed to honor.

Does anyone have screen shots or copies of the posts that got deleted.  

Maybe you could get MOE-PR or JoelKatz to argue your case, but with out hard proof I'm not sure what admins can do.

were you able to connect without ssl?

Stop bitcoind
change rpcssl=1 to rpcssl=0
restart bitcoind and try to start.



If you can connect it is probably and issue with verify_peer in rpc.

I know user kjj is a pretty sharp programer.  maybe you could ping him.

please keep us posted.

Kelticfox

I do think you should answer this.  You can certainly say that user Gienta has used multiple nics in IRC and what ever you feel he did was suspicious but I really don't think this personal info needs to be posted here.

Thanks.

I believe kelticfox started the scammer thread because you used multiple nics on IRC and there was a concern about where you actually lived (why that is important I'm not sure).  

I suggest you post publicly in the scammer thread and ask kelticfox what he would need to remove the personal information.

But i have to say you speak really bad google translate english so maybe auggstocroppo could help you you out.  unfortunately you are probably not going to do yourself any favors by trying to argue your own case.

FYI greyhawk is kidding.

@greyhawk - it is totally lost in translation.

Good luck.  

Then you should appeal to Kelticfox to remove your personal info and I would support that.

I vote for the douchebag tag before the Liar tag but it's evident we aren't getting any more tags around here anytime soon.

Who is the user who will not respond to you?

So gineta's personal info is all over this thread.  I'm all for doxing scammers and using any LEGAL means to recover a debt, however I don't think it was proven that this guy scammed anyone.

So I'd request that personally identifying info be removed.  You can certainly update this thread if you find him using other nics in IRC or attempting to defraud other members.

Maybe a mod or admin would report back on whether it would be beneficial to lock or leave the thread open.



Thanks.
 

As far I know you didn't scam anybody and if it were me I would remove any posts with personally identifying information.  Maybe would could appeal to those who posted your info and to the  original poster   to lock the post.

I think you user name and indication that there was some concern about your behavior, however there should be no reason for personal information to remain up there.

gineta

you were playing in the big kids pool and you got hosed.

It over.

Nothing to see here.

Move along.

Maybe Liberty Payout could give you some pointers about how NOT to make friend and influence people when you edit a new community.

I don't hate you man.

Just sell the watch already.

If you can prove it's real I might even give you $1500 for it.

Then I can be known as the guy who bought Dank's rolex

I don't think a scammer accusation is necessary.  There is clearly enough concern in the original thread to cause any buyer to beware.

And until DANK fails to pay a loan or does not complete a trade for no  reason then a scammer accusation is premature.

You could also start a "We don't like or trust Dank" Thread.  That would probably be more appropriate.

Thanks.
 

Has anyone reported the scammers to theymos to get scammer tags?

+1 omgitsmehehe

Thanks