i suspect new ath coming pretty soon.
if you find yourself selling because of all the (very real) FUD, you are doing it wrong!
I suspect a little down to 1120-1150 before wtf you talking about, if market was a cartoon character it would look somthing like this right now.   this is ?horrible!? https://blockchain.info/charts/transaction-fees-usd |
|
|
|
Yep i guess some miners can mine through the use of this exploit.
But a core dev said that this may harm the bitcoin network cause this mathematical trick is skipping some steps in mining blocks that's why BU miners has empty blocks sometimes.
thats more or less totally incorrect. but OK |
|
|
|
|
i suspect new ath coming pretty soon.
if you find yourself selling because of all the (very real) FUD, you are doing it wrong!
|
|
|
|
Since segwit requires 95% signaling to activate, most or all miners will be segwit anyway.
If you're asking if today, would it be possible to send your transactions to a pool signaling segwit, the answer is no. You don't have the power to do that.
Whoever mines the block decides what transactions to include.
technically it can be done if you set your node to only connect to a pools IP adress of the ones you prefer or you know the pools API to manually 'PushTX' the transaction to only the pools you prefer why wouldnt the tx get relayed onward? It most likely would get relayed. Pools do not want to harm their reputation by confirming a double spend transaction, so they will broadcast any transaction they receive to the rest of the network, and will not accept any transaction that conflicts with other transactions in their mempool. i dont see how they are at risk of minning a double spend. if the TX they are withholding from the rest of the network, at one point becomes a double spend, they simply drop it. |
|
|
|
Since segwit requires 95% signaling to activate, most or all miners will be segwit anyway.
If you're asking if today, would it be possible to send your transactions to a pool signaling segwit, the answer is no. You don't have the power to do that.
Whoever mines the block decides what transactions to include.
technically it can be done if you set your node to only connect to a pools IP adress of the ones you prefer or you know the pools API to manually 'PushTX' the transaction to only the pools you prefer why wouldnt the tx get relayed onward? some pools dont relay unconfirms to other pools. especially high fee tx's so that if the pool misses that block they can still include the still unconfirmed tx in next block. also the network game theory is that the normal non-mining fullnode relay should have got the tx's to all the pools so no need for the pools to retransmit unconfirms between each other, allowing the bandwidth between pools to be utilised better to broadcast to each other mainly solved blocks and not much else interesting... this could be a strong incentive for miners to signal upgrades. but this idea might deteriorate into a way to pay miners to signal what you want them to signal tho |
|
|
|
I want that shill generator for the other fraction too  Some words to use: - Blockstream - Bilderberg Group - Blockstream - AXA - they want 1 MB forever - Blockstream will force you to use LN - Blockstream - high fees - FlexTrans - Centralism - Banksters - Cartel - Core Mafia - Blockstream!!!! ...  So we could replace 99% of this subforum with automated content. Efficiency gains: Infinity. hat's the dumbest thing I ever heard. Roger must NOT pay you well! |
|
|
|
oh im sure it could be quite elaborate. Maybe Blockstream will hire me for a side gig. Imagine how much money it can save them.
That's the dumbest thing I ever heard. Roger must pay you well! |
|
|
|
|
maybe you can add a pull down with some of the typical topics,
"refuting what satoshi said"
"datacenter coin"
"BU"
"Big blocks not scaling solution explanations"
|
|
|
|
If you weren't paying attention, the price crashed HARD when BU came along. ...and for the record, nobody believes Jihan Wu!
BU has been around 2 years.as have other diverse implementations. segwit 6 only months and segwit devs are the ones making all the PoW nukes and mandatory activations. if you look at where the drama is coming from its from Gmaxwell and the core guys making accusations, threats and demands. waving their fingers in all directions with their fox new mindsets of "bomb them bomb them bomb them" while other implementations just plod along..waiting for consensus care to try again. this time without using a debunked reddit script Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about... look, we all know you're a paid shill. pretty sad that you have to keep twisting and spinning the narrative, don't you think? LN is going to scale 1000x more. Everyone agrees this is the way. First we must approve segwit...by that time we'll have lightening. Satoshi wasn't in favor of alternate implementations. The market knows I'm right. Go check the charts - every time Segwit goes up , the price goes up. ...and the miners aren't going to win this one! |
|
|
|
^looks like TETHER(eth scam token) is getting scrutiny for circumvention of existing wire transfer laws!  *all eth tokens are scams it seems!~jmho tether is an OMNI token aka Bitcon Blockchain asset isn't? ( yes bitcoin's blockchain has an asset layer, you didnt know? ) |
|
|
|
blah blah blah (as usial)...
Before I come to this site and bought bitcoin, I study some information about it and who are developers (Core) and what is it and so on. And I choosed Bitcoin as many other people did. Not Litecoin not dashcoin not ethcoin etc... When I come to this site and particularly this thread, I want to read some useful info about Bitcon and it's succeses, some interesting news. But what can we see? Every other topic is created by some shill, wheater some altcoiner shill or BTU shill (which is the same). That bitcoin is dead, failed etc, whereas Bitcon works perfectly and it's price is rising. That we must abandon core and choose some fishy developers and listen to some chinese undergrads and choose their china coin. And you think this is normal? it wasn't always like this... long long ago this community was somthing special |
|
|
|
Now well known BTU shills accuse Bitcoin community in shilling are you fucking stupid? read the Title of this site - BITCOINtalk not unlimited of other china shit talk the fact you believe "the community" is 99.9% backing core, and we are just a joke, is a testament to the effectiveness of their fucking crusade ahhh this is so bloody frustrating sometimes. |
|
|
|
All anyone with 1/3 of a brain can do is look at the git commit log of bitcoin-core, and the discussion in the bitcoin-dev mailing list and realize that the core devs are the heros of the bitcoin story (along with Satoshi of course).
agreed, 1/3 of a brain. |
|
|
|
seems btcpop.co is very enthusiastic about BU. @OP you might want to consider running classic if all you want to do is signal you don't approve. classic and BU are compatible, i'm considering changing my node from BU to classic, just because there seems to be plenty of BU nodes, and i want to promote diversity and decentralization of dev. IMO if dev is a winners take all type thing " BU WINS YAYE or CORE WINS YAYE" we all lose... when we start saying things like " Core's Segwit has got adopted Yaye, and BU's EC is just about to activate", then we made it. unfortunately this means a relatively strong degree of mutual respect and teamwork throughout the bitcoin dev community as a whole, which simply isn't the case for some. BUT its NOT as bad as you might think, there is at least one core contributor i know of that come on our forum and engages with BU |
|
|
|
|
some devs have found a clever hack which they can use to make BTC TX and NOT pay miners a TX fee
we should enact a USHF to prevent this hack from being exploited, the security model of bitcoin itself is in jeopardy!!
|
|
|
|
all in favor of blockstream moving to LTC while we incress blocksize in a permanent way, fix malleability in a simple way (we gata let Poon have his fun with LN), discuss fex transactions, make gmax shit bricks, and move pirce north 4000%, rise your hand.  ok its settled then. |
|
|
|
How would you know if some nerd genius isn't mining 30 blocks a day with just using a hand made ASIC like super miner with the cost of only $10,000?
we'd check the blockchain. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
