'just separate them'
ha
they were never joined to anything else,

inscriptions dont even note which output the junk belongs to.. they were already useless and it seems you are now wising up to the idea that the only thing of value was sats being sats

also the scammers create alot of dust spam utxo
i just goggled the ordinal explorer, picked the first inscription that popped up
https://ordiscan.com/inscription/61876491
https://ordiscan.com/address/bc1pn40zzy2clezt5nfsqhkkqfn373ggwqys3r3jsxhthzdtdfc8kw8s0fhr8v

the scammer has pages of 546sat utxo's unspent, and highly likely to never to be spendable due to byte vs dust vs fee trilemma during high fee season
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/bc1pn40zzy2clezt5nfsqhkkqfn373ggwqys3r3jsxhthzdtdfc8kw8s0fhr8v

heck there are some that are left as 330sat

china (mainland) let evergrande(company) fail because evergrande incorporated in hong kong gov, not beijing gov.. so let hong kong litigate and decide on the bankruptcy.
evergrandes assets(land) was in mainland so hong kong had no rights to asset grab from mainland so had to let evergrande(company) sink
in short it was not the mainland gov responsibility to bail out the evergrande company as it never registered as a business of the mainland

however the land plot evergrande owned on the mainland the beijing(mainland gov) is actually dealing with those land plots. and doing deals to get the unfinished buildings on that land finished, without causing a real estate market crash

seeing some humans in public does not reveal how well they are operating behind the door of their house
many people drive a leased/loaned car and have a mortgage which they are only paying minimums of. where they are getting into deeper debt, but presenting themselves on the public street as successful

you need to stop looking at others and wanting to be them and instead concentrate on your own finances.
open your last 3 months of bank statements/ purchase receipts

look at the incomes and write down the average monthly income..
then look at the ESSENTIAL bills
housing cost(rent or mortgage plus any county taxes, insurances, HOA's related to the housing costs)
utilities(electric, gas, water)
transport(car costs, insurances, fuel. public transport.. but just for work grocery transport, not social occassions)
basic communication (basic plan internet/phone just to contact work that you are sick or to look for jobs. not the entertainment pack/add-ons)

separately look at the total grocery spends. (not fast food, not snacks) and average a monthly amount
work out the income vs those essential expenses

next is work out the other stuff.. work out where you are wasting funds. and list them all. find out whats really important to progressive life not a life that just keeps you in the same position.
do you need certain brand of groceries. do you need as much snacks/fast food. do you need a certain shiny car. do you need the entertainment packages.

try and see where you can reduce costs or sell things,or things that you can downgrade to smaller things.
do you need the extra bedroom/floor space or is there a smaller place you can live and save some money

its more about this:
https://craigwright.net/about/academic-degrees/
he says he has dozens of degree's.. but to be able to write so many papers at some points, in such quick succession to hand in within day/weeks of each other.. indicate someone else was paid to write them

usually degrees take years to do one

(i have not contacted the universities to even check validity of the list..)

if those do validate, (but obviously contain alot of plagiarisms) it just wreaks of the smell of someone that just goes on fiverr and pays minimum amounts for a quick paper, for someone to write(copy and paste from un-cited sources) something about [insert topic] and then gets a editor in his team to look at it to make sure its ontopic to just submit as if wrote by CSW
..its the only common sense, logical, timelime that make sense

see the chart, the purple(HODL(vaneck)).. on the right most stick
its not as big as orange(IBIT(blackrock)) so not like its sky rocketing to top investment, even green(FBTC(fidelity)) has had bigger days
but purple(HODL(vaneck)) compared to its own previous days of the thin horizontal line mean yeah 1000x, so it sounds huge when only comparing it to its own previous position..
but not like 1000x of IBIT, nor 10x of IBIT, nor 1.1x of IBIT
so its not huge in the scheme of investments. but more of a sign they finally found a customer or finally stopped hiding behind a closed door and now joined the party

im sure they know why.. going from no business at all to sudden activity. seems more like a question of they need to explain their lack of business for 6 weeks

windfury, you are soo boring that you cant even realise how much of a copycat you are
find a new script

if subnetworks were human.you would be one.. you try to be someone else, not realising your position in the eco-space. find your own identity and opinion.. you are not helping yourself.

firstly roger, hearn had their own idea's that opposed the core roadmap. separate and unrelated to me
secondly roger, hearn went their own directions, nothing related to me

jonald was a troll,much like you. emulating other. and even i told him to stop being a copycat. i dont like kiss-asses. i prefer people to think of ro themselves and actually learn things from data and facts. not some social media member they read and blindly copy/follow

---

anyway back to the topic
in the gensler video he was not talking about bitcoin the network, nor bitcoin the code. he was talking about BTC the coin.. which if you look at the number of utxo's which indicate a limit of individual holders being X and then if you total up how many customers are signed upto CEX's shows the majority of people whom assume themselves to be calling themselves "bitcoiners" actually dont majority hold coin in their own utxo. instead they are other system balance holder, of some middleman service, centralised around half a dozen services

but also.
if you look at the bitcoin control triangle.. (mining pools, devs, economic nodes) certain actions in this last decade have shown that bitcoin is not powered by thousands of separate entities.. but instead entities that total under 100.. yep less then 100 entities that control the 3 main central points of the influential control triangle

less than a dozen devs with reference client maintainer keys and technical discussion moderation positions
less than 2 dozen mining pool managers
less than 5 dozen economic node CEO's

me saying the obvious is not negative.. its to make people aware of the risks, rather then other people who want people to close their eyes and dream of utopia

we need to stay vigilant and actually look for the changes and risks, rather then play dead and say "its decentralised simply because that was a buzzword of 2009 so must be true now"

there most likely was a a RBF then a CPFP to push it in..
thats why they got updated. in your log

i have not bothered to check the transactions nor fees. nor care to..
but it just seems like the most sensible answer

it probably might be just your node.. and how it just logs things
EG your node watching ALL the blockchain, all transactions... but triggered at 14:03 by the
bc1qgrjjf3xaf9ejmm5lcsfl0e2ep63t6zcxf7h9sw
efa697ee815ee0d2b4840c436836efd5c94fc550d0da55a9513ecfef2562e68f

at 14:03.. your node then seen where funds came from to THEN at 14:03 add in previous txid to wallet. but logged the time they were first relayed. not live.. but after the fact

meaning your logs only caused data entry at 14:03 but wrote about times it previously received

bitcoin never leaves the blockchain.. thats the point of one of its security features (unable to take off or put bitcoin onto the blockchain outside of the reward rules of auditing a block)
anything else reporting to be playing with bitcoin but not using the blockchain are just IOU tokens or pegged units of another medium

ETF's for instance are just pegged share units.. they are not even IOU because  by law, and regulation and many other things share holders cannot redeem "in-kind"

other things like subnetworks or CEX databases are IOU unsettled claims. that need to be see a broadcast and confirmed tx to confirm/settle the IOU

remember
#not-your-key-not-your-coin

each basket is about 1500btc to then trigger the ETF to then create a basket of shares to then sell shares on the ETF
previous day bc1qgrjjf3.. only had (1114) so needed ~386 to get to a rounded 1500. so receiving 403 from bc1qh9xvgs to more than hit the threshold(+17btc)

id say your node didnt pick up bc1qh9xvgs... magically  but picked up that bc1qh9xvgs sent the 403 it received to bc1qgrjjf3
so your node was jsut displaying the orgins that 403 ended up in known bc1qgrjjf3 came from bc1qh9xvgs

CSW game is simple

pretend to be famous. get a fan club, promise the fan club huge riches if they become loyal.. test loyalty by getting them to invest in him. delay all pay outs.. never pay out

if idiots/cultish people like HmmMAA(and others, .. and other of other cultish people of other cults) think that being loyal will make them rich..
and are years later still waiting for the kiss on the cheek and cheque in the hand.. realise it aint coming. it wont come

your idol is not a god.

CSW made promises of a large stash.. that he has no keys of.
CSW then made promises of selling licences of patents.. that never sold
        CSW made promises of court case compensation of defending reputation/patents that amounted to a candy lollipop
                CSW made promises of rights to life story, thats not even worth a fox 15minutes segment news story

win or lose CSW doesnt care because to him its just more content for his drama he wants to sell.. as either a hero or villain story(spoiler:villain)

dont use my words. we know you are a CSW supporter but dont now try grabbing onto other peoples words dragging them into your sillyness.... think for yourself for once.. we already have enough idiots copying each other or acting like they are in a cult..

if you(or anyone) cant think for yourself(s), where you instead need to copy other people. you have already failed the debate.
take the time to do some research rather then just thinking of the last thing you read else-where to just copy to use in a defense of  whatever cult allegiance you have

and that goes for both blackhat(doomad) and HmmMAA(CSW) antagonists

too many people.. even in this topic.. keep thinking the only two options is move from extreme spender, no money to save.. to extreme investor put all spare money into investing, have nothing to save

1. by this what i mean is the same person saying all his income goes to spending and nothing left..
2. then says not to save for incidentals but then go to extreme investing to grow money

the issue is by investing every spare penny, you then fear/panic/avoid taking funds out of investments because:
a. investments might be in a bear trap causing losses if sold
b. fear of missing out the next bull
c. imagining the next, next bull in 4-8 years

and so they have no rescue pot in either 1 or 2 nor between the transition from 1 to 2. meaning when surprises happen. they are in trouble. with no spare money in either context

the point of saving is not wealth creation. nor is it to use for luxury spending in a couple months. its to isolate a small pot of money in easy access form. to rescue you so that you are not panicking

its to save you from having to sell investments in bear times. its to save you from using credit in overspending times.
once you have the rescue pot of easy access cash.. THEN put later income spare cash into investments. knowing you dont need to mess with investments when incidents happen

i know people keep thinking they should lock up their rescue pot into investments too. but that is stupid as people then panic by having it locked up and can los more value than inflation, if made to sell at a loss during a bear correction

i have no mentor and thats what you are jealous of, my ability to say whats on my mind, freely. i do not need to ass-kiss

and thats what makes me think you need to learn bitcoin as it is now, in reality, not how your mentor describes it to you.. , because you, several years later still have a mentor and recite him daily, even his insults, even his pigeon hole games

you are now even copying and reciting the ill-minded stupidity that if someone is not in religious cult A they must be religious cult B
thus you are trying to put me into a group i was not part of (though your mentor told you differently)

how about realise you dont need to be in a cult at all, escape your cult and start having independence
learn what independence is, then you will start to see where things are not as decentralised, and then able to actually try to scrutinise and highlight the central points of failures instead of just being told buzzwords of years ago, told to close your eyes and dont look, while being pampered back to sleep to not notice the traps that are forming

it was more in reference to the ART of a patent. but yes also the patent filing form. but more so about the details of the ART referenced in the patent not been wrote by him
and i said about ghost writers AND editors of 'his'(used loosely) degrees
auto-biography's ghost written.
and many things like BSV code wrote by contracted dev team he hired, (not self coded by him)

emphasis: he hires people to do all his work. he cant code and nor alot of other things he doesnt do but pretends to/claims to.

and thats the excuse i feel CSW will go with, that he will blame his team for ALL the inconsistencies,
even though in court(s) he has been saying he has created, developed, coded, started up, funded, filed, wrote dissertations, blah

i think his final statement will be "i am not solo satoshi, 'we' were team satoshi, but my team wants to destroy me out of things i co-founded with them"

heres the thing.. and a great example you can check right now

in crypto we do NOT need to measure crypto in dollar.. we have just been programmed to do it, out of convenience.

you should know, or atleast take some time to check. if someone wants to buy a novelty hat using bitcoin but the novelty hat guy wants ethereum
you are not forced to do:
($52k rate)-($2.92k rate)
[ btc ] -> [ usd ] -> [ eth ]
 0.1         $5.2k        1.77
on a US commissioned exchange

you actually can find many exchanges that just do:
  (17.76x rate)
[ btc ] -> [ eth ]
   0.1        1.77
where the buyer of the hat then swaps to eth at a rate today of 17.76 and withdraws eth to the seller of the hat
or
where the seller of the hat receives btc then swaps to eth at a rate today of 17.76 and withdraws eth back to himself

..
im from the UK, i use pounds.. if i want euro. i dont need to do £ $ € i can just do £ €

however if i was to use a US trade route via a US trade commission registered distributor .. then i would need to do £ $ €
even if i didnt want $
..
so by resigning/divorcing from the US trade commission, countries can do trade deals more mutually and direct without the US influence
. do you now understand why countries are leaving the US trade commission memberships and setting up a new system of more direct mutual agreement

---

side-note:
in regards to the bitcoin ETF launches. there is this exact reason why the SEC only accepted ETF under US regulations if the redemptions were done "in-cash" when ETF want to swap btc to move out of one etf and into another. instead of allowing ETF's prefered "in-kind". because the US SEC knows if they allowed "in-kind" they would have weakened the USD and done their own de-dollarisation of allowing swaps not involving USD.
which would have been bad for the US. as they would not be allowed to claim taxes on the in-kind swaps as people wont be touching USD
so the SEC pushed for the "in-cash" redemptions as a rule for filing for US trading on US trade platforms like nasdaq.. to keep USD relevant and required as part of ETF custodianed coin swaps.. but technically not needed in swaps. but put in place just to get the US fingers in the pie(gain jurisdictional control of ETF by making USD relevant to deals)

ok so you are manifesting maybe's....

chnese is not closing the gates to the chinese wall against all countries.. they are still going to trade internationally. just not through the US trade commissions terms of international trade deals.. they are building a different trade policy...

you seem to have a weird idea in your mind that leaving the dollar is akin to leaving the planet.. being divorced from the planet like north korea..
reality is divorcing america is not divorcing the planet. its instead divorcing the US and joining a more diverse open minded orgy of polygamy

ok so heres the thing..
no china is not forcing people to use apps now, nor is in their plan

as suggested to you many many times to do some research even telling you about the BIS and NDB
what you will learn is the current and future plans and projects of china..
which sound nothing like your manifested maybes

lets take the CBDC of yuan

this is again not some centralised single app where china watch all accounts..
instead its (if you know crypto terminologies and models well enough)

like blockstreams liquid

they federate(multisig) currency into existence on agreement with a dozen payment processors..
this multisig funding tx then becomes the primer that then the dozen payment processors then use for their splits of reserves which they then multisig between the 12 partners, independent of the PBOC transaction for cross service reserve routing(swaps)
then below that each payment processor has its customers..
the customers have a choice of atleast 3 levels of account..
the top is for wealthy/ large/ business/ people that require full KYC disclosure
the mid is for middle class/small business people that require basic KYC disclosure
the bottom is more of the min wage people with not KYC

the PBOC (the bank) create the money at the federated transaction level of payment processor reserves.. but do not have access to the payment processors customers data live
its upto the payment processors to maintain, monitor and report on the customers
when they report on suspicious behavour it gets a investigation that if evident of potential crime the chinese authorities then can request a court order for full listing of transaction history of that customer

its basically how the US fiat system works now, but using crypto rather than oracle/mysql database

CSW admitted he hires ghost writers
CSW admitted he hires degree writer(editors)
CSW admitted he hires patent writers

so not a stretch of imagination to say he hires coder his imaginary v1 of bitcoin was wrote by his team and he just handed then a lego block and said "build it, but in code"

unlike a simple variable 2009-2015 of maxblocksize
the way core code is now wrote, to do with the blocksize(weight). they have re-wrote the code into cludge where it requires many parts of the code to change to take full effect, as it would bug-out if one variable was changed. and i think this was intentional as its too sloppy to be useful or the proper way to code things

so it would require more then a scriptkiddy to edit core to offer a blocksize change

as for implementing it. a mining pool group cant just change the rules without the economic boards agreeing and accepting it.
where as economic group with dev support could mandate it as mining pools cant spend rewards if economic nodes cant see funds

so this is where i also laugh when many people cry/blame mining pools. when its actually not much in the power of mining pools and is more economically politically in the power of the dev/economic nodes

and we all know if a group of economic nodes want ed to hire a separate dev team that wants to go against the core roadmap. it would get REKT by those that treat core as a religion of immortal gods

i do laugh.. because china have special economic zones

i also believe Drbeer(and some others in this topic) probably thinks chinese citizens are forced to use a chinese government app for all currency and social communication.. if that is their belief, please admit it and i can debunk that too easily..

if you are using money market/stocks accounts and CD's you are not "saving" you are "investing"

savings are suppose to be the easy access funds where you cant lose money by withdrawing immediately..
investing however has the risk of panic selling at a loss..

so if you need to have money to rescue you from unexpected incidents. save it..
then with other income you get you can invest that knowing you dont need to quick dip into investments. because the savings will save you

if you are wanting to put money aside for later PLANNED events/items later on..  where you are not looking to spend it on emergencies but want to accumulate some increases whilst not spending it. then yes invest it on some short-mid term investment plans, where some accounts lock funds up for 3-6-12months offering X% fixed high yield interest. but these are treated as investments(wealth creation) not savings(rescue funds)