they will run out of funds if you are correct.
I hope you are.
they spend $2.50 per mint of 1000json scam numbers per 'ticker'. if they sucker idiots to buy 1 json scam unit for $5 on binance. they can scam $5000 per json scam 'ticker'. $2.50 cost $5k scammed meaning x2000 there scam attempts in short we need to dry up their victim list. get people to stop buying the json scam units. then they have no income to spend to scam the next json 'ticker" junk name .. just looked, their newest scam junk json thing seems to be like trading cards. tickers with character attributes [spieces, size,weight,wealth,wisdom] https://ordiscan.com/inscription/56115969i thing the 'ordi ticker' scam dried up so now offering new digital trading card scam .. i was hoping they would have stopped last year because there are only so many 'rare sats' |
|
|
|
|
if you set one goal for the day with no deadline, time passes without checking. most work slower but the brain doesnt later remember that and jsut remember a hours worth of work started at 9am and complete at evening so felt like 8 hours passed in 1 hour
the trick is to set mini jobs with small scedules so you fit in lots of activity so that it feels like you done alot of work generating alot of memories in smallet allotments of time
EG half hour schedules
by doing 16 time allotted tasks where you check clock every 10 minutes all adds up to feel time moves by by the minute
by doing 2 tasks a day unchecked you feel like day passed where not much was done and so feels like it went passed quick
its why school kids feel like a week is a long time.. and adults feel like a year is a short time
because kids have classes every hour and adults just count in days
EG
2 hour home movie watching zooms passed
compared to
2 hour date
10min in shower, 10min dry/deoderant, 10min dress, 10min travel, 10min greet date, 10min wait for table
5min decide on meal, 15min wait for food. 30min eat and chat, 10min kiss and travel home
the date feels more indepth, memorable. good use of time, enjoy every minute, time went slower
|
|
|
|
Got a new temporary job. I have been working for just over a week so far.
less mentally impactful? if yes, good news live frugally and save the money for emergencies and bills. you dont know when this one will end and next begins but if you are ready to work, get them applications flowing |
|
|
|
Seems like a good idea.
Now, will the bot post this in all its updates? Maybe once a day is enough, since the graph shows data from the last 3 days.
I just don't see big movements on the chart, due to its scale.
Unless you can tell the time on the graph. But it seems small to me for so much information.
something like  |
|
|
|
Of course there are females that have been known to step up and do step up when the situations aren’t right but, there is always a course for this shift. For males, it’s just how life is for the gender.
well the tricks of social media and culture can play different in different era's there have been era's of the "dead-beat dads" and the "single parent moms" but yet again we are not so much talking about gender stereotyping.. but economic philosophy (no genders mentioned in both examples) invest, accumulate then spend a portion vs discount spend. then spend the rest previous era of "bread winner" one earns the household income vs "house spouse" other manages and budgets household income |
|
|
|
It's nice to see you come up with something good for yourself Dr.Bitcoin_Strange, this could be something many of us could as well leverage on to build our individual portfolios upon and adopt if we think it's something good for us to start as well, but in every first attempt, we must never forget to take the caution on risk involved because there's no strategy that we can ever adopt that has no risk,
firstly dont "leverage".. ever.. as thats the biggest gamble/risk taker method there is.. secondly.. never sell at a loss.. always sell when you profit.. then no risk because you are already at profit when you sell even if you cant buy back in... profit is profit thirdly you dont have to sell all your coins. you can still sell just some of them where individually they make profit from the individual coins purchase price in previous years, whilst hoarding the rest and if the price correction doesnt reach a corection target that you want POST next ATH sell, and you cant maximise accumulation. as long as you buy in at some price below the sell price in the correction you are again benefitting**.. or if never buying in again you still know you already made profit by selling at a profit ...... as for never buying back in post the profitable sell.. think about it. bank account interest 5% max pension ~12% max if you can make more then 21.5%-57.35% (compounded over 4 years). you are making more then other long term savings/pension plans EG $42k bought this month, beings sold >$67.5k sell is 60% so selling above $67k in next 4 years is better then any bank/pension 4year compound interest. even if you dont buy back in however wait for a multiplier of now or well over above last cycles high, to reach near next ATH you gain even more with a chance to buy more in post next ATH's correction **EG (numbers are not recommendations. purely for theory demonstration purposes.. you choose the numbers you feel safe with) if you think next ATH can reach $140k and you sell 10% of stash at $120k conservatively and you set a hopeful correction to $70k, even if correction only reaches $80k and you buy in at $90k to FOMO. you still gain by having 13.3% of stash back instead of 10% break even .. other ways to mitigate missed chances and maximise accumulation dont sell below last seasons high set a sell % increments amounts.. of above last seasons high to what you believe next season(2025) high will reach (numbers are not recommendations. purely for theory demonstration purposes.. you choose the numbers you feel safe with) EG if you presume 2025 ATH peaks $145k target.. where you are willing to sell upto 50% total of stash $115k:2% $120k:4% $125k:6% $130k:9% $135k:13% $140k:16% then set to re-buy in on the correction if you presume 2026 $80k correction bottom target $110k:2% $105k:4% $100k:6% $95k:9% $90k:13% $85k:16% (numbers are not recommendations. purely for theory demonstration purposes.. you choose the numbers you feel safe with) demo math calculated
imagining you had 20BTC and willing to sell just 10btc(50%)
$115k:0.4($46k) $120k:0.8($92k) $125k:1.2($150k) $130k:1.8($234k) $135k:2.6(351k) $140k:3.2($448k)
totalling 10btc sold for total $1.321m
on correction
$110k:$46k(0.42) $105k:$92k(0.87btc) $100k:$150k(1.5) $95k:$234k(2.46) $90k:$351k(3.9) $85k:$448k(5.27)
totalling 14.42btc bought for $1.321m
|
|
|
|
One thing that I don't like about this strategy is that, you will make profit but you will not be able to buy back the same amount of bitcoin you sold at the price that you bought it initially before selling because the price must be higher that the previous circle dip.
you still accumulate even if you dont quite hit exact tip of high or lows imagine having 10btc in 2012 2013 top $1200 (gets you $10k if selling just before or after peak at say ~$1k) 2014 bottom $130 (gets you 50btc if buying just before or after correction bottom at say ~$200) so now having 50btc in 2014-16 2017 top $20,000 (gets you $900k if selling just before or after peak at say ~$18k) 2018 bottom $3,700 (gets you 200btc if buying just before or after correction bottom at say ~$4.5k) so now having 200btc in 2018-22 2021 top $70,000 (gets you $12m if selling just before or after peak at say ~$60k) 2022 bottom $15,700 (gets you 700btc if buying just before or after correction bottom at say ~$17.5k) so now having 700btc in 2024 instead of just 10 in 2012 |
|
|
|
|
according to BSV scammers themselves CSW is running out of scam buddies to even fund CSW own scam lawsuits. so unlikely they are going to spend millions on spamming/scamming BTC network
whats actually happening is that a EX chaincodelabs(blockstream) guy(ratimov) on the btc network made the mis-counting sat scam of ordinals. then evelated tonext level scammed of none transferable meem junk. then compressed it down to untransferable json junk
he prefers the lightning network and wants to annoy the bitcoin network to promote the lightning network
he sold a few sats with appended untransferable junk memes, to scam victims for whole btc+ amounts. and then used that scammed income to pay for more fees to then create more junk. selling junk for multiples of sat value to continue the endeavour
however its more of a project of the lightning network admiration brigade wanting to promote how LN is better then bitcoin in always
|
|
|
|
|
its not about favouring either
just 5 years ago the narrative was the opposite economic philosophy
guys "YOLO LAMBO" and girls "frugal/coupon"
its got do so with for/against the post creator favouring/disliking either. its about economic philosophy
|
|
|
|
|
update (17th posted about results of end of day of 16th)
blackrock 16,361.64 btc
grayscale still 605,890 btc
|
|
|
|
Naturally your postulation is the psychological posture of the female and the male gender, it is believed that as a man your build or wired to provide and create solution and improve on your wealth, but women are built to enhance their beauty, to look good for men and for themselves, so terroristically each of them would want to spend their money on what deems them fit. However this theory is a bit twisted as most young men are usually engulf in youthful exuberance, so at that age they too would want to wear the latest shoes, wristwatches or drive the best cars, it's just a handful of them that will think about investment.
many era's of different economic philosophies of genders have manifested. generally since the civilised world of photography and television.. women wanted to be shiny things, guys wanted to own shiny things |
|
|
|
Honestly, promoting gender stereotypes for no reason isn't something I endorse. Tons of women don't care and no longer wear high heels, and wouldn't want to spend so much money on something as meaningless as a clothes item. Of course, many males also don't care neither about watches nor about cryptos and hoarding cryptos. Girls aren't stupid and focused on shoes, boys aren't investment geniuses.
Making more generic examples and saying that it's just 'person A' and 'person B' would argue for the same point of accumulating cryptos, without stereotypical harmful gender roles.
harmful? (adjective: causing or likely to cause physical damage/injury)no one is physically hitting anyone.. i did not invent "girl math" infact it was females that popularised it themselves. and even they are not physically bruising each other over it if you are in the mindset that topics should not be talked about if a gender is mentioned and then you avoid the content and context of the topics ECONOMIC philosophy, to just act offended by the very mention of a gender.. its time you wake up you getting triggered by topics for simply mentioning gender is where you are part of a group inciting more gender division and causing arguments by trying to turn every conversation into a gender debate its like the silly non binary "pronoun" trend that is meant to cause confrontation here ill spell it out when two people are talking directly to each other, both sides do not use he/she pronouns in conversation.. grammatically its not even part of the conversation.. in reality and grammatically direct 1-on-1 conversation uses "I" and "YOU" (try it. have direct conversations with anyone, and count how many times you use the term he/she when talking to them about them.. you will find it very very difficult to even try to insert intentionally " he/she" into a direct conversation when describing them directly to them.) the pronoun argument is a anti-social trend pretending to solve a problem that was not even part of the conversation so when one person interrupts the conversation to grammar-nazi check the other person, controlling the other persons narrative by saying they should identify them as not he/she.. that person interrupting is just sheep speaking(mindless copying) a trend they heard on social media. to cause argument in a conversation where by the conversation never spoke the words he/she in the first place, but instead did say i/you.. so grammatically never needed correcting, and instead was just a silly interruption to cause confrontation where no confrontation was needed when someone interrupts a conversation to then scream about some gender related emotions they have.. or how topic physically injures them because the other person is talking about a topic and not some trend they want to interrupt with.. it gets stupid by having people get triggered by very mentions of gender where by conversations are being commanded to not talk about topics as a whole unless they met some social media trending grammatical policy.. just makes people avoid the topic completely.. dividing people from even communicating with each other if you have a issue with people talking about women (good or bad) then thats on you if you have a issue with people talking about men (good or bad) then thats on you just the mention of a gender is not a reason to avoid a topic |
|
|
|
|
$1500 is standard flight delay/error rebate..handled by the in-airport flight attendants/agents
the real compensation for the specific issue is a separate compensation plan that comes later, usually handled by the airlines insurers.
|
|
|
|
With the current society where everyone try to impress other people e.g. wear branded cloth, eat in luxury hotel, have a lambo etc, even though all the assets they own are borrowed with loan. So we can't really know the real rich person and the fake one.
both genders suffer from "fake it till you make it" economic philosophy in recent generations other economic trends like "dont work for the man, take a side hustle". where minimum wage of $15 = $120 average day but social media promote "make $100 a day" meaning get paid less than minimum wage there are too many bad economic lessons at play. yet instead of concentrating on the economics, some wanna turn it into a "gender" debate |
|
|
|
I think that frank was joking, and I hope that no woman here feels insulted. If I was a newbie woman and read some of the previous posts, I would feel really discouraged to join a group of crypto-baboons. So sensible, intelligent woman who read these posts: ignore them; you're not alone.
its about the economics not insulting genders very recently in the past the roles were reversed guys would be YOLO'ing lambos and girls would be studying STEM to get good careers to invest in future its not about insulting a particular gender. its about how ECONOMICS of social media education show different philosophies, perpetrated by their own genders sharing their gender philosophy between themselves using social media to cause economics to change per generation |
|
|
|
For many of us longer term bitcoiners who do not necessarily buy these kinds of products, we still may well be curious regarding the usage and the overall BTC flow into these kinds of products, and surely if there is net inflow or net outflow that would be interesting too
those "flows" charts are fiat measured. i personally am more interested in how many BTC are lockedup things like blackrock have no updates since the 12th (presuming they done no deals) so sit at 11439btc(from 227btc on launch) things like grayscale have updates as of the 16th so sit at 605,890btc(from ~630k on launch) |
|
|
|
|
doomad forgets to mention. these institutions with their sandboxes and subnetworks of middlemen only got them by sponsoring core devs to cludge the code and finance the spam just to make bitcoin annoying, just to promote that people should move over to their sandbox
doomad forgets to mention he adores the fee wars, he adores the congestion, he adores the cludge of code that allowed the locking of value to then play in sandboxes
doomad forgets to mention he adores trying to coax innocent people into using mixers to then tag them as suspicious when users then use bitcoin legitimate merchant services. which institutions then call out bitcoiners as suspicious and possibly criminals for using laundering services
doomads perception is if you dont like the sponsored roadmap, dont highlight the issues, dont call out the issues, dont request the issues get sorted, instead just admire bitcoin for what it is, shut up or go find another sandbox,network,payment system
he wants to pretend institutions have no influence by pretending people should go to sleep and not look for risks(be complacent), even though everything doomad adores is actually not helping bitcoins have open utility
as for his buzzword "censorship-resistance"
just a quick github search for "evict", "abandon", "reject", "purge", "disgard", "orphan" shows that bitcoin has rules to not accept every byte of data ever broadcast.
rules used to be more useful to keep the network clean. but now doomad loves how the rules have been relaxed 'softened' to allow more junk into the blockchain, and he doesnt want to have the junk stopped
|
|
|
|
~
the media speculation of "use yuan" is not a BRICS plan. its a separate thing regarding the "Belt and Road Initiative"(BRI) also known as "new silk road" project.
whereby china gave out loans to many countries to construct seaports, highways, etc. but those loans were to be repaid in USD. china wanted them repaid in Yuan.
media mis-interpreted a multinational construction project(BRI) with the BRICS commonwealth project
(2 separate projects with similar abbreviations, but have different scopes of function)
DrTroll is twisting every fact like always but also I have to say it's not just about the Belt and Road thing as you said. You see BRICS is also an economic bloc to address the flaws in the previous unipolar world where for example a country that needed a loan had to beg US regime (ie. IMF regardless of what I stands for) and then US dictated a lot of things in that country's domestic affairs and at the end even after the country complied they didn't receive the loan in full and they also had to end up paying back a much higher amount since US decided to increase interest rates which would bankrupt that country even more. For example take Pakistan, a couple of years ago they needed a loan from IMF specially after the flood. US demanded a lot of changes in their country that included increasing the gas price that crippled their economy even more. After complying with all of them, they didn't even receive the full loan! Now enters BRICS and of course big economies like China with a ton of money to give out as loans. Now these countries can easily take a loan from BRICS and not have anybody meddle in their domestic affairs like forcing them to increase gas price to get the loan! Or replay a higher amount back because China increased their interest rates. Since BRICS currency is not created yet, they take the loan in something like Yuan. They use the loan for anything they want though, not just for B.R.I. This is a win-win situation, China is strengthening Yuan while weakening Dollar and the win-win situation is at least for now until the New World Order is solidified. you might want to do some research.. i can back up my stance.. i already told you to research the BIS to see the actual plans for BRICS ecomony.. i already told you to research the BRI to see the "silkroad" deals are not related to BRICS membership once you can see they are separate deals with separate function, purpose, goals, financing, economics, etc.. it becomes clear brics: is a multi-CBDC connecting via a m-bridge of forex barter of each CBDC independently. with no middle/central reserve master currency (thus not yuanization) BRI: the media news of china demanding every country(100+) repay china in yuan. is not limited or related to the brics nations. if you research more you will see its to do with loans china did with many countries(over 100(thus not brics specific)) in regards to the trade deals of developing the "new silk road"(BRI) .. where china as a independent state financing the BRI(not brics). want their loans repaid in yuan for the separate BRI project(unrelated to brics) it is funny to watch you say that if china are handing out yuan it must be BRICS.. but then say brics is not invented yet so yuan is brics equivalent.. as your bases to pretend that BRICS=YUAN (facepalm) rather then realise the different economics and trade deals are at play for the different projects the BRI is not limited to "brics" memebers. so not related to brics |
|
|
|
I could use some strong words for this, but let me just say that this is outright false.
You're talking about a particular behavior which is not really peculiar to a specific sex or gender. There are extravagant persons, both female and male. There are financially wise persons, both female and male. There are irresponsible men and women.
Although shopping and impulsive buying are normally attached to women, men are also into other things that are equally absurd and costly. It's men who usually spend a treasure on alcohol, drugs, gambling, sex, hobbies, and so on.
OP might have certain issues in the past with particular women. But this is just hasty generalization.
i have no issues with women.. seems your jumping the gender defence bandwaggon rather than see how social media are promoting a new economic narrativeim not the one that invented/promotes/viral-trends "girl math" nor previous trends of "girl power"* and like i said in other posts. over time different social trends come and go. previously for instance the social trend was guys: "YOLO a Lambo" and womens trends were "couponing" previously for instance the social trend was guys: "support the family home" and womens trends were "girl power in the workplace" previously for instance the social trend was guys: "men are bread winners" and womens trends were "be the house wife" previously for instance the social trend was guys: "men go to war" and womens trends were "get to work to support your country" it swings back and forth, depending on the era. some decade pro female independence some decade con .. the point is not about my personal experiences. because i have no negativity against females, i adore smart women the point however is, society is the ones speaking such narratives in this decade/era. and it shows how (by how viral these trends get) that it changes societies thoughts on economics its more about the economic differences of changing times.. not about attacking a gender *the funniest part about these social economic trends being bashed into a gender battle. is that its actually the females themselves that are derogatory about themselves by using "girl" instead of "women", and its the females sharing social media clips, reels, skits between themselves |
|
|
|
|
when i see people shout "deposit/lock into LN, a sub-product bridge to bitcoin"
when i see people shout "deposit/lock into ETF, a trade-fi exposure product to bitcoin"
it must be corrected that LN and ETF are not bitcoin because bitcoin never leaves the bitcoin network and these other platforms are transacting in a totally different unit pegged to bitcoin. much the same as WBTC rBTC [insert other wrapped/pegged tokens] which are not bitcoin
the only smallest positive claim is that ETF sponsors have agreements that a custodian will lock up a portion of bitcoin circulation so they can trade their other platform units(shares). and have been willing to spend millions on legal stuff, applications to be able to do it. so it gives a perception that the trade-fi have long term plans for bitcoin custody. thus legitimises bitcoin as something that will stay around for awhile
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
